15 August 2024

Build-to-rent: Crossbench backs proposed amendments to give investors, tenants more certainty

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
8
David Pocock speaking to the media

Senator David Pocock: “This is no silver bullet, but this is an important part of the puzzle.” Photo: Facebook.

A greater tax break for investors, no “no-cause” evictions and five-year leases are among a range of amendments being proposed to the Federal Government’s build-to-rent legislation, which proponents say would generate 105,000 new rental homes and immediately unlock over 1200 affordable tenancies.

The Community Housing Industry Association, National Shelter and the Property Council have joined together in urging changes to the legislation, which is held up in the Senate after the Greens knocked it back, demanding that all BTR homes be affordable.

The bill is now before a Senate committee, which will report in September.

READ ALSO ‘There’s no rental shortage here’ – calls for Canberra landlords to adjust expectations

Crossbench senators have backed the amendments package, with ACT Independent Senator David Pocock saying it was a big step forward.

“I welcome it, and I really challenge the Greens and the major parties to begin to work together,” he said.

“This is no silver bullet, but this is an important part of the puzzle.”

The property industry and BTR sector have been urging a further reduction in the concessional rate of withholding tax for managed investment trusts to 10 per cent, down from the 15 per cent proposed by the government, which would put BTR on the same level as other property types.

However, the groups say the extra tax cut will maximise BTR builds and affordable tenancies targeted towards low- and moderate-income households.

They say extending the concession to BTR projects that were existing or under development at the time of the 2023 Budget announcement could also unlock over 1200 affordable tenancies immediately.

The looming end of the National Rental Affordability Scheme, which will mean up to 6750 properties will cease to be affordable by the end of the year, is a strong imperative to unlock affordable rental housing as soon as possible, the groups say.

Proposed changes also guarantee more certainty for tenants with requirements for BTR operators that access the tax concession, including a commitment to not using ‘no grounds’ clauses to gain possession and offering five-year lease terms, up from the current three years in the bill.

The amendments also seek to ensure the 10 per cent affordable housing target within existing and new BTR projects benefit those most in need.

Changes would revise the definition of affordable tenancies so these are available to moderate-income earners, with at least 20 per cent of these available to low-income earners. They would be managed by community housing providers.

Income eligibility limits would specify that rents are up to 74.9 per cent of market value or no more than 30 per cent of household income, whichever is the lower.

READ ALSO New Access Canberra team to identify building defects early and oversee private certifiers

Senator Pocock said the government foregoing $10 million in revenue over a decade in exchange for 10,000 social homes was a pretty good deal, “especially when you’re adding no no-cause evictions and five-year leases”.

He said there was an urgency to “getting this in place to unlock existing stocks and provide that certainty for investors”.

“There’s a huge amount that could happen very quickly,” he said.

Property Council executive director Mike Zorbas recently told the Senate committee that uncertainty caused by the BTR bill’s delay since the 2023 Budget announcement had eroded investment.

“Capital flows into the sector have effectively stalled,” he said. “We are currently repelling a patient pool of institutional capital.”

Join the conversation

8
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

BTR just doesn’t work!

Incidental Tourist10:43 am 16 Aug 24

– Uncertainty around land tax is the elephant in the room. Victoria and ACT already turned it to large revenue grabs exceeding any federal tax rebates.
– Rent caps and perpetual tenancy legislation changes are another elephant in the room as it is controlled by states and territories.
– Good tenants do not need “no cause” eviction ban. The rate of no reason lease terminations by landlords is twice less than the rate of divorces and much lesser than work redundancies. No cause eviction ban encourages worst 5% tenancies and impacts 95% good tenants through higher rent.
– BTR is bad to families and mental health. Most BTR are 1-2 br high density ghettos. They trap residents in endless “no cause” childless, lone poverty cycle creating “socialist proletariat” class. Marxist theory regards proletariat as working ants who own nothing not even their house.
– BTR is more expensive. Classical tenancies have low rental yield around 3-4% because landlords invest in capital growth. BTR are commercial properties. Commercial rent yield is close to 10-15%. So for the same rent tenants will either have 3 times less real estate or for the same real estate tenants have to pay triple rent. And we do see this trend in Canberra when tenants move from larger private houses to small apartments paying higher rent.

Pocock and co seem to have forgotten that tax cuts and reducing public investment into housing are what created this problem. Tax cuts for investors only help if your economic model of the housing market is flawed. Encouraging economic rents seeking is really bad policy.

Yeah, encouraging people to invest in something by removing all control of their very expensive asset. 🤣

Do these people just get drunk and come up with these stupid policies at their communist alliance meetings? You’d have to be an idiot to sign up for this.

Labor and greens ultimale plan is everyone rents a home owner by foreign Chinese interest. How many people have spare change to donate to a renter?
If you own an investment home ‘own’ is a shakey word as the government will step in and change your rights to your house however they see fit.

They then wonder why no one wants to invest.

Thank goodness for the ACT’s Senator David Pocock and fellow indepdents. A big thumbs down to the Greens Party, supported by their ACT counterparts holding up the build to rent housing bill whose passage seeks to boost affordable housing supply in our cities. The Greens pretend that they represent renters and the less fortunate in our society but always hold out and demand more. The party has joined forces with the Federal Liberals by going out of their ways to make it difficult for the passage of this bill, with warnings that delays in its passage will hinder and price out those who want to enter the housing market including critical care workers, teachers and carers.

The Greens have been criticised by crossbench MPs, Independents and other senators and religious and social justice groups for their stance including the Community Housing Industry Association, National Shelter and the Property Council of Australia, joining together in urging them to back the policy.

The sooner ACT Labor severs links with these wreckers the better!

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.