Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Canberra’s most creative
residential property specialists

Taxi plate owners facing ruin renew compensation push

By Ian Bushnell 1 February 2019 44

Canberra’s private taxi plate owners feel that the Government has betrayed them.

Canberra’s private taxi plate owners have formed a new association and renewed their push for compensation, saying the ACT Government’s release of cheap plates has left their members facing financial ruin.

Chair of the new ACT Taxi Plate Owners Association, Petar Ivanovski says the unscheduled release on 25 January of 30 plates for lease at $5000 a year for up to six-year terms had further flooded the market and will mean 120 permanent plate holders who had paid up to $300,000 a plate will see their incomes and the value of their asset slashed.

He accused the Government of using the industry disruption caused by ride-sharing service Uber as an excuse to manipulate the market, and in effect go into competition against his members.

Mr Ivanovski said members, who lease their plates to taxi drivers, had seen their incomes halved as operators renegotiated their leases when the Government dropped the price of new plates.

“Overnight they’ve dropped them down to $5000. In a month, rentals for private plate owners went from $400 to $200 a week. Now they’re going to go even further,” he said.

Mr Ivanovski said his members felt betrayed by a Government that had promised to look after them.

He said many of his members had bought the plates to fund their retirement, with some investing their superannuation, and the impact had been devastating.

Melville Leslie, 60, of Bega, bought a plate for $260,000 in 2002 and has seen his modest income halved in recent years. He has been offered only a fraction of what he paid for the plate by potential buyers.

The stress has taken a toll on his mental health and his marriage, with Mr Leslie on medication and no job prospects.

Uncertain future: Taxi plate owner Melville Leslie and his wife Robyn Boness. Photo: Supplied.

Uncertain future: Taxi plate owner Melville Leslie and his wife Robyn Boness. Photo: Supplied.

“We’re fighting against the Government, we’re fighting against the operators, we’re fighting against each other because someone has just wiped out our retirement. There’s nothing underneath us now.”

He said that at the time a taxi plate seemed a safe, Government-backed investment, that was recognised by banks as an asset.

“It was as decent as buying a property and not being a landlord,” he said. “We found overnight that our property was worth only $40,000, if you can find someone to buy it.”

His once annual income of $25,000 is down to $10,000, and he is worried that this latest release will see his operator again renegotiating. “I have nowhere to go,” he said. “My monthly remittance comes in on 17th, and every 15th and 16th I go into a sweat waiting for a phone call from my operator.”

He said his wife had applied for a pension but Centrelink had said they had $260,000 in assets, despite the plates’ real value being so much less, a situation Mr Ivanovski said was a common one for members in need of income support.

“My members are suffering, I’ve got people having difficulty putting food on the table because they can’t get the pension, and they’re 70,” he said.

The Government has so far rejected claims for compensation, such as NSW’s $250 million package, but the association again met with officials on Thursday in a bid for mediation so their members can be adequately compensated.

Mr Ivanovski will await a Government response but in the meantime, the association will mount a public campaign to highlight what he says is the Government’s ‘socially and morally indefensible’ position, including a demonstration at the Legislative Assembly on 19 February supported by the Canberra Liberals.

Although taxi plate owners insist that the Government’s policy has nothing to do with Uber, the new plates at reduced rates began to be issued from 2015 – the same year Uber was launched in the ACT – going down $20,000 to $10,000 and, from 1 August 2016, $5000.

The Government released 50 plates for lease in 2017, 15 last October and, according to Mr Ivanovski, the next release had been due in March.

The Minister for Regulatory Services, Gordon Ramsay, has said the staged release of plates would allow operators to adapt to the changing market conditions, while meeting demand for new taxi licences.

But many in the industry believe this is unsustainable in such a small market, already under pressure from rideshare services.


What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
26 Responses to
Taxi plate owners facing ruin renew compensation push
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
rossau 2:37 pm 10 Feb 19

Any and every investor rent-seeking through simple profiteering in goods or services is on notice that you, having disenfranchised the public, have not acted in the public good and deserve no compensation.
When you bought the taxi plate, what service were you providing that every customer needed to pass their income your way? That the government no longer supports your monopoly is a wonderful evolution.
When investors in housing no longer add value but similarly disenfranchise a public seeking affordable housing what ethical dilemma should I have in wishing that your investment is washed away? I have none. You’re on notice too, no compensation.
Self-interested investors lacking compassion can get out now but not at my expense.

Peter Major 5:44 pm 02 Feb 19

ALP ruining private enterprise.

Gilavon 4:07 pm 02 Feb 19

Simply a demonstration of socialist opposition and indifference to private enterprise: “What’s your’s is mine, what’s mine stays mine and you’ll pay taxes to maintain mine”.

Byron Carn 2:54 pm 02 Feb 19

or maybe you could adjust your business with the times and competition like every other business that faces the same.

