18 June 2009

Transact upping their Charges

| ed2279
Join the conversation
44

I received a letter for Transact yesterday telling me they were upping their monthly rates on the Web and phone deal I have with them to $59.95 per month. They said its due to rising costs to provide the service and even mentioned how nice they have been in absorbing those on my behalf until now. They also said the amount includes the tax imposed by the government for the service. I checked my bill and found the tax is $3/month and my current payment amount is $48.18/month. So even taking into account the $3 tax that’s an increase just shy of $9/month! And for that I get a piddly 2MB internet speed… and I have to pay my ISP on top of that plus any phone calls I make

After doing some research I’d like to know if anyone is using iiNet’s DSL and VoIP service in Canberra, specifically in the Kambah area. Their Naked DSL plans apparently give me better speeds for less money, I dont need an ISP and i get a VoIP phone. I realise that there are set up fees and I’d need to buy some new hardware to use it, does anyone use it and recommend it? I’m sick of paying Transact a ton of money for little to no service

Join the conversation

44
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Clown Killer3:48 pm 27 Jun 09

Ozmreeee, You’re right in that I’m not a manager. But in my role as business owner I do indeed employ a handful of managers – all of whom are excellent at managing their staff, who in turn are all competent to deal with anything that our clients could ask of us.

Fortunately we’re not in the sort of business that has to deal with peoples self-inflated sense of entitlement so we don’t come across many people like yourself.

And Telstra are no longer absorbing the ACT Govt tax.

iinet used to get a lot of good raps, but there’s been a few negative comments going around lately. Internode seems to please a lot of people. If you’re looking at providers, Whirlpool is the place to go hang.

Sorry ozmreeee, not quite sure what your point is. You object to Transact but are too lazy to do anything about it. In that case the cost of Transact must be less than the cost to you of reorganising all your affairs. You were given the opportunity to decline the contract and you didn’t. In that case, Transact must be good value to you.

I’m with Transact for the main reason being they are not Telstra. I’m happy with the coverage I get. I’ve had two complaints in 6 years, both resolved quickly. I’m sure there are better deals out there, but basically can’t be bothered.

I’ve heard good things about iinet from other people too, deye … they’re on my list of providers to look at

iinet sent out a nice email this week saying they have reviewed their plans and decided to give us an extra 5 GB of quota for free 😀

I came back to the thread to give an update and saw your post, Clown Killer – while I’m not at all interested in your thoughts, having seen them I’ll comment

You are either:-
a) Not a manager; or
b) A piss weak manager who is happy to take the glory when handed out but is suddenly unavailable for a dissatisfied client and wants the team to take the brick brats

Of course it is a supervisor’s responsibility to deal with a customer when that customer is not happy with the response they receive from the staffer. Often the staffer is not even empowered to resolve the issue. In this instance I chose to short circuit the “Can I …?” “No” “OK – I’d like to speak to your manager, please” escalation process.

It’s any customer’s right to ask for a review of a decision when they are not happy with said decision … You are probably one of those acquiescing little pansies who just takes “No” for an answer and spends the rest of your life griping about how unfair everything is.

I prefer to deal with an issue when I don’t like it.

As it turns out, after approaching the Telecom Ombudsman, I have had the denial of my request to go on a month by month arrangement reviewed by, and subsequently agreed to, by TransACT.

So now I can take time to investigate alternative telecomm providers and not have to make a rushed decision

Clown Killer1:56 pm 25 Jun 09

I asked to speak to a supervisor straight off, rather than rail at the poor bugger who answers the phone – the supervisor gets paid to put up with my sh*t the standard operator doesn’t.

I’m not suprpised that you were given a frank appraisal of what you could do with your business. A call centre opperator is exactly the person you should have been speaking to rather than ewasting everyones time with grandiose request to speak to a supervisor. The opperators are paid to put up with whatever “sh*t” it was you have to whine about, they are paid to do that, it’s their job. The supervisor is paid to make sure the opperators are doing just that.

