14 February 2022

New laws allow walking feline friends in cat containment zones from July

| Lottie Twyford
Join the conversation
Chris Steel Simon Yates and Alex nickels

Minister for Transport and City Services Chris Steel (pictured with Simon Yates from the RSPCA and Alex Nickels from Domestic Animal Services) introduced the new cat legislation in the ACT Legislative Assembly in the first sitting week of 2022 . Photo: Lottie Twyford.

New cat containment and registration laws will come into effect in July. Thanks to changes to the legislation, felines living in containment suburbs will now be allowed to be taken for walks on leads.

The news has been welcomed by the RSPCA and Conservation Council, although the latter believes the containment zone should be expanded sooner and applied to more cats.

From 1 July this year, cat containment zones will be expanded across all of the ACT. But it will initially only apply to cats born after that date.

All other cats will continue to be allowed to roam unless they live in one of Canberra’s 17 declared cat containment suburbs.

Residents of these suburbs will now be permitted to walk their pet cats on leads.

Conservation Council ACT Region executive director Helen Oakey said the transitional approach taken by the ACT Government meant the current native population would continue to face threats from cats until it reached the end of its lifespan.

Cat on a leash

Furry felines will be able to be walked on leashes in cat containment zones thanks to a new bill introduced in the Legislative Assembly. Photo: Kevin Wells.

Ms Oakey urged the government to review the new laws after a year and implement a containment date for existing pet cats, too.

Minister for Transport and City Services Chris Steel said this approach for existing pet cats struck the right balance to allow a fair transition to the new rules for pet owners.

It’s still unclear whether the new laws will put an end to the government’s contentious trap, neuter, release program. Although Mr Steel said the preferred system was ‘trap, neuter, adopt’.

“We’ll be working with many of the care organisations that trap cats and try to move them to a position where we can see those cats adopted as much as possible,” he said.

Returning feral cats back to the wild is banned in most parts of Australia.

RSPCA animal care manager Simon Yates said there wasn’t a lot of local evidence to prove it worked well.

He’s hopeful the new laws will mean less work for the organisation but is cognisant this is a long-term plan, unlikely to deliver results for some time.

READ ALSO Greens MLA hits back at Chief Minister: $2000 for an e-bike is a financial burden for some

The government says the new rules will not only benefit native wildlife and the environment, but also the cats.

Pet cats who roam live shorter lives on average and have higher rates of disease than those contained to the home,” Mr Steel said.

Under the new registration scheme – similar to what’s in place for dogs – cat details will need to be updated regularly.

Existing owners will be able to register their cat or cats for free while new owners after this date will pay a fee. It currently costs about $60 to register a dog for its lifetime.

“Introducing annual registration for cats will mean we can reunite lost cats with their families more quickly by having up-to-date contact details and will ensure better education and enforcement of responsible cat ownership,” Mr Steel said.

READ ALSO Future shape of Gungahlin town centre up in the air as ACT misses report response deadline

The new bill also introduces strict liability offences for pet owners who do not register their cats or keep them contained when required.

However, Mr Steel said people would not be punished for non-compliance during the transition period as the ACT Government took an educative approach to the registration and containment rules.

The July changes were foreshadowed last year when the government released its 10-year cat plan.

New suburbs will continue to be declared cat containment areas as they are built.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments


And of course you will find another article that disputes this, which is why the regurgitation of ‘research’ from professor google often results in people finding the research that suits their position.

Now that Mr Steele has saved us from the neighbour tabby, can he do something about all these gum trees that threaten to drop limbs on our cars and houses and fill our gutters with their leaves?

They will probably consider a cat cull. This new law will not decrease the feral population and it will probably deter some from becoming cat owners.

When is the government going to ban bird feeders? People who feed native birds are signing the birds’ death warrant. The native birds become dependent on the bird feed and they are preyed upon by non-native birds and other wildlife such as foxes and cats. Containing cats is only one measure. Bird feeders need to be banned too.

Birds do not or rarely become dependent on feeders. There is ample evidence available so Google that one yourself.
Most people who provide food do so off the ground or in daylight with completable snacks.
What non-native birds prey on local birds please? The main predators in suburbs are ravens, currawongs, magpies, with owls and other raptors in the fields, and usually they are after mice.

‘…so Google that one yourself..’ phydeaux please don’t be so sententious. My information came from someone in ACT parks and wildlife. I don’t see why a comment from someone must automatically be responded to in such a combative way. Many experts warn against feeding native animals. And the bird feeders attract mice – just as backyard chickens do.

If you are relying on ACT Parks & Wildlife rather than on other available research then you could name the spokesperson, publication or their reference. Otherwise I’ll stick to the available research.
Are we talking about birds, as you started and I responded, or all animals now? Who invited the chickens?
Sorry, but your original comment is simply wrong in multiple ways and Riotact does not invite essays in reply.

No, Riotact does not invite essays. This site is for people to express opinions, not for an regurgitation of ‘research’ from professor google.

Interesting, tims. You have no response to any factual matters, seem unwilling to conduct any research or perhaps unwilling to admit its existence, then seek to define reference to research as “regurgitation of ‘research'”.
Still, as you say, you have your opinions, and what could be better than that?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.