4 December 2024

ACT Catholic schools show the way in My School rankings

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
87

St Clare of Assisi Primary School principal Matt Egan-Richards observes a Year 3 paired fluency lesson where one student reads a passage while a partner follows and provides help if needed. Photo: Kylie Coll/Catholic Education.

Catholic primary schools have dominated the top 20 places in the My School rankings for the ACT out today, attributing their success to the Catalyst explicit teaching program instituted three years ago.

The Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) My School website has been updated today with 2024 NAPLAN data and other school information for parents to view.

Its rankings are based on an Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA), which indicates the average educational advantage of each school’s students.

READ ALSO Parker quits UC, Barr proposes Auditor-General probe governance

Thirteen out of the 20 ACT schools are run by Catholic Education Canberra and Goulburn, which director Ross Fox said was an exciting endorsement of what their teachers and principals were doing.

Mr Fox said the overwhelming majority of CECG schools had embraced Catalyst, and they were now seeing the results.

“But we don’t think we’re finished in terms of the improvement we can pursue and the high aspirations we can have for students,” Mr Fox said.

“We’ve got access to other data that’s very encouraging about the impact on achievement we’re having in the early years, and we think over time we’ll see that advancement in learning consolidate and result in higher achievement in later years.”

St Clare of Assisi Primary School in Conder, which ranked eighth, started its explicit learning journey, including phonics, five years ago, but joined its fellow schools when Catalyst was adopted.

Principal Matt Egan-Richards said he had identified shortcomings in reading and writing, but since taking up a more systemic and high-impact approach, first with one program and then Catalyst, there had been a steady, although not always linear, improvement.

Mr Egan-Richards said that by the time kinder children got through to year three, teachers were finding they had a much higher skill base to work with.

“So we can spend more time on exploring other things and learning other things rather than having the biggest focus on learning literacy,” he said.

The school’s teacher-librarian had also reported a wider range of books being borrowed because children were keen to explore more challenging reads.

Mr Egan-Richards said there were also fewer behavioural issues in the classroom due to a more structured approach and settled routine, and children having learning success.

He said revision also played an important role in the school’s learning approach.

“Part of what we do now is we’re very aware that you can’t move on until you’ve revised it, touched over it, reviewed it several times,” Mr Egan-Richard said.

That process occurred with decreasing frequency over the year.

Mr Egan-Richards praised Catholic Education for its research, curriculum materials, and support from external coaches.

“It’s great to have people who are knowledgeable and experienced and know the research to come in and actually spend one-on-one time with our teachers in our classrooms,” he said.

Teachers also worked collaboratively, discussing how their students were progressing, asking questions such as: what haven’t they learned? What do they need to learn? How are we going to make sure they learn it?

Mr Fox said the My School list reflected the improvement that CECG schools had seen, the engagement of its teachers in professional learning, their change to practice, the curriculum support put in place and the efficient assessment.

“So, yes, we’re making good progress in that way,” he said.

Mr Fox also noted the context of the My School list and the wide geographic range of the schools on it.

“I’m really excited that it’s not the community or the socio-economic background that should determine academic results. It’s the quality of the teaching. It’s the learning of the students,” he said.

Join the conversation

87
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

My daughter received a great education through both an independent school (Orana Steiner) until year nine then a large Tuggeranong Catholic College. Both schools at the time had highly committed teachers and the Principals had vision and focus. The result : she now has two degrees from ANU and a good well paid career ahead of her at the age of 25. My income taxes (as well as everyone else) provide the base funding for education for all students and I have topped that up to get the additional resources to give my daughter and other students at her school to improve. As for references to sky fairies, yes, there was religious studies as part of the ATAR process but surprisingly not everyone that attended was Catholic or even religious. “We don’t really know the underlying reasons for Catholic school success, or even if they are successful at all.” The comment applies to the ACT education system since the ATAR rankings for Canberra schools are now difficult to find (please correct me if I am wrong). I respect that people are driven by ideology but they should try not to let emotive prejudices colour their argument. Since many detractors are opposed to the sky fairies I offer up, May the Force be with you.

Logicalusername2:12 pm 05 Dec 24

A long, long time ago in Canberra, as a year 5-6 we had to learn about:

• Natural selection
• Human body language
• How the parliament runs
• Multiculturalism – Refugee arrivals from Lebanon, SE Asia and the European commie
world were ramping up
• Basic marketing
• Intense reading for 30 minutes every day
• And more as I have forgotten, oh yes drama

Every morning all years 4-6 did half an hour of an early form of Aerobics on top of the long ride to school, T-Ball/Newcome ball/Dodge Ball/netball/soccer/athletics and other sports, not including out of school sports.

