31 March 2006

The end of the smoko in sight for the APS?

| johnboy
Join the conversation
41

One of our sources has sent in the following missive. Bad news for smokers as your little extra break during the day gets taken away.

Anyone think this will lead to a rise in workplace violence?

UPDATED: The Canberra Times also has the story

Message from Secretary of Dept of Industry, Tourism and Resources to their
staff:

Colleagues

Since becoming Secretary of the Department, I have placed an emphasis on
providing the opportunities, and the means, for employees to adopt and
develop a healthy lifestyle. This has taken the form of supportive and
facilitative measures, such as the very successful FITR program, which will
continue this year, and our reimbursement via the Healthy Lifestyle
Subsidy.

I want to address a need that I see to strongly discourage an activity that
is adverse to a healthy lifestyle – smoking. It is well known that smoking
is contributing to significant health issues for the community and I do not
believe it should be condoned in APS workplaces.

Accordingly, I think we have reached the stage where smoking during working
hours should be discouraged.

I therefore propose to ban smoking by all employees while they are on duty
apart from official meal breaks. Under this new policy, no DITR employee
would be permitted to smoke during the working day. Smoking before or
after these hours, or during the lunch period, would of course not be
covered by this policy.

While primarily directed at healthy lifestyle issues, this new policy will
also improve the professional reputation of the Department, by removing the
present situation where there are small groups of smokers standing outside
the entrances to our buildings throughout the working day.

The new policy will begin from 1 October to coincide with the Canberra move
to the new building in Binara Street. Apart from wanting to ensure that we
project a professional image of the highest quality in our new building,
the building also comes with a child care centre with an open area, in
which children of very young ages will be at play at various hours of the
day. I believe it is unacceptable to invite parents to leave children in
the child care centre, or to deliver and pick up very young children to
that child care centre from various directions around our building, and
expose those children to smoke from our employees. I therefore propose a
rule that no employee be permitted to smoke within 15 metres of any part of
the new building, or any other departmental premises at any time.

I believe these two rules (no smoking whilst on duty, and no smoking within
15 metres of any Departmental premises at any time):

• are objective and therefore easy to understand and apply –
there will be no disputes about the number or duration of smoking breaks –
there will be one simple, clear rule;
• will be a positive encouragement to those employees who do
smoke to quit, thereby offering them much better health outcomes;
• will bring to an end passive smoking in and around our
workplace, to the maximum extent that I can ensure this as Secretary of the
Department;
• will protect children in the child care centre from exposure
to passive smoking while they are in the centre and while they are
travelling to or from the centre; and
• will improve the professional image of the Department.

Of course, I cannot control the activities of members of the general public
in the public areas close to buildings. I am aware that the ACT Government
is preparing legislation to make all childcare centres smoke-free,
including the establishment of an exclusion zone around the perimeter of
every centre.

During a number of discussions about this change, a frequently asked
question has been about sanctions where an employee continues to smoke post
1 October 2006. I have indicated that no new or special arrangements would
be introduced. Issues that arise will be handled in the same manner as any
other potential breach of the DITR Code of Conduct on a case by case basis.
I consider this policy to be a ‘lawful and reasonable’ direction under the
Public Service Act.

Transition to the new rules

I propose that the new rules will take full effect from 1 October 2006 the
first day upon which the Department will begin moving into the new building
in Canberra noting however the policy will apply to all DITR employees and
buildings they occupy.

Recognising that quitting smoking is not an easy task, I propose generous
transition arrangements to support staff who smoke:

• increased support for quit smoking programs and that will
continue indefinitely; together with
• a range of additional assistance measures to be made
available to all staff who smoke.

The following link to the DITR Smoke-free Workforce intranet page will take
you to details of the comprehensive assistance measures that can be
accessed.

Throughout the period to October, I will be happy to receive any reasonable
proposal about how we can better assist our employees who do smoke to give
up. This could extend to providing support to spouses to also give up
smoking.

The Department’s Employee Assistance services provides general counselling.
Employees who are seeking assistance are also invited to talk through their
issue on a confidential basis with Richard Byron (02 62136213) or Kylie
Holyland (02 6213 6340), of the Human Resources Management Branch or by
e-mailing SmokeFreeWorkplace@industry.gov.au.

I would urge employees who are smokers to take the maximum advantage of the
assistance available by taking early steps to stop smoking, so as to avoid
any possibility of difficulties down the track.

Join the conversation

41
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Absent Diane12:41 pm 11 Apr 06

If the tea ladies can wear mini skirts that would be great…… and even the tea men can wear mini skirts….. to make it all equal, fun and a little risque

midnitecalla9:32 pm 10 Apr 06

agreed Diane is it still the “land of the Long Knives” i have been ousted in the early nineties cos i didnt smoke ! when we non smokers went out side to get some fresh air !

and slinky i bet that office was thick with nicotinal tar bloody gross… im kinda glad that the smokers are finally getting a kick in the arse

and as for coffee ? easy bring back the tea ladies and productivity will go through the roof. so much for those touch feely hard cases knocking them offin the eighties its come around and bit them where it hurts!

