5 January 2022

Thousands still without power as emergency storm response continues

| Karyn Starmer
Join the conversation
53
tree down on road

At the height of the storm, around 21,000 homes and businesses were without power across Belconnen and Gungahlin. Photo: Melanie Broadbent.

Around 2500 Canberra households remain without power following the severe thunderstorms that lashed Canberra’s northern suburbs on Monday (3 January).

The storm caused extensive damage to homes and infrastructure with Evoenergy reporting critical damage to the ACT’s electricity network.

At the height of the storm, about 21,000 homes and businesses were without power across Belconnen and Gungahlin and, as of Wednesday 5 January 2022, 2497 remain without power.

Evoenergy says it is rotating all available staff on shifts to manage the response and restore power as quickly and safely as possible but it expects some homes and businesses may remain without power until tomorrow.

Evoenergy Acting General Manager Alison Davis says the damage to the electricity network is the most severe observed in the ACT for many years.

READ ALSO ACT confirms 810 new cases; NSW records 35,054; National Cabinet to discuss rapid antigen tests

“At Evoenergy we’ve seen serious and extreme conditions, but the weather on Monday afternoon has resulted in some of the worst damage to our network on record,” Ms Davis said.

“Our crews are highly trained and are continuing to work as safely and quickly as possible, but working to repair the type of damage we’ve assessed over the past two days is complex, time-consuming and incredibly challenging.

“Our crews are working meticulously and methodically to ensure the health, safety and wellbeing of all workers and the broader community, as efforts continue around the clock.

“We’re working closely with the ACT Emergency Services Agency to prioritise the assessments of damage and conduct repairs. We’re coordinating efforts to ensure we’re as efficient and effective as possible as we work through the high volume of incidents.

“Right now, I want to assure Canberrans that we’ll keep going till we get the job done.”

With further storms forecast this week Evoenergy says it is carefully planning resourcing over the coming days to ensure it has crews available in the event of more extreme weather.

READ ALSO Changes announced for COVID testing and isolation categories, boosters to be expanded

The Bureau of Meteorology is predicting a very high chance of showers for the remainder of the week and into early next week with thunderstorms likely and possibly severe.

Heavy rainfall is possible on Friday increasing the risk of flash flooding.

For information on reported storm-related incidents visit Evoenergy, for information about weather warnings visit BOM and for the ACT Emergency Services Agency response visit ESA.

Join the conversation

53
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

The ACT Gov regularly blocks residents who want to remove dangerous trees on their blocks. Well done.

HiddenDragon6:40 pm 06 Jan 22

The problem here is inappropriately large trees in the wrong places. It doesn’t matter when they were planted and/or who planted them.

The issue now (as it has been for many years in this town) is the mentality which seems almost like a tree cult that has taken over the relevant bits of officialdom, with the result that unless a tree stands in the way of something that the government, or one of its powerful mates, wants to do then the tree will be protected – regardless of the potential risks it presents to people and their homes.

Anything more than a very token response to these problem trees is highly unlikely, and Canberrans who approach every “storm season” with a sense of foreboding, and with both hands tied behind their backs when it comes to over-sized trees, will continue to be on the receiving end of the glibly infuriating advice from our government about the need to prepare their homes for the coming storms.

Is it time to consider taking the electricity underground, starting with the more vulnerable parts of the network? Per house, the cost would probably be less than the disruption costs from these increasingly regular events.

Is it me or does Belco seem to be a ‘hail and mini cyclone” corridor? Agree. Evoenergy needs to step up. Of course they will come cap in hand to ACT Govt for a handout.
Bit like Telstra really.

Capital Retro12:00 pm 06 Jan 22

Most of the newer suburbs in Tuggers have underground power.

The latest on the Evoenergy outages page indicates most places still without power now are unlikely to have it back till Sunday. That really is unaaceptable, 3rd world level service.

Whilst not good, maybe stop and think for a while as to why that would be. Clearly the damage to the distribution network is large enough that it will take that time. The effected area Is largely overhead wires on poles. Not a five minute fix.

3rd world btw you would be having daily issues and if a storm hit like it did here you would be waiting months or having unskilled labourers up poles tapping into an already overloaded network.

Capital Retro12:01 pm 06 Jan 22

Are your beloved trams still running, JC?

Interestingly, a couple of times when I’ve criticised Evoenergy on Twitter yesterday, I got prompt responses defending them and telling me I’m being unreasonable, from accounts with no followers and only created in January 2022. It’s as if Evo has employed a troll army. 🙂

Not including you in that by the way, I was just amused by it. Look I know they have a big job but 6 days without power is really s***.

Ian,
I’m betting if they put the resources together that would allow them to fix these problems really quickly, the same people whinging about the delay would be whinging about the increase in their bills to fund it.

