21 November 2011

The cotton wool marches ever onward

| johnboy
Join the conversation
23
cyclist hazard sign

D-eye has sent in this pic of the Lake Burley Griffin foreshore with the following note:

One for the “WTF?” files. It’s not as though that decking is new, or that it hasn’t held the same risk for the entire time it’s been there. I am curious as to why the signs and barricades have been deemed necessary now.

Got an image of Canberra you want to share with the world? Email it to images@the-riotact.com .

Join the conversation

23
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Idiocracy is looking more and more like a documentary. How on earth did we all survive before the government was there to protect us from prickles and bumps?

OpenYourMind said :

my guess is that the barricades and signs have gone up because of accidents there. This area is used by lots of bike riders; generally more experienced riders know to watch out for wheel tramlining on parallel ruts, so it’s probably more likely this hazard would catch the weekend cyclist.

As for Stevian’s comment, well you better hope that if the karma gods slam you down that there are some nicer people than yourself that come to your aid.

Hehe, ‘tramlining’. Brings back memories of riding rattling bikes on cobble stone roads with only a foot of space between the tram line and the gutter. No sign in sight.

helium said :

I think the barricades are to stop this previously common occurrence, apparently a timber deck not rated for several tons of limo

and nor is granite tile, as there is now a new bollard nearby to prevent driving through here..

I don’t think so as they finally replaced the missing bollards that would let you out there. I like however that after placing one of those secure posts right in the middle of the bottom walkway they removed it not long after, probably to stop little kiddies running into it when they get out of control on the way down the path.

This doesn’t need paragraphs to explain, like the above posts.

Just two word: ARSE COVERING

I think the barricades are to stop this previously common occurrence, apparently a timber deck not rated for several tons of limo

http://firstclasscars.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/DSC_0027.jpg

and nor is granite tile, as there is now a new bollard nearby to prevent driving through here..

http://www.flickr.com/photos/reecephotography/3531594060/

thy_dungeonman5:39 pm 21 Nov 11

trevar said :

Come on people; from the way the sign is pointing, it’s clearly not referring to the decking. The sign is warning cyclists travelling along the concrete bit towards the stainless steel hoop sculpture. And I for one don’t think that surface is very groovy at all. It’s quite passe, really. Unlike the stainless steel hoop sculpture, which is totes groovy, man.

That’s a sculpture? I thought they were bike-racks funny how they care about this rather than the on-road lanes that end abruptly or the paths that turn into/are covered in, gravel and sand.

OpenYourMind5:30 pm 21 Nov 11

my guess is that the barricades and signs have gone up because of accidents there. This area is used by lots of bike riders; generally more experienced riders know to watch out for wheel tramlining on parallel ruts, so it’s probably more likely this hazard would catch the weekend cyclist.

As for Stevian’s comment, well you better hope that if the karma gods slam you down that there are some nicer people than yourself that come to your aid.

Holden Caulfield4:48 pm 21 Nov 11

Stevian said :

simon81 said :

I was sitting on those very decks about 12 months ago and witnessed a cyclist speeding along, veer onto the deck, only for his wheels to slip between the timber. Poor bugger had his feet clipped into his pedals. A face plant, skidding along the deck, splinters and a few broken teeth. I still wince just thinking about it.

I’d wince, but I’m too busy laughing

Same.

Makes you wonder how they managed to miss the concrete blocks. Hey, that’s the answer, some BicyleCanberra funded concrete blocks to warn of the evil car-tyre like grooved surfaces ahead.

davo101 said :

I am curious as to why the signs and barricades have been deemed necessary now.

Some idiot rode their bike onto it, fell off, and then complained to the NCA?

That’s what I assume happened. I never cease to be surprised by the growing level of stupidity amongst the general public. It seems to be inversely proportional to the level of responsibility expected of our citizens.

simon81 said :

I was sitting on those very decks about 12 months ago and witnessed a cyclist speeding along, veer onto the deck, only for his wheels to slip between the timber. Poor bugger had his feet clipped into his pedals. A face plant, skidding along the deck, splinters and a few broken teeth. I still wince just thinking about it.

Ouch, bad luck for him, though he should have been watching where he was going or going slow enough he could have made a different evasion path (assuming he was evading something/someone).

simon81 said :

I was sitting on those very decks about 12 months ago and witnessed a cyclist speeding along, veer onto the deck, only for his wheels to slip between the timber. Poor bugger had his feet clipped into his pedals. A face plant, skidding along the deck, splinters and a few broken teeth. I still wince just thinking about it.

I’d wince, but I’m too busy laughing

I was sitting on those very decks about 12 months ago and witnessed a cyclist speeding along, veer onto the deck, only for his wheels to slip between the timber. Poor bugger had his feet clipped into his pedals. A face plant, skidding along the deck, splinters and a few broken teeth. I still wince just thinking about it.

Isn’t it a bit high for cyclists to read?

Chop71 said :

“this is a sign”

“Do not lean against this sign”

“this is a sign”

Come on people; from the way the sign is pointing, it’s clearly not referring to the decking. The sign is warning cyclists travelling along the concrete bit towards the stainless steel hoop sculpture. And I for one don’t think that surface is very groovy at all. It’s quite passe, really. Unlike the stainless steel hoop sculpture, which is totes groovy, man.

Mooore signage for cyclists??!!?

They should pay rego for all the damage they cause to our paths!

Because people refuse to take responsibility for their own actions. It’s always someone else’s fault. If you ride on the grooved surface and have an accident it must be the fault of whoever put the grooved surface there, rather than yours because you’re too thick to realise that riding on a grooved surface could be hazardous or because you’re too unskilled to be able to cope with the situation.

I’m not picking on cyclists here, just using an example relevant to the sign.

because it was icy and water from the nearby sprinklers had spread onto the path and it was the middle of winter and someone had a splat?

I am curious as to why the signs and barricades have been deemed necessary now.

Some idiot rode their bike onto it, fell off, and then complained to the NCA?

Clearly cyclists are a hazard to grooved surfaces and must be kept off them to maintain the integrity of the grooved surface.

And where does it stop? You can imagine someone now being indignant because they were warned about the grooved surface, chose to ignore it, pulled their bike over the barrier and then rode their bike into the lake. Why is there no sign saying “Big Lake starts at edge of this decking. Cycle hazard.” Let’s sue!

Perhaps they felt the vista lacked something. Like a pointless sign and ugly barriers.

Think of how much time, money and effort it cost to create that lovely view. Then look at how, for pennies, in a day, it can be despoiled by idiots.

Uglification is very cost effective.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.