2 May 2012

Why not cover teeth?

| johnboy
Join the conversation
61

The Greens are asking some sensible questions as to why teeth are excluded from publicly funded healthcare, and trying to get support for a fix up here in Canberra.

“It doesn’t make much sense that teeth should be excluded from the rest of the human body when it comes to healthcare,” Greens Health spokesperson, Amanda Bresnan MLA, said.

“Low income earners are the hardest hit by the high cost of dental care, and this leads to major health problems.

“44% of respondents to the last ACT General Health Survey reported to have delayed using a dentist because they couldn’t afford it. This results in an unnecessary burden on the health system. 7-10% of GP visits are due untreated dental problems.

“If we do not start improving our preventative health measures, like regular dental check-ups, the cost of our health system will continue to skyrocket.

“Today the ACT is being presented with an opportunity to be the first jurisdiction to vote in favour of the Commonwealth Government funding Denticare.

“I’m calling on the other parties to listen to the community and support Denticare. The Assembly should make it clear to the Federal Government that this is a health priority for the people of Canberra,” Ms Bresnan said.

(Cue a bunch of vindictive arseholes huffing and puffing that they worked hard for their dental care and anyone who didn’t work as hard, or get as lucky, should live in pain and die young. Oh and let’s not forget the moral pygmies shouting “I’m allright jack, screw the rest of you”.)

Join the conversation

61
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Gungahlin Al10:30 pm 06 May 12

A breakthrough today in the Greens’ campaign to get dental care properly funded and included in Medicare. Greens Senator Dr Richard di Natale announced successful negotiations with the Government to get half a billion dollars worth of dental care improvements included in Tuesday’s Budget:

* $345.9 million for a public dental waiting list blitz, to help the 400,000 Australians on public waiting lists get treatment faster;
the Chronic Dental Disease Scheme will be saved from Budget cuts, until we can develop a comprehensive national scheme with the Government to replace it;
* $158.6 million to train more dentists and oral health therapists, and help dental professionals set up practices in rural areas; and,
* $10.5 million to promote good oral health.

But di Natale has said this is just the start:

“We’re going to take the next steps on that road straightaway. Starting this week, and continuing in coming months, we will negotiate with the Government to design a scheme to help Australians access the dental care they need. We’re all going to need to keep the campaign going to get the best outcome from those negotiations: bringing dental care into Medicare at last. Later this year, we will bring the results of our negotiations to the Parliament and establish a national dental scheme. I look forward to voting for that reform, which will be a direct result of your passionate support.”

And to everyone who put their names to the Greens petition – thank you – you helped bring this outcome to fruition.

So why is this important for the ACT? Because this investment in preventative medicine will – in time – reduce the kinds of downstream health problems that result from poor dental health. And that will in turn reduce demand on our ACT health care system and tax base.

Darkfalz said :

Everyone with a job should have private health care.
.

Oh, look who hasn’t been paying attention.

HELLO?!?!
One more time: The american system of private healthcare costs twice as much and has worse outcomes. In other words it’s a big, horrendous scam. And you’ve fallen for it – you, Gary Humphries, Tony Abbot, and the rest of that shower of idiots pleased to call themselves a “Liberal” Party who are absolutely clueless when it comes to analysing real-world facts before developing policy.

2604 said :

An annual checkup and clean costs about $200 at my local (rip-off) dentist. It beggars belief that 44% of Canberrans can’t set aside less than four bucks a week to look after their own teeth.

Also, the government socialising or subsidising anything is a sure-fire way to increase how much it costs. Anyone for a $700 set-top box?

I hadn’t been to the dentist in 10 years, went and got a clean and two small fillings (took two sessions). It cost me about $600 from memory. I got private health insurance shortly after and haven’t been since… I should probably use it. But I have very good teeth.

Everyone with a job should have private health care.

I remember getting free dental checks when I was a kid, at a clinic at primary school. I’m not sure who paid for it but it certainly wasn’t my mum (who was on child support payments).

Tetranitrate10:31 pm 03 May 12

2604 said :

HenryBG said :

The scary thing is that misinformed idiots like 2604 actually have the vote, and they use it to keep the Liberal Party in the running.

“Misinformed idiots” think that the overall cost of a health care system viewed in isolation of health outcomes and patient demographics is a reliable indicator of that health care system’s quality.

They also think that something which works in the UK will work everywhere, and that somehow socialised medicine can magically avoid all of the waste and unnecessary endemic in other government-provided services.

