15 July 2011

The blue platform boots of murder. A break in the Kathryn Grosvenor killing.

| johnboy
Join the conversation
70
blue boots

ACT Policing is urging the woman who bought a pair of electric blue boots from a St Vincent de Paul store in Wagga Wagga to contact police immediately.

On Monday July 11, two women went to the Peter Street St Vincent de Paul store and purchased the platform boots. The shoes are thought to be connected with the murder of Canberra woman Kathryn Grosvenor.

Kathryn Grosvenor, then 23, was last seen at her Nicholls home on Sunday, March 3, 2002. A woman matching her description was seen purchasing a packet of cigarettes at The George Harcourt Inn, Nicholls, just after 9 pm that night.

Kathryn’s body was discovered in Lake Burley Griffin on Saturday, March 9, 2002. She was 178cm tall, with a slim build and long brown/red hair. She was last seen wearing dark coloured hipster pants and electric blue platform shoes.

Police are urging the women to immediately contact their local police station or through Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000. Information can be provided anonymously.

A Reward of up to $250,000 will be paid at the discretion of the ACT Minister for Police for information leading to the apprehension and subsequent conviction of the person or persons responsible for the murder of Kathryn Anne Grosvenor.

In addition, an appropriate indemnity from prosecution will be considered for any accomplice, not being the person who actually committed the crime, who first gives the information. The grant of any such indemnity is at the discretion of the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions.

[Courtesy ACT Policing]

Join the conversation

70
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

forensicBOB said :

The Frots said :

EandIprefix said :

vg said

Are you 100% sure I don’t mix in the right company? 100%. Maybe I have national awards that I didn’t need to team to assist me with.

Nothing more ex than someone who worked in a policing organisation and wasn’t even a cop…..just thinks they were. Police do Police work. Consultants don’t solve crimes….the Police do that

I am sure 100% now from the lack of process knowledge in your reply. The courts require that experts do not work alone. The courst require proof of professional peer review and consultation. The years of news stories on this case remind the reader that both a consultant from the UK was used and a forensic team. In court cases experts and consultants testify and present evidence that is the final word to refute claims on both sides.

This really is a joke isn’t it………………………..yes?

It must be a joke. As an (educated and employed) forensic scientist, I cracked up when I read this. Not only does the answer have no relevance to the original comment, it is actually incorrect. In fact, it is so wrong, it leads me to believe that the author has no knowledge of forensic science whatsoever, but has overheard some big words in the office whilst making coffee and has strung them together to big note themselves.

vg was correct. Police do police work. Deep 😉

I cracked up when I read about the investigation into forensic Bob Barnes and the potentially unsafe verdict against David Eastman. The author of forensicBOB’s comment obviously has no knowledge of forensics. What a year of stories is coming about forensic Bob Barnes and his employment history (sacked in Victoria) not to mention how they are going to tear his past evidence to shreds.

Lookout Smithers4:47 pm 14 Jul 12

Treacle said :

Rawhide Kid Part3 said

That’s what they did in the Lindy Chamberlain case (consultant from the UK) in the Northern Territory and look where that got them.

And in recent discussions at RA the second forensics expert observing the first forensics expert doing ballistics tests on a Rguer rifle and look where that got them.

Why the interest in the thread and foresic related comments?

Rawhide Kid Part3 said

That’s what they did in the Lindy Chamberlain case (consultant from the UK) in the Northern Territory and look where that got them.

And in recent discussions at RA the second forensics expert observing the first forensics expert doing ballistics tests on a Rguer rifle and look where that got them.

Rawhide Kid Part310:48 am 14 Jul 12

EandIprefix said :

vg said

Are you 100% sure I don’t mix in the right company? 100%. Maybe I have national awards that I didn’t need to team to assist me with.

Nothing more ex than someone who worked in a policing organisation and wasn’t even a cop…..just thinks they were. Police do Police work. Consultants don’t solve crimes….the Police do that

I am sure 100% now from the lack of process knowledge in your reply. The courts require that experts do not work alone. The courst require proof of professional peer review and consultation. The years of news stories on this case remind the reader that both a consultant from the UK was used and a forensic team. In court cases experts and consultants testify and present evidence that is the final word to refute claims on both sides.

