27 June 2024

UPDATED: ACT rego is changing, but by how much? We worked out what different cars will cost from 1 July

| James Coleman
Join the conversation
233
Car registration

It’s not how much you weigh, it’s what comes out of here (or rather, doesn’t) that makes the biggest difference from 1 July. Photo: James Coleman.

CORRECTION: This article previously stated the 12-month private registration fee cost for a Toyota RAV4 Hybrid is currently $498.20 and goes up to $598.60 from 1 July. The registration fee component currently costs $622.70. These figures have been updated below.

From 1 July, the ACT registration system changes from a registration fee based on weight to a fee based on emissions.

Low and zero emissions vehicles will score cheaper registration fees while higher emissions vehicles will be penalised and pay more for their registration.

“Changing to an emissions-based registration system is part of Canberra’s plan to reach net zero emissions by 2045 and to make fuel efficient vehicles more affordable for Canberrans,” the government says.

The government adds that 95 per cent of all light vehicles on the road (including petrol and diesel) are expected to cost the same or cheaper relative to the weight-based system.

READ ALSO Poor design of rooftop solar can cost households more

Over four years, the combined effect of changes to registration fees, stamp duty and concession is said to save motorists $6.6 million.

But we decided to do some research of our own.

But first, what exactly is changing?

The total cost of vehicle registration is made up of many components, but the actual registration fee is the biggest.

Motor Accident Injuries (MAI) insurance takes up the next largest chunk, followed by a road rescue fee, road safety contribution, motor accident levy, and lifetime care and support levy.

Up to now, the justification for basing the registration component on weight has been easy – the heavier you are, the more stress you’re putting on the road network, the more you can pay to fix it.

New EVs already receive two-years free registration in the ACT but, beyond that, if you’re driving an EV with more than a tonne alone of batteries on board, you’re effectively being penalised.

Breaking of ACT registration costs

A breakdown of the costs involved in 12 months registration for a Toyota Camry Hybrid. Photo: Screenshot.

The new system reverses this.

Every internal-combustion vehicle on sale in Australia has been tested by the Federal Government’s Green Vehicle Guide to see – on average – how many litres of fuel it consumes over 100 km (l/100 km) and how many grams of carbon dioxide (CO2) it emits per kilometre (g/km).

You’ll see both these figures on the mandatory Fuel Consumption Label on your new car’s windscreen.

The ACT Government will use these CO2 figures to divide vehicles into six categories: AAA for pure battery-electric cars like the Hyundai Kona, AA for plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), A for hybrids like the Toyota Camry, B for small-engined cars like the Toyota Yaris, C for bigger passenger cars like the Mazda 3, with D reserved for big diesel-powered SUVs and utes like the Ford Ranger.

READ ALSO Buying a new car? Here’s how to look after your investment

Now to the cost …

The ACT Government estimates you’ll be paying $298 less to register your Hyundai Kona EV per year, $50 less to register your Toyota Camry hybrid, and no change to cars like the Toyota Yaris, Mazda 3 or Ford Ranger (although it’s unclear which engine this Ranger has).

It has also released an online calculator where you can find out what your car will cost to register from 1 July.

We did some playing around to find out what several cars across the spectrum of size and emissions cost to register now, compared to what they will cost from 1 July.

It’s worth pointing out all vehicle registration costs increases each each year due to “indexation”, according to the ACT Government, regardless of the introduction of the new system.

The Tesla Model Y was our favourite car of 2023 but, weighing just shy of two tonnes, it currently falls under the ‘large’ bracket and the private registration fee is $622.70 for 12 months. This drops to $355 from 1 July.

EV

EVs are penalised under the current regime because of their weight. Photo: James Coleman.

It’s the same story for the Tesla Model 3, which is only about 150 kg lighter than the Model Y.

The Toyota RAV4 Hybrid, also in the ‘large’ category as a mid-size SUV, currently costs $622.70. With a low combined CO2 figure of 107 g/km (which puts it in category A for emissions), this fee drops to $598.60 from 1 July.

Going up a very big notch is the Dodge RAM 1500 with a hulking 5.7-litre petrol V8, which is classed as a ‘ute/light truck’ in the ‘extra-large’ weight category. It currently costs $949.20.