Except the USA has more favorable demographics and has worse outcomes.
ie: median age in the US is about 37.5, UK is 40.5
eg: Infant mortality of 5.98/1000 for the USA versus 4.56/1000 for the UK. (most recent CIA world factbook)
Yet the NHS costs less.

Reality contradicts your ideology.

The reason the UK in particular is being bought up is because the NHS is basically the gold standard of single payer healthcare – you can’t get much more ‘statist’ than the system in the UK.
(as compared to say, the Netherlands)

HenryBG said :

The scary thing is that misinformed idiots like 2604 actually have the vote, and they use it to keep the Liberal Party in the running.

“Misinformed idiots” think that the overall cost of a health care system viewed in isolation of health outcomes and patient demographics is a reliable indicator of that health care system’s quality.

They also think that something which works in the UK will work everywhere, and that somehow socialised medicine can magically avoid all of the waste and unnecessary endemic in other government-provided services.

pink little birdie said :

Health systems like the UK also increase the purchasing power of the Health budget cos of the whole buying in bulk concept and adds to the negotating power of the purchasers.

Yeah, that and the health budgets aren’t being siphoned off to pay for shareholder profits and advertising.

I’ve seen an attempted privatisation to yank health firms at work, and it was a massive, costly disaster with very poor health outcomes.

To those whose ideology encourages them to persist in scepticism like Chewy14’s, please keep your mind open a bit longer and try reading this:

http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2012/03/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_he.php

He summarises:

To summarize, the US spends more on healthcare compared to other industrialized nations because

– We deliver it inefficiently
– Without universality problems present when critical and in the ER
– Fee-for-service incentives in the form of excessive reimbursement for procedures and hospitals ramp up costs by encouraging doctors to overuse expensive tests and perform more procedures
– Direct-to-consumer advertising (we are one of two countries that allow advertisement of prescription drugs) and medicare part D encourage overuse of pharmaceuticals while tying providers hands when it comes to bargaining for lower drug prices
– Defensive medicine
– Poor management of end-of-life decisions and excessive and futile overuse of resources at the end of life
Absence of a universal electronic medical record (or record format) to prevent redundancy and waste.

pink little birdie11:41 am 03 May 12

Health systems like the UK also increase the purchasing power of the Health budget cos of the whole buying in bulk concept and adds to the negotating power of the purchasers.

Tetranitrate10:43 am 03 May 12

chewy14 said :

Actually looking at that data presented by Tetranite I don’t think you can come to any conclusion about the different health systems.
The USA is obviously disfunctional but when you look at the % cost of GDP spent on healtcare compared to the % cost that comes from public expenditure, there is no link between them for the countries presented. It’s too simplistic a measure.
You would obviously also need to look at health outcomes to see the effectiveness of each country’s program.

Oh absolutely – the mere % of GDP spent on healthcare or $ per capita spent doesn’t tell you much at all and every country is different.

It’s just that the USA sticks out like a broken thumb, and countries like the UK with comprehensive single payer systems which according to people like 2604 should have massive cost blowouts because of their ‘inherent inefficiency’ do just fine.

VYBerlinaV8_is_back10:35 am 03 May 12

I though Reductio Ad Absurdum was something they taught at Hogwarts.

Diggety said :

Jim Jones said :

Diggety said :

No, people just need to wean themselves off their mum’s tit and take some personal responsibility.

So we should axe medicare and let everyone fend for themselves then?

After all, poor people are only poor because of lack of personal responsibility. And rich people are only rich because of their awesome personal responsibility skills!!!

Reductio ad absurdum

Lol. Given that the original ‘argument’ consisted of ‘herp derp personal responsibility’ I don’t think that swinging around logical fallacies is gonna help much.

Actually looking at that data presented by Tetranite I don’t think you can come to any conclusion about the different health systems.
The USA is obviously disfunctional but when you look at the % cost of GDP spent on healtcare compared to the % cost that comes from public expenditure, there is no link between them for the countries presented. It’s too simplistic a measure.
You would obviously also need to look at health outcomes to see the effectiveness of each country’s program.

2604 said :

HenryBG said :

The appalling american system of healthcare is ample demonstration that healthcare is unsuited to a market-based system and the British NHS demonstrates that socialised medicine is the cheapest (at half the cost of the american system) and most effective way of delivering healthcare, even if you don’t care about the vastly superior social justice impact of the latter.

