17 January 2025

Testing times: Women’s Ashes series is heading to Canberra amid calls to overhaul convoluted format

| Tim Gavel
Join the conversation
22
Female cricketers walking onto the field

The Australian team takes the field during day two of the women’s Test match in the Ashes series at Manuka Oval in January 2022. Photos: Mark Kolbe/Getty Images. With permission from Cricket ACT.

In 2022 at Manuka Oval, the Australian and English women’s cricket teams played out one of the greatest Tests of all time.

Following a sporting declaration from Australian captain Meg Lanning, England attempted to chase down a target of 257 off 48 overs.

In the end, it came down to the final ball as England held on to a draw, finishing at nine wickets for 245, with Sophie Ecclestone and Charlie Dean batting nervously as the Australian fielders surrounded the bat.

It was as tense and gripping as any Test in the history of the sport, male or female.

READ ALSO How can the ACT ride the cricket wave created by the success of the Australia-India test series and the Big Bash?

The result sparked calls for women’s Tests to be played over five days, not four as they are currently scheduled, contributing to the 60 per cent of women’s Tests finishing in a draw.

The situation was amplified by the fact that two sessions in 2022 were lost because of rain.

a runout in women's cricket

Alana King of Australia runs out England’s Anya Shrubsole during day four of the women’s Test match in the Ashes series at Manuka Oval.

Alongside this, there have been calls for more women’s Tests.

The desire for change appears to fall on sympathetic ears, but this is not reflected in the current Women’s Ashes Series.

There is still only one Test in the series, a four-day, day-night match at the MCG starting on 30 January.

One of the reasons why players and fans have called for at least a three-Test series is the narrative build-up over the longer format, as we experienced in the recent men’s series between Australia and India.

By now we should have moved on from the argument that people won’t support five days of women’s cricket.

READ ALSO Government urged to reconsider playing fields site for Molonglo

There has been the suggestion that women aren’t ready for five-day Test matches, while the players themselves have been calling for a change to the longer format.

The current Women’s Ashes Series is a convoluted mixture of three one-dayers, three T20 games, and a Test, with points awarded for wins and draws over the multi-game format.

Canberra gets an opportunity to play a role in the Ashes series with the second T20 game set down for Manuka Oval on 23 January.

The hope is that the next time England come to Australia, they will be playing in a fully fledged five-day, three-Test series.

Join the conversation

22
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Gregg Heldon9:37 am 19 Jan 25

No complicated at all. The only thing I would change is make it three 5 dayers as well. I would have played one of those tests at the WACA, (noticed that none of the games are going to Perth or Adelaide), and one somewhere “non traditional”, like Darwin or Albury/Wodonga. Random, I know. Been a great series so far for Australia. Hope it continues.
Love watching the women’s cricket, Rugby 7s and Rugby League. The passion, commitment and talent on show makes it more enjoyable to watch, than the men’s, sometimes.

You cannot play cricket in Darwin in January/February – it’s the wet season, stinking hot & humid & probably bucketing down every day.

As a sports fan the rise of women’s sport has been great, more quality sports to watch.

The NRLW has only been around a few years, but the rise in quality as the women go semi-professional has already been astounding. It will only get better as the game grows.

Gregg Heldon7:48 am 21 Jan 25

@Franky
Anyone who knows anything about Darwin or the Australian weather patterns know about the wet season in Darwin.
The Australian men’s team have played in Darwin. April, I think it was.
I wasn’t suggesting they adjust this current Ashes schedule. That cant be done. I was suggesting for future series.

Gregg, I remember around about the beginning of this century watching the Australian hockey teams at Lyneham. That was the time of our sensational women’s team. I came away thinking they were technically better than the men, positioning, ball movement and trapping superb. Ignoring any possible argument about that, the fact is they were just great to watch. So pleased other women’s sports are seeing their own suns rising.

The 2 Tests played in Darwin were both played in July.

Gregg Heldon2:39 pm 21 Jan 25

I got the month wrong, sorry. Still doesn’t take away from the fact that test cricket can be played in Darwin.

How can the women even be playing for the Ashes? The Australian men’s team hold the Ashes. The Ashes’ history and relevance are for test matches between Australia and England’s men’s teams. There is only one ‘Ashes’. The women need to come up with their own trophy to play for and not just simply steal the Ashes off the men’s game. When Australia plays India in men’s test matches, they play for the Border-Gavaskar trophy, so when Australia play India in women’s test matches, will they be playing for the Border-Gavaskar trophy? I don’t think so.

“There is only one ‘Ashes’.”

No there isn’t. The ashes are between Australia and England. No one said anything about gender. Get over yourself.

Seano so the women get the “Ashes” trophy that the men do after they win? you know the one with actual ashes in it? i dont think they do, dazzers comment was pretty valid, they dont get the “ashes” they get a trophy. Get over yourself.

The men do not get the “the one with the actual ashes”. Those stay at Lords while the men get a look-alike trophy from a trophy shop.

Get over yourself.
(seems popular)

You’ll be horrified to learn that ‘The Ashes’ isn’t presented to the winner of the mens series either.

Gregg Heldon11:56 am 21 Jan 25

@Babyal
Actually, they do get the Ashes. The trophy that was made in 1996, contains the Ashes of a bat and paperwork relating to women’s cricket.
It’s been called the Ashes since the first women’s games in 1934 but formally recognised since 1996.

The best part about non-sports fans commenting on women’s sports is that it’s pretty obvious when they don’t know their history and haven’t bothered to look it up that they’re just tedious misogynists.

“Before the ODI series in July 1998, the president of the Women’s Cricket Association, Norma Izard devised a way for the women to have a trophy of their own, like the men’s Ashes urn. The England and Australia players both signed a miniature cricket bat which was burned at Lord’s in a wok alongside a copy of the Women’s Cricket Association (WCA) constitution and rulebook, as the WCA had voted 4 months earlier to merge with England and Wales Cricket Board.[10] Izard had commissioned a trophy to hold them: a wooden cricket ball[11] carved from yew.[10]:”

There’s nothing gendered about the “Ashes” as a concept, Yes, the women do play for “the ashes”.

dazzers’ comment was the usual drivel and I would suggest you should also get over yourself babyal.

Cricket = test, one day, big bash, sheffield shield, red ball, white ball, pink ball, FGS it’s simply hitting a ball with a stick.

32roadster i assume youll be getting your baggy green cap soon enough then. i mean if its just hitting a ball with a stick you must be a superstar of the future.

Some people would attach parts of dead cats to their sticks, although nylon cats seem to abound these days.

“The current Women’s Ashes Series is a convoluted mixture of three one-dayers, three T20 games, and a Test, with points awarded for wins and draws over the multi-game format.”

It’s not convoluted at all. Having a multi-format tournament makes it more interesting. The points system is fairly easy to understand.

I think everyone is surprised that Australia has started with a 3 game sweep of the ODIs. But England blew a clear winning position in game 2 (although Alana King helped a lot), and England were well on top yesterday before a series of spectacular catches by the Aussies.

I would love to see more 5-day tests so there are more results and more women’s tests generally.

There’s been some cracking cricket played so far in the Women’s Ashes series, long may it continue.

Agreed as well. It’s the furthest thing from convoluted. Now, the discussion on getting the order right so the test isn’t a dead rubber is worth having but to call it convoluted is just weird.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.