Pedal Power ACT CEO Ian Ross with Detective Acting Station Sergeant Marcus Boorman. Photo: Michelle Kroll, Region Media.
ACT police officers will don lycra and get on their bikes to target motorists who aren’t obeying the minimum passing laws when overtaking cyclists.
In the ACT, drivers are required to keep a minimum passing distance of 1 metre when overtaking a cyclist at under 60 km/h, with a distance of 1.5 metres required if a driver is overtaking at more than 60 km/h. Drivers who fail to comply with the law can receive a $292 fine and a loss of two demerit points.
ACT Policing has announced they will conduct compliance activity targeting motorists who don’t obey the law when passing cyclists on ACT roads.
Detective Acting Station Sergeant Marcus Boorman said ACT Policing had focused on an educational approach since the laws came into effect but in the coming weeks they will “proactively enforce” the law.
“The upcoming activity will see police actively target the minority of motorists that are not doing the right thing,” Sergeant Boorman said.
“Canberra: you are on notice. The next cyclist you drive past could be a police officer, and fines and demerit points may be issued if you do not leave enough room.
“Officers will not be in police uniform, so they will look like any other cyclist.”
The ACT’s minimum passing laws were introduced in 2015 on a trial basis and were permanently implemented last year. During the two-year trial, only 11 motorists were issued with a traffic infringement notice or caution for not obeying the laws.
Pedal Power ACT CEO Ian Ross said it is a “truly terrifying experience” when cars pass too close. Photo: Kate Smith.
An ACT Government study, which was released in May, found that the majority of ACT drivers obey the minimum passing rules when overtaking cyclists on the road, with over 16,400 overtaking vehicles recorded during a four week period in 2018.
The study, which was undertaken by the University of Adelaide’s Centre for Automotive Safety Research, found 97.3 per cent of motorists kept a one-metre distance when the speed limit was below 60 km/h, while 88.8 per cent of drivers on roads with a speed limit above 60 km/h kept a distance of 1.5 metres.
Sergeant Boorman said more than one-in-ten motorists not obeying the 1.5-metre passing distance was not good enough.
“It is about everybody doing the best they can to promote road safety in the ACT,” he said. “If you are unsure, slow down, take those couple of seconds and leave plenty of room.”
Even though they will be dressed as cyclists, Sergeant Boorman also said his officers will not turn a blind eye to their fellow road users who do the wrong thing.
“I can assure you that while we are conducting this operation, if we see any cyclists that are not doing the right thing there will be consequences,” he said.
Pedal Power ACT chief Ian Ross welcomed the ACT Policing’s enforcement campaign, which is believed to be an Australian first. He said he hopes it will be as successful as similar campaigns in the UK which saw a 20 per cent reduction in cycling deaths and serious accidents.
“You can feel the wind and the suck of a car as it moves past you and you can get buffeted on the road,” Mr Ross shared. “It is a truly terrifying experience.
“Having police enforce the minimum passing distance laws is important not just for the people who are already riding, but to encourage more people to take up cycling for transport and recreation. We want everybody to feel safe and be safe when riding on our roads.”
To provide space on narrow roads, motorists are allowed to cross or straddle the centre lines, provided the driver has a clear view of any approaching traffic and that it is safe to do so. If it is not safe to pass, drivers must wait behind the cyclist.
Do you know how to safely overtake a cyclist?Be patient and leave at least 1 metre distance when passing at 60km/h or less or 1.5 meters for speeds over 60km/h. Remember if you’re unsure, leave more!To learn more about your responsibilities on the road visit: goo.gl/VTSUqN#ShareTheRoad #UnsureLeaveMore
Posted by ACT Policing on Thursday, August 23, 2018
Loading ...
There are the laws of the road, and then there are the laws of physics.
Only a fool voluntarily puts themselves in harms way knowing the risks, and then complains about the outcome.
Rationally, then we should ban all motorised vehicles from the roads, since they account for unacceptably high mortality in Australia. Since 1987 at least 21,800 drivers, 11,876 passengers, 7,665 pedestrians, and 5,891 motorcyclists have been killed on the roads. Wholly foolish to ignore the laws of physics involved in motorised vehicle accidents and collisions. (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-25/every-road-death-in-australia-since-1989/9353794?nw=0)
I hope the police pushbike riders will have audible bells on their bikes and rear vision mirrors. They also should have identifiable number plates because they are on the road. It is the law that all vehicles have number plates. As pushbikes are classed as vehicles they should have numberplates also. They cannot be both a vehicle and a protected , unidentifiable species. Before self-government there were no bike paths on the road and we were a safer and happier community.
And more importantly, both third party and comprehensive insurance cover.
Actually, that’s not correct.
Vehicles include bicycles, animal driven vehicles (ie such as horse and carriage), a ridden animal and motorised wheelchair.