Anyone who thinks that universal, socialised medicine will cost less overall than user-pays medicine purchased in a competitive market whilst resulting in the same quality of outcome needs to have his head examined. At own expense, I hasten to add.

er, but here in the real world, universal socialised medicine is half the price of the american approach.

You *do* realise that, don’t you?

The scary thing is that misinformed idiots like 2604 actually have the vote, and they use it to keep the Liberal Party in the running.

2604 said :

Also, the government socialising or subsidising anything is a sure-fire way to increase how much it costs.

Yeah, except for healthcare – as the american system *proves* with its doubled costs as compared with the socialised British system.

Tetranitrate1:24 am 03 May 12

2604 said :

HenryBG said :

Anyone who thinks that universal, socialised medicine will cost less overall than user-pays medicine purchased in a competitive market whilst resulting in the same quality of outcome needs to have his head examined. At own expense, I hasten to add.

You’re the one who needs your head examined.
See my prior post, of particular note:
http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3746,en_2649_33929_2085200_1_1_1_1,00.html
As a percentage of GDP, total health spending in the US in 2009 was 17.4%
The ‘socialist’ UK with a comprehensive single payer system? 9.8%
When it’s put in PPP $ it’s actually more than double the OECD average.

2604 said :

Anyone who thinks that universal, socialised medicine will cost less overall than user-pays medicine purchased in a competitive market whilst resulting in the same quality of outcome needs to have his head examined. At own expense, I hasten to add.

Erm, have you seen what the US taxpayer pays for their rooted system????

HenryBG said :

The appalling american system of healthcare is ample demonstration that healthcare is unsuited to a market-based system and the British NHS demonstrates that socialised medicine is the cheapest (at half the cost of the american system) and most effective way of delivering healthcare, even if you don’t care about the vastly superior social justice impact of the latter.

Anyone who thinks that universal, socialised medicine will cost less overall than user-pays medicine purchased in a competitive market whilst resulting in the same quality of outcome needs to have his head examined. At own expense, I hasten to add.

An annual checkup and clean costs about $200 at my local (rip-off) dentist. It beggars belief that 44% of Canberrans can’t set aside less than four bucks a week to look after their own teeth.

Also, the government socialising or subsidising anything is a sure-fire way to increase how much it costs. Anyone for a $700 set-top box?

They need to up the number of dentistry placements at uni and/or increase numbers of overseas trained dentists to allow more competition and lowering of fees. I am sorry but how can 10-15 minutes of a dentist’s time for a non-complex check up and clean cost me $150. There could also be bulk billed dental hygienists who can do cleaning and instruct people on proper dental/gum hygiene avoiding unecessary visits to the dentist. Alternatively, why doesnt the government subsidise or lower hecs or provide scholarships to students who in return agree to work as a salaried dentist in a public health sector for x number of years. No dentist would be otherwise compelled to work in the public system when they have a licence to print money in private.

“moral pygmies” – love it. going to try and use that in a few sentences tomorrow!

Tetranitrate7:28 pm 02 May 12

HenryBG said :

Diggety said :

No, people just need to wean themselves off their mum’s tit and take some personal responsibility.

That’s not an evidence-based response.

The appalling american system of healthcare is ample demonstration that healthcare is unsuited to a market-based system and the British NHS demonstrates that socialised medicine is the cheapest (at half the cost of the american system) and most effective way of delivering healthcare, even if you don’t care about the vastly superior social justice impact of the latter.

There is no reason to separate dental care from other forms of healthcare.

Absolutely – the Americans pay, as a proportion of GDP and in PPP adjusted $ about twice as much as the rest of the OECD (give or take, depending on which measure, which year – but it’s basically 2x) – they essentially pay twice, and have worse outcomes (eg: infant mortality) to boot.
(http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3746,en_2649_33929_2085200_1_1_1_1,00.html)

Of course plenty of the reactionary morons they have over there are A-okay with that – they don’t really care that they’re being ripped off as long as there is someone worse off to them to sneer at.
You can see the same mentality with some of the posters here.

Jim Jones said :

Diggety said :

No, people just need to wean themselves off their mum’s tit and take some personal responsibility.

So we should axe medicare and let everyone fend for themselves then?

After all, poor people are only poor because of lack of personal responsibility. And rich people are only rich because of their awesome personal responsibility skills!!!

Reductio ad absurdum

HenryBG said :

Diggety said :

No, people just need to wean themselves off their mum’s tit and take some personal responsibility.

That’s not an evidence-based response.

