24 January 2024

UPDATED: Expansion of on-demand bus would benefit some, but researchers warn against going full-speed ahead

| Claire Sams
Join the conversation
34
Buses

A group of Canberra researchers have studied the benefits and drawbacks of a fixed timetable in Belconnen. Photo: James Coleman.

Navigating fixed bus timetables is a daily occurrence for many, but some Canberra researchers have been looking into an alternative system.

Senior lecturer in the School of Engineering and Technology at UNSW Canberra Dr Milad Ghasri was one of three academics involved in a recent study examining how a flexible public transport system would work in suburban Canberra compared to the existing system.

“This study is more of a methodological study,” Dr Ghasri said.

“One of the novelties of our study is proposing a new solution method [for coming up with the best route] which is more efficient than the existing ones.

“Our method can consider multiple factors, whereas previous methods can only optimise for one thing at a time.

“We needed to test if this method actually works.”

The on-demand public transport system wouldn’t have a fixed timetable. Instead, users could lodge service requests, which would work alongside the rapid buses.

“What we assumed is that passengers would make a request eight hours in advance, and they would specify their origin and their destination and what time they want to be picked up or dropped off,” he said.

In their analysis, the researchers used a 12-seater vehicle.

READ ALSO Police car collides with moving light rail vehicle during Summernats weekend

The three academics began their study close to home – the district of Belconnen.

“We decided to work in Canberra because we’re familiar with the environment, specifically Belconnen, because the three of us live there,” Dr Ghasri said.

“We’re quite familiar with the neighbourhood and the environment, making it easier to interpret the findings and get our head around anything we observe.”

Using MyWay card data for bus trips taken on 6 March 2021 – the busiest weekend day of the busiest month between August 2020 and July 2021 – they simulated an on-demand bus system that replaced local bus lines.

“We used the data to get a picture of current trips, and then we created a list of requests for an on-demand service based on those,” he said.

“The reason [for choosing that time period] was we knew from the literature that on-demand services are going to be more beneficial for low-demand scenarios, so we wanted to see how it performs against the current public transport system.”

In the best-case scenario, they found that replacing the Belconnen buses could reduce the average travel time from around 12 minutes down to as low as 7.5 minutes and reduce operational costs from $10,377 to $4036.

The study found the average operational cost for transporting a passenger comes out at between $50 and $105, depending on the time of day, while a flexible timetable operating at best operational cost would cost from $5 to $24.*

The researchers also looked at how their results would change if different elements were prioritised over others, such as travel time, operational costs, impacts on the environment and bus delays.

For example, there would be a drop of approximately 2330 km in the distance travelled when the focus is on reducing the impact on the environment, while a focus on minimising travel time would see an increase of nearly 2000 km travelled over the current system.

The study found that the on-demand system would also need between 11 and 32 12-seater vehicles to transport the same number of passengers as the current network with 11 buses.

READ ALSO Inside the Canberra Railway Museum’s freshly restored 1960s railmotors

However, the researchers aren’t calling for Canberra’s current fixed timetable to be removed.

“What we are suggesting is that there is a potential opportunity of using on-demand services as a complimentary component of the public transport system,” Dr Ghasri said.

“The case study of Canberra only demonstrates that in some cases, [on-demand systems] can perform much better than existing public transport lines.

“That does not mean we should ditch them.”

Dr Ghasri said while an on-demand bus might sound nice, switching over would not suit the entire Canberra public transport network.

“One of the drawbacks that on-demand services have is that it’s not practical to run it for a region as large as the entirety of Canberra,” he said.

“Every time we want to run an on-demand service, we need to solve an optimisation model, which is a complicated mathematical process, and it’s a time-consuming process.

“Our model is not an exception to that.”

Transport Canberra currently operates the Flexible Bus Service, which operates across five zones, to transport people from home to community locations such as hospitals, shopping centres and medical centres.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Transport Research.

*Dr Ghasri said researchers had updated their estimates of bus operating costs to approximately $13 during the morning hours (6 am to 12 pm), $14 during the afternoon hours (12 pm to 6 pm) and over $108 during the evening hours (6 pm to 12 am).

Join the conversation

34
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Leon Arundell3:32 pm 20 Jan 24

The authors have corrected their public transport cost estimates as follows: “The average operational cost for transporting each passenger using PT amounts to approximately 13 AU$ during the morning hours (6 am to 12 pm) and 14 AU$ during the afternoon hours (12 pm to 6 pm). This cost escalates to over 108 AU$ during the evening hours (6 pm to 12 am).”

In demand it is not! The study assumes a long notice prebooked service.

The researchers said
“What we assumed is that passengers would make a request eight hours in advance, and they would specify their origin and their destination and what time they want to be picked up or dropped off,” he said.

How on earth, in any reasonable way, is 8 hour notice interpreted as ‘in demand’? Very misleading.

GrumpyGrandpa1:36 pm 15 Jan 24

Ok, this is nothing more than an intellectual brain-fart study and will probably amount to nothing more than hot air, to add to that hot air, I have some real-life experiences.

Action had an across the board Flexibus system some 15-20 years ago for I think weekend or evening services? Frankly it was confusing. I’m a regular bus user and I never user it.

Without a timetable I never knew when a bus would turn up. I figured that if I ordered a bus, it might not turn up. How long would I have to wait?What if someone else on your route, had ordered one and it’d just driven past your stop. Would they sent another one?

The uncertainty killed it for me. It just seemed a dumb idea.

Commuters want regularity of service; something they can depend on. If the ACT Government wants to increase patronage and get people out of their cars, reducing regular services wouldn’t accomplish that.

It’s a bit like their current Weekend services through the suburbs every 2 hours.
I rarely catch a bus through the suburbs on a weekend, because 2 hourly is not a “service”, it’s a pathetic joke.

Leon Arundell8:51 pm 14 Jan 24

The ACT government prioritises pollution ahead of health. It subsidises polluting public transport by at least $45 per trip. Walking and cycling provide greater health benefits, but Government spending on shared paths and bike lanes works out at only about 20 cents per trip.

Is the funding for the cycle lanes next to the road where the cyclist always takes the road anyway?

People have been able to walk places for the past 100000 years without funding.

Leon Arundell9:19 am 15 Jan 24

Most funding goes to footpaths (next to roads) and community paths (which like footpaths are for walking and cycling). Some goes to on-road cycle lanes. A tiny proportion goes to separated walking and cycling paths.

GrumpyGrandpa1:46 pm 15 Jan 24

Ride your bike if you like, but I find them a bit inpractical when I go grocery shopping, or need to travel beyond my local area or when it’s raining etc.

Leon Arundell3:34 pm 20 Jan 24

Correction: the author’s corrected cost estimates indicate that the government subsidises public transport by at least $8 per trip.

Leon Arundell3:42 pm 20 Jan 24

My bike is faster than public transport, for trips up to ten kilometres. Unlike most Canberra bikes it has a luggage basket for grocery shopping, lights for travelling at night, and mudguards so that after the rain passes I don’t get sprayed with muddy water.

ChrisinTurner6:39 pm 14 Jan 24

The case rests strongly on “average operational cost for transporting a passenger comes out at between $50 and $105”. I cannot find any evidence for this statement in the paper.

Leon Arundell9:20 am 15 Jan 24

Can you provide a link to the paper?

We already had this. it was a failure.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.