I actually decided to ring TransACT and complain about this increase. I asked to speak to a supervisor straight off, rather than rail at the poor bugger who answers the phone – the supervisor gets paid to put up with my sh*t the standard operator doesn’t.

So, I got put through to this arrogant b*tch who basically gave me the ‘lump it or leave’ option. “We are acting in accord with your contract …” (which I’ve never actually signed/seen – but I’m sure it’s available online somewhere) “… the increase has been approved by the Communications Minister and we have given you the option of cancelling your contract” “blah … blah … blah”

OK – yep, I can go elsewhere but it’s a pain to change my email address and I don’t have the time to research alternative providers. Which is why I recently chose to renew my contract with TransACT even though I know they are much more expensive than alternative providers.

I’m sick and tired of the local provider card being played (“While we encourage you to continue to support TransACT as your local telecommunications provider …”) because it’s wearing thin. I had a similar comment from an ACT car yard when they offered me a $1,000 higher changeover deal on a new car than a car broker (Private Fleet – thoroughly recommend them unless you particularly like dealing with car salespeople)

I’ll be so pleased when TransACT goes broke, cos then I’ll have to get off my ar*e and really investigate this stuff! (Though I must admit the earlier contributions in the thread are enlightening and worth following up)

I’m actually going to try to go to a month-by-month arrangement wih TransACT as happened for 6 months in between my last contract expiring and signing the new one. That way I can leave when I choose … not holding out much hope of success in that venture, but if you don’t ask you don’t find out!

God I love “Rant ‘n’ Rave ACT” (aka RiotACT).

I am with Transact and have had no problems.

I do have some concerns about the relationship between it and ActewAGL which basically administer TransACT on behalf of its shareholders. In share terms only 18% is owned by the ACT community but TransACT receives the benefit of being aligned with ActewAGL (look at their logos), ACTEW and the ACT government. And bundling? And the fact that the TransACT superannuation scheme is a part owner.

Higher fees. Ramping up earnings to get more out of the sale.

yeah, yap[x3], we also get late bills and then get bills with amounts already paid like a week or more ago still accounted on them and when i ring up to check they always go, ‘aww, don’t worry, our systems are always behind like that…’

does anyone else also find the transact digital signal drops out momentarily quite often, just a flicker, but noticeable enough to be annoying??

otherwise, i find transact ok. like lots of channels; even if there is mainly sh1t to choose from on the usual channel flick… like the floyd said, eh?

taco said :

peterh said :

next g is really coming into its own, my connection for work wireless is at 21mbits per sec. faster than standard ethernet…

my liberty plan at home is 1mb. no complaints from me re telstra.

Next G would be OK for light web-browsing, but it’s no replacement for a real fixed service

It suffers from high latency, which means it’s terrible for games

The 21mbit speed is dependent on your equipment, interference, and how many other people are using the same tower, so real world speeds are much lower.

It’s also very unreliable when trying to use it for VPN connections – it’ll work fine for hours straight, then drop out every 10 minutes just when you need to do something.

And finally, it’s very expensive, and you get low quota’s, so it’s no good for heavy use.

taco, my home BB is bigpond. my work connection is next IP. I don’t have any latency issues, as I am on the Business Grade service, running a bdsl pipe as failover. The NextIP service is one big vpn, on the old TID backbone. The port to the internet is 4/4 from hq. If i need to, I can use the nextG connection from home, and I get far faster speeds than std bigpond. Considering that I am not a gamer, and am more interested in cloud computing, email, social networking and webcasts, it is fine for my needs. (my internet quota is unlimited with no shaping) The home BroadBand connection is an ADSL1 connection, again, with no shaping.

peterh said :

next g is really coming into its own, my connection for work wireless is at 21mbits per sec. faster than standard ethernet…

my liberty plan at home is 1mb. no complaints from me re telstra.