The appalling american system of healthcare is ample demonstration that healthcare is unsuited to a market-based system and the British NHS demonstrates that socialised medicine is the cheapest (at half the cost of the american system) and most effective way of delivering healthcare, even if you don’t care about the vastly superior social justice impact of the latter.

There is no reason to separate dental care from other forms of healthcare.

‘British Smile’ didn’t enter the urban dictionary for no reason, Henry:

. British Smile

any smile exhibiting bad teeth, characterized by poor orthodontia, caries, and other dental maladies stereotypically associated with the British, but actually observed in all peoples globally.

Alderney said :

matt31221 said :

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

JB did warn the reader about d***heads like you. Just because you brush your teeth and eat healthy food doesn’t mean you’re not going to get dental problems and vice versa. Genetics is a factor in it as well.

Fortunately for me then I lucked in. I went through an 18 year career as an A-Grade Rugby League player and 5 years in the kickboxing ring without losing a tooth. This is because I spent hundred’s of dollars on good mouthguards, not the crap you buy at a chemist.

I also don’t have a filling at 43 years of age. I have however had gum problems that I paid to remedy and pay attention regarding my dental health.

My wife also, at nearly 40, does not have any fillings.

You however obviously lucked out and have some sense of entitlement that others owe you for your poor dietery decisions and/or breading.

I can also resort to debate without lowering myself to terms of abuse, but if you’d like me to kick your teeth in so you can get your free treatment it should only take me a minute, or two if you know how to fight.

I used to work with an ex private school rugby boy. Dunno if he was a martial artist, but he was certainly a complete tosser, just as you appear to be.

Threatening to kick peoples teeth in on an anonymous website is patently absurd and just makes you look dim, despite your splendid teeth. Around here, you can claim, as I do, to have super powers such as the ability to see peoples farts floating in the air. Unfortunately for you, your claims to martial or other capabilities are no more credible than mine. 😉

Anyway, back to the OP…I reckon it’s a great idea. I have friends who are medical specialists, and they both tell me that the contribution of bad teeth to general ill health is huge. I’ve always wondered why dental care isn’t included under Medicare. Was it the influence of the dental lobby at the time that Medicare was introduced? Whatever the case, it makes as much sense as excluding any other random part of the body. Perhaps we should also exclude all the embarrassing bits like penises, anuses, colons etc…:-)

Alderney said :

matt31221 said :

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

JB did warn the reader about d***heads like you. Just because you brush your teeth and eat healthy food doesn’t mean you’re not going to get dental problems and vice versa. Genetics is a factor in it as well.

Fortunately for me then I lucked in. I went through an 18 year career as an A-Grade Rugby League player and 5 years in the kickboxing ring without losing a tooth. This is because I spent hundred’s of dollars on good mouthguards, not the crap you buy at a chemist.

I also don’t have a filling at 43 years of age. I have however had gum problems that I paid to remedy and pay attention regarding my dental health.

My wife also, at nearly 40, does not have any fillings.

You however obviously lucked out and have some sense of entitlement that others owe you for your poor dietery decisions and/or breading.

I can also resort to debate without lowering myself to terms of abuse, but if you’d like me to kick your teeth in so you can get your free treatment it should only take me a minute, or two if you know how to fight.

I have good teeth and look after them well also but what the heck is ‘breading’? I also have a few years of muay thai training. You seen quite confident in your ability but being quite a few years younger that you, I dare say I have the advantage and it is you that will require the dental work my friend. Perhaps we might be evenly matched who knows – I certainly won’t back down from you.

I really wonder if you learnt your ‘kickboxing’ in a boxfit class though, because if you had some proficiency in it you would realize that violence doesn’t solve first world problems and you would naturally avoid fighting. It sounds like you love to throw your weight around.

So tough guy, sure I over-reacted with the dick**** thing but some people eat really healthy and look after their teeth – but still have a lot of dental problems. Some of those people may have low paying jobs and cannot afford dental work. It was really heartless of you to say what you did – that is why I reacted strongly. I will gladly pay tax to subsidize dental work for people who cannot afford it.

I read an article recently which quoted the American Dentists Association (or like) which noted that there seems, over the last 30 years, to be a general increase dental disease in more affluent countries.

One of the things that they put it down to was the use of bottled or filtered water, which is defeating the fluroidated water supply. Mind you, this was just one of the reasons given.

It got me thinking, I grew up in a non-flouridated city yet Mum made all us kids take a flouride supplement tablet every morning.

Neither me nor any of my siblings (all in our 40’s) have any fillings at all.

