16 October 2023

ACT's Yes vote for Voice referendum a 'silver lining' as Territory considers further change

| Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
32
Katy Gallagher, Andrew Barr and Alicia Payne

Chief Minister Andrew Barr (centre) and Federal ACT MPs Katy Gallagher and Alicia Payne backing the Voice. Photo: Facebook.

“Where do we go as government and as a community to responding to the substantive issues that the referendum raised?”

This is the question ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr is focusing on as the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum returned a No result.

Counting is still underway and the result is yet to be officially announced by the Australian Electoral Commission; however, enough votes have been counted to show only the ACT returned a Yes vote for the proposed change to the Constitution.

Mr Barr said while there was sadness the referendum had failed, the “silver lining” was how strongly Canberrans had been willing to embrace change.

“A lot of the campaign involved rhetoric of ‘if you don’t know, vote No’, [so] I think we’d characterise that Canberrans’ response was, if they didn’t know they took the time to find out,” he said.

“It didn’t necessarily mean they voted Yes, but I think this community is generally more engaged on political matters. We have a long history of that.”

He admitted there were problems with the Yes campaign, such as not seizing on “pivotal moments” to make arguments clearer earlier.

Campaigning in a social media environment also made communication on a national level more difficult.

“The environment is ripe for misinformation,” Mr Barr said.

“Selling a No message is easy, blocking change is easy, actually achieving things in politics … that’s the hard bit.”

But he said looking at what went wrong won’t fix the problems still faced by First Nations peoples and the rest of Australia.

“Picking over the entrails of this campaign doesn’t serve a huge purpose. I think the question now is where do we go as government and as a community to responding to the substantive issues that the referendum raised?” Mr Barr said.

“I don’t think this was a vote against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, I don’t think this was a vote against Reconciliation, and I don’t think this was a vote against closing the gap. It was a vote about constitutional recognition and a national Voice.

“The Australian people have spoken on those two questions but it is very clear to me … that [No voters] were interested in engaging in more practical ways to close the gap.”

READ ALSO 1 in 10 young Canberrans experience homelessness. How can we help them unleash their potential?

Mr Barr said wheels were already in motion to continue working on closing the gap both in the Territory and nationally, with announcements expected on education and training later this week.

He identified the delivery of government services, housing, mental health and employment as other areas that needed continued attention at both levels.

“I don’t think we’re going to solve all of the issues this week, this month, this year. But we should continue to listen and engage, and that’s what we will be doing in the ACT,” Mr Barr said.

The referendum result comes as a casual vacancy has opened on the ACT Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Electoral Body.

ACT Electoral Commissioner Damian Cantwell said he was notified last week that member Jacob Keed had resigned from his position on the body.

“[I] call for applications from the unsuccessful candidates at the 2021 Elected Body election who still live in the ACT and who wish to contest the vacancy,” he said.

Applications close at midday on Wednesday (October 18), with a declaration of the candidates wishing to contest the vacancy to be made at 12:30 pm on the same day.

READ ALSO Pathway to Politics Program is creating the next generation of advocates and community champions

Mr Barr encouraged those people to get back in touch and put their names forward.

“I think one thread through this campaign was an unrealistic expectation that every Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian was going to be of the same view on a particular issue,” he said.

“I think an important element of our elected body is it exists as a forum to engage with government – it’s not going to solve every single issue, but it certainly doesn’t hurt, and it’s better than the alternative of no elected representative body.”

Join the conversation

32
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

The ACT’s yes vote shows only one thing: How out of touch the ACT is with the rest of Australia.
If you look at the other electorates, it’s pretty much always in the big cities where more people vote yes – i.e. more rich people who think “sure it’s fine to give up a bit more of our income”. Meanwhile the rest of us Australians are just trying to put food on the table and keep a roof over our heads through this cost of living crisis.

But besides all of that, treating a group of people differently solely because of their race is literally the definition of racism, and that is exactly what yes voters were voting for putting in our constitution. I, for one, am glad that most of Australia had the sense to vote against that.

