Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Over 20 years of trusted service
Plumbers available 24/7
02 6297 2022

Tania Tominac not guilty

johnboy 28 September 2009 86

666 Radio is reporting that the Former St Francis Xavier College science teacher Tania Tominac has been found not guilty of having sex with a 14 year old student.

More on this as it comes to hand.

UPDATE: Make of this what you will. The accompanying photograph is the current profile photograph for a facebook profile in Ms Tominac’s name. Bear in mind the possibility of fraudulent profiles on Facebook.

FURTHER UPDATE: The ABC has a very brief story:

    Today in the ACT Supreme Court, Justice Malcolm Gray found her not guilty of all six charges.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Thanks to Caf for pointing out that the ACT Supreme Court has been very quick off the mark in publishing the judgment which includes this conclusion:

    Overall, the matters put by the prosecution as support for the complainant’s account of the matters that are the subject of the charges on the indictment before me do not overcome the reservations that I have earlier expressed about the complainant’s evidence. I am not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that any one of the charges is made out.

Tanya Tominac Facebook Profile

  • The picture looks real to me (12%, 8 Votes)
  • It could be real? (16%, 11 Votes)
  • Is definitely a fake (72%, 48 Votes)

Total Voters: 67

Loading ... Loading ...

A FURTHER UPDATE: Peekz, who has an alarmingly encyclopedic knowledge has identified the woman pictured as being one Brittany O’Neil. On which basis the facebook profile can almost certainly be classified as fake and malicious.

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
86 Responses to Tania Tominac not guilty
Igglepiggle Igglepiggle 2:21 pm 06 Jul 09

Oh her poor back. Implants like those are the same degree of unethical as IVF for 60 year olds I reckon.

Danman Danman 2:25 pm 06 Jul 09

Or as it seems in this case, Boobie Implants on a 60 year old

deezagood deezagood 2:32 pm 06 Jul 09

I can only presume that these types of comments (#42, # 41, etc..) were exactly what JB was hoping to garner when he posted the photo, the link and created the fun little survey.

Pelican Lini Pelican Lini 3:24 pm 06 Jul 09

Panhead said :

deezagood said :

Why on earth would you post this photo JB??

Because he’s a serious “journalist” who feels obliged to delve deeply into all the relevant issues around a story and not focus on the crap like they do on ACA or the Daily Telegraph.

– cough, cough – Pauline Hanson

Roadrage77 Roadrage77 4:58 pm 06 Jul 09

If you thought even for a millisecond that the facebook site was genuine then you need to get checked for Down Syndrome.

astrojax astrojax 5:03 pm 06 Jul 09

i do find peekz’s encyclopaedic knowledge herein alarming, jb…

jessieduck jessieduck 5:54 pm 06 Jul 09

If you have a facebook page and feel that this profile was created maliciously, you can join me in reportng it to facebook. 1) it’s a fake profile, 2) I doubt they own the rights to use Brittany O’Neil’s photo.

Granny Granny 6:11 pm 06 Jul 09

I have reported it also, jessieduck.

GB GB 6:24 pm 06 Jul 09

Make of this what you will.

I’ve just now discovered the facebook profile of a “JB” in Canberra, in which he claims to be a “shock-jock” for a website called “riotact”. Nothing on his profile throws any light on the illegal porn allegations currently doing the rounds.

I won’t post his photo here though, that wouldn’t be right, would it?

Peekz Peekz 7:11 pm 06 Jul 09

astrojax said :

i do find peekz’s encyclopaedic knowledge herein alarming, jb…

I’ve done some extensive independent research, what of it? 🙂

rosebud rosebud 7:20 pm 06 Jul 09

Pardon my extreme naivity, but just who is this Brittany O’Neil?

rosebud rosebud 7:25 pm 06 Jul 09

I just googled her…errggg Some boys just never get over their Mama’s mammaries!

roawww roawww 7:25 pm 06 Jul 09

1. That is not the her and you’re stupid for posting it. For all we know you probably created the account. Also in case you hadnt heard or noticed she is not single. Her husband is a lovely person and they are more in love with each other now then they were 15 years ago when i first met them.
2. Please stop posting crap about this now that the matter has been dealt with, the family have suffered enough.

Thumper Thumper 7:26 pm 06 Jul 09

No idea, but I guess Ms Tominac can now take legal action against her accuser?

bigred bigred 8:03 pm 06 Jul 09

great more salacious material in the public domain.

nyssa76 nyssa76 8:31 pm 06 Jul 09

I’d like to know what has happened to the little toe-rag who made the claims. Will he now be sued for legal costs as well as loss of future income?

caf caf 8:42 pm 06 Jul 09

Thumper: Well I’m no lawyer, but I don’t think defamation is available for accusations made to police / in the course of court cases. Anything else would probably require her to prove the accusations were untrue, which would be hard.

This is probably as it should be, because otherwise no-one would ever be able to report a crime for fear that it wouldn’t be proven and they’d end up liable – imagine how few rape victims would come forward under such rules?

Spideydog Spideydog 8:50 pm 06 Jul 09

You can see her face is not proportionate to the body. Photoshopped for sure, no doubt.

Spideydog Spideydog 9:01 pm 06 Jul 09

nyssa76 said :

I’d like to know what has happened to the little toe-rag who made the claims. Will he now be sued for legal costs as well as loss of future income?

This is the sort of comment that is why some female victims of rape don’t come forward. Because a prosecution was un-successful doesn’t automatically make the accuser, the offender.

Thumper Thumper 9:22 pm 06 Jul 09

True caf, except in this case, due to the accusations, her career is over. And no matter where she goes the accusation will follow.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2019 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | | |

Search across the site