7 November 2006

Interactive map of ACT Primary Schools

| aidan
Join the conversation
39

Using Google Maps you can design your own education system. Did the Stanhope Government get it right or wrong? Would they know if they had? Make your own mind up and decide which schools should stay and which should go.

Join the conversation

39
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Seepi I am sure you are correct about the historical reasons for the transport arrangements. It’s a factor that should be considered in the overall mix of school closure decisions.
Having read a couple of the published submissions I am even more baffled about the array of weird variants on proposed school structure, and the inconsistencies of availability of all these weird variants! Who on earth would want to send their child to a P-3 or a P-10?

Miz when I went to school in Woden, lots of Tuggers kids went to Woden as there weren’t many schools in Tuggers then, and once there were, kids continued to come to woden to go where their siblings had gone. The transport could be still a hangover from those days. (so it should be fixed, but it could be historical accident rather than conspiracy).

I went to Hackett. My cousin went to Watson and then transferred to Campbell.

It was a terrible 3-4 years. Which is why I am against closing Dickson – the inner north has suffered enough, not to mention the other communities who will suffer because of this crap policy.

Weston Creek also had a lot of schools close last time round, and now it’s full of old people. Its (and Woden’s) schools survive with Tuggers kids, this is why I hate this alleged ‘choice’ business, which is really a snob factor. We’d be better off with properly enforced zoning like in NSW, then we could properly see where the resources are really needed.

And I admit I’m a bit one-eyed about Tuggers! I just don’t want it to be consigned as a dormitory slum by the powers that be (most of whom seem to live on the Northside).

Cheers Aidan. Interesting comments though in AEU’s sub about the way school transport in Tuggers has been set up to favour transporting Tuggers kids to Woden! (Broadly speaking, public transport in a number of parts of Tuggers is far less than the services to Belco. I used to work at Defence Russell, and about five times as many buses would go from there to Belco than anywhere southside (admittedly this anecdotal, ie my perception at peak hour while I waited for my bus). I think it’s because most of Tuggers got ‘set up’ after self govt (apart from Kambah/Wanniassa which are almost as old as Woden). Hence it is not on par with other areas through no fault of its own. But ripping the heart out of it is NOT the way to fix these issues.

Kerces,

I was just trying to be comprehensive. Point taken.

Aidan, the high school that’s now the school of art was Canberra High, which has been in its current (bigger) site in Jamison/Macquarie for yonks. So it didn’t really close, just move.

Miz,

I think it looks worse for Tuggers because it hasn’t had any school closures up till now (as far as I know, correct me if I’m wrong).

The inner north has already lost Downer Primary, Hackett Primary, Watson High and the high school that is now the School of Art at ANU. Was there a primary school in Campbell too?.

Belconnen has already lost Page Primary (merged with Scullin to form Southern Cross, which is now being downsized to a P-3 .. wonder how long that will last), Charnwood High and Spence Primary (merged with Melba Primary to form Mt Rogers, and now proposed to close) and of course Ginninderra District High (though it is being replaced by a new P-10).

Woden I’m not so sure about, but Melrose Primary is an amalgamation of Chifley and Pearce Primary schools, and it is scheduled for closure too.

Belconnen and Tuggeranong are the two big areas as far as enrolments go so it isn’t surprising that these are the hardest hit areas.

Not counting preschools (as I can’t be arsed working it out) Belconnen is losing six Primary schools, with one downsizing (to P-3) and an amalgamation of a High School and College.

Tuggeranong loses five Primary schools and a High School.

Because they want the land.

Pretty simple.

The AEU report says the Inner North will have more 15-18 year olds (College age) than anywhere in Canberra except Tuggers in a couple of years, and gets a lot of local NSW kids as well – Sutton, Wamboin etc. So why would they close Dickson College????

The AEU makes reference to the absurd need for Gungahlin to have several K-10 schools and then a college in 2008/2009.

Kids from Isabella can use the underpass to get to Bonython, but I sure as hell wouldn’t want my kids walking under it.

Gungahlin will be the “new Tuggeranong” in a few years and considering Amaroo was built with aircon and Gilmore has portables is pretty pathetic.

miz, I did relief there years ago – after finished my degree.

Nice place. Went to China with a few of the staff from there too. Great ladies.

Fair enough seepi! You might be interested in this sub from the AEU which breaks down the issues region by region. http://www.aeuact.asn.au/Hot%20issues.htm (click on top hot issue)

Yeah Miz – the inner north gets all the good stuff – lovely airport noise, the dragway – the new quamby, and seven storey towers in the suburbs 😉 And they are closing the only College.

I gather that the plan is for all preschools to become part of primary schools, and those that aren’t are being shut. I can’t remember where I read that now though.

And what about pre-school resources? Parents have been investing in them for years. All the ed dept provide is the building, voluntary contribs fund everything else. How rude if they just ‘absorb’ them into another preschool.

Aidan, they seem to be really gunning for Tuggers. If I may comment, I have noticed a distinct northside bias from the Assembly for quite a qhile now.

Regarding Gilmore community, I am hoping the govt sees sense, seeing it is not meant to close till end 2007. I am also hoping they will actually read, and not simply dismiss, all the subs people have gone to the trouble to put together. Gilmore has valid case and it would be (dare I say ‘Wednesbury’?) unreasonable for it to be closed.

Simbo, true. But if the Feds carry on that it was for Kambah High and not any other. They could well take the things back.

It will be interesting to see what happens if the school closes.

Well, presumably a fair percentage of these Kambah students are going to end up at other public schools, should the school close down. So they’d still be getting the benefit of the machines if they were relocated. Just in another location.