That’s what they did in the Lindy Chamberlain case (consultant from the UK) in the Northern Territory and look where that got them.

Rawhide Kid Part310:33 am 14 Jul 12

Watson said :

EandIprefix said :

vg said

So what?

I watched a footy game once, doesn’t make me a Wallaby

You do not mix in right company to expect to have these qualified people around: they are the equivalent of the “Wallabies” in their profession trained by the best who earn more than $2000 per hour. The Professor who trained my team is in demand on high profile cases. Where the “Wallabies” get trophies my teams achieve national awards in frames hanging on walls of their offices.

Wow! National awards! Framed! I feel so much safer now…

I’ve got an award….. Oh wait. Its a Marriage Certificate.

NoIAmRight said

‘At least I dont need to make up stuff on the intawebs to try to get an ego boost’

And you’re always right just to boost your fragile ego just like forensicbub who is making up stuff to boost his ego.

NoIAmRight said

“At least Idon’t make up stuff on the intawebs to get an ego boost.”

No you are always right (such a fragile ego almost as bad as forensicbub who is the one making up stuff to boost their ego).

EandIprefix said
‘ forensicbub what a dummy spit’

That is soooooooooo cute!

johnboy said :

forensicBOB said :

My team leader has been interviewed by two well known Australian newspapers. He is also known by the owner this Website.

News to me.

That wasn’t me. I’m bound by international covenants of confidentiality not to reveal how many newspapers my boss has been interviewed by. Quote the wannabe.

Lookout Smithers6:15 pm 09 Mar 12

EandIprefix said :

TAD said on the thread “Javk Waterford thunders at ACT Policing media management” at 10:01AM 21 Feb 2012

“1. An AFP member is not allowed to identfy themselves as such in a forum like this. (ask VG why he has been quiet of late)
(NOT THAT I AM SAYING THAT I AM)”

So why is Lookout Smithers still commenting here: obviously, he has no credibility.

You are right. I have no credibility. But I do know you have little to no idea about it. Go find me a suspect in the case, not person of interest. But a suspect. And I will stand corrected.

Roadrage77 said :

NoImRight said :

EandIprefix said :

TAD said on the thread “Javk Waterford thunders at ACT Policing media management” at 10:01AM 21 Feb 2012

“1. An AFP member is not allowed to identfy themselves as such in a forum like this. (ask VG why he has been quiet of late)
(NOT THAT I AM SAYING THAT I AM)”

So why is Lookout Smithers still commenting here: obviously, he has no credibility.

Glad this was revived just to see your posts. I feel so much better about my mundane job and myself now. At least I dont need to make up stuff on the intawebs to try to get an ego boost.

You do realise by commenting again you are contradicting your own argument? Hows the credibilty?

Please refrain from the use of “interwebs”. It ceased being funny in 2007.

Actually I said intawebs and it was done for a deliberate purpose in this case ( kind of a parody thing :-)) but snotty point taken.

NoImRight said :

EandIprefix said :

TAD said on the thread “Javk Waterford thunders at ACT Policing media management” at 10:01AM 21 Feb 2012

“1. An AFP member is not allowed to identfy themselves as such in a forum like this. (ask VG why he has been quiet of late)
(NOT THAT I AM SAYING THAT I AM)”

So why is Lookout Smithers still commenting here: obviously, he has no credibility.

Glad this was revived just to see your posts. I feel so much better about my mundane job and myself now. At least I dont need to make up stuff on the intawebs to try to get an ego boost.

You do realise by commenting again you are contradicting your own argument? Hows the credibilty?

Please refrain from the use of “interwebs”. It ceased being funny in 2007.

EandIprefix said :

TAD said on the thread “Javk Waterford thunders at ACT Policing media management” at 10:01AM 21 Feb 2012

“1. An AFP member is not allowed to identfy themselves as such in a forum like this. (ask VG why he has been quiet of late)
(NOT THAT I AM SAYING THAT I AM)”

So why is Lookout Smithers still commenting here: obviously, he has no credibility.

Glad this was revived just to see your posts. I feel so much better about my mundane job and myself now. At least I dont need to make up stuff on the intawebs to try to get an ego boost.

You do realise by commenting again you are contradicting your own argument? Hows the credibilty?

