16 July 2024

Tax reform doubts: Rates rises not enough to cover stamp duty losses, says Budget review

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
15

Is the ACT Government backpedalling on its tax reform program or not being upfront about the next stage? Photo: Michelle Kroll.

A review of the 2024-25 ACT Budget has questioned whether the ACT Government is backing away from its tax reform program, saying the increase in rates will not be enough to cover the loss in revenue.

The Pegasus Economics review for the ACT Legislative Assembly’s Select Committee on Estimates 2024-2025 suggests the government is using increases in payroll tax to make up for the shortfall.

The review also says the Budget is becoming increasingly vulnerable, with net debt expected to increase by 70 per cent over the forward years to $12 billion in 2027-28, and interest payments forecast to reach $514 million in 2024-25 and $832 million in 2027-28.

This is $127.2 million higher than the estimated 2023-24 outcome and is forecast to increase by a further $318.3 million over the Budget and forward years.

READ ALSO Open light rail leg to Parliament first, urges public transport lobby

The 20-year tax reform project aims to rebalance the ACT’s tax base through incremental general rates rises in four stages and a gradual elimination of inefficient charges such as stamp duty on the sale of property.

The goal is to provide a more reliable revenue stream and put the Territory’s finances on a more solid footing. Economists have generally praised the approach.

Rates will rise 3.75 per cent this year and the next to complete Stage 3. It is not known how much rates will rise in Stage 4, which kicks in in 2026-27.

However, the review says general rates are not rising quickly enough to replace the amount of revenue lost from changes in commercial and residential conveyance thresholds and rates.

It argues that in nominal dollars, the increase in rates does exceed the decline in stamp duties, but this ignores the growth that could have been expected in both revenue sources over the period without the change in policy.

“As a result, when expressed as a percentage of total own-source revenue, the increase in rates is less than the decline in stamp duties,” the review says.

“The level of rates as an overall percentage of total own-source revenue remains largely flat at just over 29 per cent in 2024-25 and through into the out-years.”

This is despite the forward estimates including two years of Stage 4 of tax reform.

“If the ACT Government were intending to replace the amount of revenue lost from changes in commercial and residential conveyance thresholds and rates with increases in general rates, you would probably expect the overall amount of revenue collected from both sources would remain about the same in terms of an overall percentage of ACT Government own-source taxation revenue.” the review says.

“However, this is not the case as the percentage of ACT Government own-source revenue from the combined commercial and residential conveyance thresholds and general rates actually falls across the years from an estimated 41.9 per cent in 2023-24 to 39.0 per cent in 2027-28.

The review says either the Government is backpedalling on its tax reform program by not increasing rates sufficiently to make up for the reduction in stamp duty or it is not being transparent about its plans for Stage 4.

It says the shortfall appears to be made up through an increasing reliance on payroll tax, which is now forecast to increase from 29.0 per cent of own-source taxation revenue in 2023-24 to 33.4 per cent by 2027-28.

The government also brought forward in the Budget the introduction of a payroll tax surcharge for very large businesses from 1 July, ostensibly to make up for the loss from fewer people employed in the consultancy sector due to Commonwealth in-sourcing.

The review also highlights a more than doubling of revenue from fines (from an estimated $52 million in 2023-24 to an estimated $108 million by 2027-28). This includes fines from traffic offences and mobile speed cameras.

READ ALSO ‘Toxic’ WorkSafe threatens staff with dismissal for ‘gossiping’, employee says

Overall, the review says that while the ACT has a strong balance sheet, that position is deteriorating over time, with growing debt and falling net worth.

“The ACT has moved from the position of being a net creditor at the beginning of the last decade to having a substantial and increasing debt and interest burden in the Budget and forward years,” it says.

“The recent downgrade of the ACT credit rating is an indication of its weakened position.”

The review casts doubt on the Budget returning to surplus in 2026-27 as forecast due to its dependence on Commonwealth funding and population growth.

“Past trends suggest that a return to surplus would require a shift in policy settings and a continuation of favourable economic circumstances,” it says.

“A return to surplus in the medium term cannot be assumed.”

The review also says that while the ACT’s fiscal position has deteriorated, the Territory still sits within the range reported by other states and territories.

Join the conversation

15
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Incidental Tourist4:10 pm 17 Jul 24

I don’t understand why previous tax system was inefficient? We did not have such a huge debt and even parking around Canberra was free – do you still remember it? Barr slapped 10-15% tax on each and every rent via Land tax. Doubling rents, skyrocketed home prices, disappearing small businesses, extinction of bulk billing GPs, introduction of paid parking everywhere along with draconian speed cameras and the cost of living pressure let alone skyrocketed debt are his “progressive tax reform” results over the decade. There are no small street shops left in Canberra today comparing to what we can see in many small towns interstate. In Canberra many hair stylists now work semi-legally in their homes as they can’t afford tax on a shop. The whole push about changing “inefficient taxes” has been yet another failed Marxists experiment. Marxists always claim their regime is “progressive” with a consistent result of bankrupting states.