Slinky the Shocker11:24 am 04 Apr 06

We watched the ‘Hitchhikers Guide’ on Video last night. I wondered whether the Vogons have smokos?

Absent Diane11:13 am 04 Apr 06

the public service is far from a-political…there is no way it can be

StS, proving that you are a good manager isn’t within the selection criteria for most public service positions.

They are:

I can do the job you want me to do.
I can work (with/in) a team.
I can communicate, orally and written, with other people.
I can do a specific task that has been plucked out as exceptionally difficult for the position.
I am willing to comply with OH&S and Workplace Diversity

See ? no need to mention you’re a good manager at all, thereby resulting in good management being progressively recruited out of public servants.

Fortitude and Backbone have also been progressively recruited out as well. I hear through the grapevine also that some SES get paid their bonus based upon the scores they receive from ministers in relation to their ministerial correspondence. So much for the apolitical nature of the public service when they are obliged to say what the minister wants to hear so they can get their bonus package.

Slinky the Shocker2:56 pm 03 Apr 06

Ok, before I start this, let me say that I do have a fair bit of work connections with the public service at both territory, state and fed. level (natural recources sector). 90 percent of public servants I deal with are competent and interested in their work.
However, people with a mentality like Kimba gave public servants in Bavaria (where I originally come from) their nick-name: Armchair-farters. The distinguishing feature of an armchair-farter is the fact that he arrives on time and leaves on time – however work can be done as slowly as possible (or not at all), as long as they are present to fart in their chair.

My point: In most well managed public and private workplaces smokos are not an issue: Good management looks for performance, not mere presence and this applies to all levels-from labourer to management.

Next I want them to target those assholes who think that shopping entails a daytrip out for their little shitheads who want to argue their way through the snackfood section, and that think leaving their trolley of subsequent junkfood crap down the middle of the aisle while they decide the merits between pop-tarts and diet pop-tarts as ‘Dallas’ and ‘Daytona’ continue yelling and screaming…

Sorry Thumper, McDonalds can be next mkay ?

Absent Diane2:02 pm 03 Apr 06

it is a civil rights issue… not a smoking / non smoking issue…

the ct covered this on the weekend.

basically conscluding that well its bad to smoke so this is ok (having rights taken away that is).

i hope they crack down on dithering old matrons who babble about last nights tv show all day. that consumes more time than people having a relaxing durry.

Oops who did it were smokers.

I forgot to mention, when I was in the office, morning tea (30mins) would always turn into a 1hr session. Then 1hr later it was lunch (1hr) which would turn into a 2hr session.

And those who didn’t weren’t smokers. Talk about being non-productive…..

No kimba, smokers DON’T want special privilages.

If people can “pop out” for a 2hr lunch or a 30-45min coffee, then smokers can also pop out for a 5 min smoke.

Oooh, smoking’s bad. Get over it. At least smokers don’t light up in the office.

What about the social drinks in the office? Isn’t that promoting alcoholism and drink driving?

They’re just targeting smokers ’cause it’s not PC to attack fat people or slackers.

Where I work I am amazed at the amount of ‘going for coffee’. Some people do it twice a day for about 30 mins each time. I’ve worked in plenty of departments, and this never happened at all. I think it is a location thing though. It seems to happen in Civic and Woden centres, and not out in the sticks.

The problem with that arguement is that people who smoke also have coffee, people who smoke also chat about the weekend and people who smoke also check a cricket score every now and then ( and blog on RiotACT) Got to draw a line somewhere!

I am sure bosses would crack down on someone who was going for coffee all the time or spent the day chatting. Smokers want special privilages.

Slinky the Shocker3:21 pm 31 Mar 06

Hehehe…even after 2 1/2 years of non-smoking this bulls**t still gets my blood boiling.
I actually think I might have been more productive when I had a little break every 1-2 hours to get outside and unwind. Now I just read RiotACT….

Absent Diane3:10 pm 31 Mar 06

touche slinky

Slinky the Shocker3:08 pm 31 Mar 06

Kimba: Why should people have coffee? Why should people chat about the weekend? Why should they be able to check a cricket score every now and then. If the performance at the end of the day satisfies your team leader/boss/customer, then WHO CARES?

Good move, why should people be allowed time off to have a fag. They can do it in on their own time.

Slinky the Shocker2:49 pm 31 Mar 06

Jeezaz… As punishment for “the secretary”, I would suggest sending him to work at a place in Munich where I worked 8 years ago. We were 3 smokers who were doing GIS (computer mapping) work all day and were allowed to smoke in our office. Needless to say, there was a constant thick fog around, even in Summer when the windows were open and we were titled ‘the sick office’. Those were the days 🙂

Vic Bitterman2:39 pm 31 Mar 06

About time someone did something about those sneaky bludging smokers.