TAD said on the thread “Javk Waterford thunders at ACT Policing media management” at 10:01AM 21 Feb 2012

“1. An AFP member is not allowed to identfy themselves as such in a forum like this. (ask VG why he has been quiet of late)
(NOT THAT I AM SAYING THAT I AM)”

So why is Lookout Smithers still commenting here: obviously, he has no credibility.

Lookout Smithers5:03 pm 12 Feb 12

The Frots said :

Lookout Smithers said :

The Frots said :

Rawhide Kid Part3 said :

A reminder from CT 2004. http://tinyurl.com/6ayykap

Thank you.

Do these ‘suspects’ still live in the Ngunnawal area?

Were they suspects or ‘persons of interest’? What is the difference exactly?

They were both – for want of a better description, take suspect as being identified as a closer fit to the crime than a ‘person of interest’, who may, after questioning, be cleared of the crime.

Lookout Smithers said :

The Frots said :

Rawhide Kid Part3 said :

A reminder from CT 2004. http://tinyurl.com/6ayykap

Thank you.

Do these ‘suspects’ still live in the Ngunnawal area?

Were they suspects or ‘persons of interest’? What is the difference exactly?

No, incorrect. No suspects have ever been identified? Person of interest mearly suggests that the Canberra Times felt confident no one would lauch a defo case against them. Cheeky buggers. You really shouldn’t part with such public labeling if you actually have no idea and albeit risk defaming someone too. Little decorum eh?

Lookout Smithers4:57 pm 12 Feb 12

EandIprefix said :

CT item on local forensics at link http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/crime-and-law/burglars-beware-acts-csi-agents-on-case/2403341.aspx

Wow. You can’t let this label of CSI fanboy go? This case is approaching a decade unsolved. Don’t use it as your source of inspiration to self actualize. Again. We don’t give a shize

TheDancingDjinn12:12 am 27 Dec 11

THUNDERBIRDS ARE GO !!!

EandIprefix said :

CT item on local forensics at link http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/crime-and-law/burglars-beware-acts-csi-agents-on-case/2403341.aspx

How is this relevant to your international crime fighting team? Are you part of Team America or Thunderbirds?

Lookout Smithers3:24 pm 31 Jul 11

EandIprefix said :

vg said

“So have 1, 3 in fact, and appeared on national TV. What’s your point other than abject stupidity and a complete lack of knowledge of criminal investigations?”

Trolls vg and Lookout Smithers. End of response.

What is a troll exactly? I’m just outlining the reality of the situation. Glad you want to help solve crimes. Go fight crime Casey Jones!

vg said

“So have 1, 3 in fact, and appeared on national TV. What’s your point other than abject stupidity and a complete lack of knowledge of criminal investigations?”

Trolls vg and Lookout Smithers. End of response.

“My team leader has been interviewed by two well known Australian newspapers”

So have 1, 3 in fact, and appeared on national TV. What’s your point other than abject stupidity and a complete lack of knowledge of criminal investigations?

Sounds to me like EandIprefix works for one of those ‘guns for hire’ organisations so loved by defence lawyers.

They types who are willing to say anything as ‘expert’ opinion, provided the price is right.

Lookout Smithers4:31 am 23 Jul 11

EandIprefix said :

Lookout Smithers said

“…Maybe use this as the reason you stop grandstanding in a such a righteous manner to get rouse applause. We don’t care.”

That reply is incoherent. You use “We” but you should speak only for yourself. It is obvious to all that your reply is just another dummy spit, so GROW UP!

EandIprefix said :

Lookout Smithers said

“…Maybe use this as the reason you stop grandstanding in a such a righteous manner to get rouse applause. We don’t care.”

That reply is incoherent. You use “We” but you should speak only for yourself. It is obvious to all that your reply is just another dummy spit, so GROW UP!

When i say we, I meant Kat’s family. Pfft. Expert.

Lookout Smithers said

“…Maybe use this as the reason you stop grandstanding in a such a righteous manner to get rouse applause. We don’t care.”

That reply is incoherent. You use “We” but you should speak only for yourself. It is obvious to all that your reply is just another dummy spit, so GROW UP!

p1 said :

EandIprefix said :

I now work with specialist crime-fighters….

EandIprefix said :

The Professor who trained my team is in demand on high profile cases….

