Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Community

Donating over $1.5 million to 350
local Community Groups each year

Updated Primary School Map

By aidan - 14 December 2006 33

The interactive map of ACT Primary Schools has been updated to reflect the final decisions of the Stanhope Government. In short, Mt Rogers, Giralang, Isabella Plains and Gilmore are now classified as remaining open.

The proposed P-10 school on the Kambah High site (due to open in 2011 apparently) has been added to the map. It is not clear why they have decided to build a P-10 school right next to Urambi Primary School.

The lack of coverage in Weston is now a reality.

Chifley is badly affected as well. If you look at the map it seems well covered, but sending a child across the Tuggeranong Parkway to Arawang (in Weston Creek) is not viable, nor is it desirable to navigate through Phillip to Mawson Primary. If the circles for both of these schools are turned off (by clicking on the blue dot representing the school) then it is only the circle from Lyons that covers Chifley at all. Lyons is going to become a P-2 school. If the Lyons circle is turned off, the result is the coverage for kids from year 3 to year 6, i.e. none. An amalgamation of Lyons and Melrose on the Melrose (Chifley) site would have resulted in a more equitable distribution of schools.

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
33 Responses to
Updated Primary School Map
Sammy 4:53 pm 14 Dec 06

those preschools will be feeders

If you believe some, the new super schools will become feeders for the new prison.

bubzie 4:39 pm 14 Dec 06

about the whole urambi being next to the super school, i read somewhere that they’d have to close it in 2010, like what they’re having to do to some of the schools in west belconnen..

nyssa76 3:42 pm 14 Dec 06

Don’t forget that Stromlo will now be a 6-10 school starting next year.

So Arawang won’t be “entirely” overloaded.

Fiona 2:44 pm 14 Dec 06

I think mt neighbour pre will be with Urambi primary

Fiona 2:44 pm 14 Dec 06

those preschools will be feeders and under teh wing of other close primary schools

seepi 2:23 pm 14 Dec 06

Have they explained how the whole preschool thing is going to work?

They say all preschools must be part of a primary school by 2008 – presumably so they can get rid of existing pre-school buildings.

But what of preschools like Hackett, Weston and Chifley, which are listed to stay open, but won’t have a primary school to join onto? Both Hackett and Chifley seem to be in a babyboom, so they aren’t closing the preschools, but assuming a govt preschool can’t join a private school, how will it work?

emd 2:12 pm 14 Dec 06

Actually, a lot of kids in Pearce attend the Catholic school. This is because the Pearce public pre-school is located right next door. I can only imagine that Chifley pre-school will also feed into Sacred Heart now that there the Catholic school is the only one within walking distance.

Sacred Heart seems to be a very good school. However, if the ACT Govt were serious about keeping kids in public education, they would provide public schools.

Sammy 2:00 pm 14 Dec 06

I was one of the writers of the Melrose submission.

As someone who writes submissions to Government (tenders), and regularly receives non-favourable responses, I feel for you.

When you put a lot of time into something, it’s natural to feel that everyone should agree with your view, and respond accordingly. Unfortunately, it often doesn’t work out this way.

aidan 1:59 pm 14 Dec 06

I know there isn’t alot of tolerance for a “but the process sucked” kind of argument, but basically, it did and it has lead to some poor outcomes for ACT education.

Once the hitlist was announced pretty much the only thing affected schools could do was attempt to stave off closure. There was very limited scope to step back and take a broader look at education provision, to bring other schools that had not been ‘named’ into the mix. I guess the Government would have had another six month consultation on their hands and politically this was unpalatable.

I read the Melrose submission and I thought the Lyons / Melrose amalgamation sounded like a winner. I am not sure what purpose turning a small school like Lyons into an even smaller P-2 school. I would have thought it would just hasten it’s demise. Melrose is already the result of a Chifley and Pearce Primary amalgamation, so perhaps that turned them off, but do most Pearce kids now attend Torrens?

Anyway .. commiserations on the bad news emd.

emd 1:44 pm 14 Dec 06

Waramanga is in the Weston Creek district. This means that Chifley/Pearce kids do not have automatic right of enrolment at Arawang. I checked with DET in October. Arawang is also a very popular school and unlikely to take out-of-area enrolments. I believe the re-drawing of PEA’s (to be released 8 Jan) will not include changes to district boundaries. Pity, as I hear Arawang is a great school with many cultural similarities to Melrose that would make for an easier transition.

As for Mawson, its numbers are being monitored, with the threat that it will also close. Melrose parents would be unlikely to send their children to another potentially closing school.

I was one of the writers of the Melrose submission. We did propose an amalgamation of Lyons with Melrose, and that we share our principal with Curtin. This would have put our enrolments at 100% of capacity in a school that has had lots of money and time put into maintaining great facilities, and would have avoided the “dead zone” shown on the map. I have no idea why it didn’t fly with Barr. It’s clearly a political decision, not based on what’s actually best value for money or best educational outcome.

You can download the Melrose submission from the Save Melrose website.

johnboy 1:41 pm 14 Dec 06

Dare I ask how safe the pedestrian underpass is?

seepi 1:33 pm 14 Dec 06

Arawang is going to be a packed school with most of Weston Creek as well as all the Chifley kids -demountables anyone? Or maybe if numbers pick up at Lyons they won’t actually go to P-2 afterall.

aidan 1:32 pm 14 Dec 06

Re: Underpass between Chifley and Waramanga

Thanks, I didn’t know that. Still looks fairly ordinary coverage for Chifley I reckon.

Re: reponse

It’s been there for since June and noone else noticed (or bothered to tell me). Fixed now. Any other typos?

Sammy 1:13 pm 14 Dec 06

Talk about a freudian slip in the sub-title of the page that is linked to:

A reponse to the plan to close 39 schools in the ACT

reponse?

Sammy 1:09 pm 14 Dec 06

There is an underpass under Tuggeranong parkway, between Chifley and Waramanga. So, those kids who choose to do so, can travel safely to school. Those who choose to dodge 100 km/h traffic have that option available to them.

1 2 3

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au

Search across the site