2 September 2024

Cycling's dark knights need to see the light before it's too late

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
320

That’s better. Drivers need all the help they can get to spot cyclists. Photo: Pedal Power ACT.

It’s pretty well accepted that white cars are the least likely to be involved in an accident and that black cars are the most likely.

You can probably put grey (sorry, silver) in the latter category as well.

Why?

Because they tend to blend into the road background, and of course, at night, they are just so much less visible.

So why do some cyclists, aka vulnerable road users, persist in trying to be the dark knights of the road?

READ ALSO Paddle boats are coming back to Lake Burley Griffin in a big way

Recent experience has put the wind up me and I’ll do what cyclists tend to say and try to be more alert for their presence.

But in the flat light of a Canberra morning or evening, try picking up a small, thin fast, fast-moving black or grey object heading towards you in a cycling lane while you’re waiting for a break in the traffic to turn into a busy road.

“Where the f… did he [it’s mostly he] come from?” That’s accompanied by a cold sweat as the sliding door possibility of that close encounter sinks into your adrenalised brain.

Not only was the cyclist on a black bike but clad in black from head to toe. The blinking red rear light is irrelevant from front on.

Not a skerrick of colour, high viz or something to contrast with the tarmac.

There are plenty of kaleidoscopic and hi-viz kits out there that are for day and night, city and country travel, and plenty of cyclists do like to be seen.

But lately, I’ve noticed – and maybe it’s winter – a hardcore of two-wheelers who seem to prefer stealth mode.

Cyclists will argue the studies on this are inconclusive and that it’s motorists who need to keep a proper lookout, but a bike rider does not have a margin for error if something goes wrong.

We’re all best served by being defensive on the road and ready for the unexpected.

There is an unwritten hierarchy on the road from biggest to smallest. When I’m driving, trucks tend to be given a wide berth and generous leeway. Given the size ratio and damage that can be inflicted, it’s just the prudent thing to do. Arguing ‘but I was in the right’ from a hospital bed is no comfort.

Go to a building site and yellow is a favoured colour for good reason. Tradies aren’t really worried about looking uncool. A bit more of that OH&S spirit would go a long way.

So here’s the deal. I’ll keep tuning my radar for cyclists – ok, scooters too – and argue for more separated bikeways if you’ll come over from the dark side and find some colour, reflective material, lights, anything so you don’t vanish and reappear suddenly before it’s too late.

By the way, I’ve driven a white car for decades. They’ve served me well.

Join the conversation

320
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

This is not theoretical. Every year, Canberran cyclists lose friends and family to local vehicles. I am one and know several more. Tragically, most of our cyclists don’t die at dusk or in the rain but in broad daylight, while cycling lawfully. If you want to know what to blame, it’s not dull colours in dim light but close passing, inattention, and illegal phone-use while driving.

Like other cyclists I’m also a driver, and as a driver I sometimes wish that some dark cars were brighter at dusk, that some turned their headlights on sooner, and that some dark-clad cyclists were dressed brighter too, or had lights and used them. Like other drivers I sometimes shudder in horror at the risks — and I have more reason than most to do so, since I had to endure my late wife dying in my arms. But brighter colours aren’t an effective safety policy — that idea is just a fig-leaf. We either need less road-sharing or safer drivers.

However, controversial fig-leafs can make cheap clickbait for lazy journalists, which I suppose is why we’re here yet again. Why not research and report on effective road-sharing safety policies instead of cherrypicking?

“Cyclists will argue the studies on this are inconclusive….” Sure, try telling that to all the workplaces that insist their employees wear hi-vis whenever they’re near moving vehicles, or perhaps try convincing the armed forces that it doesn’t matter what colour clothing you wear. I too cannot comprehend the number of cyclists whose lives are apparently not worth the $30 a cheap set of lights might set you back.

Incidental Tourist8:33 am 05 Sep 24

Regular commuting cyclists have been well equipped with high visibility vests and flash lights. It is mostly teenagers who ride in the dark without flash lights.

If your vision isn’t good enough to see other road users then maybe you shouldn’t be driving. Try a bike instead – less of a risk to everyone else.

I would have thought that wearing hi-viz (Hey! People…. The message is in the name of the gear!) was a BETTER way to avoid being hit by even those who aren’t looking!

It doesn’t appear to be.

And a lot of motorcyclists think it’s cool to wear dark colours.

…as do pedestrians walking on shared paths

Kent Ireland10:40 pm 02 Sep 24

Maybe car drivers could be better, but it’s human nature to be fallible. As cyclists, we just don’t register as easily to car drivers on the road. All we can do is reduce our risk as much as possible, by being as visible as possible. High vis vests are fairly cheap, I even stumped up for the slightly more expensive zipper one from REA. Apparently biomotion triggers are also more registerable, so high vis around ankles and knees, highlighting your biomotion are better than a vest on its own.

40 plus years of cycling to work.
I’ve embraced fluro, lights on during the day and cycled defensively. When in doubt, I ride cautiously. And still too many times it’s a near miss and a “sorry mate, I didn’t see you” , When I see a rider in black/ dark clothes and no reflectors or poor lighting a part of me dies The onus is on the vulnerable road user to make themselves visible. Being in the right is not a shield from foolishness. Protect your selves and be vigilant.