None of these vehicles are required to have number plates.
To everyone demanding that cyclists pay rego:
1. Your rego doesn’t pay for roads, your taxes do
2. The majority of cyclists own a car, so they do pay rego. The difference is that they’re not clogging up the roads and air by driving.
To be specific, the fuel excise pays for the roads, in which case if you’re not driving a vehicle that runs on petroleum then you aren’t paying for the roads. If your car or truck is at home in the garage then you aren’t paying for the roads.
The hate towards bike riders is ridiculous. I ride a bike to work. I also own a car. I pay taxes. I ride for exercise and to keep at least one car off the road and bc parking fees in Canberra are expensive. I have also had very little problem with car drivers. They have for the most part been very courteous. Let’s just get along people!
That “car at home” argument makes me laugh every time it gets trotted out.
I could say the same about my motorcycle, but I still need to register and CTP insure it.
Great use of resources. NOT
Only in the ACT. Wow. Surely police have better things to do.
you mean cyclists not giving motorist enough room....
Cyclists using the road should not be discriminated against, just the same as all other road users, cyclists should pay approx. $900 per annum to be registered to travel on our public roads (paid for by vehicle registrations)..
Except that your premise is wrong. Rego doesn't pay for roads, rates and taxes do.
Noted. but registration for all forms of vehicles using roads is still required, cyclists “vehicles” too.. fees paid (vehicle inspection/roadworthy, TAC, other applicable), rego plates attached, able to be picked up by traffic cameras at intersections, identifiable to other road users, etc. and ensuring safe/correct “vehicle” condition (roadworthy condition, visibility to other road users, signalling/lights for night travelling)..
Milan Vukoja it’s been considered and rejected by governments across Australia and around the world as being an unworkable, expensive non-solution to a trivial problem. If you want to know why, read the 2013 report of the Queensland Parliamentary Transport Committee.
Cops.. hard up for cash..
Here come the hippies, you vote the greens into "power" . Accept the results.
getting paid to roam around in a bicycle and getting all the health benefits at the cost of ratepayers. living the dream!
I hope the police are going to do the same thing on bike paths with people walking because cyclists don’t slow down it’s happened to me quite a lot
Les Eite Why are you walking on bike paths?
Bill Mulger because I can
Then don't bitch about it
Wow, taxpayer dollars being utilised to the Nth degree...... 😂
Just another thought. I wonder how the policeman will measure the distance? If it is an estimate, will that hold up in court?
David Brown video evidence is compelling. All they have to prove is that you didn’t provide the mandatory minimum distance. They don’t have to prove exactly what distance you left.
It’s easy to tell the difference between 50 cms and 150 cms.
Paul Casimir I have been a photographer for more than 50 years. Among other things that I have learnt is that the focal length of the lens greatly influences the apparent proximity of the object in view.
David Brown two objects next to each other ie at the same distance from the lens - the error will be trivial. You can get a sense of the distance by reference to fixed dimensions eg the diameter of the car's wheel, or by looking at whether the car crosses the lane (and, if so, by how much).
As I said, it's not hard to spot people who grossly infringe the law. I doubt that anything marginal would be prosecuted. Certainly it's been my experience dealing with the AFP that they will only prosecute when the video evidence is undeniable.
Apart from video evidence there's also an ultrasound based system that will provide a number
Paul Casimir Using the expression “sense of” goes back to my comment. Will an estimate stand up in court? I don’t know. I imagine you don’t either. Time will tell.
David Brown I do know, because it has happened already. People have already been convicted in court based on video evidence.
As I said, there may be some doubt when it's a matter of a few centimeters, but many cases are absolutely unarguable.
I hope he can peddle really quickly so he can issue me an infringement.
David Brown he will most likely have front and rear cycliq bike cameras. No need to chase you down they will just send you the infringement notice.
Well done for admitting intent
I look forward to seeing ACT policing members out on their bikes. If they’d like to pick up their quota of fines quickly, they can just pedal up and down Northbourne ave in peak hour where the truck drivers often pass way too close. Also ride along any action bus route, the bus drivers appear to have all been terribly lied to by their boyfriends about what 1metre actually looks like.
Looking at the comments on here, what a load of nasty, angry people, I miss the days when your average Australian was chilled, they increasingly seem like uptight, whingers and busybodys.
I agree, but I’m pretty sure that was before lycra became a thing.
Back when governments and bike riders had common sense rather than belligerent entitlement.
I don't mind this, but it has to work both ways, not simply "cars are bad mkay"
No I did
Question thou
First person to ark up
Do u ride bikes
Blake Rose ever cut one off they are some deadly tights coming at you
I’ve actually cleaned one up at round about on Ginny drive😂😂😂
Is that all they have to worry about? That and mean tweets, blimey!
Angela Thomas having been deliberately run off the road recently on my ride to work, this is something I worry about .