The grant is Federal and for use by Kambah High. If it is closed, then the computers etc should be returned to the Feds.

Why should ACT Govt enjoy the “fruits of labour” by the staff of Kambah who applied for the grant FOR Kambah students?

Woody Mann-Caruso4:41 pm 08 Nov 06

Woody, Kambah High (ON THEIR OWN) applied for this FEDERAL grant.

If it’s between the school and the Feds, then the grant shouldn’t form any part of the Territory’s decision-making process about whether to close the school. It’s not like the Territory gave them $143,000 then shut them down.

They haven’t finished with school closures either.

Take a look at Tuggeranong. Now take out Richardson, Gowrie and Wanniassa Hills. No gaps eh?

These schools are projected to have enrolments of 140 (Richardson), 160 (Gowrie) and 290 (Wanniassa Hills, but Wanniassa will have only 185, so they will close one of the two).

Watch out Tuggeranong.

I dare say Weetangera could be in trouble too if it’s enrolment drops as the suburb is covered by Hawker and Macquarie Primary schools.

Woody, Kambah High (ON THEIR OWN) applied for this FEDERAL grant.

The ACT Govt has no say as to how the money is spent by the school.

Hell, if we want to get technical, the Feds could take the machines back if the school closes, as the money was solely for the use of Kambah High.

Personally, if I was Chief Numpty, I’d release Cook’s Federal funding too. They can’t deny the school the money they applied for and won fairly.

And if the school closures were done properly – all aspects – then you would have a decent argument. They weren’t.

Woody Mann-Caruso12:46 pm 08 Nov 06

Gee, what a waste of money….right Woody?

So long as they remain Territory assets and are transferred to a school that’s pulling its weight, I say it’s a great idea. And with the school closures, we’ll be able to afford even more computers!

Kerces, there’s also all the admin attached to moving files. It’s a bloody nightmare – I’ve done it.

It will take more than 9 days. Plus parents have to enrol – more paperwork, buy uniforms etc. They’ve also missed out on the book pack order form for the “new” school. Jacaranda will be more flat out this time than ever before (worked there too once).

simto, well they have to be consistent at something.

It said in the paper yesterday the final decision on closures would be announced on Wednesday December 13. Term ends on 22 December, so it’s not that much time for parents to scramble round finding new schools.

Ah, lovely. It’s wonderful to know that the screwed up process is going to be screwed up at every single stage. Consistency is a wonderful thing.

Simto, it won’t be known until the decision re: school closures is finalised for December.

I suspect that some DET staff will have their leave cancelled.

Nyssa, since you have contacts in DET, any idea whether leave plans have been curtailed?

Or haven’t the post-it-notes reached that point yet?

Simto, that’s the plan….well a patchwork of post-it-notes to be honest.

If they pull it off, it will mean DET staff working 24/7 to get it done over the Christmas break.

That timeframe’s quite optimistic, isn’t it?

Are we meant to be expecting that everything will be organised for Feb next year so that whatever schools are left standing will be fully ready to accept the additional student load?

Should be a laugh a minute come Feburary…

Kambah’s “unveiling” their $143,000 upgrade of computers (Federal funding) today as well.

Gee, what a waste of money….right Woody?

Simto, they’ll make the announcement in about 3-4 weeks (early December).

Well, students are still attending them until the end of the year.

On the other side of the coin, you would kind of expect them to have definatively announced the final list of what’s closing so that people can make suitable accomodations by now.

Woody Mann-Caruso9:16 am 08 Nov 06

Aren’t these bloody schools closed yet? What’s the hold up?

I’d like to know where the funding for ICTs that Cook got (Federal) is going to go – seeing as it is closing and the ACT Govt and DET won’t release it.

Any ideas?

Miz,

Unfortunately I think it is too late. They have a set of target schools and whatever they do they will only be closing/amalgamating those.

Gilmore is a weird case, as they are going almost entirely off enrolment projections, as currently it has high numbers. The large number of demountables doesn’t help, as it gives a misleading percentage capacity figure.

There is a very real possibility that Chislhom Primary will have to have demountables to cope with the influx of Gilmore kids. That is just nuts.

Having worked in the Dept last year and a friend does this year – we knew nothing about it.

With the new curriculum, school closures and amalgamations, ACT Govt Education is going to have no end of troubles.

I heard that the Dept was shocked at the policy turnaround too! I can kind of sympathise, they have had to implement this horror. What a mess.

I just love the comments by Barr re: enrolments being down for Giralang, Flynn, Kambah and one other school who I can’t remember atm.

The Census is in Feb and August. Does the fact that Towards 2020 was out in June mean anything to you Mr. Barr?

Of course it was the contributing factor in a drop in enrolments.

miz, when you rush a policy, like this one, there will be mistakes and errors.

They haven’t planned this well and the students of the ACT will be the real casualties.

Aidan, thank you. It’s very revealing. Hope they note your comment about Gilmore.

The irony for Gilmore community is that Chisholm Primary (which is rather unwillingly and disbelievingly having to amalgamate with Caroline Chisholm High) could easily go, when you look at this map.

Note here ( http://www.det.act.gov.au/publicat/pdf/census_gov_school_aug06.pdf ) that Gilmore and Chisholm have almost identical enrolments, Gilmore having had very few ‘dropouts’ because of the 2020 proposal. I think no one there can quite believe the Govt would be so stupid as to close it! I also think they have ‘forgotten’ that Gilmore the suburb is not equivalent to Gilmore’s PEA and there are many in its PEA who live in Chisholm, which is a very large suburb (some of Chisholm is also zoned Richardson Primary). God I hope they haven’t botched these PEA numbers up!

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.