Try going into a bike shop and getting road bike clothes in anything other than dark colours.

Here we go. Let’s hear it all again for the billionth time.

tom anderson3:12 pm 02 Sep 24

Totally agree Ian with what you have said here. They put the begessers up you when you are suddenly confronted by a cyclist clad in black just in front of you and like you I drive a white car.

Just as helmets are a requirement, so should hi viz or night reflective vests or at least a strap. The number of bike riders who go around in dark clothing is ridiculous.

Think how stupid the average car driver is – half of them are stupider than that.

I have cycled almost every day in Canberra for 30 years. I wear ridiculously courful clothes, with hi-viz jerseys, socks and reflective jackets. At night I’m lit up like a Christmas tree, 1000 lumens in front, 400 lumen our back, spoke lights and side lighting. During the day I run flashing amber running lights.

And STILL, I have close calls with idiotic car drivers every week.

If Mr Bushnell is truly concerned about cyclist safety, as he pretends to be, he would be far better off addressing car drivers and their attitudes. I suggest he dons all the high-vis gear he wants and spends a week or two on a bicycle on Canberra’s roads. He might learn who the real threat is.

Think how stupid the average cyclist is – half of them are stupider than that!

And just because you stick a bunch of lights on yourself doesn’t mean you don’t then ride like an idiot and put yourself in dangerous situations. Much like people who “always get tailgated”, if it happens all the time, the problem just might be you.

Victim blaming at its finest. Not addressing the argument I made.

I work in a trauma operating theatre. I see car crash victims (drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians) every day. The issue is car drivers driving dangerously.

I have cycled in many places in the world – Japan, Europe, Alaska to Mexico. The most inconsiderate and dangerous drivers are in Australia, in my experience.

The only “dangerous situation” that I put myself into is driving on roads, those roads that my taxes paid for and I have a legal right to ride on.

“The issue is car drivers driving dangerously”
This is a very one eyed view Mr Gasman.
You don’t address or even acknowledge the “cyclists riding recklessly” side.
My comment simply addressed your generalist comment regarding stupid drivers (quite clever really) with an equally offensive rebuttal mimicking your own words with cyclists being the party being generalised.
Who is in the right and who is in thw wrong is an age old debate…. unfortunately

Refusal to take any responsibility for your own safety like a toddler.

I din’t care where you work. If you put yourself in dangerous situations, that’s your own fault. I have a “legal right” to do a heap of stupid stuff too, but I don’t, because doing so is likely to get me killed. That “legal right” win’t do you much good from the grave.

Gasman you’ve raised the exact reason why Canberra’s shared cycle/pedestrian path system is in place. You can cycle safely on them without any threat of car drivers being blinded by your lumens.

Cyclist in the wrong – cyclist gets hurt or dies
Car driver in the wrong – cyclist gets hurt or dies

There is a HUGE imbalance of power in the car/cyclist interaction. With that power come much greater responsibility.

I don’t think you read my comment very carefully.

Where I work is not the point. The point is that I see broken car crash victims every day. Bad driving is endemic in Australia – its the second biggest cause of life-years lost.

I don’t do “stupid stuff” as you put it. I take extra care, extra lights, extra visibility, extra caution, because I know that the next car driver I encounter might do the most stupid thing possible.

Safety begins with yourself. You only need to look up WHS and the number one rule is that safety begins by ensuring your own safety first. This should also apply when you’re not at work. Don’t expect other people to be responsible for your safety before their own. The hi-vis shouldn’t just apply to cyclists, it should also apply to early morning/late night joggers and walkers as well…

Literature on “inattentional blindness” offers insights into why drivers don’t see anything not in cars or trucks irrespective of hi-viz.
Further, analysis in the current Economist magazine highlights how growth in vehicle size over the years is compounding safety issues: “for every life that the heaviest 1% of SUVs and trucks save, there are more than a dozen lives lost ….”. Let’s incentivise people to use lower mass options and reduce the number of lethal large vehicles driven by people who’s ideas of invulnerability are compounded by their sitting high in a missile of steel. This won’t be by placing mandates on the victims.

You’re just not as good of a driver as you think, Ian.. You said it yourself, you’re searching for a break in traffic to turn onto a busy road… from other cars but not all road users. You have a bias that you’ve publicly shared and recognise is a problem for you – that’s a great first step. Now you know the next step is to keep an eye out at that and other intersections.

How dare you suggest cyclists take any responsibility for their own safety.

Why the sarcasm?

Because every time somebody suggests that cyclists do anything at all to minimise their risk of being killed, they all throw a tanty and demand that car drivers have sole responsibility for their safety. Usually with things like “I’m entitled to do X stupid thing!”. Yeah, you might be entitled to, but that won’t do you any good from the grave. Use some common sense like motorcyclists have been required to do forever.

As a cyclist I appreciate your considered response. I think you’re right that it’s well worth thinking about visibility. It made sense to me on a motorcycle and now on a pushy as well. Particularly having bright, visible lights at night. Yeah, everyone might not be looking and see you. But you’re helping the people that are looking and as you say being right is not much help from a hospital bed.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.