5 June 2022

Some ACT laws will soon be gender neutral: here's why and what that means

| Lottie Twyford
Join the conversation
Shane Rattenbury

Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury introduced the Statute Law Amendment Bill 2022, which will update almost 40 pieces of ACT legislation with gender-neutral language. Photo: Region Media.

Around 40 pieces of ACT legislation will soon be updated with gender-neutral language.

That means references in the acts to ‘he’ or ‘she’, ‘his or her’, ‘him or her’ and ‘himself or herself’ will be deleted in favour of ‘they’, ‘their’, ‘them’, ‘themself’ or the relevant noun.

Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury said this change is in line with current guidelines for drafting legislation.

What is ‘gender-neutral’ language?

Its official definition is language that doesn’t identify or refer to a gender.

For example, words like fireman, policeman and chairman were used because there were times when only men could hold those positions.

These are gradually being phased out and replaced with so-called neutral terms like ‘chair’, ‘police officer’ and ‘firefighter’.

READ ALSO Giant Sydney Olympics kewpie doll to star at Bungendore auction

Why is the ACT Government changing the language of its laws?

Mr Rattenbury said genderneutral language is important to create an accepting and inclusive Canberra.

“Language is important and powerful. Many Canberrans are gender diverse, and Canberra is an inclusive and welcoming community. It is time that the language of our legislation reflects that,” he explained.

“The use of personal pronouns in the masculine or feminine are simply no longer appropriate in our legislation. The use of genderneutral language in our society is important to reflect and foster an accepting, inclusive, and progressive Canberra community.”

Many people who are non-binary and don’t identify as either male or female use the pronoun ‘they’ to refer to themselves because it is not explicitly gendered.

“Using gender-fair and inclusive language also helps reduce gender stereotyping, promotes social change and contributes to achieving gender equality,” Mr Rattenbury said.

READ ALSO Fears for new tree rules as mapping shows canopy increase

Does this change have any precedent?

A petition to remove gendered pronouns from the Australian Constitution last year didn’t really get anywhere.

The Australian Constitution contains the pronouns “his” and “he” around 70 times in reference to the Governor-General, Justice of the High Court, Justices of Courts, Members of the House of Representatives and Senators.

Petitioners called on the government to replace these references with neutral terms such as “this person” or “these people”.

That petition garnered 148 signatures and was ultimately rejected by then-Attorney-General Michaelia Cash who responded in writing that the Commonwealth Government was not currently proposing any changes to the Constitution.

She referenced a “longstanding rule of interpretation that, unless the contrary appears, words importing the masculine gender include females”.

But an updated Commonwealth Style Manual, which was released in October 2020, recommended the use of gender-neutral pronouns.

The manual said pronouns like ‘they’ or ‘them’ should be used unless an individual could be asked for their preference.

READ ALSO Is it time more federal electorates were given First Nations names?

What’s the issue with using ‘they’?

Many people (grammar lovers) have a problem with using the pronoun ‘they’ in English to refer to a singular person without specifying a gender.

But some scholars say this was not always the case and that hundreds of years ago, ‘they’ was often used in the singular form.

In fact, it’s believed it was used in this form as early as the 1300s to refer to an unspecified, unknown person.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

“…That petition garnered 148 signatures…”
Is that Australia-wide?

I am offended. I am woman, I am she, her – I am not ‘they’.

Why are you using the word Mr? And why are you saying ‘he explained’? All references to the AG should in future omit the gender specific title, ‘Mr’, the gender specific personal pronoun, ‘he’, and the gender specific first name, ‘Shane’. Because we are an inclusive progressive society that rejects gender diversity.

Sounds good!

Our government has so many issues to deal with like: lack of public housing; Mental health wards so full that they turn away seriously ill people. How can they possibly think that this is a good use of time, money, and brain power? Deal with some of your serious issues, then come back to dotting “I”s and crossing “t”s. It seems they are finally admitting they don’t have the skills, willpower, or knowledge to deal with what is most important.

Or they’re taking care of smaller things first so they’re done?

It’s a shame that our Government can put so much time and expense into this language change when most of our population would like that money to go into our health care and aged care and esp our schools

Capital Retro2:14 pm 06 Jun 22

Does this mean no more quotas and affirmative action?

No, that’s something entirely different.

The sitting days for the ACT Assembly are limited. Good to see those days are being used to address the really big issues!

While your at it, please change words like man-slaughter, man-splain, man-ufacturing, man-dates.

Hu-man doesn’t mean man. Man referred to everyone. Then we had a special word for the man that gave birth, a wo-man. However man still referred to everyone. Eventually man referred to males only in a casual context. However most of the words like man kind and fireman aren’t gendered as they come from Human.

However feel free to waste millions of dollars fighting a few letters in words.

More time wasted on unnecessary changes. By all means use gender neutral in new legislation, but how about concentrating on things like the health system or the AMC.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.