12 November 2024

Dutton wants to give under 16s the social media ban as a Christmas gift

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
17
Peter Dutton

Peter Dutton wants the social media ban for under 16s in place by Christmas. Photo: Peter Dutton Facebook.

The ban on children using social media is not likely to be in force before the end of the year, but the Federal Opposition thinks it should be.

The Coalition appears to like Labor’s social media ban plans so much that it wants action on it now.

This is despite the Federal Government saying just last week the new laws wouldn’t be in force until late next year.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said he would like to see the news laws around banning children under 16 from using social media in place before Christmas.

There are only two sitting weeks left for parliament this year so that it would be a big ask.

Speaking to reporters in Brisbane on Tuesday (12 November), Mr Dutton said the social media ban could be implemented by Christmas if Labor acted swiftly.

“We’ve got two sitting weeks coming up and we would encourage the government to make sure that they continue the drafting process to get the bill into parliament,” he said.

While there will be exemptions for what the government is calling “low-risk platforms”, the new laws would ban children from using X-Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat and possibly YouTube, even if they have parental permission.

READ ALSO Policy rumblings begin in Australia following the US election

If passed, the new laws would see Australia lead the world in banning social media for children and young teenagers.

Some countries have already set in train laws to curb social media use by children, but none has tried using biometrics or government identification methods as is proposed by the Albanese government.

The planned age limit is also set higher in Australia than it is in other countries.

Announcing the plan last week, Anthony Albanese said social media was doing harm to Australia’s children, and the government was helping parents troubled by the influence it was having.

“The onus will be on social media platforms to demonstrate they are taking reasonable steps to prevent access,” the Prime Minister said.

“The onus won’t be on parents or young people. There will be no penalties for users.”

However, there will be significant penalties for social media platforms that breach the laws, with the eSafety Commissioner given powers to provide oversight and enforcement.

The laws were expected to come into force in 12 months, following a review of the yet-to-be-seen legislation – and that is still the plan as far as the government is concerned.

But the Opposition is placing pressure on the government to act sooner.

Shadow communications minister David Coleman has already extended an offer to the government to work cooperatively to get the legislation introduced and passed as soon as possible.

The Coalition is no doubt hoping that by offering bipartisan support and going one further by saying it’s ready to pass the laws now, they can gain the moral high ground.

READ ALSO Australia now has an Anti-Slavery Commissioner

Mr Dutton has also accused the PM of being “tricky” over an election date and said Mr Albanese should come clean about discussions with WA Premier Roger Cook about that state’s election date.

Media reports have suggested Mr Cook was looking at the possibility of shifting the WA election, which is slated for March, to make way for an early federal election.

It has led to immediate speculation the Prime Minister could be announcing a federal election as early as January. The next federal election is due in May.

But the PM denied talking with the WA Premier about election dates.

The Opposition Leader has called on the Prime Minister to “be upfront” with the Australian people about the election and any discussions he had with Mr Cook about it.

Mr Albanese hit back, saying there was no discussion about election dates and that the Opposition Leader had much more to come clean about.

“Peter Dutton needs to be upfront to the Australian people about anything at all,” the PM said when asked about it during a media conference in Tasmania.

“Anything will do. Can we have a single costed policy?”

Join the conversation

17
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
HiddenDragon7:37 pm 14 Nov 24

“The Coalition appears to like Labor’s social media ban plans so much that it wants action on it now.”

The Coalition had an unconditional commitment to a social media ban for under 16s prior to Labor –

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-06-14/social-media-age-limits-experts-warn-they-aren-t-simple/103975740

– so this is actually a case of Labor having firmed up support for a Coalition idea.

Dutton’s attempt to rush the government into acting before the election on a policy which he had promised to enact within 100 days of being elected suggests that he no longer sees it as a clear cut vote winner and wants to get it out of the way before the election – with Labor lumbered with the baggage for what looks like growing reservations about the wisdom and practicality of this policy.

The ban should be once your 18 you can access it with age verification.

Between 16 and 18, with parental support plus parent/child age verification.

Under 16, no cigar.

wildturkeycanoe8:43 am 14 Nov 24

The bullies will just have to pick on kids face-to-face now I guess.
On the plus side, we might see children actually talking to each other instead of sitting glued to their phones.
I wonder how far reaching these laws will be, as there are social media apps used to communicate and coordinate sporting events, such as Heja. Without these, how will they convey venue changes, ground closures etc?

GrumpyGrandpa9:12 pm 13 Nov 24

Requiring our kids to use biometrics or government identification methods as proposed by the Albanese government, seems a bit over the top, considering that the no one within the targeted age group will be liable if they fail to comply.

While I think there are very good reasons to limit access to social media for younger vulnerable people, this is going to be a hard sell. It’ll be Mum & Dad in the hot seat trying to get their kids off the social media. Good luck telling a 14 or 15 year old they need to close their Tik Tok or Insta.

At least there is bipartisan support.

In order for this ban on under 16s to be possible, it will need age verification from everyone – along with all of the handing over of data that entails – and yet that’s not being talked about much is it?

Capital Retro4:21 pm 13 Nov 24

The Greens were trying to promote this on some lefty forum called Q+A last night.
I can’t see any problem for intelligent people as they don’t waste their time with it anyhow.

Geez the conspiracy theories are tedious.

Whilst I don’t support the government doing parenting in the real world there will just be an age verification requirement on the social media companies to whom the users are already giving their data anyway.

Many ‘conspiracy theories’ have recently been been proven right, so that’s not the insult you may think it it.
I know that the small amount of social media websites I use don’t have my real name, phone number or my main email address (always have a junk one for that). They don’t know who I am, and I like it that way. If I’m forced to provide real details, either I dump that company altogether, or use a VPN. I’m not going to comply, and will tell my kids not to either. We already manage what they do quite well.

Social media should be banned but it should be a parenting decision, not a government one.

For once, I agree.
This isn’t about “protecting kids” though.

The most tiresome part of this, is both parties hoping everybody is stupid enough to believe this has anything to do with protecting kids. It’s blatantly overt surveillance.

I just hope the platforms close their Australian offices and ignore our governments attempts at authoritarian nonsense.

Hoping for a new tin foil hat for Christmas Ken, that might keep the nasty surveillance away.

Yeah, requiring every Australian to provide ID to use social media isn’t anything to do with surveillance.

Are you drunk?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.