With a combined CO2 figure of 283 g/km, it’s obviously deep into the top D emissions category, you’re probably preparing for the worst come 1 July, but it ‘only’ goes up by $49 ($998.20).

Returning to the ACT Government’s example of the Ranger, the 2-litre bi-turbo diesel might fall under category C and cost $647.60 from 1 July, but the 3-litre V6 turbo diesel actually echoes the RAM’s figures.

Ford Ranger

Depending on the Ford Ranger you get, you could pay between $647 and $998 for rego. Photo: James Coleman.

What does this mean?

Canberra’s EV owners obviously welcome the change, but the ACT Council of Social Services (ACTCOSS) has raised concerns about how it will impact low-income households who might be keeping an older car running because they lack the capital to buy an EV.

CEO Dr Devin Bowles told Region that while the change is “a vital step to becoming a net-zero community”, the government’s current incentives mean everyone who can realistically afford an EV already has one.

“Given the cost of low-emissions vehicles, and lack of used low-emissions vehicles, this change will disproportionately advantage those who are already well-off.”

ACTCOSS argues the ACT Government needs to develop incentives for low-income earners, which would also have the “additional financial benefit of reducing fuel costs for this group”.

“Following this boost for higher-income households, ACTCOSS encourages the ACT Government to look at ways to make its overall tax and fee system more progressive,” Mr Bowles said.

Do you support the ACT Government's implementation of emissions-based registration fees?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Join the conversation

233
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

How is there only a $50 difference between a Dodge Ram and my little Suzuki Swift? It’s a third the size and half the emissions. Cooked.

Well, mostly because the entire idea is virtue signalling by midwits. Just remember this stupidity at the next ACT election and put Labor and the greens last.

Another green washing classic by the comedy duo of Barr and Rattenberry. They must be laughing so hard at the ongoing gullibility of their support base that they are at risk of doing themselves an injury.
To the issue at hand. What has emissions to do with the maintenance of the ACT road network which is the purpose of the collection of registration? Zero is the answer. EV’s on average weigh at least 30% more than their ICE equivalent with some larger ones weighing up to twice their ICE equivalent. As for environmental impact, a recent Volvo study found that the environmental impact of building an EV compared to its ICE equivalent was 70 times (not a misprint) greater. They also found that the EV would have to travel at least 110,000km to break even on its environmental footprint, perhaps longer depending upon the electricity generation source. This would make the assertion that the registration cost reflects the environmental impact via emissions specious at best.
As to the Muppet in the comments that thinks this is somehow sticking this to the oil companies, the people that this really hurts the most are those who can least afford to either get on the EV ideological bandwagon or for which an EV doesn’t make sense or is not suitable.
Change of government pls. The Libs may be no better, but at the least we need a change, especially from the Green led ideological nonsense.

This government introduces new rules without consultation and without giving advance notice to enable people to alter their purchases or to sell cars that will not meet the new criteria. Surely there must be a legal case to stop this kind of behaviour by the Barr/Rattenbury Government.

The best way to reduce C02 emissions is to hang onto your existing car for longer.
Perhaps rego costs should reduce according to the age of the car?

Last week I asked the ACT government to please list the 5% of vehicles who’s registration will stay the same or increase according to their spin.

I’m still waiting.

Pure Discrimination aimed at the poor. Electric cars are out of the price range of most but the few yet the ACT government chooses to discriminate against the poorer people of our community. Is there a lawyer with the balls to take on a class action against them?

More climate nonsense. Its just a green tax for an imaginary problem….. yawn

Craig Applegate1:31 pm 25 Jun 24

This deserves our support. A brand-new petrol or diesel car will continue producing C02 emissions for a long time.

Don’t plants breath in CO2 and expel.oxygen.

@Michael M
Yes – and humans breathe in nitrogen, oxygen, CO2 and other gases and expel nitrogen, oxygen, CO2 and other gases. So what?

Please don’t admit that you are suggesting plants rely on ICE vehicle emissions to exist.

It was never a refined method anyway. A heavy vehicle may distribute its weight over a large number of tyres reducing the pressure / cm. It’s our public buses with the rear steering tyres which gouged up road surfaces.