The above was on top of the normal curriculum, lots of fun for everyone.

The opposing Catholic School were more into math and English, grey uniforms and picking fights with our school. Now it looks to have flip flopped. My kiddies learnt math, English and first nations study….from a local government school.

I think you’re getting a little confused or you’re trying to compare 2 completely time periods. All schools in Australia have to follow the same National Curriculum. There will of course be some differences around the edges but the content itself is the same. The Catholic kids will of course have additional content added about the magical sky-fairy that lives in the clouds and (I don’t know this for sure but assume) they sit through some kind of indoctrination about why some man who lives in a tiny nation-state inside Italy, knows best, and is the best person to bank all their money.

Logicalusername8:36 pm 05 Dec 24

Differing time periods that’s for sure, we learnt so much more back then, even some green issues. Huge money being a Cardinal in the Vatican, should have been a priest out of school:)

And once again Tuggeranong public schools consistently fill the bottom rung of educational performance in the ACT, even when taking Socio Economic Score into consideration.

The Education Minister hasn’t been properly targeting her limited education budget to the schools in need for over a decade. I challenge anyone to visit a South Tuggeranong High School and consider it to be a well resourced school with adequate facilities, teachers and support.

Much depends on the teachers, the principal and the way the school is run.

I’ve seen the best in public schoolos and was lucky enough to attend one of those, as well as the worst. My progress very much depended on the quality of the teacher in working with kids. I’ve seen the same issue with Catholic schools.

One of the advantages of having to move frequently is the ability to see many options and their success/failure as well as why.

I’d like to know how good these schools are at dealing with neurodivergent children and parents, as I’m seeing some problems in this area in public schools, perhaps because of staff shortages and under-funding, but also because of a lack of training and understanding of neurodiversity.

ACT Catholic schools have around 1 in 6 kids on personalised learning programs, which I believe is the terminology for addressing the education of kids who are neurodivergant, have ADHD or are physically or mentally disabled.

As for underfunding, whenever I’ve looked at the funding levels for nearby public and catholic primary schools, the public schools have been operating on more funding per student. Also, it should be noted that the ACT is the only jurisdiction to fund public schools over the resourcing standard. If you’re seeing shortages and shortcomings, I think the question should be asked of the minister as to where the money’s going if not to providing the staff and training required.

Capital Retro1:37 pm 04 Dec 24

Amazing what a bit of divine intervention can do.

It wouldn’t be hard to beat the public schooling system. Designed in Prussia to fail people from the start and exported to the West by the likes of John Dewey – who literally wanted to transform America into the Soviet Union – what use is it, I ask you, in knowing how to think to those who want to instil radical collectivism?

Public schooling: yet one more thing in society that’s not an unquestionable good.

Great story. Completely inaccurate in just about every aspect you mention but it’s still a great story.

These results may well be very good. There’s no way of really knowing though. The Catholics have consistently refused (explicitly and/or implicitly) to provide certain data. One metric is exclusions and expulsions. Public schools are required to provide this data in a timely manner and its published openly. Catholics…not so much. For all we know they’re expelling students who aren’t performing to a certain level. Also, enrolment is via (among other things) ‘Interview with Principal’ who decides whether a particular student is enrolled in the first place – public schools must enrol a student if they live locally.

Important points to consider. Thanks Paul.

How shocking, remove the government from the equation and things improve….

Stop public funding private schools and direct the money to government schools and things improve…

Every school child shoyld get the same amount of government funding.

If their parents then decide to top up that funding to provide more facilities, that’s up to them. This constant whine about public funding of private schools is ridiculous. It’s akin to saying people who have private health insurance shouldn’t be allowed to use Medicare.

No they shouldn’t.

Your opinion, as usual, is wrong and irrelevant.

Seano, Catholic schools are not like Grammar or Radford. They often operate on less money per student than ACT public schools, even with the school fees. Also, ACT public schools are not underfunded. They are funded above the standard resourcing level and the ACT is the only jurisdiction that funds to that level. However, ACT public schools are still producing education outcomes that significantly lag peer schools interstate, despite those other schools having lower funding levels.

The Canberra Liberals proposal for education reform in ACT public schools as released in 2021 was modeled on the Catholic catalyst program. Your beloved Labor-Greens government rubbished it for 3 years until finally agreeing to an inquiry to find out why our public schools were performing so poorly. The findings largely reflected Liberals policy. Labor finally saw the light, but then said they’d only half fund it. Most of the money was to come from within the existing budget, but they declined to reveal what they were cutting.

