Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Community

Quality childcare in a
welcoming & supportive environment

Bill Stefaniak – Internet Enforcer

By johnboy 29 November 2005 28

Old ladies who can’t beat their way onto talkback radio call up local MLA’s to whinge. Which I suspect prompted this media release from Wild Bill Stefaniak warning that *SHOCK HORROR* people should beware of email scams following reports to his office of an email disguised as an advertisement for several positions.

Let’s hope Bill can keep up a consistent and accurate account of internet threats.

Because if he can’t, or doesn’t, then an isolated warning is worse than useless.


What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
28 Responses to
Bill Stefaniak – Internet Enforcer
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
bonfire 3:21 pm 02 Dec 05

my work here is done. off to the durham.

Maelinar 3:05 pm 02 Dec 05

bonfire, welcome to my ignore list. You join the Limey champion of all things monkey bike, ufu*kface.

What that means is I no longer give a shit about anything you say. I won’t respond to you, and any comments I make will most certainly not be in relation to any of your posts.

I’m guessing that you’ll most certainly not be bothered, as the holder of the best actor in a musical award for your portrayal of Billy Flynn in Chicago, I’m sure you’re above all that.

You’re most welcome to come and discuss the situation with me anytime, I’m sure you’re familiar with the time and place.

adios, assbandit.

bonfire 2:48 pm 02 Dec 05

perhaps if you tore yourself away from the task at hand for a moment you may like to know that i was implying your mouth was close to a source of shit. i see know that it is in fact the source.

i dont think ive ever stated or implied i was a homosexual. because i wont denounce perversions, does not mean i partake in them.

youre a gobshite.

Maelinar 2:37 pm 02 Dec 05

umm bonfire, I hate to point out the obvious, but it was you that implied that you are the homosexual. All I did was call you an assbandit for being infatuated with my ass, then your ass, then denying you’re a homo, not interested in other peoples perversions, accusing me of being a masturbater, and then accusing me of being a homosexual.

self-inflicted assbandit.

bonfire 2:31 pm 02 Dec 05

well its a friday arvo.

Spitfire3 2:23 pm 02 Dec 05

This is going well.

bonfire 2:14 pm 02 Dec 05

if you imply i am a homosexual, and im not then its not much of an insult. if you imply that i am one and i am one, then again, its not much of an insult. so im confused.

should i be offended by being described by you as a homosexual ? just thought i’d clear that up. cos apparently im a tard as well.

maybe youre a homosexual having difficulty coming to terms with your own sexuality. you may be in a world of mental turmoil.

in which case, i’ll misquote jesus of nazareth ‘forgive him father, he knows not what he does’.

Maelinar 1:51 pm 02 Dec 05

Bonfire, you are a tard.

I hope that this shard of advice does not come as a surprise to you, because I have witnessed many other posters on this website tell you the same.

My advice to you is to get your own head out of your own ass, as the foot in your mouth is causing me no end of dilemma trying to work out which part is where.

assbandit.

bonfire 1:22 pm 02 Dec 05

By your own postings perhaps i need to reassess, like a dog perhaps you prefer to spend many hours exploring your own arse crack.

not that it has any impact on my observation on this website, but i can assure you i am not a homosexual or have i ever taken part in any homosexual behaviour.

as i have stated elsewhere, im not interested in other peoples perversions. as long as their actions dont impact me i couldnt care what they did to each other in the privacy of their own home.

for example, you are obviously a compulsive masturbator. that doesnt affect me or worry me at all, except that in your overfrequent acts of ritualistic onanism, you divert energy that your brain could use to form arguments.

resulting in comments on this website that are frankly, odd.

Maelinar 12:21 pm 02 Dec 05

Who’s ?

Be so brazen as to identify just whomsoever I’ve ever supported on this or any other website.

At least your sexuality is clear assbandit.

bonfire 12:13 pm 02 Dec 05

well perhaps thats because my tongue is firmly in my cheek, whereas yours is firmly in someones arse crack.

Maelinar 11:44 am 02 Dec 05

Bonfire, you make me laugh.

Your voice of reason, sanity and balance sounds as sane as those chaps in South Australia who liked storing people in plastic barrels in the back of old banks.

bonfire 11:36 am 02 Dec 05

spitfire, down the bottom it says ‘leave a comment’ so i do. i wasnt aware this requireed research and qualified footnotes. contrary to your assertion, i do not regard my comments as axioms. that is a tactic the softheads adopt when they mount their pointless arguments for cause du jour.

why should i care why they hold a particular view, often they dont want to hear others, just ram their own down peoples throats.

should i ask them to lay on my couch and tell me about their relationship with their mother ?

i can more profitably employ my time tearing their flimsy arguments apart. I like to think i bring a voice of reason, sanity and balance to riotact .

woudl you prefer i post mung bean casserole recipes instead ?

Spitfire3 5:03 pm 01 Dec 05

Just to clarify, I don’t mean mainly in this thread in particular. This is a view built principally on past threads.

Spitfire3 4:58 pm 01 Dec 05

I know it’s only sometimes that you are the first stone-thrower. And I agree that often other views are unoriginal. But often you dismiss and rudely criticise people for holding other views without much discussion to further explore that person’s views or why they hold them. You tend to generalise instead, and then attack that generalisation.

bonfire 1:11 pm 01 Dec 05

i cant edit the previous post, so replace the word ‘lack’ with ‘contain any’.

bonfire 1:09 pm 01 Dec 05

i think you will find it was not i that cast the first stone in this instance.

i am happy to listen to others points of view. its just that im so often right and so rarely wrong that their views are often amusingly irrelevant and rarely lack substance. often they are just views they have adopted from someone else as their own. they have very little original analysis and rely on glib throwaways.

throw a new idea up and lets assess it.

Spitfire3 12:02 pm 01 Dec 05

Bonfire, stop insulting people who have differing opinions to yours. You seem unable or unwilling to try to see an issue from someone else’s point of view.

bonfire 5:21 pm 30 Nov 05

stefaniak hasnt committed or admitted to a crime. the firework zealot did. he arranged teh stunt, had himself photographed, turned himself in and then got all shitty when he was charged with a crime he provided all the evidence that proved he had committed!

theres a big difference. one person alerts others to a possibel crime, anotehr actually committs a crime.

if stefaniak had spammed everyone with a scam and suckered some unfortunates in ‘just to prove it could be done’ do you think you softhead hand wringing idiots would be happy with justice softsentence letting him off – amazed that such a naif should have been charged in the first place ?

Spitfire3 4:42 pm 30 Nov 05

bonfire said: “good intentions, however misguided and odd, should be applauded.”

Wow, that seems like kind of a turnaround from your position in the recent thread about the fireworks crusader’s acquittal.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2019 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site