Next G would be OK for light web-browsing, but it’s no replacement for a real fixed service

It suffers from high latency, which means it’s terrible for games

The 21mbit speed is dependent on your equipment, interference, and how many other people are using the same tower, so real world speeds are much lower.

It’s also very unreliable when trying to use it for VPN connections – it’ll work fine for hours straight, then drop out every 10 minutes just when you need to do something.

And finally, it’s very expensive, and you get low quota’s, so it’s no good for heavy use.

ed2279,
I too was disgusted to see the increase – my monthly access with ‘Home Zoom’ is increasing from $72.68 to $84.95/month for for 2 megabits/sec which the service rarely achieves. My ISP is grapevine which is another $24 for 3 gig.

While I would prefer to support a local company, I want to send Transact a message that I will not be bullied into paying for a second rate service. The flippant letter from the CEO telling me that this is only 6 cents a day gets up my goat. As others have indicated how much cheaper would our monthly bills be if this company provided services rather than sponsoring every sporting team in Canberra.

I have considered scrapping my landline and using VoIP (I have no experience with this) so I will need digital TV and internet.

I just wonder if I will be able to get a similar ‘package’ cheaper than that offered by Transact but I have 40 days to continue my research (without incuring a cancellation fee) so I will be following this thread with interest.

James-T-Kirk7:44 am 19 Jun 09

Wow – Do Transact still exist?

I am amazed.

I’m with Transact, and leaving all other failings aside for the moment, why is it I get my invoice ten or twelve days after it’s dated, leaving me a day or two to pay before the $5 penalty kicks in. This has happened, for each bill, for the last 6 years.

GottaLoveCanberra10:54 pm 18 Jun 09

Internode FTW.

Taz said :

Anyway, I signed up with Optus then found out I could not use their Broadband plan as Telstra lines ran to the house/unit. I then swapped to Telstra.

This sounds very wrong – Telstra have to sublet the network to competitors, no?

canberratowie29:51 pm 18 Jun 09

ed2279 said :

canberratowie2 do you use them for your phone service as well (VoIP) ho have you found that if you do use it?

canberratowie2 said :

ed2279

I live in kambah and changed from transact to iinet about 4 months ago and I tell you what I love it iinet is a lot faster and cheaper than transact its the best thing I have ever done
Then only thing with iinet is you are charged for up and down so if you download a lot of movies and so on you have to keep a eye on your usage and limits

I live near Livingston av so I’m not far from the interchange (its in Vanzetti cr) the closer you are the better speeds you get I connect at 14 megabits so much better than transact that wasn’t even 1 megabit !
I really recommend looking into iinet I don’t think you will be sorry at all !

I have had people tell me i sound a bit tinny to them on the voIP phone but no one has had any trouble hearing me

caf said :

el: peterh is technically correct, because “standard (original) ethernet” is 10Mbps. Faster speeds are newer standard, eg 100Mbps = “Fast Ethernet”.

thanks caf. i forget that there aren’t many people who lived through the horrors of token ring.

el: peterh is technically correct, because “standard (original) ethernet” is 10Mbps. Faster speeds are newer standard, eg 100Mbps = “Fast Ethernet”.

next g is really coming into its own, my connection for work wireless is at 21mbits per sec. faster than standard ethernet…

??? 21Mbps != > 1 (or 10) Gbps

Unfortunately consumer level 3G is still complete arse. Telstra provides the only decent speeds and you get to pay an arm and a leg for the privilege.

I’m over Transact. They are a rip-off. I signed up to bundle with ACTEWAgl thinking after being convinced of how much money I would save. Unfortunately I have since found out that their idea of informing their client thoroughly is to tell them as little as possible. My $69 capped phone bill was $135 last month, I no longer have mobile coverage when I travel out of town to visit family and I get an extra Telstra bill for any 1902 numbers I phone. Informed consent to the contract is a no starter with them. To add insult to injury, I have been informed that it will cost me $400 to get out of the contract with Transact and there will probably be a fee to escape the bundling contract as well ( the person on the other end of the phone wasn’t sure about that).

kieran AP said :

taco said :

Go Naked and don’t look back.