So it’s not just a matter of throwing more money at ACT public schools, but ensuring there is a minister and directorate that is leading public education in the right direction rather than into the wilderness. Now that the government has been returned, it remains to be seen if there will be any real energy expended in getting ACT public schools back on track. Unfortunately thousands of ACT public school kids have already been left with lesser educations thanks to the decisions of the ACT government, as endorsed by the majority of the electorate.

I didn’t say anything about Catholic or other religious schools Garfield. I can see how it’s problematic not to fund them to a certain degree. Far less public money should go to private schools.

As for “above the standard resourcing level” get a grip. The P&C at our local public school had to fundraise to get air con in some classrooms meanwhile private schools are putting in taxpayer-subsidised lavish facilities. Public schools struggle with to afford the support staff for kids who need remedial help while taxpayer-subsided private school kids want for nothing.

You can pretend it’s a fair and equitable system, but it demonstrably isn’t. Why are battlers who haven’t got it subsiding rich people don’t need it?

“Your beloved Labor-Greens government”….where have I defended the government? Again, get a grip.

I’m ignoring Ken who is clueless as always.

Huh? All schools in Australia, including the Catholics, are following the same National Curriculum

All schools in Australia follow a National Curriculum so I’m not sure that you can validly talk about the removal of Government. Funnily enough though you are 100% correct though – the Catholics have consistently refused to comply with certain transparency provisions requested by government so who the **** knows what they’re doing on some measures.

Seano, the terminology “private” schools generally refers to all non-government schools. You may want to use “independent” in future if you want to make it clear you’re not including catholic schools.

Maybe instead of beloved I should have written preferred in relation to the ACT government. Your posts seem to regularly side with them and I don’t remember ever reading one where you’ve agreed with the Canberra Liberals. Apologies if I missed it.

With a school system that’s more expensive than any of the states, lacks the regional and remote communities to service and still produces substandard education results – if your school isn’t adequately funded why aren’t you holding the minister’s feet to the fire in a quest for answers? Also, did you make the choice at the recent ACT election to support the party promising to fully fund the needed education reforms in our schools and promising more for school infrastructure? If not, I’d suggest you’re like Bob from one of the Liberals advertisements – complaining about the government in between elections while refusing to support the alternative.

We don’t really know the underlying reasons for Catholic school success, or even if they are successful at all. The Catholics are notorious for failing to provide certain data that we take for granted from public schools. Expulsions from the system? Exclusions from the system? Data on what students are enrolled and what students are rejected?

“Maybe instead of beloved I should have written preferred “…maybe you should stop assuming because you have a rusted-on preference.

The fact that the ACT Liberals aren’t fit for government doesn’t mean I like Labor or Barr.

I’m ignoring the rest of the drivel it’s all assumptions attacking my politics which you know nothing about. It says a lot more about you than it does me.

I don’t support private schools being funded with public money. But I accept there is an argument for religious schools to a point.

All Australian kids deserve a quality education not just those with rich parents. I don’t accept the BS that public schools are adequately funded. Not when we’re sending kids to high school who can’t read while private schools build taxpayer subsidised sports complexes.

Wow! I didn’t realise how incredibly influential the Catholic Canberra-Goulburn people were! To think that ‘Catalyst’ has led the way in an international push towards more explicit learning etc. Impressive!

Explicit teaching of base level skills and phonics has been well known to be best for learning for decades, but it’s taken a very long time to get teachers and education directorates across Australia to consider changing what they were doing, even though it wasn’t working.

Our ACT government has been slower than most. That goes to the nature of Barr and his mob. They are very slow to accept the science on anything, preferring to do what they want rather than what is best for Canberrans. Teachers’ unions here are very influential, more so than parents and students except at election time.

pink little birdie12:04 pm 06 Dec 24

I’ve been questioning the minister on a monthly basis and going through all the right channels and it has been 6 months for basic infrastructure at our public school and the best they have done is within this electoral term (seperate election promises from both parties) – despite the current facilities is insufficient and basically a whole half being unable to be used for 12 weeks.

Our new principal has done wonders but there are other public schools who need new roofs, toilets, heating and cooling – Absolutely no ACT govt funding should be going towards non public sector schools for anything aside from essential facilities (and they can join the queue with other schools) while public schools need these facilities.

I got my ideal candidate mix in my electorate.

Wanting to remive funding from a childs education because you are upset their parents have more money than you is an all new level of petty and pathetic.

That’s not the argument being made Ken, it’s a puerile deflection and therefore can be dismissed.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.