Back on topic – My opinion is that two general preventative visits (check ups and clean) should be free twice a year and everything else should be subsidised or fully covered (subject to a means test) under Medicare or a similar scheme.

Diggety said :

No, people just need to wean themselves off their mum’s tit and take some personal responsibility.

So we should axe medicare and let everyone fend for themselves then?

After all, poor people are only poor because of lack of personal responsibility. And rich people are only rich because of their awesome personal responsibility skills!!!

Diggety said :

No, people just need to wean themselves off their mum’s tit and take some personal responsibility.

That’s not an evidence-based response.

The appalling american system of healthcare is ample demonstration that healthcare is unsuited to a market-based system and the British NHS demonstrates that socialised medicine is the cheapest (at half the cost of the american system) and most effective way of delivering healthcare, even if you don’t care about the vastly superior social justice impact of the latter.

There is no reason to separate dental care from other forms of healthcare.

Diggety said :

No, people just need to wean themselves off their mum’s tit and take some personal responsibility.

Which is a tad ironic if they were raised on Coke (I have seen toddlers having this poured into baby bottles) and crappy food and already had dental problems as a child. Hardly their fault for having the wrong parents.

No, people just need to wean themselves off their mum’s tit and take some personal responsibility.

Alderney said :

Fortunately for me then I lucked in. I went through an 18 year career as an A-Grade Rugby League player and 5 years in the kickboxing ring …..

So at what age did you grow up and get a real job?

Jim Jones said :

HenryBG said :

I’ve helped on Greens’ stalls collecting petition signatures supporting this initiative and can say that almost everyone I spoke with signed up. It has almost universal support.

I’m at a loss to see how anyone could be against this proposal.

The public being overwhelmingly against junkies doesn’t stop junkies from doing what they do.

A bit like the pokies: the public is overwhelmingly against them, but the pollies for some reason refuse to do anything about them.

If the public is overwhelmingly against them, why won’t it just stop putting money into the evil things?

Alderney said :

matt31221 said :

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

JB did warn the reader about d***heads like you. Just because you brush your teeth and eat healthy food doesn’t mean you’re not going to get dental problems and vice versa. Genetics is a factor in it as well.

Fortunately for me then I lucked in. I went through an 18 year career as an A-Grade Rugby League player and 5 years in the kickboxing ring without losing a tooth. This is because I spent hundred’s of dollars on good mouthguards, not the crap you buy at a chemist.

I also don’t have a filling at 43 years of age. I have however had gum problems that I paid to remedy and pay attention regarding my dental health.

My wife also, at nearly 40, does not have any fillings.

You however obviously lucked out and have some sense of entitlement that others owe you for your poor dietery decisions and/or breading.

I can also resort to debate without lowering myself to terms of abuse, but if you’d like me to kick your teeth in so you can get your free treatment it should only take me a minute, or two if you know how to fight.

I was a top SAS gunman and superfighting all-star for 20 straight years. I won all the medals offered by the Australian Armed Forces and then they made a special one just for me because of outstanding awesomeness and even once I beat a whole huge gang of terrorists just with a pocket-knife.

I’ve also got numerous degrees in the field of rocket-surgery and once I flew a megarocket to the outer rings of Saturn and collected samples that conclusively proved that aliens exist and are totally kick-ass but the government hushed it up because they knew that everyone would freak out and also on the way home I totally blew up an asteroid that was heading for Earth and would have killed everyone but they never told anyone because I didn’t want all the attention.

I’ve also done male modelling but had to quit because seeing pictures of me would have turned lots of hot girls boyfriends gay and I already get hassled enough by hot girls who want to kiss me and I’m too busy being on the cutting edge of ninja training and hanging out secretly with celebrities.

I don’t brush my teeth. I don’t need to. Having to brush teeth is a type of weakness to me. I laugh at people who have to brush their teeth – they need to be tougher and harder and then they stand a small chance of defeating their bodily weaknesses live I have.

Alderney said :

matt31221 said :

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

JB did warn the reader about d***heads like you. Just because you brush your teeth and eat healthy food doesn’t mean you’re not going to get dental problems and vice versa. Genetics is a factor in it as well.

Fortunately for me then I lucked in. I went through an 18 year career as an A-Grade Rugby League player and 5 years in the kickboxing ring without losing a tooth. This is because I spent hundred’s of dollars on good mouthguards, not the crap you buy at a chemist.

I also don’t have a filling at 43 years of age. I have however had gum problems that I paid to remedy and pay attention regarding my dental health.