HiddenDragon7:16 pm 16 Oct 23

Calling it a silver lining might be an overstatement, but if all the states and territories eventually have bodies similar to the ACT ATSIEB, they could provide a practical alternative to the federal body which was voted down on Saturday.

Bearing in mind that the states and territories, and the local governments which operate under their auspices, deliver many of the services relevant to the Closing the Gap targets, it would make good sense (if this is not already happening) for federal officials to consult with these bodies and for federal and state/territory funding to be pooled as far as possible in each jurisdiction to minimise bureaucratic overlap and associated paperwork.

Noting, though, that the ACT has had a Voice-style consultative body for about 15 years, and that there are still many gaps to be closed, the expectations have to be realistic – as the penultimate sentence of the above article, quoting the Chief Minister, acknowledges.

Incidental Tourist5:46 pm 16 Oct 23

Looks more like Canberra bubble on full display. $450 millions taxpayers money spent on this referendum could have been far better placed to relieve the cost of living pressure to all needy people including first nation people.

Yep, well said.

This is an opinion piece. The Riotact used to be a serious news website, now it’s nonsense.

I’m glad it’s all over so thet the name calling on both sides can stop.

I’m also optimistic that the Federal Government will still find a way for a “voice”.

O look! The mean girl and the chap who couldn’t balance a budget. What do they want? More public servants! When do they want them? NOW!!!!

I guess if anyone knows how hard it is to achieve anything in politics, Barr would know. So far he hasn’t achieved much apart from wasting heaps of money and reducing our credit rating. Oh yes and Australia didn’t know because we weren’t told. It’s not up to the public to dig through google etc to find out. It should have been spent out by those instigating change. The NO campaign didn’t provide any misinformation. The YES campaign provided nil information. That is where the problem lied.

If they had been upfront it would have been an instant no. The fact they hid it and then claimed the other side were stupid was a late note.
The polling indicated the same. Yes, pending the info then gradually into the big NoOo

Rob McGuigan3:41 pm 16 Oct 23

How is this any sort of ” silver lining?” How out of step with the vast majority of Australians does an area have to get? Then we get to the editorial bias exhibited here, that’s even more one- sided and more our of step with the majority. By all means report your opinion and your pro Voice sentiments because it’s a free country. However, if you continue ignoring the majority of what Australians actually want your Publication risks being an ALP Bulletin Board and nothing else. How about a bit of balance?

Margaret Freemantle6:25 pm 16 Oct 23

It concerns me what the majority of Australia ns want! Is it racism, stupidity, or disinterest ?

I love how the “Progressive left”, now that they’ve completed the long march through the institutions, and having ensconced themselves as the new Establishment based in the wealthiest suburbs (the only places to vote “yes” in majority, “yes” to the same old failed indigenous affairs policy monopoly they’ve held for the past 40 years), are now fulminating against the trashy plebs for their impertinence in not doing as their Progressive masters tell them. Thanks Margaret, for the excellent illustration of this: a crystalline perfect far-right reactionary elitist comment (from someone who no doubt is convinced of their progressive left credentials). Proves George Orwell was right in the very last paragraph of “Animal Farm”.

Tom Worthington3:30 pm 16 Oct 23

Canberrans want changes on indigenous matters, but need to do it in a way which the rest of the country will find palatable. That could be with practical measures designed to help all those less advantaged in our community. As an example, by raising the age of criminal responsibility, stopping people going to prison for fines they can’t pay, stop people being arrested because they are in poverty, or homeless.

So effectively, the suggestions are to lower the standards of societally acceptable behaviour in order to artificially generate a perception of change? And for what? So that the patronising and condescending do gooders can have better statistics to hide behind? Why the hell would anyone ever raise the age of criminal responsibility in response to indigenous issues? Is the idea that they cognitively develop slower or something? That doesn’t seem at all racist? How about instead of lowering standards of crime and transgression, encouragement of leading a meaningful life is pursued? A little game called individual responsibility maybe?

