19 June 2024

ANU accused of 'pulling the rug' from under families over decision not to renew childcare centre licences

| Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
13
children at Lake Burley Griffin with educators

Families have been left outraged that four community childcare centres on the ANU campus won’t have their licences renewed, effectively closing them down. Photo: Parent Community of UPCCC.

Current and hopeful future parents with children at four of the ANU’s community childcare centres have been left in a tailspin following the university’s decision not to renew their operating licences.

The licences of University Preschool and Child Care Centre (UPCCC), Acton Early Child Care, Cubby House on Campus and Heritage Early Childhood Centre (all located in the Acton Conservation Precinct) are due to expire on 31 January 2025.

ANU Chief Operating Officer Christopher Price informed current families in a letter that the decision had been made not to renew them.

“Due to the age of these buildings and the ongoing work required to remediate hail damage and ensure the buildings meet our high standards, the University has explored options to help us provide the best, uninterrupted childcare services for ANU families in the future,” he wrote.

These centres will be closed unless the community operators can find another venue.

It’s a decision that’s left parents stunned.

“I just wanted to throw up when I heard the news,” one staff member who just commenced parental leave told Region.

“Finding good childcare is hard enough, and without warning, ANU is pulling the rug from underneath hundreds of families – their own staff, too!”

READ ALSO ‘Review should happen’: Questions raised over Brindabella Christian College student safety during a fire

Another staff member told Region this announcement would impact their decision to return to work.

“Where else are people supposed to apply for? Wait lists are 18 months to two years, and I have been on the UPCCC wait list since I was 10 weeks pregnant to try and get a spot. Now there is no certainty I can get in anywhere else,” they said.

“My soon-to-be-born child is on other waitlists, but as an ANU staff member, and with the reputation of UPCCC, I now have to decide if I even can go back to work or put my child in sub-par childcare [and that’s] if they even get it to another centre on such short notice.”

University Preschool and Child Care Centre nursery and toddler playground

The University Preschool and Child Care Centre (UPCCC) at ANU is one of four centres that won’t have its lease in the Acton Conservation Precinct renewed. Photo: Facebook.

The Parent Community of UPCCC has already been formed to protest the closures, and an online petition has been launched.

In an open letter to the ANU, the group urged the university to extend the lease by six months to allow for “meaningful community consultation” and to agree that only community-based, not-for-profit organisations should be considered for the university’s new centres.

“[We also request] ANU acknowledges that its decision to close UPCCC is brought about solely by reason of its failure to uphold its responsibilities to undertake building maintenance in a timely manner and to a reasonable standard,” the group wrote.

The group has also claimed that UPCCC had made “multiple direct requests” for remediation works on its building over the past five years, but said some were agreed to but “never commenced or completed”.

Maintenance has been an issue, with the UPCCC forced to close earlier this year after lead paint particles were found in the carpet.

The group pointed to the university’s expected operating deficit of $105.1 million for 2023 as a potential motivator for the decision.

“It is disappointing that ANU may wish to prioritise the monetisation of early childhood education over real quality and continuity of care for children in its community.”

READ ALSO Protesters rally for ‘freedom’ as ANU announces work on new policies to crack down on anti-Semitism

Two purpose-built childcare facilities are under construction on campus and are expected to be complete by the time the community centres close.

Procurement is underway to find the operators of these new centres, which the community providers have been invited to participate in.

Mr Price assured existing families their children would be prioritised in the new facilities and that there would be enough spots for the “current level of demand” for childcare on campus.

“We will work to ensure ANU parents and families have access to the excellent services and facilities you expect in our childcare centres, both now and into the future.”

Region approached the ANU for further comment, including clarification around consultation with the centres and what families with children on wait lists for the community centres could expect.

A spokesperson reiterated that while the four community providers had offered “excellent care” for many years, the heritage status of their centres made maintenance difficult.

“Hail remediation work, which would require the temporary move of each Centre in due course, is an additional complication to the sustainable running of the buildings,” they said.

“The University has received feedback from staff, parents and guardians that the current buildings are not the ideal environment structurally for childcare centres.

“The University also gives urgent maintenance at childcare centres the highest priority.”

The spokesperson also rebuffed concerns about consultation.

“All centre directors and boards were aware of the end dates of their licences.”

This announcement does not impact the Goodstart Early Learning ANU Centre.