My wife also, at nearly 40, does not have any fillings.

You however obviously lucked out and have some sense of entitlement that others owe you for your poor dietery decisions and/or breading.

I can also resort to debate without lowering myself to terms of abuse, but if you’d like me to kick your teeth in so you can get your free treatment it should only take me a minute, or two if you know how to fight.

Oooh. Looks like the jury’s decision is in:

Vindictive asshole with a strong dash of moral pygmy and a big side serve of internet tough-guy!

Alderney said :

poor dietery decisions and/or breading.

My poor dietary decisions usually involve breading…and then deep frying.

matt31221 said :

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

JB did warn the reader about d***heads like you. Just because you brush your teeth and eat healthy food doesn’t mean you’re not going to get dental problems and vice versa. Genetics is a factor in it as well.

Fortunately for me then I lucked in. I went through an 18 year career as an A-Grade Rugby League player and 5 years in the kickboxing ring without losing a tooth. This is because I spent hundred’s of dollars on good mouthguards, not the crap you buy at a chemist.

I also don’t have a filling at 43 years of age. I have however had gum problems that I paid to remedy and pay attention regarding my dental health.

My wife also, at nearly 40, does not have any fillings.

You however obviously lucked out and have some sense of entitlement that others owe you for your poor dietery decisions and/or breading.

I can also resort to debate without lowering myself to terms of abuse, but if you’d like me to kick your teeth in so you can get your free treatment it should only take me a minute, or two if you know how to fight.

ooh, provocative. ok, i’ll bite…

matt31221 said :

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

JB did warn the reader about d***heads like you. Just because you brush your teeth and eat healthy food doesn’t mean you’re not going to get dental problems and vice versa. Genetics is a factor in it as well.

Yeah, but is he a moral pygmy or a vindictive asshole? That’s what I wanna know.

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

JB did warn the reader about d***heads like you. Just because you brush your teeth and eat healthy food doesn’t mean you’re not going to get dental problems and vice versa. Genetics is a factor in it as well.

Little_Green_Bag3:28 pm 02 May 12

sarahsarah said :

Dental care IS expensive – having just recently had braces I can certainly testify to this! Surely basic check-ups every year should be covered at least?

Having the Greens suggest something that isn’t monumentally stupid is a shock to the senses.

The Hawke and Keating governments in the 1980s and early ’90s had the Commonwealth Dental Scheme which provided free dental care for low income earners and welfare recipients. I had major work done over several visits during 1989.

When John Howard came to office he abolished it saying it was a state responsibility. A few cash-strapped state governments brought in Claytons schemes with expensive co-payments and long waiting lists. Some didn’t even bother.

The last time I went to the Phillip Health Centre for an emergency (in 2006) I was told that I would have to make a booking four weeks ahead (yes, for an emergency) and that I would have to pay. I didn’t make a booking and went home in pain. I phoned a private dentist and was told that I would have to pay over $400.00, money I could not afford. I haven’t been to the dentist since.

HenryBG said :

I’ve helped on Greens’ stalls collecting petition signatures supporting this initiative and can say that almost everyone I spoke with signed up. It has almost universal support.

I’m at a loss to see how anyone could be against this proposal.

A bit like the pokies: the public is overwhelmingly against them, but the pollies for some reason refuse to do anything about them.

If the public is overwhelmingly against them, why won’t it just stop putting money into the evil things?

veronicamars said :

Because there is a clear link between dental health and general health.

Ramsess II, the greatest, most celebrated, and most powerful pharaoh of the Egyptian Empire, who lived well into his 90s, and was said to have sired almost 100 children, died of poor dental hygiene.

I’ve helped on Greens’ stalls collecting petition signatures supporting this initiative and can say that almost everyone I spoke with signed up. It has almost universal support.

I’m at a loss to see how anyone could be against this proposal.

A bit like the pokies: the public is overwhelmingly against them, but the pollies for some reason refuse to do anything about them.

Really bad teeth are probably one of the major indicators that a person is from a lower socio-economic group (along with smoking, perhaps?). It is unfair that people can’t afford to have dental care and it must be socially limiting as well as having all sorts of health effects. I wonder where they’d draw the line on funding under this proposal? I can’t help but notice that at my daughter’s school, in some year groups, most of the girls seem to be wearing braces, for (eventual) cosmetic reasons, I assume. The other day I saw a boy with teeth that *really* stuck out and it was difficult not to look at them; will some cosmetic dentistry/orthodontic services be covered?

