11 January 2024

Police car collides with moving light rail vehicle during Summernats weekend

| Genevieve Jacobs
Join the conversation
21
police car and traffic lights on Northborne Avenue

A police car collided with a light rail vehicle over the weekend. Photo: Screenshot.

Footage of a Canberra police car turning in front of a light rail vehicle on Saturday night, resulting in a collision, has prompted both shock and bemusement from the Canberra community.

Captured on Saturday when Summernats was in full swing, the video footage appears to be taken from the intersection of Northbourne and Wakefield Avenues near the light rail stop close to midnight.

A police car with flashing lights makes a right-hand turn directly in front of an oncoming light rail vehicle, colliding with the tram and spinning around in its path. The light rail vehicle, which had been moving slowly, comes to a stop immediately.

A statement from police said “About 11:50 pm on Saturday, 6 January 2024, a police vehicle was travelling north on Northbourne Avenue, when they stopped at the intersection of Northbourne Avenue and MacArthur Avenue.

“About this time, police had cause to activate their emergency lights and observed the intersection to be clear of vehicles, before proceeding against a red turn arrow.

“At this time, a light rail vehicle entered the intersection and collided with the rear of the police vehicle. No people were injured in the collision, however both the police vehicle and the light rail sustained damage as a result of the collision.

“As per ACT Policing’s standard protocols, the matter is currently being investigated”.

The film footage has been widely shared across multiple social media sites.

“Few months ago act policing posted a video of every other light rail accident, telling people to be aware of the new lights and to be careful etc …” one social media user wrote .

“I guess they’re gonna be in they’re (sic) own video compilations now?”

Another user commented: “Extra training, to be able to ignore road rules, but forgot to use their eyes …” prompting others to suggest a trip to Specsavers might be in order for the officer.

READ ALSO Alleged liquor thief accused of exposing himself in supermarket says he has ‘no common sense’

In the first three months of last year, Canberra light rail drivers reported they’d been forced to use the emergency brake 21 times, averaging once every three days.

Drivers are trained to use the emergency brake, which automatically sounds a horn, as a last resort after using a cautionary bell and regular brake.

Canberra Metro Operations general manager Bruno Lancelot said at the time the trams do not have automatic braking and rely on the driver’s “line of sight”.

“If [trams are travelling] at about 70 km/h, which is the maximum speed, [they] need around 60 metres to stop, which is double the length of a tram,” he said.

“And that’s why people need to be really, really careful when they cross in front of a tram, even if the tram is on the other side of the intersection.”

Any incidents automatically trigger an investigation by Canberra Metro Operations, with assistance from the AFP and safety regulator.

Last year, ACT Road Policing said increasing police enforcement was only part of the answer, pointing to limits on resources but noting that police were prepared to take stronger enforcement options if necessary when drivers or pedestrians flouted safety regulations regarding light rail.

Earlier this week, senior police were sharply critical of some Summernats participants despite a relatively uneventful car festival. Around 100 extra police were deployed on each day of the event both inside and outside the venue, including traffic patrol.

“If we set up an IQ-testing station at the border instead of a vehicle-testing station, we’d halve our problems,” Acting Inspector Mark Richardson said on Monday.

“The real car enthusiasts are not the problem; it’s the moron tourism”, he said, describing the trouble-makers as “a sub-species of the human race”.

Join the conversation

21
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Not too sure the police crew members collide with the need to do the RBT or drug test, and who’s going to do these testes.

Tom Worthington9:42 am 12 Jan 24

The police statement on this incident is inconsistent with the video. I suggest whoever prepared and authorized the statement be suspended from duty, and subject to an investigation to determine why it was made.

To say the intersection was clear is inaccurate, as is to say the light rail vehicle collided with the police vehicle.

An better description would be to say a police vehicle entered an intersection which a light rail vehicle was approaching; the police vehicle then turned into the path of the oncoming light rail vehicle, which it then collided with.

If we go back a bit we could also say the police vehicle passed the light rail vehicle as they were both travelling in the same direction and then turned into the path of the same oncoming light rail vehicle…

@olfella
I think you’ll find that the police vehicle was stopped at a red light, in the right turn lane, before it activated its emergency signals. So whether or not the police vehicle passed the LRV is needless speculation.

