Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Sunday 8 April 2018, 9 am - 3 pm

Cook school meeting – Barr states “Cook is a great School”

By Special G - 12 September 2006 26

Minister Andrew Barr attended a Community meeting at Cook Primary School tonight (12 Sept 06) and made a large number of vague comments about how the Government was going about assessing Schools marked for closure.

I looked around the School hall and noted that there was hardly a spare seat in the room and a number of people standing around the sides and at the back.

Barr agreed that Cook School has a fully integrated P-6 model with excellent IT, classroom and playground facilities that the rest of the ACT system should be modelled on. He made a number of comments on topics such as Cook School’s leading work with their autism programs and that Cook provided a high quality in teaching.

Audience pointed out that Cook was operating at 91% capacity (140) that the school was reduced to by previous Labour Government in order to gain revenue by leasing the second wing of the school. This was followed up by Barr commenting that there were 56 Cook Primary aged students currently attending out of area schools which could potentially be displaced by other school closures.

Barr also stated “Cook is a great School”

Which begs the question; Why the bloody hell is it marked for closure?

The government’s plan as outlined by Barr and the 2020 document is Primary Schools with 200-400 students. Aranda has 375 and Macquarie has 206. Aranda already has one demountable building suggesting that it is lacking the infrastructure to take any more students, leaving Macquarie as the only option for Cook families.

Barr outlined that Cook’s slightly higher than average operating costs did not impact greatly on the decision to close the school. He quoted figures that it costs $1000 more per year to send a kid to Cook than the average.

Cook school uses an integrated Autism program and has a large number of ESL (English as a Second Language) students. Both of these special needs groups have a much greater cost associated with them than the average student increasing the overall cost per student at the school where they are located.

On the short note Barr seemed impressed by Cook School except in two areas.

1 – number of students – part reason by the Government setting the maximum number of students at 140 and making $61,000 in revenue by leasing the second wing of the school, which goes to ACT property management, part of Urban services. A small amount of this (20%) is factored into the school operating costs for electricity and water.

2 – Cost per student – Special needs not calculated and not significantly above the average.

As far as I could see he could not come up with a good reason why Cook should be closed except that it was on the list.

On a slightly different note he made several comments throughout the meeting about the high quality of teachers in the ACT – too bad he doesn’t convert his opinions and comments into a half decent pay rise for the quality he expects.

Money saved on education today is money spent on law enforcement in time.

To see the Keep Cook open website follow the link.

What’s Your opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
26 Responses to
Cook school meeting – Barr states “Cook is a great School”
Showing only Website comments
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
nyssa76 4:37 pm 15 Sep 06

The policy will cause heart ache and stress throughout the system.

Mr. Barr, do you know where you will work next year? Yes you do.

I sure as hell don’t.

FFS, get off the can and quit destroying a system that is the best in Australia.

Chris S 4:24 pm 15 Sep 06

seepi, one would hope that they would, but of course they won’t. Then of course, few organisations do.

What should happen is that whatever changes occur in December, there is some sort of follow-up to see whether or not the objectives (whatever they are) of the closures have been achieved. Have costs been cut? If so, as much as expected? Have those disadvataged by the changes settled into the new arrangements? What needs to be done now? What lessons could be learned? etc, etc.

Won’t happen, though.

seepi 11:47 am 15 Sep 06

This govt writes so manyplanning papers, sets up committees , ‘consults’ , but do they ever actually evaluate things after the fact, to see if in fact they did make any savings, or achieve their goals?

aidan 9:35 am 15 Sep 06



nyssa76 10:25 pm 14 Sep 06

I await the decision for December. We all know what it will be, and we know Mr. Barr knows.

The consultation is a big joke – yes it is a part of the process but the decision has already been made, stated in LA and created in the shitty policy document Towards 2020.

miz 4:33 pm 14 Sep 06

Yep Aidan that sounds pretty right. ‘A range of factors’.

Hate that phrase ‘going forward’ – always reminds me (appropriately perhaps) like a line from Devo’s Whip It.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | |

Search across the site