There are some ACT Government dental services already for children and pensioners, and Medicare does cover certain chronic problems to a limited degree:
http://health.act.gov.au/health-services/a-z-health-services/dental-health

As long as its well designed and only covers necessary dental care then why not?

So many other health problems come from dental problems that this will surely save large amounts of money elsewhere.

veronicamars1:54 pm 02 May 12

Alderney said :

“Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?”

Because there is a clear link between dental health and general health. We have Medicare for our general health care and dental care IS part of health care. Dental care should be covered too. These two articles discuss the link between dental health and medical conditions.

http://www.everydayhealth.com/dental-health/oral-conditions/oral-health-and-other-diseases.aspx

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/dental/DE00001/NSECTIONGROUP=2

Alderney said :

Jim Jones said :

john87_no1 said :

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

The same reasons my tax dollars get spent on lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private schools – personal wealth *shouldn’t* dictate distribution and accessibility of Govt funding/services.

+1

And all that aside. Even people who look after their teeth carefully need to visit the dentist sometimes.

Now, what was the last paragraph in the OP again?

But I don’t use your teeth, and the services on the Lower North Shore of Sydney, or anywhere for that matter, are available for the use of all.

Moreover, parents who send their children to private schools pay taxes for the upkeep of the public eduction system too.

One could argue until the cows come home about for what we contribute and what one uses.

My taxes contribute to lots of things I do not use and I dare say yours do too, so don’t play the cherry-picker with me.

My point is, that personal responsability has to come into it at some stage. If you want me to pay for your teeth, you can hold up your end of the bargin by doing your best to keep them healthy.

A further point is those on the lower end of the socio-economic ladder are in effect net taxation consumers whereas most on the upper end are net taxation contributors.

Think about that next time you stick your hand out of something.

Oh god please not another ‘my tax dollars’ rah rah rah ‘personal responsibility’ thing.

Just kill me before all the stupid rots my brain.

Excellent proposal, long overdue.

Gungahlin Al1:27 pm 02 May 12

quote comment=”403387″]This has always puzzled me.

Dental health is just as important as, well, any other health.

Denticare sounds eminently reasonable and sensible.

However, we have the ‘must be in surplus’ (TM) budget coming up so it won’t happen.

Indeed Thumper. And as this article on The Conversation today shows, poor dental care imposes substantial downstream costs on our community (read: tax base).

People will say we can’t afford it when the government is trying to return the budget to surplus. But the reality is that it would be an investment rather than an expense. Implementing this via this year’s budget would have negligible cost impact this year and for their beloved surplus.

I’ve helped on Greens’ stalls collecting petition signatures supporting this initiative and can say that almost everyone I spoke with signed up. It has almost universal support.

Jim Jones said :

john87_no1 said :

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

The same reasons my tax dollars get spent on lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private schools – personal wealth *shouldn’t* dictate distribution and accessibility of Govt funding/services.

+1

And all that aside. Even people who look after their teeth carefully need to visit the dentist sometimes.

Now, what was the last paragraph in the OP again?

But I don’t use your teeth, and the services on the Lower North Shore of Sydney, or anywhere for that matter, are available for the use of all.

Moreover, parents who send their children to private schools pay taxes for the upkeep of the public eduction system too.

One could argue until the cows come home about for what we contribute and what one uses.

My taxes contribute to lots of things I do not use and I dare say yours do too, so don’t play the cherry-picker with me.

My point is, that personal responsability has to come into it at some stage. If you want me to pay for your teeth, you can hold up your end of the bargin by doing your best to keep them healthy.

A further point is those on the lower end of the socio-economic ladder are in effect net taxation consumers whereas most on the upper end are net taxation contributors.

Think about that next time you stick your hand out of something.

Tetranitrate12:25 pm 02 May 12

Yay, the Greens actually pushing something sensible.
It’s very unfortunate that Dental has been effectively left out of the public health system, aside from a couple of tokenistic programs aimed at kids and centrelink recipients.
It’s a really important aspect of public health, and it’s one where prevention is significantly better than a cure. Its absence from government support is a massive hole in the system… a cavity if you will.

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

If you actually believe this is solely the issue and have put it into practice (I don’t need to go to the dentist, I brush and floss!) you should make a booking ASAP.
Plaque will gradually build up no matter how well you brush – you can only minimize it, which is why it’s recommended you go at the very least once a year and preferably every six months so buildup can be removed and any nascent problems identified.

random said :

I know someone who didn’t want to pay for a filling so they waited until it got sufficiently infected that it was done for free at the hospital.