Blaming EV or ICE misses the point. The ACT Government runs this town. They need $ to pay for trams and to bail out failed ICT procurements. They need our taxes and levies to fund their salaries and lifestyles (free executive parking, free meal allowances, business class travel, new vehicle allowances, entertainment expenses, free childcare, free training, reimbursements for flowers for personal assistants).

Stop complaining and put your backs into it. Lean in. Let’s show our Labor government just how much we appreciate them.

Billy Bunter11:34 am 25 Jun 24

Scientist have confirmed all planets in our solar system have had an increase in the surface temperature. Maybe Barr should share his rego idea with Pluto

I keep wanting to use Uranus in the right context…….hmm….

Billy Bunter8:44 am 25 Jun 24

So can the Barr government prove how much the temperature will drop in the ACT as a result of the registration change 😂

Billy Bunter8:41 am 25 Jun 24

So my 2004 V6 ute travels less than 5000km a year yet a Suzuki Swift could travel 15000km (creating more emissions) but pay less rego. How does that work?

Registration used to ve weight based since heavier c vehicles do more damage to the road. Now with the emission based registration, poor people driving small to medium sized cars can fund the roads that middle class ev driver damage. Middle class welfare strikes again. Let’s subsidise some ev chargers while we’re at it

HiddenDragon8:25 pm 24 Jun 24

This fake Labor government will do nothing meaningful about the issues raised by ACTCOSS.

The sorts of people that Labor supposedly cares about will continue to be on the receiving end of (well) above CPI increases in registration and related costs for vehicles that they could only dream of replacing.

Michael Dupe8:06 pm 24 Jun 24

The ACT government has broken its own system. Our 2020 Audi Etron is a full EV. Its previous registration fee was $345. The renewal notice for 30 June says it will be $990 (registration only). Plainly the algorithm is broken. Despite repeated calls to Access Canberra, nobody can explain it and they have not got back to us.
Expect some red faces as more price increases hit EV owners

I just checked car prices. A 2020 Audi e-tron is selling for $140,000+. I cannot imagine how much more it would have cost new back in 2020. Elsewhere in this string you said you also own a Tesla. If you can afford to own two cars like that then you can afford to pay whatever it costs to keep them on the road. To paraphrase the great Bill Shakespeare, methinks thou doth protest too much. I’ll now just jump into my 24 year old, 300,000km. Honda Civic and jog on.

So Green Vehicle guide states 2012-14 Ford Falcon 4 cylinder, 2.0 litre has better performance and milage figures than its 6 cylinder 4 litre equivalent. However, somehow uses $662 more fuel for the same 14,000km travelled ?? Get out of here.

I hope all of the people who keep voting for these clowns enjoy paying more, so people who can afford a new EV can get 2 years free rego, and you can continue to subsidise them into the future. LOL

Heavy EV which create more road wear pay less rego and no fuel tax. So all other motorists are now subsidising them in both areas – and no doubt, our road infrastructure will deteriorate even more

Even though the government wants to promote EV use, they should still reflect individual vehicles impacts on other areas than emissions to minimise cross subsidy between road users.
A per Km road user charge would be a good way to go but as the Vic experience showed, it requires Federal implementation.

Oh yeh, that’s fair…..NOT! So people that drive ICE’S are subsidising EV drivers. So this is the first Territory or State government to attempt to alter people’s vehicle choice. And why could that be? Could it possibly be because EV take-up is so poor? People realize a dog of an idea and vote with their wallets maybe? EV’S because of their increased weight when compared to an ICE vehicle will damage the roads much more than an ICE vehicle. Also then there’s the increased risk of spontaneous combustion of these mobile lithium bombs as well. YEP, excellent idea if your a brain dead ALP/ Green Canberra politician and a bad idea for nearly everyone else.

@Rob
Or it could simply be that the ACT government is committed to tackling anthropogenic climate change, Rob.

Felix the Cat4:49 pm 24 Jun 24

“EV take-up is so poor”🤣
Try Googling ‘best selling car world wide 2023’.
I’ll save you the trouble, the answer is Tesla.

The most efficient and low impact way to move people around, esp per kg, is the humble motorbike. (Not including pushbikes and public transport, of course).

Why aren’t motorcyclists being rewarded and encouraged more in these changes?

