26 October 2023

Legislative Assembly election year sitting days announced

| Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
3
Legislative Assembly entrance

No double sitting weeks are planned for the Legislative Assembly in 2024. Photo: Region.

The current Legislative Assembly will sit for the last time in the first week of September, 2024, according to the “election year sitting calendar” notified on Tuesday (October 24).

Only one double sitting week is planned in 2024, with business needing to be wrapped up ahead of the October election.

“The number of sitting days will be adequate to provide enough time to manage the business of the Assembly,” manager of government business Mick Gentleman said as he presented the calendar.

With the three parties consulted on the draft calendar, Mr Gentleman said all feedback from the Canberra Liberals had been taken on board.

It’s intended the final budget of the current term of government will be presented on 25 June, with debate held during the double sitting between 27 August and 5 September, 2024.

“A standard estimates timeframe has been included after the July school holidays, there are eight sitting weeks and 24 sitting days, with the caretaker period commencing on the 13th of September,” Mr Gentleman said.

The 2024 calendar for the Legislative Assembly will be:

  • February: 6, 7, 8
  • March: 19, 20, 21
  • April: 9, 10, 11
  • May: 14, 15, 16
  • June: 4, 5, 6 and 25, 26, 27
  • August: 27, 28, 29
  • September: 3, 4, 5

READ ALSO Brindabella Liberals MLA Nicole Lawder won’t contest 2024 election

Ginninderra Greens MLA Jo Clay said she had some concerns about the presented 2024 calendar.

Part of the estimate committee hearings into the 2023-24 ACT Budget, Ms Clay drew the Assembly’s attention to recommendation one from the inquiry’s report, which called for a period of four weeks between the closing of estimates hearings and the committee’s report due date.

She said extending the timeframe between hearings and the report had also been recommendations from the 2022 estimate committee.

“These recommendations were made because the timeframes have been too short,” Ms Clay said.

“There were 21 business days from the final day of hearings to the day when the budget debate commenced [this year] and it is just not enough time. The committee had just five business days after the last hearing to submit questions on notice, the government then had just five business days to respond to questions on notice.

“The secretariat need at least seven to 10 business days to write up the report and the committee needs time to meet and discuss and agree to those recommendations, and that’s where that recommendation for four weeks comes from.”

Ms Clay pointed out this year’s questions on notice weren’t back in time for the committee report, and argued more time was needed to provide a “more thoughtful” document which could provide more scrutiny of the budget.

She said the short timeframe also put pressure on the politicians to have fully read the report before debate began and unnecessarily on staff.

“We pride ourselves here from having a culture that’s different to the culture up on the hill,” Ms Clay said.

“I’m concerned if we keep making recommendations for longer timelines, and we don’t get those, that that might be where we’re heading.

“[Government directorates] had less than a week to respond to 150 recommendations.”

She suggested presenting the ACT Budget at the start of June as one way to ease time pressures.

The calendar will be agreed to unless an absolute majority of members requests an alternative.

Join the conversation

3
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Martin Keast9:14 am 28 Oct 23

We are effectively a one-party state in the ACT. I have been disturbed by the tendency of ACT public servants to reflect a very distinct ideological bias publicly. They are supposed to serve the whole community, not radical ideologies even though the ACT government has been ruled for a long time by a very leftist Labor/Green coalition. The latest example eas the ACT Chief Justice’s comments. Janet Albrechtsen observed that “Divisive political activism is egged on at the highest levels by judges such as ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum, who uses her courtroom to channel Lidia Thorpe by acknowledging that sovereignty has never been ceded. ” This should not be happening in our courtrooms – there should be the highest degree of integrity and impartiality in our courts, not political activism. All signs of a one-party state being too long in power.

What about the Christian church and the influences they have on political decisions Martin Keast? What about the influence of far right fringe groups like the Australian Christian Lobby, Right to Life, Advance Australia and their offshoot groups Advance and Fair Australia? The influences these groups had on Australian government policy decisions was particularly evident during the 10 years of conservative government we saw under Tony Abbott and Scott Morrison.

These deeply conservative and secretive groups are backed by some of our country’s richest and most powerful individuals. Advance Australia and Advance have strong links to Zed Seselja and ex MLA Vicki Dunne. These groups were particularly active and influential campaigning against the same sex marriage equality plebiscite and The Voice to Parliament referendum. 

Some Canberra Liberal MLA’s are members of these groups. Deputy leader Jeremy Hanson was particularly active campaigning against the Voice referendum while his leader Elizabeth Lee looked on approvingly. Mr Hanson was particularly active on Facebook using the Canberra Liberals platform to get his message across. Everything Mr Hanson said and published was authorised and endorsed by Advance and Fair Australia!

You purport that the christian church will make decisions and your basis of this is that Hanon voted against the divisive voice? Most of Australia also voted against it.

You could say the same thing about some of the Labor Members being in LGBTI groups. These don’t support the nuclear family and have anti child policies.
Saying this doesn’t make me Anti-LGBTI because membership in a group doesn’t mean you are anti the group that group member doesn’t represent.

Many of the LGBTI groups have been fiercly anti female, and don’t care about protecting womens sports.

Its been clear for ages that there are secret groups and factions in Labor, the teals and the greens. The greens openly supported hamas, who had just murdered babies.

Also you realise that ACT politics isn’t federal don’t you?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.