(By which I mean: the rotten tooth and surrounding infected tissue was gouged out under general anaesthetic, an outcome both worse for the patient and substantially more expensive for the health system.)

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

Even if you’re not going to listen to bleeding heart leftists who don’t have talkshows on 2CA, you should be interested in this because you have to pay anyway. I know someone who didn’t want to pay for a filling so they waited until it got sufficiently infected that it was done for free at the hospital. The quote above says that 7-10% of GP visits result from untreated dental problems: your tax dollars, your overburdened health system.

Even if you look after your teeth, it’s valuable to have frequent checkups for a clean, polish and fluoride treatment as well as a quick check to see if something is wrong. Catch a problem early and it can be a small filling without anaesthetic.

john87_no1 said :

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

The same reasons my tax dollars get spent on lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private schools – personal wealth *shouldn’t* dictate distribution and accessibility of Govt funding/services.

+1

And all that aside. Even people who look after their teeth carefully need to visit the dentist sometimes.

Now, what was the last paragraph in the OP again?

Alderney said :

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

The same reasons my tax dollars get spent on lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private schools – personal wealth *shouldn’t* dictate distribution and accessibility of Govt funding/services.

It’s funny to me, how people will harp on about the inefficiencies of government, and the benefits of personal responsibility, free markets. Until the market prices them out. Aside from dental care, a similar thing is happening with childcare.

In fact, the free market approach would be reduction in barriers into the market—i.e. deregulate, encourage lower standards for dentist/dental aides to enter the market, so that they can do basic procedures at less cost. Or encourage the free market to make a buck—e.g. Flight Centre could create special medical tourism combo packages so that people can have their teeth done, a CT scan of their choice, the sights in Phuket and a prostate exam. Or Bunnings could sell teeth fixing epoxy and disposable tools.

If Denticare becomes reality, someone has to manage funding, prevent rorting (more public servants, can’t have that). Someone has to create schemes to encourage dentists to serve rural areas (more meetings, fundings, consultations, or transport assistance schemes for those in the rural). And then if scarce funding is reflected in long wait times (familiar), someone has to juke the stats to meet funding requirements (also familiar).

Essentially what is being proposed is that government act as an insurance company. I would benefit from Denticare, so that’s good. But that good, comes with the “bad” of more government intervention that is frequently complained about here.

As for those in the “centre-right”, some of those already look harshly on Medicare. e.g. NSW elected official: http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2012/02/medicare-the-loss-of-personal-freedom.html

Dental care IS expensive – having just recently had braces I can certainly testify to this! Surely basic check-ups every year should be covered at least?

Having the Greens suggest something that isn’t monumentally stupid is a shock to the senses.

Why do I have to pay for someone’s inability to brush their teeth and their desitre to eat s*** food until their teeth rot?

I know this argument could be extented to wider health issues such as, why should I pay for your inability to exercise and desire to eat s*** food until you’re the size of a house with all the health complications that go along with that, but teeth are bloody expensive and supply and demand will say more people making appointments at the dentist means longer waiting times and higher prices.

Unless that is only certain dentists will provide services to the great unwashed (sorry, lower North Shore of Sydney and Eastern Suburbs private school boy superiority complex coming out there).

Like most health-related issues, this is one where there is lots of room for a standoff between the Commonwealth and the states/territories, with the self-interested violins of the health funds and the dental lobby playing a support part amplified by media hysteria. . My recollection is that promises were made at one point but it probably became too hard.
The other complication is that, when there was a Commonwealth scheme to enable people with dental and other problems to get their teeth fixed, it had to be closed down because of reported wildly excessive overservicing and overcharging by some dentists. (See also the abuse of the Meducare safety net by some medical specialists). It would be irresponsible for any government – Commonwealth or state/territory, Labor or Coalition – to set up something that could be so easily rorted by the unscrupulous,
No, I don’t know what the answer is.

neanderthalsis10:11 am 02 May 12

I hate it when the Greens do something sensible,it offends my centre-right sensibilities.

Basic dental cover through public health makes sense. I had a colleague who headed to Thailand for major dental work simply because they were facing a bill of over 15k here for a number of root canals and crowns. The same cost under 10k in Chiang Mai including flights, accommodation and a decent holiday before the surgery.

I’ve always found it puzzling, I had to join private health care before being able afford basic dental care, I mean, I only joined the private health care to avoid a huge medicare bill, so I end up winning any way, but I can understand there is a lot of people who can’t afford either.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.