Your team of crimefighters was trained by a professor?

Oh snap!

EandIprefix said :

I now work with specialist crime-fighters….

EandIprefix said :

The Professor who trained my team is in demand on high profile cases….

Your team of crimefighters was trained by a professor?

Lookout Smithers4:16 pm 20 Jul 11

EandIprefix said :

johnboy said

News to me

I should not have to reveal private information here about the owner: his intitals are TH (I do not know his middle inital). To forensicbub what a dummy spit. That is worse than the xbikee dummy spit about johnboy’s quote from CT about “gain” versus “loss” of demerit points.

As for the newspaper interviews with my team leader: the RiotACT has discussed these already whether you realised it or not.

You shouldn’t have to reveal any information about this case personally. It doesn’t really seem relevant. The family wouldn’t take anything positive from the experience of it. So what if it is a case study! Maybe use this as the reason you stop grandstanding in a such a righteous manner to get rouse applause. We don’t care.

You seem to be confusing a shareholding with outright ownership.

johnboy said

News to me

I should not have to reveal private information here about the owner: his intitals are TH (I do not know his middle inital). To forensicbub what a dummy spit. That is worse than the xbikee dummy spit about johnboy’s quote from CT about “gain” versus “loss” of demerit points.

As for the newspaper interviews with my team leader: the RiotACT has discussed these already whether you realised it or not.

Holden Caulfield7:04 pm 19 Jul 11

This thread has the potential to become quite hilarious.

Potential?

Perhaps you missed some bits; it’s well and truly delivered already, haha.

Lookout Smithers5:52 pm 19 Jul 11

shadow boxer said :

I blame the cop shows on tv that make forensics out to be something cool, hats off to those that do it but I would imagine it would be one of the most tedious, boring repetitive jobs man has devised and you would very rarely see the outcomes of your handywork.

In other news today a woman threw her shoe at a brick wall in a fit of spontaneous shoe throwing….. Just so we all feel up to date.

Cheers
LS

shadow boxer2:43 pm 19 Jul 11

I blame the cop shows on tv that make forensics out to be something cool, hats off to those that do it but I would imagine it would be one of the most tedious, boring repetitive jobs man has devised and you would very rarely see the outcomes of your handywork.

johnboy said :

forensicBOB said :

My team leader has been interviewed by two well known Australian newspapers. He is also known by the owner this Website.

News to me.

But it sounds like you just gained yourself a very powerful friend. His office has won NATIONAL AWARDS! You are a lucky man and I envy you.

Bwahahaha!

johnboy said :

forensicBOB said :

My team leader has been interviewed by two well known Australian newspapers. He is also known by the owner this Website.

News to me.

Probably news to everyone I’d say JB.

forensicBOB said :

My team leader has been interviewed by two well known Australian newspapers. He is also known by the owner this Website.

News to me.

My team leader has been interviewed by two well known Australian newspapers. He is also known by the owner this Website.

Also, the murder investigation was initially handled by the Coroner’s court. The police were working for the Coroner as were the experts and forensic team.

Game, set and match to me!

What match? You haven’t actually made a point yet. Your claim to fame is that you know someone who may or may not be successful, depending on how much of your story you’ve completely made up i.e. Nobody in the industry makes $2000 an hour. That’s just BS.

I’ve been interviewed by several newspapers myself. I have national awards (OK, just one) in the bottom of my desk drawer (because I don’t need to advertise) and I’ve given presentations at international conferences (OK, just one again), and believe me when I say I’m on the bottom of the heap.

This is the part where you threaten to have your boss tell his friend that I haven’t played nice with you and…OH NO… delete my account. Of course, you should be embarrassed to show your boss what you have written here, but we all know that you’re not that smart.

forensicBOB said :

The Frots said :

EandIprefix said :

vg said

Are you 100% sure I don’t mix in the right company? 100%. Maybe I have national awards that I didn’t need to team to assist me with.

Nothing more ex than someone who worked in a policing organisation and wasn’t even a cop…..just thinks they were. Police do Police work. Consultants don’t solve crimes….the Police do that

I am sure 100% now from the lack of process knowledge in your reply. The courts require that experts do not work alone. The courst require proof of professional peer review and consultation. The years of news stories on this case remind the reader that both a consultant from the UK was used and a forensic team. In court cases experts and consultants testify and present evidence that is the final word to refute claims on both sides.

