Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Daily flights from Canberra
to Singapore and the world

Exercise Ettiquette?

By MrMagoo 20 January 2011 31

Possibly like many of you, I regularly use LBG as an exercise venue, primarily to run around on the now excellent paths that have been laid. 

My question or ponderance is what is the ‘right of way’ when running around the lake?  (This will obviously have similar implication for LT and LG). 

My thinking is like the road, if you keep left then you should be OK.  However, some people seem to think the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. 

Or in other words they run as close to the lake as possible even if they are running the opposite direction to you. 

Running either clockwise or anti-clockwise I think should see you running/riding/roller blading on the left.  The new paths offer plenty of room for over taking and huts still have room for both directions of traffic.

Be interested in people’s thoughts.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
31 Responses to
Exercise Ettiquette?
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
thedarlings 5:18 pm 21 Jan 11

If a humble etiquette teacher might put in two cents’ worth, Mr Magoo I agree with you that it is etiquette (and also, I believe, the rules) for all traffic to keep to the left.

Good etiquette is based on common sense. It is sensible and polite for cyclists to let pedestrians know when they are coming (that’s what the bell is for but I’ve had cyclists shout ‘excuse me’ in a friendly way, and been perfectly happy about it), and for pedestrians it’s then sensible to keep firmly to the left, keep their dogs under control and allow the cyclist/jogger/faster walker to pass on the right.

We should always slow down to pass somebody – and never force another person off the path. (Well, obviously.)

If somebody is walking a dog it is a good idea to remember that whizzing by unexpectedly might freak out the animal, so it is better to slow down and let people know you’re coming – or else don’t be surprised if you get barked at. By the same token if you have a dog that might get freaked out and you know somebody is passing, it might be worthwhile moving off the path slightly to avoid problems.

And I always think if somebody has gone to an effort to do the right thing by you, a friendly smile or wave goes a long way.

Blossom Darling

georgesgenitals 3:34 pm 21 Jan 11

Like driving, a bit of common courtesy would go along way toward solving the problem.

Lin 2:47 pm 21 Jan 11

niknak said :

Lin said :

So I vote for a completely seperate footpath on that busy stretch that goes past the Gallery, etc. That would make everyone happy!

Your self-entitled atttitude and others like you means that other more reasonable and pedestrian-friendly cyclists are tarred with the same “cyclists suck” brush.

Whoop it on the tarmac, not the around the central basin.

Hehe, I’m trying to imagine myself ‘bombing about at 50km/hr’. I have been overtaken by joggers going uphill. (And they did NOT use their bell!!!) But why would you ask cyclists to ride the speed of your average mobility scooter? (or not much faster than a pedestrian)

Why would pedestrians object to a seperate footpath? How is that self-entitled? For all I care they can keep the shared path and they can make a seperate cycling path.

I just thought it would stop all the whingeing from both sides.

I’m a bit confused about why my post deserved such an aggressive response, but I will try not to lie awake about it…

niknak 2:21 pm 21 Jan 11

Lin said :

So I vote for a completely seperate footpath on that busy stretch that goes past the Gallery, etc. That would make everyone happy!

I vote that you ride on the road, not a shared use path if you want to bomb about at 50km/hr. Funnily enough, pedestrians are also trying to get from point A to point B.

Your self-entitled atttitude and others like you means that other more reasonable and pedestrian-friendly cyclists are tarred with the same “cyclists suck” brush.

Whoop it on the tarmac, not the around the central basin.

AngryHenry 1:26 pm 21 Jan 11

watto23 said :

Also the speed limit in the ACT is 50km/h and this applies to foot/cycle paths.

If there is indeed a 10km/h sign around the basin, then its not reasonable, because there are not enough signs. It would be easy to enter and depart the path there without seeing a 10 Km/h sign.

50 kph! For a footpath?!?!? Ridiculous…

I think you might be thinking of on road cycle paths.

A speed limit of 50kph on the path around the lake is one of the most stupid things I’ve heard this week.

I get out a fair bit, and work with some really stupid people so that’s saying something.

Erg0 1:04 pm 21 Jan 11

Lin said :

It is a cyclepath, not a footpath.

I don’t see the term “cyclepath” on the TAMS website – they refer to footpaths and “shared paths”. Presumably the path around LBG falls into the latter category, meaning that neither cyclists or pedestrians have the right to claim it based on nomenclature.

Lin 11:55 am 21 Jan 11

Genie said :

I have to admit I no longer walk around LBG because I got fed up with the cyclists thinking they own the footpath. It got to the point where I would actually walk on the grass next to the path where I could.

LG isn’t too bad with cyclists, those that I encounter while walking normally ring their bell on approach.

As for the speed limit being 50km… I’d be curious to see a pedestrian run at this pace.

It is a cyclepath, not a footpath. And I do know that all cyclepaths in the ACT are shared zones. I just think it’s a bit unrealistic and unfair to ask cyclists to ride that whole stretch at 10km an hour. I used to commute from Narrabundah to Civic or Lyneham and I would’ve been late for work every day if I had to ride that slowly. I don’t ride for recreation, I ride to get from point A to point B. I don’t ride fast at all, but 20kph is a pretty low average speed for most cyclists.

So I vote for a completely seperate footpath on that busy stretch that goes past the Gallery, etc. That would make everyone happy!

Genie 11:34 am 21 Jan 11

I have to admit I no longer walk around LBG because I got fed up with the cyclists thinking they own the footpath. It got to the point where I would actually walk on the grass next to the path where I could.

LG isn’t too bad with cyclists, those that I encounter while walking normally ring their bell on approach.

As for the speed limit being 50km… I’d be curious to see a pedestrian run at this pace.

watto23 11:03 am 21 Jan 11

Its actually an offence for a cyclist to
A) not have a bell or horn fitted to the bike and
B) not to use it to warn others they are overtaking

Also the speed limit in the ACT is 50km/h and this applies to foot/cycle paths.

If there is indeed a 10km/h sign around the basin, then its not reasonable, because there are not enough signs. It would be easy to enter and depart the path there without seeing a 10 Km/h sign.

deye 1:16 am 21 Jan 11

niknak said :

My experience is that many cyclists do not realise the speed limit for traffic – inclduding bikes – on the path around the central basin is 10km/hr.

Admittedly there are very few signs and some cyclists probably miss the big black 10 inside the big red circle as they whizz by at 40km/hr on a busy, not-very-wide, shared-use path. Blind freddy could see that if speed was the order of the day, the Central Basin loop is an unsuitable venue.

I’ve walked, rollerbladed, ridden and photographed around that area many times, but I don’t recall seeing a speed sign anywhere. Where is it ?

As for the OP, keep left and don’t spread across the path, or if you do move aside when someone approaches.

screaming banshee 10:57 pm 20 Jan 11

To the lycra clad cyclists:
– Its not a velodrome
– Yelling BIKE! is rude, use your bell

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site