2 October 2024

ACT comes out on top again in climate action rankings

| James Day
Join the conversation
12
Canberra is Australia's largest inland city and the eighth-largest city overall.

Canberra is Australia’s largest inland city and the eighth largest city overall. The capital was founded and formally named as Canberra in 1913. Photo: File.

After being hailed for passing legislation enshrining the right to a healthy environment, the ACT Government has been acknowledged by the Climate Council as a leader for action on climate change.

The council’s ‘Race to the Top’ report compares states and territories’ progress on important shifts like rooftop solar, home batteries, electric vehicle registrations and more. It found the most populous states are enhancing their plans to cut climate pollution, while South Australia, Tasmania and the ACT are nearly powered by 100 per cent clean energy.

Councillor and former BP executive Greg Bourne said the amount of renewable energy powering Australian homes and businesses had doubled in the past six years.

“Our main national grid is often powered by at least 40 per cent renewables, and the states have been key to this progress,” he said.

READ ALSO ACT to adopt electronic monitoring of offenders, accused

According to the report, ACT has the highest electric vehicle uptake (6.8 per 1000 people) and purchases 100 per cent of its electricity from clean energy sources.

Since 2020 the region has been powered completely by renewables, which was secured through power purchase agreements that afford locals some of the lowest bills in the country. It is also the first jurisdiction planning to end the sale of new fossil-fuelled vehicles by 2035.

The only deficiency identified in the ACT was that it has the lowest shared transport use of any Australian capital (3.1 per cent). This was mainly attributed to limited public transport services in Canberra’s spread-out suburbs, leaving residents reliant on their cars.

The Climate Council report arrived shortly after the ACT Parliament passed legislation that recognises access to a healthy environment as a basic human right.

It was called a “watershed moment in human rights and environmental law” by the Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) and Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC).

“A healthy environment is fundamental to everything we as humans hold dear,” said EDO Director Nicole Summer. “We congratulate the ACT on leading the nation and urge legislators in other jurisdictions to follow the territory’s lead.

“EDO has advocated for the recognition of the right to a healthy environment in Australia for over 20 years, since a bill of rights was first considered for the ACT in 2002.

“The passage of this legislation corrects that critical oversight, at least in the ACT, and maps a way forward for other states and territories.”

READ ALSO King and Queen to visit Canberra as ACT goes to the polls

In July 2022, the Federal Government supported a landmark resolution in the UN General Assembly to formally recognise a standalone right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment in international law.

Recently a Joint Parliamentary Committee also recommended for it be laid down in federal law as part of a national Human Rights Act. However, to date, the only jurisdiction to enshrine this right into domestic law is the ACT.

HRLC Senior Lawyer Jack McLean said governments across Australia should be doing everything they can, in collaboration with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, to protect human rights in the face of the extraordinary threats posed by the climate crisis, biodiversity loss, and rampant pollution.

“The ACT Government has followed the lead of 160 countries around the world that are already protecting the rights of their citizens to a healthy environment by providing essential guarantees regarding access to clean air, water, and soil.

“Other governments across Australia are tragically lagging behind and should take note that the status quo has changed — access to a healthy and safe environment is a human right, and it must be protected.”

Original Article published by James Day on PS News.

Join the conversation

12
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Bright Spark8:06 am 08 Oct 24

Sorry, but nothing here adds up. Could that be because the Government’s own 100% electrification modelling is error-ridden & biased?

Going directly to the caryards over the weekend and hearing straight from the horses mouth how electric car sales have tanked (pardon the pun), leaves one to wonder how these articles see the light of day.

People are starting to twig that electric cars are similar to mobile phones – technology is outdated very quickly & no one wants a 2nd hand one.

And don’t get me started on the cost of public csrgerrs, or the government’s plan to draw power from personal EV batteries…

Canberra has no heavy industry.

Also the climate change agenda is a scam.

Terrence O\'Brien9:05 pm 07 Oct 24

So I imagine we can see the impact of our costs in lower temperatures, less extreme weather etc? Or is China’s, India’s and other’s growth in CO2 emissions made the ACT’s self-harm entirely invisible? If so, why are we doing it?

Capital Retro6:19 pm 07 Oct 24

“The ACT Government has followed the lead of 160 countries around the world that are already protecting the rights of their citizens to a healthy environment by providing essential guarantees regarding access to clean air, water, and soil.”

Is China one of the other 160 countries?

Yay we came out on top as the most gullible again.
Pollution we can and should eliminate.
Climate change we can not and will never manage.
If this government had lived through the ice age they’d be losing their minds right now.
The climate has and always will CHANGE.

@Dave
Yet another moronic counter against action on climate change.

Nobody has ever denied that there is always climate change, Dave – it’s the speed at which average global temperatures have risen, and the consequential increase in extreme weather events, as a result of anthropogenic climate change, which is the issue.

Name calling, the weakest response when challenged with obvious facts.
You will not stop climate change, we have over populated the earth and are terribly wasteful. Address these two facts and we will be better for it but we will still see climate change.

@Dave
Not name calling – just appropriately classifying your comment.

Still you persist with the rhetorical “still see climate change” argument without reflecting the difference between the last 200 years and previous era.

Yes, there is over population. And with that over population also comes destruction of native forests and greater proliferation of carbon emitting activities involving fossil fuels. This is all related to the science of anthropogenic climate change – which is the action that can be taken to counter its effects.

Capital Retro11:08 am 08 Oct 24

Ironically, the destruction of forests includes balsa wood for bird blender blades and wood chips to fire converted coal power stations in the UK which attract renewable subsidies from the EU.
Some of the woodchips from the USA come from old growth forests.

@Capital Retro
Not ironically, you have failed to appropriately research those subjects, CR.

Yes – in the production of wind turbines and blades there is a degree of ‘one step forward – a quarter step back progress’ but ongoing investigation is leading to advancement of a circular economy (i.e. extending the life cycle, reducing waste, and enhancing recycling) for wind energy. You might find this article (from the US Department of Energy and the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) enlightening:
https://www.energy.gov/eere/about-office-energy-efficiency-and-renewable-energy

… and yes, the UK government (why would the EU subsidise a British company for anything?) does currently subsidise the wood pellet burning power plants. However you also would know, those subsidies, a source of concern for many UK politicians, are under review, as the move towards more sustainable energy sources grows further in the UK.

Capital Retro2:48 pm 08 Oct 24

Yeah, nah.

@Capital Retro
The usual standard of erudite, with supporting facts, rebuttal from you, CR … not!

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.