Join the conversation

13
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

It’s not exactly clear what the building problems are. One had lead contamination, but the others don’t. It would be helpful for ANU to release more details. Also if the new facilities are demountables with playgrounds fenced in like dog runs, it’s hard to see that as an improvement.

The existing childcare facilities are ageing and not fit for purpose. Two new purpose-built facilities are under construction on campus and are expected to be up-and-running by the time the community centres close.

Existing families and their children will be given priority in the new facilities!

Procurement processes are underway to find operators to operate the new facilities with community providers invited to participate.

Just what is the problem?

Canberra Engineer8:45 pm 19 Jun 24

The problem is change, culture and communication. All broken at ANU. The culture is disintegrating, management is retreating. Change is poorly managed and there’s no communication. There’s no respect for staff or students. The way this news was communicated is yet more evidence. No plan, except cut and hide. That’s the problem.

Jonathon Hancock9:35 am 24 Jun 24

My daughter attends one of the centres affected. There are several major problems. Firstly there are no problems with the building that her centre is located in. It is well maintained and purposely set up as daycare centre. If ANU want’s to provide a better environment, I don’t understand why they didn’t talk with parents and educators about the best way to do so.

More importantly, a day care centre is not just a building to store children during a work day. My daughter has built close relationships with her educators and peers. It is these relationships that are supporting her to thrive. I have no doubt, as a parent, that the closure will have a detrimental impact on her wellbeing and development. It will tear her away from those who have cared for more than half her life. That’s the problem.

Result of too much red tape – it’s just not possible to repair those buildings to comply with current building codes, plus childcare regulations plus heritage requirements. ANU cannot continue to operate the centres in those buildings while being strangled by various bureaucratic departments that are seemingly unaware of the existance of other bueaucratic departments, all with conflicting requirements… and that’s not even considering recent bushfire regulations that won’t let you build (certify) an education building within 50m of a tree, or blade of (natural) grass

Canberra Engineer11:00 am 19 Jun 24

The University is in a critical financial situation. Insiders know this and knew it was coming. At least with Brian you had faith in the bad being handled transparently and with humility. The new Vice-Chancellor is silent, hidden, and the bad news conveyed by underlings with no tact or consultation. How the ANU has fallen. It’s not a National University, so much as a National disgrace in terms of financial management and as a workplace. Slash and burn is the name of the game ahead.

Queenie-Lou Hilario10:39 am 19 Jun 24

ANU gave up any pretense of public good or community service a long time ago. It’s far closer in ethos to a bank than a learning institution. It’s revolting and embarrassing.

Agreed! It is not an organisation that cares about people. Try working there and you’ll soon see that.

Parents and small children are not the reason for ANU’s budget deficit and they are not the solution either. Building new centres is great as there is demand but these community run centres are of the highest quality. They are embedded in beautiful pockets of nature where the kids, growing up in an anxious world, get to dig in the dirt and listen to birds in the real shade of trees. The new ‘purpose built’ facilities around Canberra that we have toured have sad outdoor spaces with astroturf, plastic, concrete, and sun sails. The existing centres have educators who have been there for 10+ years, who want to be part of community not commercially run centres. Quality and consistency of care is key to allowing parents, and in particular women, get to work and contribute to the University and the community. Taking that away means putting women at a disadvantage. It is a shameful decision.

John Pierre Favre9:13 pm 18 Jun 24

Obviously a decision made by old folks who have finished their child producing time and couldn’t give a hoot about our future generations. This reminds me of a meeting I once attended in Sutton when the speaker raved about us looking after future generation. A chap at the back shouted ‘What have future generations ever done for me?’

Your bias against older people does you no credit. You’ve made assumptions without any evidence – not smart. It’s just as likely the decision was made by people without children, by those who don’t want them, or by men who don’t think of those things as it’s a ‘women’s issue’ for them.

They could have spared some cash to upgrade and repair these buildings for a small percentage of the massive amount of money that has been spent on new buildings at ANU. The work could have been done progressively over each lot of university holidays. Clearly flashy new buildings are more important than parents and children to ANU.

What a short-sighted decision by ANU. There’s absolutely no way the two hypothetical, unbuilt and unapproved ‘new centres’ can ever replicate or replace the community around the existing centres, let along accomodate existing children.

ANU needs to be honest with the communitynabout this – they’ve decided by stealth to kill community childcare on ANU campus and replace it with commercial providers. Shame on them.

UPCCC is over half a century old! Imagine taking an institution like that and tossing it in the trash.

Shame on ANU.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.