15 November 2024

Sex ed in schools needed to combat dangers of easily accessible pornography: study

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
6
Wayne Morgan gives lecture

ANU senior lecturer Wayne Morgan says a social media ban won’t restrict young people’s access to porn. Photo: Twitter.

Around one-third of young people are using pornography as a form of sex education, according to a report commissioned by Our Watch, a group that seeks to prevent violence against women.

The study, which was based on a survey of 832 people aged between 16 and 20, also indicated that children are accessing pornography at a younger age – around 13 for both boys and girls.

Our Watch says this emphasises the need for better sex education, a view supported by Associate Professor Wayne Morgan, an expert in sexuality and a senior lecturer at ANU.

“My major reaction to the findings is that, although they are problematic, I don’t find them surprising. It continues a trend we have seen over a number of years in terms of a younger age of access to porn,” he said.

“There were some aspects of the key findings which I think are cause for optimism. The fact that 84 per cent of surveyed young people think porn pushes stereotypes shows that even though they’re accessing porn at a younger age, they’re casting a more critical eye over it.

“What I find concerning is that a greater percentage of young men believe porn reflects reality in terms of what women want.

“This shows that we do need better education about sex, and at younger ages, which can be controversial. Part of that also needs to include education about pornography, which can also be controversial.”

READ ALSO The ice-rink cometh: Developers finally ‘very comfortable’ with where Tuggeranong project is up to

Mr Morgan says the fact so many young people are getting their sex education from porn suggests schools need to step up.

“What it demonstrates to me is that we need to educate kids on sex from as young as 11 and 12 because if we don’t give them that education, they’ll seek it elsewhere, including from unreliable sources such as porn. I know that’s something some parents might find difficult to accept,” he said.

“There is not enough focus in either government or private schools on the need for sex education, including education about pornography.”

Our Watch CEO Patty Kinnersly highlighted the dangers of what boys learned about sex from porn.

“Porn may be a fantasy, but it has real-life impacts. Young men and boys who frequently use porn are more likely to blame a woman for abuse, while acts such as sexual ‘choking’ or strangulation commonly depicted in porn have become mainstream. More than half of women aged 18 to 35 report being strangled during sex at least once,” Ms Kinnersly said.

Mr Morgan doubts the federal government’s proposed social media ban for under-16s will reduce porn consumption among children.

“Some of the biggest porn sites are available on the general internet, sites like Pornhub, where you don’t have to prove your age or establish an account. Such sites simply ask you if you’re over 18, which just requires you to tick a box,” he said.

“To some extent, banning access is a futile endeavour. Intelligent young people will always find a way around the measures the government puts in place. That’s why we keep coming back to the importance of critical education.

“That is the best and most foolproof method we can use to make sure children are aware of the dangers of pornography.”

Join the conversation

6
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

No one pays for Porn anymore. It’s free to access which is why kids consume so much so young. Maybe if we put it behind a paywall and it was worth it for good companies to make quality porn without the violence and misogyny, what kids do consume might be more realistic and controllable. Banning it won’t stop anyone from finding it.

Not a bad idea Elf but unless we fundamentally change how the internet works (and we can’t even agree to sensible reduce emissions to limit the impacts of climate change to save ourselves) I can’t see it happening.

I agree banning it like with most bans only creates more and more difficult-to-solve problems.

The answer IMO is always better education and more support & guidance for parents in how to deal with this stuff.

BS.

You just make porn illegal. It’s no good for anyone – not even adults – not even in small amounts, and the people who are involved in making it also suffer terribly. Therefore, just as many things are made illegal, so too can porn be made illegal, making it really quite difficult for kids to access, removing ‘the need’ for perverts in the education system to ‘have to’ teach children about sex.

Honestly, I’d eat my hand before the neo-marxist with green hair and army boots taught my kids anything about anything, let alone something as sacred and fragile as sex

“You just make porn illegal.”

sigh. Let’s put aside freedom, liberty and rights and look at the situation’s practicality. How exactly do they do that?

“Honestly, I’d eat my hand before the neo-marxist with green hair and army boots taught my kids anything…” oh right…the usual clueless, cooked fantasy land stuff.

GrumpyGrandpa10:41 pm 17 Nov 24

This is the part of the government’s proposed ban on social media that doesn’t make a lot of sense.
It’d be a pretty big overstep if we ban teenagers from accessing YouTube, but sites that don’t require verificable identification are still accessible.
I’m not sure how we can expect multinational social media companies to establish systems to protect our young people, when we don’t hold those young people accountable for the content they access?
It might just be that we have to require parents to have content blockers on family internet accounts and mobile phones used by under 16 year olds be in the names of responsible adults who can monitor /control the content accesses, and be responsible for the content accessed.
The problem with all of this is it’s draconian & I’m sure breaches various civil liberties. Neither political party is going to run with that, which is why they are both supportive of pushing the responsibility to social media companies. Both parties want to be seen to be doing something, before an election. And yet sites like Pornhub, which is arguably more sinister, remain accessible.

Government bans on social media are likely to be unworkable but they’re also definitely
government overreach.

My kids are not on social media but that decision was based on conversations I had with them.

I don’t need Albo or Dutts doing my parenting for me. And whilst not all parents are good parents governments can’t legislate that either.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.