This really is a joke isn’t it………………………..yes?

It must be a joke. As an (educated and employed) forensic scientist, I cracked up when I read this. Not only does the answer have no relevance to the original comment, it is actually incorrect. In fact, it is so wrong, it leads me to believe that the author has no knowledge of forensic science whatsoever, but has overheard some big words in the office whilst making coffee and has strung them together to big note themselves.

vg was correct. Police do police work. Deep 😉

Totally unrelated (because that’s where this post was heading anyway), I once had a 2-man forensic team rock up to fingerprint my battered 20yo Subaru after it had been stolen and taken for a joy-ride. It was a definite highlight in my otherwise very mundane existence.

forensicBOB said

It must be a joke. As an (educated and employed) forensic scientist, I cracked up when I read this. Not only does the answer have no relevance to the original comment, it is actually incorrect. In fact, it is so wrong, it leads me to believe that the author has no knowledge of forensic science whatsoever, but has overheard some big words in the office whilst making coffee and has strung them together to big note themselves.

vg was correct. Police do police work. Deep

My team leader has been interviewed by two well known Australian newspapers. He is also known by the owner this Website.

Also, the murder investigation was initially handled by the Coroner’s court. The police were working for the Coroner as were the experts and forensic team.

Game, set and match to me!

EandIprefix said :

vg said

Are you 100% sure I don’t mix in the right company? 100%. Maybe I have national awards that I didn’t need to team to assist me with.

Nothing more ex than someone who worked in a policing organisation and wasn’t even a cop…..just thinks they were. Police do Police work. Consultants don’t solve crimes….the Police do that

I am sure 100% now from the lack of process knowledge in your reply. The courts require that experts do not work alone. The courst require proof of professional peer review and consultation. The years of news stories on this case remind the reader that both a consultant from the UK was used and a forensic team. In court cases experts and consultants testify and present evidence that is the final word to refute claims on both sides.

And when was the trial in this matter?

You’ve never seen an angry man, nor been on the inside of a contested Court matter in your life. You’re, at best, a faux academic.

” The years of news stories on this case remind the reader that both a consultant from the UK was used and a forensic team.”

As well as the actual Police investigators who, unlike the ‘experts’ you assign divinity to, have never given up on the matter. Forensic teams are a stock standard part of any investigation, but I’m guessing you were part of the downsizing in that area

The Frots said :

EandIprefix said :

vg said

Are you 100% sure I don’t mix in the right company? 100%. Maybe I have national awards that I didn’t need to team to assist me with.

Nothing more ex than someone who worked in a policing organisation and wasn’t even a cop…..just thinks they were. Police do Police work. Consultants don’t solve crimes….the Police do that

I am sure 100% now from the lack of process knowledge in your reply. The courts require that experts do not work alone. The courst require proof of professional peer review and consultation. The years of news stories on this case remind the reader that both a consultant from the UK was used and a forensic team. In court cases experts and consultants testify and present evidence that is the final word to refute claims on both sides.

This really is a joke isn’t it………………………..yes?

It must be a joke. As an (educated and employed) forensic scientist, I cracked up when I read this. Not only does the answer have no relevance to the original comment, it is actually incorrect. In fact, it is so wrong, it leads me to believe that the author has no knowledge of forensic science whatsoever, but has overheard some big words in the office whilst making coffee and has strung them together to big note themselves.

vg was correct. Police do police work. Deep 😉

EandIprefix said :

vg said

Are you 100% sure I don’t mix in the right company? 100%. Maybe I have national awards that I didn’t need to team to assist me with.

Nothing more ex than someone who worked in a policing organisation and wasn’t even a cop…..just thinks they were. Police do Police work. Consultants don’t solve crimes….the Police do that

I am sure 100% now from the lack of process knowledge in your reply. The courts require that experts do not work alone. The courst require proof of professional peer review and consultation. The years of news stories on this case remind the reader that both a consultant from the UK was used and a forensic team. In court cases experts and consultants testify and present evidence that is the final word to refute claims on both sides.

This really is a joke isn’t it………………………..yes?

