Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Community

Charity and fundraising auctions for the Canberra community

Thomas Sorahan not guilty of Ferret Torture

By johnboy - 31 March 2009 93

The ABC is reporting that Thomas Sorahan’s conviction for ferret torture has been set aside.

    Thomas Sorahan, 26, was charged with committing a serious act of animal cruelty intending to inflict serious pain.

    The owner of the ferrets who lived with Sorahan found pictures and a video of his pets on his housemate’s camera.

    The vision showed one of his pets being injected with a substance, thought to be a drug.

A decision on Adriano Larobina will be published in the next few days.

FURTHER UPDATE: Tom has left this message for you all:

    #13 posted by Tom Sorah
    (Newbie)
    10:34, 1 Apr 2009

    I would welcome the opportunity to meet up for a chat with any of you peices of s***. My phone number is 0415 636 483. If you read the paper you shall read that the conviction was overturned. And i couldn’t care less what you retards write on this rubbish forum, just wanted to make sure you were aware of the circumstances and i hope it pisses you off.

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
93 Responses to
Thomas Sorahan not guilty of Ferret Torture
Tooks 10:53 am 01 Apr 09

A piece of sh*t and a retard would be someone who tortures small animals, wouldn’t it?

weeziepops 10:46 am 01 Apr 09

Thanks for your phone number, Tom. You’ll be getting some calls, I am sure. I saw the evidence and know what you did to those innocent creatures. You are guilty. You are a bully. You are a coward.

And as for your message – “Retards”??? Please. We already know you are a complete oxygen thief – there’s no need to add any further proof.

Tom Sorah 10:34 am 01 Apr 09

I would welcome the opportunity to meet up for a chat with any of you peices of s***. My phone number is 0415 636 483. If you read the paper you shall read that the conviction was overturned. And i couldn’t care less what you retards write on this rubbish forum, just wanted to make sure you were aware of the circumstances and i hope it pisses you off.

PBO 8:48 am 01 Apr 09

I suppose that it would be like a murder conviction here in the ACT, wont happen and all they get is a slap on the wrist. I hope to meet you one day thomas and we can discuss how animals have feelings too.

Thumper 8:20 am 01 Apr 09

Yeah, I’d be interested as to how the decision was reached.

caf 8:00 am 01 Apr 09

The decision will probably eventually be put up here.

Ari 1:21 am 01 Apr 09

Does it really matter? Any future employer/partner/friend/acquaintance is likely to google Tom Sorohan.

Seeing that he “got off” a ferret torturing conviction is hardly going to instill confidence.

He knows it …hence “Tom Sora”.

ant 11:43 pm 31 Mar 09

If this is another of those stupid “circumstantial evidence” rorts, I just give up.

Granny 9:40 pm 31 Mar 09

Well the first we heard of it was yesterday when “Tom Sora” posted:

‘Yep I have some information for you the charges were dropped. Whats your thoughts on that?’

Ags 9:40 pm 31 Mar 09

Apparently most murderers started off by torturing animals. He needs help NOW before its too late…..

ramblingted 9:27 pm 31 Mar 09

No more room in the new prison, I’m hearing…

Deckard 9:24 pm 31 Mar 09

It would be nice to know why…

ant 9:17 pm 31 Mar 09

Ye gods, what does it take to be convicted of something? A jury sitting there watching them do the deed? It’s getting ridiculous.

SheepGroper 8:46 pm 31 Mar 09

The ABC reports that the sentence was “set aside”, whatever that means, but surely that means there’s no dispute the vermin did torture his housemate’s pets, just that the punishment is being thought about?

Granny 7:00 pm 31 Mar 09

Not happy, Jim!

1 2 3 7

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site