The final result was about missing information, not misinformation.

Rob McGuigan4:10 pm 16 Oct 23

I watched ALL the YES23 Campaign at some stage say the NO Campaign was disseminating misinformation. Even this article says it. That’s when they weren’t name calling anyone that disagreed with them. To this day I have NEVER heard annunciated what exactly that misinformation was, or is. It appears to be nice a catch phrase not backed up by actual fact. In stating over and over again that NO did this is misinformation in itself. Ironic isn’t it?

It’s been said that the indigenous incarceration rates are higher in the ACT than in any other jurisdiction. Maybe the Barr government should focussed on rectifying this injustice.

So how is that an injustice exactly ?

Stephen Ellis2:22 pm 16 Oct 23

Just goes to show how out of touch so many Canberrans are with the rest of the country. The one thing it does show is an alignment between Canberra and the privileged elites in inner Sydney and Melbourne. Apparently the further you are from the problem the easier it is to believe that gestures are better than actions.

The richest 30 electorates voted yes, the poorest and most disadvantaged 120 electorates voted no…

That’s one way to look at it. Or you could say that the electorates with the best standards of education voted yes. That is, the areas with people who are trained to think critically and to question the easy narrative. Whereas when did you see a politician or major advocate for either side go to one of the more disadvantaged areas to explain it? therefore, those areas didn’t get the full amount of detail.

As a university educated electrical engineer with a Masters I just have to laugh at the delusion of others who feel that universities train people to think critically and to question easy narrative, or are more intelligent because they went to university. Universities these days teach people to regurgitate whatever narrative the university and lecturer have decreed the ‘correct’ one. Get out of the Canberra bubble and talk to more people, you’ll find that critical thinking doesn’t depend on whether they went to university, but by a person’s inate intelligence and upbringing. Whether they attended uni or not is irrelevant.

Please tell us the detail – Albo couldn’t, so this’ll be great. I’ll wait here…

Love the undisguised elitism, Tim. You’re obviously in favour of a constitutional amendment to remove the vote from all but the wealthy white inner city electorates who voted “yes” to this failed referendum just past. After all, their big talking point was that they always know best, and everyone else is too dumb to vote.

How is being out of touch with the rest of the country a “silver lining”. Gee whiz the journalistic bias is getting worse and worse. This should be labelled an opinion piece.

But Sam, Canberra isn’t out of touch with the rest of the country. An analysis of the results shows the ‘Yes’ vote was predominant in areas that are higher educated, and/or have younger populations. Canberra has a younger mean population than the rest of the country and a higher mean level of education. Therefore, the result in Canberra reflects other parts of the country with similar demographics.

Rob McGuigan4:14 pm 16 Oct 23

Yep, OUT OF TOUCH agree! Nothing to do with anything else other than the major employer is the Federal Public Service in the ACT. Now there’s a Conservative hotbed if I ever saw one ( joke).

I have 3 university degrees in the humanities and am what would be considered erudite and knowledgeable – have read most of Shakespeare’s plays, read “War and Peace” and “Anna Karenina” as well as many other classics. Listened to all 9 of Beethoven’s symphonies and many of Bach’s cantatas. Know my way through the operatic repertoire and read Dante in the original Italian. I have studied history including Australian history under eminent professors and know my way around most of the philosophical schools of the world. Yet I was an emphatic No supporter and saw the weaknesses in the whole Yes campaign.

How does the ACT count more than any other of the polling places?
We are not a state and our poll only counts towards the national total. Of which was a no.

The referendum didnt fail. It was a success. Everyone got to vote and there went any notiable issues.
The goal of the referendum was to find out the popular opinion and make it a very confident popular opinion by requiring 4 of 6 states and general majority. We now have that opinion.

I guess people are leaving the ACT voice as there is no point and they never get listened to?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.