Lookout Smithers6:34 pm 18 Jul 11

EandIprefix said :

vg said

Are you 100% sure I don’t mix in the right company? 100%. Maybe I have national awards that I didn’t need to team to assist me with.

Nothing more ex than someone who worked in a policing organisation and wasn’t even a cop…..just thinks they were. Police do Police work. Consultants don’t solve crimes….the Police do that

I am sure 100% now from the lack of process knowledge in your reply. The courts require that experts do not work alone. The courst require proof of professional peer review and consultation. The years of news stories on this case remind the reader that both a consultant from the UK was used and a forensic team. In court cases experts and consultants testify and present evidence that is the final word to refute claims on both sides.

And still no result, just news stories. Yay the expert.

vg said

Are you 100% sure I don’t mix in the right company? 100%. Maybe I have national awards that I didn’t need to team to assist me with.

Nothing more ex than someone who worked in a policing organisation and wasn’t even a cop…..just thinks they were. Police do Police work. Consultants don’t solve crimes….the Police do that

I am sure 100% now from the lack of process knowledge in your reply. The courts require that experts do not work alone. The courst require proof of professional peer review and consultation. The years of news stories on this case remind the reader that both a consultant from the UK was used and a forensic team. In court cases experts and consultants testify and present evidence that is the final word to refute claims on both sides.

“You do not mix in right company to expect to have these qualified people around: they are the equivalent of the “Wallabies” in their profession trained by the best who earn more than $2000 per hour. The Professor who trained my team is in demand on high profile cases. Where the “Wallabies” get trophies my teams achieve national awards in frames hanging on walls of their offices.”

Are you 100% sure I don’t mix in the right company? 100%. Maybe I have national awards that I didn’t need to team to assist me with.

Nothing more ex than someone who worked in a policing organisation and wasn’t even a cop…..just thinks they were. Police do Police work. Consultants don’t solve crimes….the Police do that

EandIprefix said :

vg said

So what?

I watched a footy game once, doesn’t make me a Wallaby

You do not mix in right company to expect to have these qualified people around: they are the equivalent of the “Wallabies” in their profession trained by the best who earn more than $2000 per hour. The Professor who trained my team is in demand on high profile cases. Where the “Wallabies” get trophies my teams achieve national awards in frames hanging on walls of their offices.

Wow! National awards! Framed! I feel so much safer now…

Lookout Smithers8:45 am 17 Jul 11

vg said :

EandIprefix said :

This case was the cause of change of employment: I now work with specialist crime-fighters (not working on this case).

So what?

I watched a footy game once, doesn’t make me a Wallaby

Here Here Tooks!!

EandIprefix said :

…I now work with specialist crime-fighters…

Bitten by radioactive bugs?
One too many experimental drugs?
Went for a stroll amongst the gamma rays?
Capes, masks, underwear on the outside, no real day jobs… That kind of thing?

On a more serious note: Not for long if you try to brag about it…

vg said

So what?

I watched a footy game once, doesn’t make me a Wallaby

You do not mix in right company to expect to have these qualified people around: they are the equivalent of the “Wallabies” in their profession trained by the best who earn more than $2000 per hour. The Professor who trained my team is in demand on high profile cases. Where the “Wallabies” get trophies my teams achieve national awards in frames hanging on walls of their offices.

EandIprefix said :

This case was the cause of change of employment: I now work with specialist crime-fighters (not working on this case).

So what?

I watched a footy game once, doesn’t make me a Wallaby

This case was the cause of change of employment: I now work with specialist crime-fighters (not working on this case).

merlin bodega said :

Is it just me or did it not occur to the police to get the shoes before they were sold oat the Vinnie’s store?

I sincerely hope the perpetrator is caught and punished for this crime.

Going on the evidence though if there was any hope of catching the murderer(s) then ACT policing would not be the “go to” people to make that happen.

Well given it’s a Canberra murder, who else would you have investigate it?

merlin bodega said :

Is it just me or did it not occur to the police to get the shoes before they were sold oat the Vinnie’s store?

I sincerely hope the perpetrator is caught and punished for this crime.

Going on the evidence though if there was any hope of catching the murderer(s) then ACT policing would not be the “go to” people to make that happen.

Of course you would’ve been able to locate a specific pair of boots at a Wagga Vinnies in your sleep. Amateurs!

merlin bodega10:37 am 16 Jul 11

Is it just me or did it not occur to the police to get the shoes before they were sold oat the Vinnie’s store?