That comment just strikes me as being a good answer for most things in life 🙂

except in winter…

Clown Killer2:44 pm 18 Jun 09

I have perfect crystal HD coverage. down near mt neighbor…

We’re backing onto Sulwood Drv. at the top of the hill. All of the aerial technicians that we had come out to try and improve it all said that it was a notorious black spot for TV.

We get OK reception of the free to air with the new LCD tv – if you don’t mind occasional pixilation and the odd screen freeze but the transact television pipe into the house is pretty damn good.

taco said :

Go Naked and don’t look back.

That comment just strikes me as being a good answer for most things in life 🙂

next g is really coming into its own, my connection for work wireless is at 21mbits per sec. faster than standard ethernet…

my liberty plan at home is 1mb. no complaints from me re telstra.

I’m on Naked ADSL with iinet – $69.95 a month for a real-world connection of around 800 kilobytes/second with 35GB of quota (15GB in peak (midday to 2am) + 20GB in offpeak) plus with ABC iView and an Ubuntu repository in their freezone, I usually get about another 10GB of quota free data
It also includes a VOIP phone number with free national fixed line calls, and reasonably cheap mobile calls – I usually pay less than a dollar a month in phone calls now (mostly paying for calls to 13xxxx numbers)

Transact really shouldn’t charge extra for a faster line speed, it’s just greedy double dipping on their part. It really should cost between $10 and $20 to lease your physical line, with your ISP applying whatever speed they want to up to the line’s capability of 50mbit or possibly more. Transact was a great idea, but it’s run incompetently by mini-Sol’s (sorry, that’s a tautology)

Go Naked and don’t look back.

Clown Killer said :

I’m in he same boat dvaey. We’re in the shaddow of Mt Taylor and no amount of fannyingbout with aerials etc was going to improve free to air TV reception.

CK, I am on the other side of drakeford, how close to mt taylor are you? I have perfect crystal HD coverage. down near mt neighbor…

Mr Waffle said :

Unfortunately, those of us stuck in the northside ADSL blindspots have to rely on transact as the only source of broadband (real broadband, not that 3G fluff). My 8mb plan went up to $69.95 (if I remember my letter correctly) from $66.25.

+1
Or that iBusted fluff (it ACTUALLY did go fluff, no longer there).
Let’s drown our northside boradband sorrow in our favorite drinks…

I moved a couple of years ago into the new part of Watson. No Transact of course. I had previously been with them but was unhappy with the download limit, the TV I did not want to watch and the line rental before calls were made. Why do they make you sign up for their crappy TV lineup?

Anyway, I signed up with Optus then found out I could not use their Broadband plan as Telstra lines ran to the house/unit. I then swapped to Telstra. Well after paying $45pm before any calls were made and they would not even tell me what speed I could expect from their broadband! (for a paltry 200MB?) I ditched Telstra, I ditched Telstra mobile.

I signed up to 3 mobile. $69pm $650 calls/text and 1GB (yes 1GB) of data. Still not enough data for me, so I pay for more ($39 for 6GB). Not fast – sometimes slower than 1MB/sec, but I am not downloading/streaming video. 3 use their own towers in most mainland capital cities, and Telstra GSM out of town. So not as good as Telstra NextG. Horses for courses. Look around and compare. I will again when my 2 year contract finishes. I used to believe in customer loyalty – no point in that as the terms keep changing.

Canberra has poor communication options for the average customer. I will never again use the big telchos or Transact – they just fleece you!

Clown Killer12:47 pm 18 Jun 09

I’m in he same boat dvaey. We’re in the shaddow of Mt Taylor and no amount of fannyingbout with aerials etc was going to improve free to air TV reception.

