1 March 2025

Canberra's newest magistrate 'delighted and deeply grateful' to be joining the bench

| Claire Sams
Join the conversation
24
woman in white jacket

Amy Begley will join the bench from March 2025 as a new magistrate. Photo: Legal Aid ACT.

Amy Begley is set to join the ACT Magistrates Court from March, bringing years of “considerable and diverse experience” to the bench.

“I am delighted and deeply grateful for the opportunity to serve the Canberra community in this role,” the incoming magistrate said.

Ms Begley brings extensive experience in legal practice, having most recently served as the Head of Practice for Early Intervention Legal Practice at Legal Aid ACT.

In this role, she was responsible for the leadership, management and strategic direction of various services, including the Family Violence and Personal Protection unit, Family Law Duty Service, and the Health Justice Partnership.

READ ALSO Coalition talks more about APS job cuts as election announcement gets closer

ACT Attorney-General Tara Cheyne welcomed Ms Begley to her new role.

“I am very pleased that a legal practitioner of Ms Begley’s calibre will join the ACT Magistrates Court,” the Attorney-General said.

“She brings considerable and diverse experience to her new role, having worked in a range of roles within the ACT’s justice system.”

Ms Begley will start in her new role on 17 March 2025.

She will replace Magistrate Robert Cook, who was appointed in September 2013.

Magistrate Robert Cook.

Magistrate Robert Cook speaking at an event in 2021. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Ms Begley has a strong background in family violence law, having previously served as the Head of Practice of Legal Aid ACT’s Early Intervention Legal Practice.

She has also worked as a prosecutor at the ACT Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, where she conducted trials, appeals, and summary hearings in both the ACT Supreme Court and Magistrates Court.

The new magistrate holds a Bachelor of Laws, Bachelor of Arts, and Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice from the ANU, where she has lectured over the past decade in criminal and evidence law.

She was admitted to practice as a barrister and solicitor in the ACT in 2006.

READ ALSO ‘There’s only one truth’: Fresh call for information on third anniversary of Queanbeyan man’s death

In a statement, ACT Bar Council President Brodie Buckland congratulated Ms Begley on her appointment on behalf of the organisation.

“Ms Begley will bring a range of relevant experience to the role of Magistrate having worked across diverse backgrounds and subject matters, including having worked as a prosecutor at the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions office,” the statement said.

The last magistrate to be appointed was Alexandra Burt, who commenced in January 2024.

Join the conversation

24
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Heywood Smith12:18 pm 04 Mar 25

Easiest job in the world, just need to grant everyone bail.

Harsher punishments don’t deter crime and may make things worse in many situations.
https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2020/07/do-harsher-punishments-deter-crime

And before the usual intellectuals *cough* start yes some violent criminals have to be locked up and yes sometimes the judiciary may get things wrong.

But if the goal is to reduce crime “lock em up” is not an effective solution and we are lucky to have an independent judiciary that assess cases on their merits and the law and come to sensible decisions that seek to break the cycle of crime and punishment.

Seano or should I say Shaneo (you sound like rattenbury)… easy to say when your house hasn’t been entered and robbed while you sleep by degenerates on bail. Easy to say when a loved one hasn’t died because bail was granted. Need I continue? Do you understand where the resentment comes from?

It’s got nothing to do with Rattenbury and it’s a sign of a weak argument that that’s where you start.

The fact is the cycle of crime is usually worsened by prison. There is a tonne of evidence for this.

And I complete agree that people have been the victims of crime have the right to be upset. But much of the commentary on here is the usual reactionaries who aren’t interested in solutions that lessen crime and result in fewer victims of crime as a result.

You allude to the ideals of restorative justice and rehabilitation as opposed to incarceration. But where are the services? Where is the funding? As our population has grown, our police force has not. Someones idea that catching criminals increases the stats on crime and doesn’t rehabilitate. You would think that extra funding to law enforcement might be diverted to rehabilatative services but I can’t find any evidence of this. Instead of trying to defend our magistrates, point people in the direction of those truly responsible. The beautocrats that refuse to build a community sector capable of intervening and rehabilitating.

A fair comment but you’re asking for a depth of response and analysis seemingly not required of the “lock em up” crowd who have universally and incorrectly assumed that incarnation is the solution rather than a cause.

These same people would also be apoplectic at any suggestion of better funding for restorative justice services.

But I am happy to point out flawed logic and defend the magistrates because they’re by and large doing a difficult, important, necessary and good job regardless of funding issues and despite the selective outrage over incompletely understood and/or cherry picked cases.

if pointing out flawed logic causes someone to think more deeply then great, if not well it’s not my job to hold the hands of the dim.

Am I right in thinking we now only have one male magistrate?

Canberras magistrates are soft on crime and repeat offenders. I suspect she will continue the trend. Time for the Auditor General to examine Canberra’s court processes.

Any proof of this claim?

Heywood Smith12:22 pm 04 Mar 25

Um, the simple fact that alot of people getting arrested on many occasions are reportedly already on bail, strict conditions etc.

Opinion is not fact nor proof.

Judges should be elected.

We give tenure to these people, and most of them really don’t meet community expectations in sentencing. As it is, there’s absolutely no accountability for the pathetic sentences given, and the continual bailing of repeat offenders who then go on to repeatedly breach bail.

At least if they could be booted out after 4 years or something, they might consider the safety of the community they are supposed to serve, instead of the welfare of criminals.

If sentences should meet “community expectations’ as you appear to understand them, then why bother with magistrates when you can have a lynch mob?

It is one of Australia’s virtues that it has an independent judiciary, unelected, interpreting law but not making it. We already have elected parliaments, which I must now presume that you love, making the laws you also love.

No they shouldn’t.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.