Thumper, I think you look more like an anaemic paedophile

Thumper, you have a point.

I want people who don’t do their bloody job in the first place to be banned from the workplace. I want people who drink copious amounts of coffee and call it a “lunch meeting” docked.

I want more time paid for the hours I work, but I won’t get it any time soon – unless I change professions.

I smoke in my break time (which is a rarity) and when I do I walk 4 blocks from my work place to do so.

(Before anyone asks why aren’t I at work, I had to have a CAT scan and X-ray on my spine – apparently spine is stuffed).

Absent Diane12:55 pm 31 Mar 06

And greet random people at the airport>>?? that is fun

at least DITR ain’t out at brindabella park, where there is just nothing else to do but smoke.
(and watch airplanes land…)

Absent Diane12:39 pm 31 Mar 06

we thin that you should do this… or you will be disappeared

I think it’s funny how at the beginning it says…

“I think we have reached the stage where smoking during working hours should be discouraged”…

yet as you read on it adds…

“no smoking whilst on duty, and no smoking within
15 metres of any Departmental premises at any time”…

hehehe.

social engineering softhead.

while i agree that smokers may take more frequent breaks, as a manager this should be addressed at a team level, not a dept level.

i dont smoke at work so it doesnt affect me, but i think that once they mandate no breaks for smokers, its one step away from no breaks for coffee.

i hope the union that represents them has balls.

PS: have a look at the smokecloak company in the google ads… one of the more bizarre things I have ever seen, plus meaningless statistics. Awesome

Plus, forcing this healthy lifestyle crap is an insidious method of forcing views and lifestyles onto others who may not really want that jive. Can anyone say reformation?

Mael,

been doing it for years mate. two hours a fortnight generally covers it. Secondly, I would prefer a happy smoker as a colleague than some coffee swilling twat who swans around the office like Imelda Marcos.

Just to throw a spanner in the works: if you meant to have a ten minute break every hour to ensure that your computer isn’t killing any vital body parts through laziness and non-moving. Whats wrong with ducking out for a smoke at those times? two birds one stone, all is good.

Don’t have a drama with it – and I say this as a smoker. I can go without for a couple of hours w/o a smoke, but I agree with the point that it will now work both ways. As Thumper said, If I was in the same situation the flex sheet would be filled out meticulously, and it would then reflect all the additional crap which doesn’t now warrant notation because it all evens out.

Absent Diane11:30 am 31 Mar 06

I agree that if they are going to ban smoko’s that should ban everything else… the world is pissing me off today…

bring on catacylsm, nuclear war… that’s far more entertaining than having civil liberties stripped as such….

“I would urge employees who are smokers to take the maximum advantage of the assistance available by taking early steps to stop smoking, so as to avoid any possibility of difficulties down the track.”

IF changes to IR legislation actually did have anything to do with this ‘health message’ from the departmental secretary, I’d say staff would have been forced to have no smoking clauses in their contracts with their employer ie. the Commonwealth.

This is clearly a health issue not an IR one – oh, and won’t someone think of the children!

In Sweden (I think it’s Sweden) non-smokers get a couple of extra weeks of annual leave a year. Seems like a much less draconian way to encourage quitting. Although you could say that smokers are penalised a couple of weeks of leave..

This article conjures forth the image in my head of John Hurt doing exercises under scrutiny of a large TV screen.

If they mean to discourage, they offer nicobate sunsidies and quit programs. Anything more and discourage turns into eradicate.

What’s the problem ?

All they’re saying is that if you want to smoke, you do it on your own time.

Flex up your lost work hours, and see what your non-smoking counterparts have been covering for you for all these years…

jamius maximus11:00 am 31 Mar 06

Even though they might be at their desks more, they will be pissed and hungry for a cigarette, so I don’t think this new rule is going to help productivity.

I predict the breaks continue and people just walk across the road or wahtever to smoke.

Policy coming from the top is one thing, but local enforcement is another.

Absent Diane10:56 am 31 Mar 06

sorry we aren’t allowed to smork near the building we are however allowed smoke breaks notes to self read before rant)… my sentiments remain the same though

Absent Diane10:54 am 31 Mar 06

the useles cunts here at dimia have had this for ages….

It seems civil liberties are going out the window… fuck this shit pisses me off…. and I don’t even smoke at work anymore….

Next they will ban people from making or drinking coffee, eating fruit, wearing perfume, going to the toilet or changing their tampons outside “meal breaks”.

Thanks for the new IR laws Howard you fucktard.

balls, piss, arse and crap. Coming soon to a workplace near you… a little carny that will help you wipe your bum and also assist you with the hard decisions such as, which sock goes on your left foot.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.