8 November 2024

Ban coming for social media use by under 16s

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
15

The Federal Government is determined to ban social media use by children under 16. Photo: File.

Australia will lead the world in banning social media for children and young teenagers with new legislation Anthony Albanese hopes will become law late next year.

The Prime Minister announced a suite of measures on Thursday (7 November) that he said was overdue and much needed in order to counter the risks of health and mental health on young people.

The ban will be for children under 16.

“This one’s for the mums and dads,” Mr Albanese said.

“Social media is doing harm to our kids and I’m calling time on it. I’ve spoken to thousands of parents, grandparents, aunties and uncles.

“They, like me, are worried sick about the safety of our kids online. And I want Australian parents and families to know that the government has your back.

“I want parents to be able to say, ‘Sorry mate, it’s against the law for me to get you to do this’.

“We don’t argue that the changes that we will be legislating will fix everything immediately. We have laws such as people can’t buy alcohol if they’re under 18, and from time to time that can be broken.

“But those laws set what the parameters are for our society and they assist in ensuring the right outcomes.

“Now the Government’s proposed age is 16 – that decision was made in Cabinet on Monday. And that proposal will go to the National Cabinet meeting that I’m convening online, a virtual meeting, tomorrow morning (Friday).”

While some countries have already set in train laws to curb social media use by children, none has tried using biometrics or government identification methods as the Albanese government is proposing here.

The age limit is set higher than in other countries, too.

“The onus will be on social media platforms to demonstrate they are taking reasonable steps to prevent access,” the PM said.

“The onus won’t be on parents or young people. There will be no penalties for users.”

READ ALSO Without the Greens, Labor redefines itself as the party to get the job done, responsibly

The eSafety Commissioner will provide oversight and enforcement, and legislation will come into force 12 months after its successful passage.

There will be a review of the legislation following its start.

“We want to make sure that it is got right,” Mr Albanese said.

“The eSafety Commissioner will issue regulatory guidance setting out what reasonable steps can be taken by platforms and that will be informed by the age assurance trial.

“A new definition of age-restricted social media platform will be adapted from the existing Online Safety Act definition of social media service for the purpose of the age limit.

“This definition will have flexibility to be narrowed through regulations because we want to make sure, for example, that young people can continue to access educational services.

“We will introduce privacy protections for information collected for age assurance purposes. The legislation won’t feature grandfathering arrangements.”

READ ALSO NDIS fines for dodgy or dangerous operators could jump to $15 million

The Federal Opposition has so far expressed support for a ban, as have state and territory governments.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland said social media platforms have shown that they can not be left to themselves to protect young users.

“We know that social media offers many benefits to Australians, including to young people, as a way of keeping connected, of finding their tribe, of making sure that young people who may otherwise be isolated by geography or other factors have that connection,” the Minister said.

“But we also know that it brings many harms. As a mother of two young daughters, I understand this personally. I understand this from family and friends. I understand this from my community, as would every Member of Parliament.

“I want to say to those parents, just as the Prime Minister did when it comes to protecting children from the harms caused by content or addictive behaviours as a result of social media, we are on your side.

“The fact is that social media has a social responsibility, but the platforms are falling short.”

Act for Kids, an organisation that delivers evidence-led professional therapy and support services to children and families who have experienced or are at risk of harm, welcomed the news, saying it was right to put greater emphasis on social media giants and their own provisions to protect children from online harm.

However, chief executive officer Katrina Lines said stronger protections needed to be put in place for all social media users.

“We also acknowledge there is not yet effective technology in place for age assurance or to verify parental consent,” Dr Lines said.

“Act for Kids wants to see more commitment from the Federal Government that they will hold social media companies accountable for improving the safety and well-being of all social media users.

“We will continue to strongly urge parents and carers to empower children with the knowledge they need to stay safe online, noting Act for Kids own research found 55 per cent of parents allow children unsupervised access to the internet.”

Join the conversation

15
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Might be a dumb question, but would it include things like riotact comments? I’m guessing so…

Ideally, parents should educate their children in the safe use of online material. But this law, if it passes, does not give any exemptions for parents to take this responsibility. How can you educate your children if they can’t use the banned media? It’s like trying to teach your kids to bake a cake, without using any ingredients.

It will be interesting if the ACT Greens offer support to their Federal colleagues for supporting this because you can get your Learners under 16 in the ACT, so no social media for you, but you can drive a car

HiddenDragon8:36 pm 08 Nov 24

“While some countries have already set in train laws to curb social media use by children, none has tried using biometrics or government identification methods as the Albanese government is proposing here.”

This is a big step towards constructing a surveillance state on the back of the raw emotions of grieving and despairing parents – which has to be a new low for an already distinctly shabby governing class.

Rather than setting up a regime which will involve proving who you are to Big Brother for every visit to a social media site – regardless of how brief/and or innocuous that visit might be – it would be better to take the approach of curbing and discouraging social media use by kids and providing supports which recognise that bullying and depression existed long before the internet was invented and won’t be stopped by trying to keep kids under 16 away from social media.

We all use it but in reality it has had a detrimental effect on young people. We stopped teaching our kids resilience and to fight back when bullied and that has had a negative effect on their mental health. Parents now refusing to believe their child could do something wrong and be at fault has let bullies prosper with parental blessing.

Digital ID by stealth. You’d have to be stupid to support this.

Well cooool! What sanguine teenager isn’t drawn to the frisson of forbidden fruit? Especially when it’s such a “nanny said so” rule.

Yeah, it’s a bully’s playground, but banning the playground isn’t the solution.

And how are they gonna make sure under 16’s can’t access social media? By forcing social media companies to require *all* social media users submit their ID when making an account?

This is clearly just yet another attempt to force everyone – especially adults – to be identified on social media so they can threaten us with fines/jail time for saying the “wrong” thing on social media…

Yes, children should be protected from the harms of social media, but that should be done by parents taking responsibility for their own children instead of demanding the government raise their kids for them.

This proposed legislation is certainly a progressive’s wet dream.

Parents, it is therefore absolutely crucial that you get your A’s into G and start educating your children that are younger than 16 that the progressive globalist ideology is nothing but the devil in disguise. And then when your child is allowed to access social media, they’ll have a solid foundation for further research – except for the censorship that’s also in the works for adults, under the title of the mis and disinformation bill, because the prime minister and all the rest are worried sick about us, too, which is totally believable if you’ve wasted your life.

Therefore, parents, jump online and buy all the good conspiratorial books you can find, and read these around the fire with your kids at night, having thrown your TV and your radio out the window

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.