19 April 2016

Tags to provide protection from Mr Fluffy asbestos

| Canfan
Join the conversation
3

Chief Minister, Katy Gallagher, has announced the rollout of high visibility tags in meter boxes for Mr Fluffy homes in Canberra to make it easier for tradespeople to know when they are working on a house which contains the loose-fill asbestos.

Homes affected by loose-fill asbestos will be required by law to have tags fixed in their meter boxes making it easier for tradespeople to identify properties.

“It is important that the government focus not only on those living in affected Mr Fluffy houses, but also apply strategies to protect tradespeople and other workers who may come into contact with affected homes,” the Chief Minister said.

“This legal requirement to display a tag in the meter box is the latest step to deal with the Mr Fluffy situation and balances the need to ensure tradespeople and workers are aware a home is affected by loose-fill asbestos insulation against the personal interests of homeowners and occupiers who have requested their privacy be respected.

The tags which are made from an industrial strength self-adhesive vinyl will be required to be affixed to meter boxes from next month. The tags will be free of charge and homeowners will have the option to affix tags themselves, or have them placed by WorkSafe ACT.

All tags will be placed in meter boxes by January 1, 2015 and from this point penalties will apply to affected houses without the tags in place. Once affixed, it is a penalty to remove them prior to 1 January 2015.

The Chief Minister said tagging was only one of the ways workers could raise their awareness in working with asbestos.

“All workers must be trained in risks they may encounter as part of their work. The ACT Government has recently mandated asbestos awareness training for all tradespeople and other workers who may come into contact with asbestos. This training, which specifically deals with Mr Fluffy asbestos, must be undertaken by 30 September this year,” the Chief Minister said.

“Tradespeople should also continue to discuss the circumstance of homes they may be working on with homeowners, ask for copies of any asbestos assessment reports for the property and engage appropriately licensed asbestos experts to assist with the work to be undertaken.

“It is also important to note that the law does not absolve a homeowner’s responsibility to inform tradespeople that their home is affected by Mr Fluffy insulation, or to provide a copy of any asbestos assessment report.”

The ACT Government, through the Asbestos Response Taskforce will work with industry and stakeholders to disseminate information on this new requirement.

Tags will be available for affected homeowners free of charge from licensed asbestos assessors, WorkSafe ACT and the Asbestos Response Taskforce in coming weeks.

(Katy Gallagher Media Release)

Join the conversation

3
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

creative_canberran said :

Qlander said :

I have sent an Asbestos search form for my house in Weetangera and been advised that it was not in the asbestos removal program. Can I take that as an iron clad guarantee from the ACT government that I haven’t purchased a Mr Fluffy House. – I’ve been told by TAMS that an asbestos inspection could cost me up to $1500 – this seems to be an exhorbitant amount – why so expensive?. Does the ACT govt offer any financial assistance in this regard?

There is unfortunately no such thing in this case as an ironclad guarantee. A small number of homes were missed by the original program, a larger number of homes had the stuff removed before the program and it’s unclear how that has been recorded, if at all.

If it’s not on the register though, that’s a very good sign. It means it’s a very small chance that it was one.

There is only one “ironclad guarantee” allocated each term of the assembly.
The current term one was allocated to the Rattenbury/Corbell light rail deal. There is a possibility it will be handed back soon, albeit a bit rusty but it would be a good idea to get on the waiting list.

creative_canberran2:11 am 21 Aug 14

Qlander said :

I have sent an Asbestos search form for my house in Weetangera and been advised that it was not in the asbestos removal program. Can I take that as an iron clad guarantee from the ACT government that I haven’t purchased a Mr Fluffy House. – I’ve been told by TAMS that an asbestos inspection could cost me up to $1500 – this seems to be an exhorbitant amount – why so expensive?. Does the ACT govt offer any financial assistance in this regard?

There is unfortunately no such thing in this case as an ironclad guarantee. A small number of homes were missed by the original program, a larger number of homes had the stuff removed before the program and it’s unclear how that has been recorded, if at all.

If it’s not on the register though, that’s a very good sign. It means it’s a very small chance that it was one.

I have sent an Asbestos search form for my house in Weetangera and been advised that it was not in the asbestos removal program. Can I take that as an iron clad guarantee from the ACT government that I haven’t purchased a Mr Fluffy House. – I’ve been told by TAMS that an asbestos inspection could cost me up to $1500 – this seems to be an exhorbitant amount – why so expensive?. Does the ACT govt offer any financial assistance in this regard?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.