I sincerely hope the perpetrator is caught and punished for this crime.

Going on the evidence though if there was any hope of catching the murderer(s) then ACT policing would not be the “go to” people to make that happen.

WonderfulWorld9:37 pm 15 Jul 11

Awesome boots, I’d kill for a pair.

Or

I’d die if I had to wear those shoes.

Seriously good pick up by the police.

Hmm, I bought boots like that recently at a Vinnies but not wagga, put in a call to crimestoppers just in case.

Lookout Smithers4:35 pm 15 Jul 11

The Frots said :

Lookout Smithers said :

The Frots said :

Rawhide Kid Part3 said :

A reminder from CT 2004. http://tinyurl.com/6ayykap

Thank you.

Do these ‘suspects’ still live in the Ngunnawal area?

All speculative.
Were they suspects or ‘persons of interest’? What is the difference exactly?

They were both – for want of a better description, take suspect as being identified as a closer fit to the crime than a ‘person of interest’, who may, after questioning, be cleared of the crime.

Watson said :

Lookout Smithers said :

The Frots said :

Rawhide Kid Part3 said :

A reminder from CT 2004. http://tinyurl.com/6ayykap

Thank you.

Do these ‘suspects’ still live in the Ngunnawal area?

Were they suspects or ‘persons of interest’? What is the difference exactly?

I thought I knew what it meant (ie. that it could include witnesses too), but Wikipedia proved me wrong: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_of_interest

Better response!

Lookout Smithers said :

The Frots said :

Rawhide Kid Part3 said :

A reminder from CT 2004. http://tinyurl.com/6ayykap

Thank you.

Do these ‘suspects’ still live in the Ngunnawal area?

Were they suspects or ‘persons of interest’? What is the difference exactly?

They were both – for want of a better description, take suspect as being identified as a closer fit to the crime than a ‘person of interest’, who may, after questioning, be cleared of the crime.

Lookout Smithers said :

The Frots said :

Rawhide Kid Part3 said :

A reminder from CT 2004. http://tinyurl.com/6ayykap

Thank you.

Do these ‘suspects’ still live in the Ngunnawal area?

Were they suspects or ‘persons of interest’? What is the difference exactly?

I thought I knew what it meant (ie. that it could include witnesses too), but Wikipedia proved me wrong: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_of_interest

Lookout Smithers3:28 pm 15 Jul 11

The Frots said :

Rawhide Kid Part3 said :

A reminder from CT 2004. http://tinyurl.com/6ayykap

Thank you.

Do these ‘suspects’ still live in the Ngunnawal area?

Were they suspects or ‘persons of interest’? What is the difference exactly?

Rawhide Kid Part3 said :

A reminder from CT 2004. http://tinyurl.com/6ayykap

Thank you.

Do these ‘suspects’ still live in the Ngunnawal area?

Rawhide Kid Part32:36 pm 15 Jul 11

A reminder from CT 2004. http://tinyurl.com/6ayykap

The good thing about real life is that criminals are not as smart as they think they are!

shadow boxer2:04 pm 15 Jul 11

They could have said hipster pants and shoes.

Seriousy though a terrible business and good luck to them finding the perpetrators,

Watson said :

Wow, that really is something out of a crime fiction!

How on earth did they learn about these boots being sold at Vinnies in Wagga??? And why did they only discover their presence there after they were sold?

I think all her clothes have been missing all this time so maybe something else has turned up there too?

Wow, that really is something out of a crime fiction!

How on earth did they learn about these boots being sold at Vinnies in Wagga??? And why did they only discover their presence there after they were sold?

Kathryn was originally from Wagga (went to school at Mt Erin) so it’s not all that odd that there is suddenly this link to back there. I wonder what it all means.

I hope it means the cops have a massive lead and the killer is close to being caught.

colourful sydney racing identity1:33 pm 15 Jul 11

I really hope they eventually get the bastard that did this.

Holy crap – this isn’t weird much!

Great news if they have a lead…………………..better news if they catch them.

At the end of it, I am really keen to find out how these boots come into play after such a long period. This is beyond even the smartest of ‘mediums’ I’d say.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.