Turns out it’s all good though as it’s going to be investigated by a completely independent body located interstate and by chance inthisterritory called the AFP. Breaking News: The completely, totally, absolutely independent body has reported they have completed their investigation, it found ” The tram driver and seventy passengers have been issued warnings over unsafe driving of a vehicle other than a car and a police officer has been commended for his bravery for responding in such a speedy time time to what was a serious accident involving a tram and a private vehicle the driver of which fled the scene and has yet to be located due to a lack of witnesses or any CCTV footage and despite extensive ongoing investigations”. Trust the process!

mikaloviche15:43 pm 11 Jan 24

When I learnt to drive in Melbourne there was one lesson you had to learn TRAMS RULE OK . If a cop car does this with impunity how are the rest of us meant to take it when obviously there was an oversight and illegal turn until lights activated . I think in light of the comments made by the ACT police in recent days there needs to be a neanderthal, sub species test for over zealous law enforcement officers to use their common sense and that is what should prevail. Summernats incidents pail in insignificance to this almost tragic incident. Tram drivers need to be aware their are police with attitudes and low IQ’s out there tempting fate. Maybe put a little tram training center in Goulburn to train ( or tram ) up new recruits as to the right of way trams have . wham bam thank you tram for your skills and response to abject unexpected stupidity you would not expect in this scenario.

@mikaloviche1
“… there was an oversight and illegal turn until lights activated”
While it’s obvious, in the video, the police officer hasn’t proceeded with caution, it’s clear that the emergency lights and siren had been activated when it actually came into view – i.e. commenced a LEGAL turn under emergency conditions.
Perhaps you need to take of your rose coloured glasses and the chip on your shoulder and view the video again.

Who has right of way? The tram? Or emergency vehicles?

If the emergency vehicle has its light activated, then they have the “right of way” but at a red ligh they need to ensure the other vehicles (and tram/s) have seen them and are going to give way

There are certain laws that can be bent slightly if lights and sirens are activated. However the laws of physics can not be bent. The tram could not have stopped to enough to allow the police car to go through because physics. No matter the lights and sirens, the tram should have had right of way because common sense.

What does the IQ test say when you pass a tram then turn in front of it? Any awareness of their surrounds?

If you read the article… the police car was waiting to turn right, they then activated the lights (assume they got an urgent call) and started to turn right and forgot to look in the rear view mirror/side mirror before moving and collided, they didnt over take it

Both were travelling in the same direction. One on rails and one on the road. So it is safe to say the light rail was travelling at a slower speed than the police car and therefore the police car overtook it without noticing it was there. Unless of course you subscribe to he theory that the light rail was travelling a a faster rate (to beat the green light it had)…

@olfella
You have ignored one important observation from Bulldog “the police car was waiting to turn right”.
So it (the police vehicle) was stopped at the intersection waiting for the traffic light to change from red.
We have no idea of the route the police vehicle took to arrive at that intersection. So it’s totally conceivable that the police did not pass/overtake the LRT.
Though why passing the LRT is relevant I don’t know, again as Bulldog said, they commenced to make a legal manouvre under emergency system conditions but “forgot” to ensure the path they were about to take was clear.
As for “it is safe to say the light rail was travelling at a slower speed than the police car”, how so? The police car was stopped and the LRT has traffic light priority.

Are the police IQ tested? Can anyone identify where the rail vehicle hit the car. You lose points if you say the rear.

Acting inspector should be relieved. Antagonising visitors and calling them subspecies is racist speech. Imagine the riots if that was any other group.

What gives him the right to play judge?

swaggieswaggie4:06 pm 11 Jan 24

Most people are of the opinion Officer Richardson should be promoted and no one’s playing judge, they’re just giving an opinion. Also there’s an online dictionary you can use to look up the meaning of “racist” as you seem to be unaware of it.

I wonder if this is an example of cops putting their lights when there isn’t an emergency.

Capital Retro5:42 pm 10 Jan 24

Light rail vehicle?

Surely they mean “tram”.

Yes, Light Rail vehicles are conveniently called a ‘trams’. Regrettably, the word ‘tram’ is too often misused by those opposed to Light Rail development. The aim being to denigrate the modern Light Rail system by evoking images of old style trams from a century ago.

Quite so, it is convenient for the regulations to use the term tram and simply define it as encompassing Light Rail vehicle. Easiest way to achieve consistency and continuing practical recognition for traffic management purposes within the Australian Road Rules dating from before modern light rail .
The term light rail seems to have been developed to avoid confusing modern light rail systems with old style tram systems (Melbourne is a mix of styles) and the perjorative misuse of the term ‘tram’.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.