21 October 2024

Nation's capital has the lowest total fertility rate

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
22
Sleeping baby

The ACT had the lowest total fertility rate of all states and territories in 2023. Photo: Kim Treasure.

The Australian Capital Territory had the lowest total fertility rate in the country in 2023, recorded at 1.31 babies per woman.

Births were down, however, in most states and territories.

Australia’s birth rate is continuing to decline, with a national total fertility rate of 1.5 babies per woman, according to the latest data released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).

There were 286,998 births registered in Australia in 2023, which is a decrease of 4.6 per cent (or 13,686 births) from the previous year and has resulted in a record low.

Of the 2023 births, 51.4 per cent were males, resulting in a sex ratio at birth of 105.6 male births per 100 female births.

A total of 60.1 per cent of the year’s births were to parents in a registered marriage.

READ ALSO Aerial arsenal boosted as national fleet readies for natural disasters

The head of demography statistics at the ABS, Beidar Cho, said only Tasmania saw an increase in its total fertility rate since 2022, growing from 1.49 to 1.51 babies per woman.

Western Australia had the highest total fertility rate (1.57 babies per woman) in 2023, closely followed by NSW and the Northern Territory, both at 1.55 babies per woman.

The ACT had 6102 births in 2023, which is 273 less than the previous year’s 6375 – a 4.3 per cent decrease.

The national birth rate has been on the decline for some years now. Over the past 30 years, the total fertility rate has slowly dropped from 1.86 in 1993.

This decline was most prominent among women aged 15 to 19 years, and the age-specific fertility rate fell by more than two-thirds (to 6.2 per 1000 women).

The age-specific fertility rate of women aged 20 to 24 years also saw a large decline.

In contrast, the age-specific fertility rate of women aged 40 to 44 years almost doubled (to 15.1 per 1000 women) when compared with 30 years ago.

READ ALSO New draft strategy for valuing carers opened for consultation

Meanwhile, women aged 30 to 34 years continue to have the highest age-specific fertility rate (105.2 babies per 1000 women), followed by women aged 25 to 29 years (74.9 babies per 1000 women).

“The long-term decline in fertility of younger mums as well as the continued increase in fertility of older mums reflects a shift towards later childbearing,” Ms Cho said.

“Together, this has resulted in a rise in the median age of mothers to 31.9 years and a fall in Australia’s total fertility rate.”

The ABS also presented specific birth rate data for Indigenous Australians.

“In 2023, the total fertility rate for mothers who were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander was 2.17 babies per woman,” Ms Cho said.

“There were 24,737 births registered where at least one parent was an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian, which makes up 8.6 per cent of all births.”

The total fertility rate is the number of registered births per woman. Crude birth rate is the number of births per 1000 estimated resident population.

Statistics are published on the Births, Australia 2023 website and based on births registered in a calendar year and reported to the ABS by Registries of Births, Deaths and Marriages in each state and territory.

Join the conversation

22
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
William Teach9:27 am 23 Oct 24

The fertility rate is highest among women from less-developed countries, and in countries where they collect that data is elevated amongst their daughters. Canberra’s immigrant population is smaller than some cities and has a higher proportion from richer countries.

Unfortunately, just to stabilise the population and cancel out immigration the fertility rate nationwide would need to be half what it is in Canberra, let alone to bring it down to a sustainable level.

pink little birdie9:57 pm 22 Oct 24

Or how bad pre and postnatal care here is. It’s not the only reason I’m not having more but it is a significant factor.
The actual process of giving birth do effect if women will have more babies or not – Almost every state has had an inquiry into birth experiences and it hasn’t been good.
Get rid of the Baby Friendly hospital initiative – it’s terrible and there are a lot of mothers who shouldn’t be looking after a baby alone, TCH has share rooms where a support person can’t stay which is a breech of the policy and they don’t staff according to the ratio required (1 midwife per 4 patients but TCH counts a mother baby pair as 1 patient not 2).

Educated women have recognised the long term cost of having babies on their career, their superannuation and their lives, so are deferring until they feel more secure in taking the time out from their current existence. Sadly, by then fertility has declined and many struggle to get pregnant.

Our population is set to increase. We are building more homes, have an economy built on growth we are insignificant bystanders in history.

Show we in the ACT are savvy enough to be preparing for the climate catastrophe.

That tinfoil hat must be on tight.

Not surprising that the birth rate here in Canberra is the lowest of all Australian jurisdictions.

This fits neatly with the ACT GREENS policies which concentrate on telling the rest of us how to live our lives – SMALL homes, small cars, restricted parking, “active” transport and a general abhorrence of public fun (think restricting sporting facilities, suburban open spaces, block sizes (backyards), bans on horse/dog racing, motoring events (whoops – Sorry – all Barr SummerNats (a weird exception). And a general distaste for family convenience (ie frowning on car use), and owning coastal holiday houses.

It seems logical that no or fewer children fit better with this view of how (they) think we should live our lives here..

They may not say it, but I suspect they are against having reproductive sex too. Hence today’s fertility figures.

I knew someone would try to blame Labor or the Greens. And what a cooked take it is…

“They may not say it, but I suspect …”…I suspect this is all rather silly.

PS. Guess where else the birth rate is declining (besides nearly everywhere) with a record low birthrate…China….those damn Greens *shakes fist at cloud*

Could that be due to the one child policy and most parent favouring a male child. Some parts of China are 1.4 men per woman.

It certainly would be part of it Henry but the decline hasn’t slowed since dropping the one-child policy. China also has had the rise of the middle class but it’s also the same issues we have here with regard to changing social norms, education and opportunity, and economic and environmental concerns…one birthrate decline it isn’t the fault of the is the Greens being the fun police as suggested by johnm.

pink little birdie10:06 pm 22 Oct 24

Aside from covid I actually preferred living in medium density with children rather than suburbia.
We had a community playground across the road that was rarely busy but frequented by neighbourhood children, walking distance to major shopping centre and work, the lake and the bigger playgrounds so I was fitter and more active. We actually only required 1 car while living there and didn’t use it for commuting. We could walk to many community activities. Random walks to dinner and dessert – it was close enough.

You should try living in medium density close to work the lifestyle benefits are actually pretty great. I’m certainly moving back to that area when kids finish primary school.

Capital Retro1:39 pm 21 Oct 24

Here’s a clue why our birth rate rate is falling:
“The proportion of same-sex couples is highest in Canberra and Sydney and lowest in Perth and Adelaide.” from: https://gaycelebrant.melbourne/same-sex-marriage-statistics-australia/

@Capital Retro
It’s not a given that same sex couples are childless, CR.
Perhaps you can find statistics on how many hetero couples are childless in Canberra.

Please explain how this stops women from having babies….*reaches for popcorn*

Not surprised that seano needs to have how babies are conceived explained to him..

Great response Seano. A pity that Ken M misread it.

William Teach9:18 am 23 Oct 24

It does mean that they only have definitely intentional babies, because they have to go out of their way to become pregnant.

You do wonder if some effects of the covid years play into all this. If not the virus itself, maybe something else related to covid is affecting fertility?

Nothing to do with COVID, fertility rates have been dropping in most countries long before COVID. It has to do with many factors including education and choice for women, changes in social structures, concerns over the environment and economic and political stability and as Jessica points out below cost.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.