Weatherman 2:42 pm 02 Feb 19

Investments are always are risk with no guarantee of market value. It’s speculation based. As well as the effort put in by investors to maintain value in their assets. If rival companies, such as Uber are doing well, that’s not the governments fault. That’s a fault within the reputation of taxi services.

Mat Barber 12:48 pm 02 Feb 19

Doesn’t need to provide them, if you invest in the stock market with say Apple, then five years later The banana company starts up, with a better product causing Apple to lose market share and start losing revenue, would you then sue for compensation? No, it’s just tough luck, that’s how investments work, it’s a gamble, you never know what new technology is around the corner.

David Brown 10:50 am 02 Feb 19

They made an investment hoping to make money. Just like the people who bought Telstra tranch 3 shares, not all investments rise in value. Sad for them but it was their decision and the taxpayer should not bale out their misjudgement.

    Cathy Dearnley 12:15 pm 02 Feb 19

    The govt doesn't go around nuking everyone. ..because people would all feel the pain and protect each other. Because this isn't your pain. ..you don't care

    Cathy Dearnley 12:16 pm 02 Feb 19

    David Brown sorry. ..I've caught 7 taxis in my life. I don't know the first name of a single driver...self serving?

    David Brown 12:17 pm 02 Feb 19

    Cathy Dearnley What about Telstra tranch 3? The government set the price and the shares dropped like stones shortly after. I did not see too many people demanding or expecting compo for that government decision.

    David Brown 12:18 pm 02 Feb 19

    Cathy Dearnley Try Uber or Ole. You will get a better service no save money.

    Cathy Dearnley 12:21 pm 02 Feb 19

    David Brown let me help explain the difference.

    The difference is that there was no govt interference with the market AFTER the share sale. If there had been then there would have been a royal commission.

    In the taxi industry, the govt interfered with the market price.

    Natalie Legg 7:16 pm 02 Feb 19

    Oh please, the single biggest 'investment' in Australia is the property market and if there's even a suggestion of the government changing negative gearing the boomers go bananas...

Adam Vinning 9:29 am 02 Feb 19

Maybe if they had invested in the customer service side of their product (taxis turning up on time, drivers who were not rude, cars not falling apart) they would not have been in a situation for a competitor to take advantage of these issues.

Jack Hearps 8:12 am 02 Feb 19

This has been unraveling for a decade...got to know when to depreciate a loss...your accountants should have helped you do this via your business strategy...! Write off etc.

Cathy Dearnley 8:09 am 02 Feb 19

The limited and expensive plates had made catching a taxi in Canberra an expensive and problematic.

But people invested in the system. Built their livelihoods and family futures around it. The investment fails not because it was a bad decision or didn't work hard. But because the rules changed without compensation.

If govt decides to build a road through your home, you get compensated. People don't say 'suck it up, you've made a poor investment'

    David Brown 10:52 am 02 Feb 19

    Cathy Dearnley What rules changed? There were just more plates available. Competition increased. Looks like market forces to me.

    Natalie Legg 7:11 pm 02 Feb 19

    Cathy Dearnley I agree Cathy, I'm not fan of Taxi's but I think a lot of people are letting their general dislike of taxi's cloud the logic. When I opened my business I needed to jump through a million government hoops at a very high cost. If I failed once I opened because I sucked at it then that's fine, that's my problem. But if the government turned around and said to my competitor, hey you don't need any of those licences, registrations, inspections... you can bet I would be raising hell.

    Pippa Campbell 8:08 pm 02 Feb 19

    Taxi drivers and company owners were always free to adjust their price systems and make use of technology for bookings. But they didn't, and so they got left behind. It's grim and I wouldn't want to rule out compensation over the plate prices, but also when you invest, it's your responsibility to keep track of market changes and proposed legislation. There's no such thing as a sure investment, but taxi drivers thought they were exempt from that rule.

Aaron Clausen 7:32 am 02 Feb 19

They had it too good for too long. This is inevitable change and the best thing for consumers. Nobody reimburses my failed investments.

Richard Handley 6:58 pm 01 Feb 19

Ok I would be upset as well but you made an investment. It was good for 20-30 years with no competition. Be happy about how long and good your run was. No investment is guaranteed. I bought a DVD player back in 2002 for $550 and now it’s worth nothing at all. You don’t see me trying to sue online movie providers for making it easier, more convenient and cheaper to watch a movie. Again if you bought a 1 bedroom apartment in Canberra you don’t see people trying to get their money back because the government released more land for unit development. It was their choice to purchase in the hope of making money or building equity and investments don’t always work out.

    Capital Retro 7:37 am 05 Feb 19

    So, when your current job is disrupted by globalisation or imported cheap labour you will apply the same philosophy?

Daniel Königs 6:50 pm 01 Feb 19

They should never have been a saleable asset in the first place.

Stephen Page-Murray 6:30 pm 01 Feb 19

Time to take legal action

John McAvoy 6:21 pm 01 Feb 19

Neo Liberal economic theory in action. Did you really think the ACT government would leave that cash cow alone. Just ask yourself who gets the new license plates individuals or groups.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2019 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site