Couldn’t agree more Les. MRA ACT has been pushing for a better deal than the crude cc based system in order to get More Riders More Often.

It used to make sense to relate a vehicle’s rego to its weight. Prior to the discovery that EVs weighed more than comparable ICE vehicles, the fourth power law indicated that the greater the axle load of a vehicle, the stress on the road caused by the vehicle increased in proportion to the fourth power of the axle load. That means, the more a car weighs, the more damage it does to the road. Hence the increased rego. By relating rego fees to emissions, the cars that do the most damage are now being let off the hook.

I’d love to know what this “government” does with all the old and burnt out batteries!!

Hard to say. There’s not a lot of batteries removed yet from EVs after over seven years or so for it to be an issue. In the meantime, there are numerous companies looking at how to re-use them (they are typically retired from an EV with ~70% efficiency remaining) or even recycle them, so it’s inevitable that this issue will be dealt with in time.

Capital Retro4:10 pm 24 Jun 24

The ACT government operates about 500 totally or partly powered with lithium batteries. The oldest of these would be about 6 years.

Currently, the government does not appear to have developed or adopted a policy to deal with their disposal: https://the-riotact.com/coming-ev-battery-pile-up-requires-action-sooner-rather-than-later/666295

Interesting. I got my rego renewal for my camper trailer last week and the fee has increased albeit there’s the spiel about changing from weight based to emissions based. That trailer emits nothing but the fee has increased. Go figure, but Tesla’s rego has reduced. The camper doesn’t weigh anywhere near what a Tesla does.

Michael, it’s EVs and hybrids in general, not just Teslas. That clarified, you’re right – that doesn’t make sense.

Maybe just charge everybody the same amount of rego instead of using it as a social engineering tool.

holden owner12:55 pm 24 Jun 24

interesting that a Tesla model Y weighs 227 KG more than my Holden Commodore

I can’t verify that, but so? I think you’ve missed the point of the initiative – it’s about emission levels, not weight.

They should increase the Road Rescue component just for EVs to cover the increased fire management risks.
https://the-riotact.com/what-happens-when-an-ev-catches-fire-act-firies-say-its-sobering/640993

For a total of 4 to 6 EV fires in Australia, is it really worth it?
“There have been just six EV battery fires in Australia out of more than 180,000 EVs on the road, according to EV FireSafe. ” https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/ladocs/submissions/83044/Submission%208%20-%20EV%20FireSafe.pdf

@archie400
Why are you letting a trifling factual statistic get in the way of tried and proven fear mongering?

Archie, it’s not the total number of EV fires, it’s the greatly increased risk managing those fires.

However, as you have been told EV fires are extremely rare … there is a 60 times chance of an ICE fire. Therefore fire reduce have to attend many more fires than EV’s. Its not as though EV fires are not extinguishable, especially when out in the open.

Nobody,
But the overall fire risk and cost for ICE vehicles is greater due to the significantly higher number of fires both total and proportionally in those ICE vehicles.

So by your own logic we should be giving ICE vehicles an increase in costs.

New skills and procedures are required, alternate equipment purchased, increased risk, increase the levy.

Nobody,
so despite the significantly lower risk, you now want to change your argument to talk about outsourcing training costs for the fire brigade to road users?

Hmmm, almost like you’re just making arguments up on the fly because you don’t like EV’s.

A Nonny Mouse9:14 am 24 Jun 24

The six band emissions-based rego is replacing the previous weight-based scheme, from which an EV was exempted for 2 years with free rego. Free rego is not continuing.

Canberra’s impact on the global climate is so minuscule that to penalise residents for driving cars seems like local council members actually just have outright disdain for the people they have sworn to serve.

OpenYourMind10:16 am 24 Jun 24

That’s like throwing your rubbish on the ground and saying, well my contribution is miniscule compared to all the junk in the world. Or p1ssing in the public pool and saying well, it’s only a small amount of p1ss.

That’s like saying “well the bus is going in that direction anyway, why should i pay”

Well if they based it on weight Tesla drivers would be paying a lot more, so no doubt Rattenbury had a bit to do with this.

Please note EV’s only get 2 years free rego if purchased by 30th June 2024 by someone with an ACT licence and they’re garaged in the ACT. This article gives the impression that scheme continues into the future.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.