14 January 2025

Dozens of courses, 52 teaching positions to go in UC changes

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
29
University of Canberra building

The University of Canberra will offer fewer courses with fewer staff. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The University of Canberra will axe dozens of courses and 52 academic positions in proposals for a reduced but more streamlined offering as part of its plan to rein in spending and get its finances in order.

Its organisational change documents show all five faculties will be affected but Arts and Design, Health and Business, Government and Law will bear the brunt of the cost-cutting designed to take $50 million out of the university’s recurrent spending and get its budget back into balance by the end of the year.

In Arts and Design 13 undergraduate degree programs will go, with many of these to become majors in single entry point degrees, including Arts, Communications and Built Environment (architecture) degrees.

These and seven other programs have either been suspended or closed in the last year or will be closed in 2025.

Across the faculty, the net loss will be 13 positions.

The change documents say student numbers in the Faculty of Arts and Design have slumped since 2019.

In the School of Arts and Communication, the full time student load fell by 32 per cent between 2019 and 2024 while staff grew by six per cent.

READ ALSO Did Peter Dutton just call an election?

In the School of Design and Built Environment, enrolments have been flat since 2019, but staff numbers are up 38 per cent.

In Health, no degree programs will be lost but eight programs where enrolments have been low will no longer be offered, with the loss of 17 positions.

The Business, Government and Law Faculty will lose four undergraduate degrees, two undergraduate programs and 13 staff.

In the Canberra Business School, four degrees will shrink to just one, reflecting declining enrolments, while the offering in the School of Politics, Economics, Society will be halved to just one program.

Areas to be affected in Business include Events and Tourism Management, Accounting, Entrepreneurship, Urban Planning, Entrepreneurship and Banking, while in Politics, Economics, Society, it will be the areas of Sociology, Political theory, Socio-economic Modelling, Applied Economics and National Security and International Relations.

Law will only lose two research staff but electives will be consolidated, resulting in fewer units taught.

The Science and Technology Faculty will lose six positions, four through a spill-and-fill process.

In the School of Science, two of the four capability groups will be axed and two new capability groups formed, Foundation Science and Biomedical Science.

Nine positions are proposed to be cut in the School of Education.

The university had announced that up to 250 staff overall could lose their jobs. It has already identified 141 non-academic positions and is in the process of implementing those job cuts.

A UC spokesperson said there would be little or no impact for continuing students who would be able to complete their degrees.

“Courses identified for closure have not been open for applications and we have not made or accepted offers into these courses,” the spokesperson said.

Decisions to close courses were made following a review of student demand and in some cases industry feedback.

“In most cases, the courses had low enrolments for at least the past three years so UC does not expect to lose student load as an outcome of this process,” the spokesperson said.

“In 2024, we introduced 20 new or revised online courses in response to market analysis.”

The spokesperson said UC was taking all necessary measures to prioritise student experience and provide high-quality education and opportunities.

But National Tertiary Education Union ACT division secretary Lachlan Clohesy said the changes would damage UC, and students would feel the impacts through bigger class sizes.

Dr Clohesy said many individual subjects would be cut, but the details of that were not in the change documents.

“So you have big class sizes, you get less opportunity for consultation, less feedback on assessments, so it does have an impact on the student,” he said.

But the public should not lose sight of the root cause of UC’s predicament, which was poor governance, he said.

READ ALSO New boss of the Australian Cyber Security Centre named

“A lot of that is at the feet of [former vice-chancellor] Paddy Nixon, and we’re dealing with a lot of the consequences of that,” Dr Clohesy said.

“We can’t come out of this without addressing university governance.

“A lot of staff have the view that it’s not great we’re in this position, but let’s use this opportunity to make sure that we’re never put in this position again.”

New Vice-Chancellor Bill Shorten is due to arrive for the start of the semester in February.

Dr Clohesy said staff were optimistic that Mr Shorten would right the ship but “the proof will be in the pudding”.

He said Mr Shorten’s comments about forging a greater relationship with the Australian Public Service and specifically focusing on Canberra and the region were welcome.

However, he was likely to face more oversight and scrutiny from the UC Council in the wake of the university’s financial troubles.

Staff consultation on the change proposals closes on Friday 24 January.

Join the conversation

29
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Where did all the money go and why all the teachers in the first place and how is Shorten at $750k annually going to help.

As a UC alumni (actually, it’s first year as most on my degree was undertaken when it was named the CCAE), I’m disappointed to hear of such a magnitude of change. However, it’s perhaps unsurprising given what I hear from parents that kids of that age have no desire to continue onto higher education after college – indeed, many suggesting that they may not finish Year 12. Local intake numbers must therefore be decreasing, with demand for higher education potentially greatest from overseas.

I suspect that this merely reflects the perception and priorities of recent generations vs earlier generations, with a focus being on having a job as opposed to having a career. I’d be interested to hear other’s thoughts on this.

wildturkeycanoe11:39 am 14 Jan 25

StuartM, I suspect it’s economics. You can’t afford to study full or part time these days unless you are born rich, live at home with parents or work multiple jobs. It’s not even a choice for most whether to study or not, employment to pay for food and accommodation is the priority.

Capital Retro12:39 pm 14 Jan 25

It used to called Canberra University in the 1980s and my experiences there reflected it was a meeting place for public servants who needed a “piece of paper” to pursue a career in the public service.
The lecturers knew very little about what happened in the real world of the private sector.

Yeah, that’s valid to say. The kids I know who ARE going to university still live at home or have a scholarship.
It wasn’t an issue for me all those years ago (and now I feel old) because I had already started paid work and then decided to do my Degree part-time. It was a hard slog for a number of years, but at least I could fund it.

No, it was never called that – it was the Canberra College of Advanced Education (CCAE). I went there.
And that’s a very cynical view, CR. Sigh

devils_advocate2:48 pm 14 Jan 25

“You can’t afford to study full or part time these days unless you are born rich, live at home with parents or work multiple jobs. It’s not even a choice for most whether to study or not, employment to pay for food and accommodation is the priority.”

Lmao

Option B:
-Take out a HECS loan to fund courses
-work full time
-take on a full time study load with evening classes
-drink lots of coffee and energy drinks

Capital Retro3:31 pm 14 Jan 25

You are correct but it was sold as “Canberra University”. If you asked a taxi driver to take you to CCAE he would ask you what planet that was on. I never heard anyone refer to it as the CCAE.
My comment was cynical because it was there for public servants who got their fees paid for by the taxpayer and were given free work time to do their assignments.
What was the sigh for? Did I disturb your afternoon nap?

Shorten will fix it, just use the same NDIS model he was responsible for, and sunny days ahead

‘Reduced but more streamlined’ – is this a cut and paste from their media release?

So closing courses and shedding jobs can be wordsmithed into streamlined.

Almost sounds positively uplifting.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.