What exactly about the tax reform do you believe has caused the myriad of problems you’ve ascribed to it?

Incidental Tourist10:44 pm 17 Jul 24

Every listed problem has root cause from new draconian tax imposed in the last decade because of this “progressive tax reform”. For example a hairdresser or retail shop or a car mechanic workshop located in a dwelling with modest UAV $700,000 in ACT attracts some $42,000 commercial rates every year. This “efficient tax” is charged regardless of how many sales you make, even if your businesses can’t break even in the first years. The same shop in NSW attracts $5,000 commercial rates. Do you understand now why many small streets shops disappeared in Canberra and those remaining are far too expensive?

Yeah, that’s not remotely correct and has nothing to do with the tax reform program.

Incidental Tourist11:31 am 20 Jul 24

You said below that ” ACT Government budget has just about doubled”. It has doubled because of all these direct and indirect taxes I listed above. If all these revenue grabs are not the tax reform then this must be a total mess.

They aren’t the tax reform and you’ve weirdly attempted to link GPs, paid parking, speed cameras etc. to something that’s not remotely close to it.

You’ve also ignored that stamp duty that the tax reform is replacing has numerous negative effects on housing and the economy as a whole.

The Labor apologists on this site seem to have all gone to ground in this thread. That presumably means Labor’s position on this issue is completely indefensible, and they know it. But, being the ACT, Labor will be voted in again anyway.

devils_advocate4:05 pm 17 Jul 24

Pretty much, yeah

HiddenDragon8:20 pm 16 Jul 24

The basic arithmetic of the tax changes announced by the ACT government in 2012 was to increase general property rates revenue by somewhere between 150% and 200% (in real terms) in order to replace other revenue sources.

This is why the ACT Liberals’ 2012 election slogan “triple your rates” was highly plausible – even though it was dismissed at the time by many (who may have come to regret their smugness) as “a three word slogan”.

When the introduction of “progressive” tax scales (another element of the 2012 changes) for general rates was added to the mix the likelihood for many property owners was that their annual rates would more than triple in real terms – particularly given the ACT government practice of indexing its revenue needs/demands by a factor in excess of the CPI measure of inflation.

The ACT government has painted itself into a corner on this issue and is now facing a version of the reality embodied in the dour line attributed to Margaret Thatcher – “the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money” which, locally, might be modified to “the problem with democratic socialism is that you eventually run out of voters willing to tolerate the revenue gouging”.

The broader issues facing the ACT budget (i.e. unsustainable spending trajectories) are, as the apologists point out, by no means unique, but that does not solve the problem – if anything, it just highlights the fact that other sub-national jurisdictions, with many more marginal seats at stake, will be ahead of the ACT in the queue for federal bail-outs.

GrumpyGrandpa7:30 pm 16 Jul 24

Since the gov’t started the transition from S/Duty to increased Rates, property values have increased substantially.
In Victoria, if you but a property for $1m, the Stamp Duty is $55,000. In ACT, it’s $34,270.
That said, in Victoria, they are introducing more and more property taxes, to cover their debts.
In the ACT, courtesy of LR and its planned expansion, our debts are sky-rocketing. Is it any wonder the government has slowed down the transition; they need revenue, and slugging a homebuyer a one-off Stamp Duty fee is more politically palatable than ramping up Rates, particularly leading up to an election.

Whilst the taxation mix is obviously an important component of the tax reform program, the overall revenue received (and what it’s spent on) is just as important.

The ACT Government budget has just about doubled in the last 10 years, well in front of population growth and inflation. It’s fine to point out the lack of proportional growth of rates as would be expected against the tax reform program but that isn’t a blanket excuse to further increase that area of taxation to fuel further unrestrained spending.

The government should just as equally be held to account on where the money is going and why it continues to fall into greater debt despite burgeoning taxation revenue.

I wonder if our treasurer knows how to calculate the liquidity ratio and what it means if (and I.mean if)he can. Likewise the debt/equity ratio. The financial management of the govt is.nothing short of woeful. Maybe Steel could repay the $70 odd million he wasted. What a mess.

LOL
So ACT Labor have been telling lies. Raising rates was just to pay for their irresponsible spending and not to replace stamp duty, which they would know rates alone could never cover

How are the various parties going to deal with this? Greens, Liberals, independents, others, what is your plan?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.