Light Rail too expensive?

areaman 24 May 2007 28

The ABC has an article stating that John Hargreaves thinks a light rail system linking all the town centres would cost almost a billion dollars, going on to say that is bigger than the entire health budget.

While I’m yet to be convinced of the affordability of light rail either does he really think we’re that stupid? I don’t think anyone’s claiming an entire network should be built in a single year. By his pricings if was built over say a 10 year period it’d cost 90 million a year less what you’d saving on not having to replace old buses and, you’d hope, higher patronage.

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
28 Responses to Light Rail too expensive?
Pandy Pandy 1:06 am 26 May 07


Deano Deano 9:21 pm 25 May 07

And think of all of that prime real estate, currently being used as carparks, that would be freed up by a decent public transport system. Surely that would cover most of the cost for a light rail system.

Al Al 2:36 pm 25 May 07

When talking about costs, and the alternative – more bloody expensive roads, let’s not forget the costs of carparking. Because as Gungahlinite says, for 6 hours in the middle of every day, there aren’t so many cars on the road – they’re all parked in Civic. And if the government actually repsonds to Catherine Carter’s every more shrill cries about the car parking “crisis” that we apparently have (those of us who refuse to walk more than 100 m anyway), that is goping to cost a motza too. So cars don’t have to be actually moving to cost us money.

Gungahlinite Gungahlinite 2:28 pm 25 May 07

Whatever the cost it will still too much for a system that will only be used for 90 minutes in the morning and 90 minutes in the afternoon monday to friday.The rest of the time Canberra’s traffic is fine.

areaman areaman 1:38 pm 25 May 07

Yeah, except like i said not directly and not in the ratio it was earned, so it doesn’t matter how much we generate we’ll still get basically the same amount (sure the whole pot would shrink, but a tiny amount).

Joker Joker 1:34 pm 25 May 07

GST goes back to the States.

Pandy Pandy 1:23 pm 25 May 07

So Al, paint one of the lanes on Nth Bourne green (as they do in the Sydney CBD) and make it bus only with que jumping lights at every intersection.

areaman areaman 1:01 pm 25 May 07

Um, the ACT government doesn’t collect the GST, the Feds do, and the amout of federal funds that they do get isn’t based on how much GST we pay.

Joker Joker 12:59 pm 25 May 07

If the ACT Government implemented a popular rail service they would miss out huge amounts of GST from vehicle sales and petrol, keep in mind that fuel cost are going to go through the roof so they’re almost guaranteed huge profits through taxation.
Ideally though a rail service that could accommodate bicycles, bridging town centres would be fantastic, removing congestion from the roads, significantly reducing carbon emissions and the general population would be healthier.

atoz atoz 11:50 am 25 May 07

Exactly Al. I work in Civic, live near Lyneham Shops. 20-25 minute bus ride (route 35) or half an hour walk. I choose to walk.

Al Al 11:08 am 25 May 07

MrM sounds like you do not live on the north side, or you’d be well aware that buses take 20-25 minutes to do the 3-minute drive down Northbourne. And THAT is the problem with total reliance on buses using normal roads.

Thumper Thumper 10:06 am 25 May 07

And to add to that all terminals should connect with bus terminals and a single ticket should be able to be purchased that covers all modes of transport.

Maelinar Maelinar 9:27 am 25 May 07

Who are you dumb-heads ?

Light rail = ongoing revenue raiser. A mere 100 people using a train system, paying $2 a trip would gather the public purse a whopping $146,000 per year. THOUSANDS of Canberrans would use a l/r service daily.

My personal suggestion is to consider a park and ride rail network servicing a monorail circuit around LBG, that would catch just about every public servant, and most of the populace in wherever they need to get to.

MrM MrM 9:17 am 25 May 07

Light rail just doesn’t make sense here – apart from the high cost compared to buses, this city doesn’t have enough of a traffic problem that buses get stuck in traffic jams that would be avoided if they were on rails – and for those odd parts where this may be an issue, a bus lane is a much easier and cheaper solution.

Quite apart from that, if you built a ‘backbone’ light rail network linking town centres, anyone travelling that way would have to swap from a bus to light rail somewhere along the route – not exactly convenient when at the moment you can get on a 3xx bus in a large number of suburbs and go all the way on the same bus.

It just seems simpler and cheaper to me to buy buses – which, on a unit cost, have got to be cheaper than trams – and run them on roads which other vehicles can use as well.

Rawhide Kid No 2 Rawhide Kid No 2 8:53 am 25 May 07

And what happens when the power fails in summer due to lack of water for electric generation? Back to the Buses

poptop poptop 8:51 am 25 May 07

Sadly mass transport sort of supposes mass population to transport and Canberra doesn’t really have enough. So it’s either fund public transport (for all the other good and sufficient reasons) or only provide what the Goverment (and presumably the community) is prepared to pay for.

Pandy Pandy 11:14 pm 24 May 07

Pratt does a half pike:

“Further, the Opposition believes that Canberra needs a stabilised and more efficient, attractive and clean mass transport system, along the lines perhaps of a fast electric light rail system. The Opposition is committed to examining such a system for the long term, as part of its integrated city and town planning strategies.”

from the Liberal website

Deano Deano 10:21 pm 24 May 07

Actually a monorail makes a lot of sense. Light rail needs a lot of space for tracks and would need considerable earthworks. A monorail could be installed along the medium strips of our major roads with a lot less effort.

The other consideration is that with any sort of mass transit system, we will still need buses to get from our front door to the station, so buses aren’t going to be completely replaced. And we will still need roads for things like garbage trucks, fire engines, delivery trucks, ambulances etc, so roads won’t disappear either.

Pandy Pandy 9:32 pm 24 May 07

we are not springfield Kraemer

Kramer Kramer 7:55 pm 24 May 07

I think what we really need is a monorail 😉

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site