On 16 February 2015, ABC’s Four Corners program aired a report showing video footage of live baiting practices in greyhound racing across New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria.
Not since Four Corners exposed the horrific treatment of Australian cattle in Indonesian abattoirs in 2011 has a single news report on animal welfare had such a significant impact. Within days of the program going to air, the New South Wales Government terminated the employment of Greyhound Racing NSW’s CEO and board members. Queensland and NSW’s racing bodies immediately suspended implicated trainers, owners and dogs. It took about a month, but eventually Greyhound Racing Victoria’s entire board also resigned.
It would be naive to think that live baiting does not occur in the ACT, particularly given that the practice has occurred in other states. While RSPCA ACT hasn’t had any useful leads yet, we have received a few calls that are taking us closer and closer to finding usable evidence that such practices actually do occur in the ACT.
Weekly NewsletterEvery Thursday afternoon, we package up the most-read and trending RiotACT stories of the past seven days and deliver straight to your inbox..
In the meantime, in the months following the Four Corners report, we have seen even more inquiries, investigations, prosecutions, suspensions and even lifetime bans across the country. We have also seen one of the other ugly side effects to greyhound racing with a mass grave found near Bundaberg earlier this month filled with 55 greyhounds that were shot or bludgeoned to death. Similar investigations are currently underway in New South Wales.
This is just a small representation of what happens when a population of such wonderful animals are overbred in the hopes of finding the one lucrative champion amongst the litters. However, live baiting and the overbreeding and oversupply of greyhounds are just two of the many issues that RSPCA has with the greyhound racing industry. The others include:
- Low rehoming rate
- High rate of injuries suffered by racing greyhounds
- Inadequate socialisation and environmental enrichment
- Administration of banned substances
- Lack of industry transparency and accountability
- Export of racing greyhounds to countries with poor animal welfare standards
- The use of greyhounds to supply donor blood and plasma to vet clinics, universities and research laboratories
The ACT has one greyhound racing club, the Canberra Greyhound Racing Club. It responded to my attempt to meet after the airing of the Four Corners report with a general media release. You can view the release on its website, as well as several others issued by Greyhound Racing NSW.
Greyhound Racing NSW, you may ask? That’s because the ACT does not have its own regulatory body for greyhound racing. Instead it relies completely on the NSW body to license and regulate its trainers, owners and racing. The concerning issue is that nowhere on the GRNSW website or Facebook page (that I could find anyway) does it even mention the ACT.
One of the supporting views of greyhound racing in many places is that there is a significant economic benefit to the community. Locally however, government documents and studies show that the ACT Government has committed to ongoing funding of the Canberra Greyhound Racing Club until 2016/17 (including $978,375 in 2013/14). The Club also does not have to pay any industry taxes.
Furthermore, the 2011 Investigation into the ACT Racing Industry report showed that the Canberra Greyhound Racing Club added just $472,984 worth of value and the equivalent of five full time employees to the local economy. With inflation taken into account, simple math shows that it is the ACT taxpayers paying for this industry, not benefiting.
Given greyhound racing’s inability to self-regulate to ensure any kind of reasonable standards for animal welfare, and that the industry provides no economic benefit to our community, it is time for Canberra to decide if we:
- Trust that Greyhound Racing NSW can properly regulate and monitor animal welfare in the ACT; or
- Set-up our own monitoring and controlling authority to ensure that the industry is properly regulated locally (at the taxpayer’s expense); or
- End greyhound racing in the ACT, given the animal welfare risks and lack of economic benefit it provides to the local community and its residents.
I think the answer is quite obviously option three. If you agree, I encourage you to write to the following ministers asking them to reconsider the greyhound racing industry in the ACT.
- Chief Minister Andrew Barr: email@example.com
- Minister for Territory and Municipal Services Shane Rattenbury: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Minister for Racing & Gaming Joy Burch: email@example.com