Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Avani Terraces - Greenway
Life is looking up

Liberals to move no confidence in Stanhope

By Kerces - 14 February 2007 20

Bill Stefaniak has announced he’s made up his mind about what to do about Coroner Maria Doogan’s report into the 2003 bushfires.

First thing next Tuesday morning, the Legislative Assembly’s first sitting day of the year, he’s going to move a no confidence motion against the Chief Minister. Effectively this means the sitting agenda won’t get underway until the following week, as debate must be adjourned so members can consider the motion.

Mr Stefaniak does say that “the Opposition does not lightly move a motion of no confidence in a Chief Minister”, though it will handily give them all an extra week of holidays.

If the motion is passed (unlikely, with the majority government), convention requires the Chief Minister to resign.

Interestingly, Jon Stanhope has moved the most no confidence motions in the Assembly’s history; being three against Kate Carnell. She resigned before the last of these could be debated.

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
20 Responses to
Liberals to move no confidence in Stanhope
Thumper 8:16 am 15 Feb 07

She was in charge VY.

Buck has to stop somewhere even if she was coerced by an over zealous public service looking to save a quick dollar.

VYBerlinaV8 now_with 8:11 am 15 Feb 07

Kate laid the charges and pressed the button did she? Or did overzealous public accountability requirements (buy the CHEAPEST, dammit!), result in a contractor being selected that was inappropriate for the task?

I’m all for public accountability, but the value equation gets lost very easily.

Thumper 8:03 am 15 Feb 07

Futto,

Calamity Kate did blow up a hospital with slightly disasterous results.

Thumper 8:01 am 15 Feb 07

I’m interested to see which way Foskey votes.

Ten to one she won’t support the motion.

Not that it matters as none of the government members have the guts to actually do anything. Nope, they’ll hide behind statements such as, ‘Its time to move on’, and ‘we must now learn from the past and look to future’.

What a crock of shit. If Stanhope had any scruples he would have stepped down immediately after the coroner’s report was released, rather than simply dismiss it outright.

His arrogance is truly a wonder to behold.

futto 1:00 am 15 Feb 07

Come on. Sure Jon oversaw one of the worst disasters in australia but Kate painted the GRASS GREEN IN THE STADIUM!!!!

Its like apples and oranges.

simbo 11:42 pm 14 Feb 07

That’s rather common for politicians in any majority government, though, isn’t it?

And yes, I am thinking of the mob further on up the hill…

johnboy 11:32 pm 14 Feb 07

He likes the bits that give him untrammeled power, he’s just less keen on the accountability and responsibility components.

Avacry 11:25 pm 14 Feb 07

Anyone have the hansard links of Stanhope’s speeches when he was calling for Kate Carnell to resign? I think it would be an interesting read.

It seems like Jon Stanhope doesn’t hold the Westminster principals of government as important anymore.

Ingeegoodbee 6:03 pm 14 Feb 07

“…I’d get behind it if, for instance, Stefaniak was going to present something new, some incompetence above and beyond the stuff we already know about…”

I would have thought that there was enough proof of deceit, incompetence and gutless weaselling already in the public domain to justify a no confidence motion – it’s just a shame that there wont be anyone on the Labor benches with the guts and respect for the Canberra community to cross the floor.

louise 5:17 pm 14 Feb 07

I have to agree with Johnboy. There should be a quota system to prevent majority governmet, but then, maybe voters should be smart enough not to elect one in the first instance?

terubo 5:10 pm 14 Feb 07

Why do they need a whole bloody week to consider the motion?
Disgraceful.

johnboy 4:30 pm 14 Feb 07

ACT Assembly was fundamentally not designed for majority Government.

There should be some cutoff when a party is one seat shy and the preferences assigned as if candidates had reached quota.

simto 4:21 pm 14 Feb 07

See, I’d get behind it if, for instance, Stefaniak was going to present something new, some incompetence above and beyond the stuff we already know about. But I highly doubt he’s got anything up his sleeve that particularly surprises.

At least when Stanhope was running similar motions, the libs were in minority government, and there was the possibility of Kate losing (I’d guess that possibility looked quite realistic when Kate decided to resign rather than face it)

johnboy 4:14 pm 14 Feb 07

noper, a whole week of sittings

simto 4:11 pm 14 Feb 07

So, basically, he’s going to waste a sitting day?

Hell, why not – it’s not like they’re going to be doing anything important at all, like, I dunno, GOVERNING!

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site