Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Business

Australia's tier 4 data centre. Micron21 mission critical hosting services.

You must be at least this smart to develop new theories of gravitation

By johnboy 8 May 2009 33

ANU informs us that the ANU Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, lead by Dr Helmut Jerjen, has debunked that hack, Sir Isaac Newton:

    “Our studies of satellite galaxies have revealed some astonishing phenomena,” said Dr Jerjen. “First of all, there is something wrong about their distribution. Standard Cold Dark Matter theory tells us the satellites should be uniformly arranged around their mother galaxy, but this is not what we see. In fact, they all lie more or less in the same plane – they are forming some sort of disc in the sky.”

    ….

    “A possible solution to this contradiction would be to reject Newton’s classical theory of gravitation. We might live in a non-Newton universe. And if this is true, then our observations could be explained without dark matter. This conclusion has far-reaching consequences for fundamental physics and for cosmological theories,” he said. “The Stromlo Missing Satellites Survey project at ANU will perform crucial tests to verify this subtle hint nature threw at us.”

I realise I am not a Doctor of Astronomy and Astrophysics. But I’d be having another look at the newer and less tested “Standard Cold Dark Matter theory” before worrying too much about living in a non-Newton universe.

Tags

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
33 Responses to
You must be at least this smart to develop new theories of gravitation
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Skidbladnir 11:07 pm 09 May 09

ScienceDaily has more of an explanation, and fewer disparaging remarks.

Bonn, Universitaet. “Study Plunges Standard Theory Of Cosmology Into Crisis.” ScienceDaily 5 May 2009
http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2009/05/090505061949.htm

Bundybear 7:37 pm 08 May 09

Nicely done Emlyn @ 21, proving my point beautifully. Did I dare to question the inviolable theory of climate change, better tell him to shutup quickly because he’s just wrong. I actually prefer Spectra’s idealism.

And in fact I didn’t question it, just an example of lack of open minded review IMHO.

monomania 5:10 pm 08 May 09

farnarkler said :

Why is there such curiosity about space, planets, stars, etc??? Yes it looks pretty through a telescope, yes there might be little green men out there and yes sometimes stars explode. The $6 billion already spent on Hubble could have funded quite a few hospitals in the US.

Of course the Hubble telescope was not only funded by NASA. The European Space Agency chipped in a bit.

The technology and medicine used in the hospitals are based on knowledge derived from pure research.

Skidbladnir 4:38 pm 08 May 09

farnarkler said :

Why is there such curiosity about space, planets, stars, etc???

Its a search for truth, and observation of (and research into) exotic phenomena can pay off dividends.
While its nice to be a shareholder in commercial research (_especially_ if you are a shareholder in a product that pays off big), pure research has unintended consequences in applied sciences and engineering, in that the scientific research requires better tools to have more precise and accurate observations, which in turn lead to more need for calculation, etc.

DARPANET wasn’t much more than a military research network originally, then it grew to eventually become used with US Dept of Energy, then CERN in Europe helped create the modern World Wide Web on it to facilitate research, and was still similarly academic when Australia first connected to it.
The Internet was the name of researching Out There.
The mankind-built Large Hardon Collider is an attempt to research down here on earth the things we’ve observed Out There and theorised about.

farnarkler 4:32 pm 08 May 09

Won’t happen in our lifetime.

peterh 4:29 pm 08 May 09

farnarkler said :

Is it though? Can you imagine the meltdown if we knew we were all going to die from a meteor impact. I would rather not know, look up and go “oh f…”

True, but the movie industry have already given us some really farfetched scenarios, like the sun expanding, etc.

peterh 4:23 pm 08 May 09

Emlyn Ward said :

Bundybear said :

…just making the point that your definition of science is a tad idealistic. I’m not sure all theories are subjected to this ongoing process of open-minded review, so much as the “Theory of biggest bucks/popular culture/loudest yellers/pushiest media becomes the accepted and if you don’t agree shutup”. Another good example is global warming/climate change.

Yes, “global warming/climate change” is another good example of observed facts being accumulated through experiment and observation into a theory.

Amazingly, scientists do not develop their theories according to your “loudest yellers/pushiest media” methods, because those are the methods of Dogma – usually religious – to push Opinions (such as Creationism/Flat-Earthism/Climate-Denialism) which are most certainly not science-based and hold no water in the world of science.

sorry, could you repeat that in smaller and easier words to understand?
lost me at dogma.

farnarkler 4:23 pm 08 May 09

Is it though? Can you imagine the meltdown if we knew we were all going to die from a meteor impact. I would rather not know, look up and go “oh f…”

peterh 4:21 pm 08 May 09

farnarkler said :

Why is there such curiosity about space, planets, stars, etc??? Yes it looks pretty through a telescope, yes there might be little green men out there and yes sometimes stars explode. The $6 billion already spent on Hubble could have funded quite a few hospitals in the US.

we have to be able to see what is coming, but we can’t move out of the way when it hits the earth. Nice to know when it is coming, isn’t it?

farnarkler 4:14 pm 08 May 09

Why is there such curiosity about space, planets, stars, etc??? Yes it looks pretty through a telescope, yes there might be little green men out there and yes sometimes stars explode. The $6 billion already spent on Hubble could have funded quite a few hospitals in the US.

Skidbladnir 3:59 pm 08 May 09

“Be smarter than Newton before daring to tell me he might be wrong!” is a really strong appeal to authority though, Jb.
Scientists can be, and frequently are, wrong.

Darwin helped refine evolutionary thought, but science moved on to the point that we started looking at chromosomes and inheritance as well. And yet, some people still refer to things as Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (and still call it Darwinism, strangely), even though is now been refined to a point far beyond what Darwin would recognise.

Back on topic though, good on Dr Jerjen for attempting to redefine the theoretical model.
Not being an astrophysicist either, if his work gets peer review, is procedurally reproducable, and the end result of which is that Newton’s more than three centuries old theory gets another update…

Good for him.

Emlyn Ward 3:21 pm 08 May 09

Bundybear said :

…just making the point that your definition of science is a tad idealistic. I’m not sure all theories are subjected to this ongoing process of open-minded review, so much as the “Theory of biggest bucks/popular culture/loudest yellers/pushiest media becomes the accepted and if you don’t agree shutup”. Another good example is global warming/climate change.

Yes, “global warming/climate change” is another good example of observed facts being accumulated through experiment and observation into a theory.

Amazingly, scientists do not develop their theories according to your “loudest yellers/pushiest media” methods, because those are the methods of Dogma – usually religious – to push Opinions (such as Creationism/Flat-Earthism/Climate-Denialism) which are most certainly not science-based and hold no water in the world of science.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site