The greatest art heist in history set to backfire?

johnboy 15 January 2009 25

[First filed: January 13, 2009 @ 11:45]

The Canberra Museum and Gallery’s long been known to covet the Nolan collection from Lanyon.

The fine political arts of neglect and concocted emergency have in recent years allowed them to conduct possibly the biggest art theft in history, ever, anywhere in the world.

Bear in mind that when Sir Sidney Nolan gave the foundation collection to the Lanyon Homestead there was no ACT Government and no CMAG. The gift was not to them. They were given the responsiblity of looking after Lanyon and its collection as part of the haphazard process of self Government.

The Southside Chronicle is now reporting that Sir Sidney’s widow, Lady Nolan, has tired of the games. 220 of the works CMAG has scarpered with are on loan from her and she wants them back if they’re not returned to their intended location at Lanyon.

With the Chronicle sadly not online here’s a scan of the story for the Northside readers, click on the image for a larger version.

UPDATED: Days late the Liberals’ Vicki Dunne is getting in the game:

    “I can’t help thinking there is a hidden agenda here, with both governments trying to find reasons to shut the Nolan Gallery and obliterate all memory of it, instead of making it the success it deserves to be.

    “We simply cannot let that happened [sic],” concluded Mrs Dunne.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
25 Responses to The greatest art heist in history set to backfire?
Filter
Order
Skidbladnir Skidbladnir 11:51 am 13 Jan 09

I wish I got my Southside Chronicle copy as quickly as that…

Thumper Thumper 12:08 pm 13 Jan 09

I agree with them. The reasoning behind the decision to move them was flimsy to say the least.

poptop poptop 12:23 pm 13 Jan 09

Good brinksmanship, Lady Nolan.

How will Chiefly Funding Public Art feel about going down in history as the Chief Minister who lost the Nolan Foundation Collection and Lady Nolan’s loaners?

p1 p1 12:32 pm 13 Jan 09

Seems pretty straight forward to me. She has them over a barrel, and the ACT gubmint needs to decide if they like publicly owned art or not (giant pears on pedestals beside the GDE not withstanding).

Mr Evil Mr Evil 12:32 pm 13 Jan 09

Maybe Jon forgot to consult with anyone?

caf caf 12:55 pm 13 Jan 09

So… it’s a set of works, some owned by the Commonwealth and some owned by Lady Nolan, formerly exhibited in a gallery owned by the ACT Government that needs expensive repairs to continue to operate.

No wonder it’s a SNAFU. Lady Nolan and Bob Debus get to call the shots on where the artworks go, but we have to foot the bill.

Thumper Thumper 12:58 pm 13 Jan 09

Well put caf 😉

johnboy johnboy 1:08 pm 13 Jan 09

Except Caf, the problems with the original gallery give every indication of having been engineered.

Thumper Thumper 1:10 pm 13 Jan 09

You’re not suggesting that someone deliberately downgraded the maintenance schedule at Lanyon so as to ensure that the artworks would have to be moved in the future?

Surely not…

Granny Granny 1:19 pm 13 Jan 09

If the ACT government can no longer honour the terms of an agreement made in good faith they really should give them back.

From Lady Nolan’s perspective I am sure it would seem that she has had to foot the bill for what must be an exceedingly valuable collection, while we are now wanting to dictate the terms.

emd emd 1:20 pm 13 Jan 09

I think Chalker makes some good points in the article, that the government should continue to honour the artist’s intentions (of having the works displayed in the Nolan gallery), and that if those intentions are not honoured then other art owners might question the worth of bequesting important cultural artwork to government collections in future. It’s not necessarily about what’s legal, it’s what Nolan intended when he made the bequest.

I also wonder if this is some kind of land development deal in the making? If Nolan Gallery is no longer going to function, could the ACT Government try to develop more land around Banks/Gordon towards Tharwa on the grounds that the land is not paying its way anymore? Or would heritage rules mean that’s not possible anyway?

Mr Evil Mr Evil 1:28 pm 13 Jan 09

I thought Lanyon was going to be the site of the new data centre/power station/cemetery/crematorium………oops!

tortfeaser tortfeaser 2:17 pm 13 Jan 09

That gallery was one of the few things that made living in Banks bearable. Go you good thing, Lady Nolan.

p1 p1 2:46 pm 13 Jan 09

I thought Lanyon was going to be the site of the new data centre/power station/cemetery/crematorium………oops!

You forgot the dragstrip…

Thumper Thumper 3:01 pm 13 Jan 09

And the overflow for the gaol…

Granny Granny 3:30 pm 13 Jan 09

… and the new dam!! … Oops!

peterh peterh 4:58 pm 13 Jan 09

Granny said :

… and the new dam!! … Oops!

flood tuggeranong valley. no water probs any more, and Kambah pool gets a lot bigger….

Mr Evil Mr Evil 5:18 pm 13 Jan 09

I’ve heard a rumour that Lanyon Homestead is going to be used by Kevin Rudd as an annexe to the PM&C Department.

It is to be staffed by a specially selected bunch of kids of between 5 and 8 years of age who will be forced to work 18 hour days, 7 days/week writing reports for Rudd.

Apparently the kids are less likely to complain about the hard work, they don’t know who the CPSU are, and he can pay them with lollies, bottles of fizzy drink & chips.

Granny Granny 5:29 pm 13 Jan 09

I’ve heard that they’re stockpiling nuclear missiles there.

Pandy Pandy 7:48 pm 13 Jan 09

Granny we will have to detain you now. “Get the ram boys’

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

 Top
Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site