Gentleman’s unjustified hospital call-in has to be stunt

Ian Bushnell 8 August 2021 16
Mick Gentleman

Planning Minister Mick Gentleman announces the Canberra Hospital Expansion approval. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

The Canberra Hospital Expansion project has been a long time coming, but last week’s intervention by Planning Minister Mick Gentleman was a curious affair.

A 2016 election promise, the project previously known as SPIRE, has had its fair share of delays and controversies, but with the DA finally in and contractor named, there had been no hint that a start would not be made as expected later this year for a 2024 finish.

Yet, Mr Gentleman seemingly took it upon himself to use his call-in powers to cut short the planning authority’s usual assessment process and wave the DA through.

But when pressed about why the sudden haste or how much time his intervention will save, the Minister could only say he wanted to ensure the project got underway in a timely manner.

It would only start “a little bit sooner” than if he had let the process run its course.


READ MORE: Gentleman calls in Canberra Hospital Expansion DA


There was no suggestion that the DA would be refused, or lengthy negotiations would be required or that it could end up stranded in the ACT Administrative Appeals Tribunal, a situation that might justify the Minister’s call for such an important piece of public infrastructure.

The DA had generated only nine representations, a product of the extensive consultation already undertaken, according to Health Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith, and Mr Gentleman said those concerns had been addressed.

The Notice of Decision says the key issues raised were parking, the siting of the building, landscape design, the level of health services and amenity, and access and wayfinding, some of which were outside the planning authority’s remit.

Mr Gentleman rejected assertions that the intervention undermined the approvals process, saying he had used the power sparingly or once a year.

That is true, but in those instances – the Manuka Oval Media centre, Dickson shops development and the Common Ground social housing project in Dickson – at least he could argue some need, urgency or time restraint.

This decision looks gratuitous; a political stunt pulled to provide an ‘announceable’ to maintain the project’s momentum.

The only other reason could be to give the project a marginally greater chance of being completed by the next election in October 2024.


READ ALSO: Electric vehicle registrations in the ACT surge past 1000


The government has been consistently attacked for its management of the Territory’s health services, especially Canberra Hospital, by the Opposition and a former Labor chief minister, Jon Stanhope.

Mr Stanhope argues that under Andrew Barr, Labor has been underspending in health and that the hospital expansion will not provide sufficient capacity to match the ACT’s growth.

Labor will be striving for a seventh continuous term in 2024 and will want to have a number of big infrastructure projects on track, underway or locked away to make sure of it.

Maybe Mr Gentleman thought a helping hand would be good for Canberra – and his grateful party.

The ACT Greens oppose the use of the call-in powers, arguing that the proper public consultation and assessment processes should never be bypassed.

But maybe this is how the ACT Government rolls these days – acting with impunity, without evidence or argument and frankly dismissive when someone questions such an unwarranted intervention.

Mr Gentleman may disagree, but that’s what arrogance does.

His actions do undermine the planning approvals system and tarnish the call-in powers that should only be used as a last resort when a development of significance faces lengthy delays or the community is deadlocked.

There is still a long way to go in 2022. Mr Gentleman may yet rue using up his ‘once a year’ dip on a such a sure thing.

Unless, of course, there’s something he isn’t telling us.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
16 Responses to Gentleman’s unjustified hospital call-in has to be stunt
whatwik whatwik 3:58 pm 10 Aug 21

Yes, for a planned city that might have avoided the haphazard or devious development outcomes seen elsewhere, Canberra’s planning process has produced some shockers – that Magistrates Court monstrosity (I was talking only of the building, Your Honour) abutting Vernon Circle being one that has me shaking my head every time I drive past (a good case perhaps for successfully claiming to have been distracted from the 40 kph zone around the bend).

The only consolations are the Liberal Party cheer squad doesn’t get to whine about NIMBYs as often as it would like and that ‘development’ outcomes under a Liberal Party-dominated Assembly would be far worse.

Gabriel Spacca Gabriel Spacca 11:48 pm 09 Aug 21

This government has a long history of using the so-called call-in powers to circumvent proper planning scrutiny. This shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone.

Phil Andrews Phil Andrews 10:08 pm 09 Aug 21

That is the ACT planning system. If they Govt (or developers) don’t get what they want through the gazetted process, Barr & Co use the call in powers to achieve what they want. Look at the Dickson development, despite their own planning process, reviews, court action, they just did what they wanted in the end.

Allan Wilcock Allan Wilcock 9:59 pm 09 Aug 21

This ACT labour/greens government has to go. They are riding roughshod over us. Taxes, taxes and hidden charges in our rego and rates etc. It just has to end.

    Ray Zak Ray Zak 9:05 am 10 Aug 21

    Allan Wilcock You are correct in your summation of the ACT Greens government. Labor is now beholden to the Greens who are actually controlling the ACT. Rates increases plus the ones attached as levies which seem to pile up and even the small amounts add up. It is becoming difficult for low income earners and pensioners to survive the onslaught of government charges.Now they are going to spend $$$$ building another Rattenberry railroad to Woden, of course the hapless Canberran will be forced to pay for it even if one never travel on it. The disruption in the city will be horrendous and apparently the tram will take longer to the city than busses .Canberrans have been paying for the Gungahlin tram although most have never travelled on it.

m6447 m6447 1:19 pm 09 Aug 21

“But maybe this is how the ACT Government rolls these days – acting with impunity, without evidence or argument and frankly dismissive when someone questions such an unwarranted intervention.” Too right.

Jp Romano Jp Romano 11:11 am 09 Aug 21

No one who lives around the hospital should be shocked. You bought a house next to a hospital...

    Kyla Bilow Hunt Kyla Bilow Hunt 11:52 am 09 Aug 21

    Jp Romano Garren was built in the 60’s and the hospital opened in 73/74. 👀

Jp Romano Jp Romano 11:10 am 09 Aug 21

Government projects should not be subject to DA’s anyway.

    Marc Edwards Marc Edwards 11:43 am 09 Aug 21

    Jp Romano yes they should, any project that could have potential issues should be subject to a DA.

    Jp Romano Jp Romano 11:43 am 09 Aug 21

    Marc Edwards except it’s a waste of time. Because who approves the DA’s? The Government.

    Marc Edwards Marc Edwards 11:45 am 09 Aug 21

    Jp Romano yet the public should still have the same right to consultation and commentary for any DA that may affect them.

Dennis Yu Dennis Yu 11:01 am 09 Aug 21

This is the worst minister ever.

Shane Jasprizza Shane Jasprizza 9:47 am 09 Aug 21

Way out of his depth. Bowing to commercial interests?

Kyla Bilow Hunt Kyla Bilow Hunt 7:57 am 09 Aug 21

Not surprised. He is clueless on most issues. 🙄

Gai Wil Gai Wil 7:32 am 09 Aug 21

There was no consultation process. The first residents heard was a meeting where Ms Stevens-Smith TOLD us the site was decided, the entrance from a suburban street opposite a school was not up for negotiation. And like to Women’s and Children’s Hospital, it’s likely to be obsolete in size by the time it’s built!

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

 Top
Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site