We have used Transact for a number of years, and apart from the bill increase you described (we got ours a few months ago) we’ve been VERY happy with it. What other service brings phone, internet and TV in through one source? A friend recently subscribed for pay-TV, paying more than what I pay for basic transact, and receives less features. One of the major benefits I find with transact, is the ability to multi-use their connection, so I can have multiple internet connections or multiple TV connections running off the one VDSL line.

Now, having said that, I do have a couple of gripes. The main one was only partly transacts fault, and partly netspeeds fault. We subscribed on a 512k plan and were more than happy with that speed. Transact then forced us onto a 2mbit plan and forced us to pay the difference. Netspeed (our ISP) however, have left our connection at 512k and wont increase it to 2mbit without extra payment. Transact wont reduce our charges for the 2mbit service they provide. One ironic thing here, is on occasion netspeed has ‘issues’ with their servers, and I actually get to use the full speed.

Apart from the fact Transact charges us for 2mbit while the ISP only allows a fraction of that, the service has been great, and better for our uses than any other combination of systems Ive seen elsewhere.

I’ve just started with Transact, and my 8MB plan is now up to $69.95 a month. Then there is the cost of actually buying the data on top of that, which I am doing through Netspeed. Over $100 a month seems a bit ridiculous, to be honest, for 35GB of downloads at modest speeds. 8MB/sec is not really that fast by anyones standards. As such, i’m going to see how much it is to cancel the Netspeed, and then kill the plan and look elsewhere. Researching on whirlpool.net.au is always a good start.

canberratowie2 do you use them for your phone service as well (VoIP) ho have you found that if you do use it?

canberratowie2 said :

ed2279

I live in kambah and changed from transact to iinet about 4 months ago and I tell you what I love it iinet is a lot faster and cheaper than transact its the best thing I have ever done
Then only thing with iinet is you are charged for up and down so if you download a lot of movies and so on you have to keep a eye on your usage and limits

I live near Livingston av so I’m not far from the interchange (its in Vanzetti cr) the closer you are the better speeds you get I connect at 14 megabits so much better than transact that wasn’t even 1 megabit !
I really recommend looking into iinet I don’t think you will be sorry at all !

Do a plan search on whirlpool.net.au and read their reviews of the various available options. This should help you get the best deal.

http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/bc/?action=search

screaming banshee11:24 am 18 Jun 09

I saw a dog transact bill go up once

canberratowie210:07 am 18 Jun 09

ed2279 I live in kambah and changed from transact to iinet about 4 months ago and I tell you what I love it iinet is a lot faster and cheaper than transact its the best thing I have ever done
Then only thing with iinet is you are charged for up and down so if you download a lot of movies and so on you have to keep a eye on your usage and limits

I live near Livingston av so I’m not far from the interchange (its in Vanzetti cr) the closer you are the better speeds you get I connect at 14 megabits so much better than transact that wasn’t even 1 megabit !
I really recommend looking into iinet I don’t think you will be sorry at all !

Unfortunately, those of us stuck in the northside ADSL blindspots have to rely on transact as the only source of broadband (real broadband, not that 3G fluff). My 8mb plan went up to $69.95 (if I remember my letter correctly) from $66.25.

I ran a question on transact on whirlpool, when i was looking at options for my internet connection. amazingly, I found that the response was from transact people, not the ISPs, and the hot air that was blowing around was staggering.

I use telstra, but in kambah, the internode or iinet options are pretty good. I always mention engin, the call costs I have for national and international calls are really cheap – we pay for the flag fall, untimed.

Clown Killer9:31 am 18 Jun 09

Nine bucks a month! Incredible. Yawn.

Indeed, I recommend Internode or IInet. I have good experience with both and they provide a very high quality Internet and VOIP solutions. Your phone calls will also cheaper.

Nambucco Deliria9:09 am 18 Jun 09

It’s so that Ivan Slavich can plough more money into the ‘bid4Canberra’.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.