Probably. Although I think we’re already paying premium level prices.

Capital Retro5:54 pm 05 Jan 22

Damn climate change!

Being without power for 2-3 days is a consequence of the ACT Government planting gum trees throughout the suburbs of Belconnen and Gungahlin.
Gum trees are totally unsuitable for suburban areas. They litter constantly, burn fiercely, snap easily and fall catastrophically in high winds.
Inner suburbs are not as badly affected by falling trees in storms because stronger more flexible deciduous trees predominate. They also look better in spring and autumn.
Now is the time for residents of Belconnen and Gungahlin to insist these arboreal Mr Fluffys be replaced.

We have backyard power lines here in NW Belconnen. Not sure how you can blame the ACT Government for what people planted in their backyards 50 years ago. Though you can blame them if they’ve refused permission to trim or remove dangerous trees.

We’re without power and our understanding is that it won’t be restored for several days. Which is making WFH interesting. I have some sympathy for Evo. They didn’t plant hundreds of peppermint gums and other inappropriate trees next to the powerlines 30 years ago. I hope someone realises now that these need to be removed, although it won’t be an easy task.

Capital Retro6:58 pm 05 Jan 22

On 1 January 2018, the part of ActewAGL that operates and maintains our ACT electricity and gas network changed its name to Evoenergy so it was the same entity that planted the trees.

I don’t have any sympathy for them at all.

Didn’t know that Evo or any of its predecessors or even government planted trees in peoples back yards now or at anytime in the last 50 years or so since the homes in this area where built.

Capital Retro9:14 am 06 Jan 22

A lot of “street” trees have fallen on powerlines, JC.

Not all Canberra suburbs have powerlines in their backyards.

JC,
Yes that’s a very strange claim, that unsurprisingly doesn’t have supporting evidence to back it up.

Why on earth would CR think an electricity supplier planted the trees. Mind boggling.

And if a government was responsible, it was the Federal Government, who was in charge at the time the areas were built.

I’m not in a position to apportion responsibility for the trees except in relation to my immediate neighbourhood. The tree that cut off our power was in a backyard. It would have been planted by a previous house owner some decades ago. A number of street trees fell over too. They were street plantings from the early 1970s. The old National Capital Development Commission may have had something to do with that, but I can’t be sure. They probably seemed like a good idea at the time.

I had no idea ACTEW AGL was in the tree-planting game. If they were, then that’s not great, but I would be surprised if they planted the ones that fell over near us.

Capital Retro12:09 pm 06 Jan 22

I know you like to split hairs chewy so lets accept that Actew/Evo or whatever name they use/used are owned/controlled by the ACT Government so it’s fair to say the government made the decision.

Also, despite what you are saying, a lot of suburbs don’t have powerlines in their back yards and there are lots of street powerlines. Go for a drive.

Capital Retro,
There’s nothing remotely “splitting hairs” about it.

The company didn’t exist when most of these trees were planted and have never been involved in anything remotely like that type of activity.

They are a corporate entity only half owned by the government and half owned by private interests, so attempting to link them to trees falling over is absolute garbage.

On the same point, we also didn’t have self government when a lot of these trees were planted, so even blaming the ACT Government is stretching it.

And lastly, despite your claims, almost all older suburbs have backyard powerlines because that’s where they put the easements for all services at the time and the way the suburbs were designed. I don’t need to go for “a drive”, they can easily be seen on the ACT mapping system and the easement layer.

There are very few overhead powerlines in the ACT that run along streets and would be subject to government planted nature strips.

Sure there are some in every (older) suburb but for the most part the power lines in suburban ACT run in the backyards. This was another of those NCDC design decisions all those years ago to shield us from pesky visual pollution from overhead wires. Something I know you are so passionate about.

Oh and to answer your question above re light rail it’s running fine. It has been designed with redundant power feeds and is underground. So all good. Besides the storm the other day went past Gungahlin, my place was right on the edge of the storm. The centre of the storm the other day cut across Belconnen towards Hall.

It doesn’t really matter that much who planted the trees. The facts are that inappropriate trees were planted near powerlines and rather than removing them, it’s been left to
mother nature to bring them down.

The questions are: 1. What will they be replaced with and
2. Will the ACT Government now remove trees that potentially damage infrustructure?

People in Belconnen really need to lobby the Government and demand they
sharpen some axes.

All fixed, I was expecting a few more days of no power; they seem to be getting through the work.

As a resident of the affected area in northwest Belconnen, I can confirm that we have backyard power lines and the trees growing near them are in people’s backyards. The tree that knocked out my power certainly was.

What authority does the ACT Government have to start chopping down trees on private land? The only scope I see for government involvement is in granting permission to remove trees where homeowners request it. Replacements would be up to the homeowner.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.