Stuart Brogan you didnt use a cycle path?
Cars have to keep a 1 metre gap from the bike. Bikes also need to keep that same gap and not encroach on the traffic forcing cars to move away even more.
Alex Elliott Very wrong buddy. Bicycles are entitled to take whatever space in the lane they require to feel safe (unless there is a separate bike lane). So if we want to take the lane we will. And you will have give us the lawful distance when passing. Time to read & understand the road rules again for you little man.
I hope a few cyclists get booked. Under freedom of information, I would love to know the stats on cyclists who have been fined. They break the rules often enough!!
Margaret Freemantle do they Margaret? Do they?
Margaret Freemantle oh dear, but did they endanger lives?? Examples, please.
Margaret Freemantle please tell me all about the many deaths caused by all these alleged bicycle law-breakers? Or just give me, say, 3-4 actual cases in the past 5 years in the ACT❓🤔
Addrienne Adamson like motorists, both break the rules, unlike motorists, cyclists don't kill.
Peter Signorini none in the last 10 years perhaps.
Euan Buchanan she is just another hypocrite.
Margaret Freemantle “cyclists booked under freedom of information” 😂😂😂
For what? Carrying documents in their panniers?
Peter Signorini try driving along Forbes st. The police and ambulance there this week. Bike riders coming from the ANU, a narrow street, all over the road regularly, black jackets, no helmets- there will be a death and someone will have to live with the guilt.
Eoin Wotkinz they do. Red lights mean nothing and nor do orderly lines or lanes. And I have witnessed them ignoring stop signs near construction sites- just plain ignorant
Margaret Freemantle On the Gold coast it is simmilar, but the uber delivery riders and tourists. There is only 2 countries in the world with helmet laws, so could be a lot of foreign students.
The reason is that helmets are not that effective, and the argument for helmets can equally be applied to motor vehicles, although modern cars with air bags serve the same purpose.
The introduction of helmet laws in Australia saw a dramatic drop in the numbers of people cycling as the law was sold on the danger of cars and trucks. The consequence, actually more people have died due to health issues.
Margaret Freemantle Studies suggest that cyclists break the law far less than car drivers.
https://www.outsideonline.com/2273001/cyclists-comply-traffic-laws-more-drivers
https://www.bicycling.com/news/a27456430/cycling-laws-bike-lanes/
Mathew Mendo there was a truck driver charged this year, and of course the famous one of the guy that murdered a cyclists after anti cycling posts and nearly hitting another. He is doing jail time if course.
Mathew Mendo I do not know about ACT data, but there have been 8 deaths of cyclists in Victoria so far this year. On the pattern of fault 6 of those at least will be the driver at-fault. In 2017 there were 12 cyclists killed and 10 of those were directly caused by drivers. One of the riders killed was a good mate of mine. Nationally drivers kill 1200 people annually!
Meantime the last death (of a pedestrian) caused by an at-fault rider was in 2006. Before that it was about 1973. I am not aware of a single motor-vehicle occupant killed by a bicycle rider.
So basically, such claims about the “dangerous cyclists” are shit❗️
Stuart Brogan cyclist get killed by not looking out for their own safety.
Peter McDonald what utter shite! The classic victim-blame line. I guess you will blame you daughter and not the rapist when she gets done over at a night out when wearing fancy clothes❓
Peter McDonald yes, but not common, see post above or check out the UniSA study for the Automobile Association of Australia Study, motorists at fault 79% of the time.
Euan Buchanan doubt this!! In Australia, cyclists aren’t monitored- can you please provide stats on how many cyclists have been charged?
Debbie Thomsen nearly lost a two year old to a peanut cyclist, flying along on the footpath. Didnt even hear him coming..
Peter Signorini Who mentioned deaths? Arrogant cyclists want the road, the bike paths and the footpaths. Im constantly dodging them while driving and then nearly being hit by them on the lakes paths as im walking with the family.. They certainly dont feel the need to give distance or slow when passing pedestrians, even with small kids...
Phil Mcdonald so true. They ride around the lake and the majority have no respect for pedestrians and no bells. Just once, I would like to see them pulled up!
Peter Signorini ,Mate once again i dont follow your logic and your comparative example really doesnt fit what i think you are trying to say. Perhaps you need to remove your lycra and your head from your arse and go for a walk around one of the Canberra lakes..
Margaret Freemantle if you want data about cyclists being 'monitored' I suggest you get that from the AFP. But if you think cyclists aren't booked by police then just google 'operation pedro'.
Phil Mcdonald generalizing much?
Phil Mcdonald road deaths, and injuries, are the key indicator of "risk". People on bicycles are a minimal risk of harm to others. The greatest risk, by a quantum leap, on our roads and footpaths are the drivers of motor vehicles. But in the nature of your "othering" this is simply brushed away 🙄😒
Phil Mcdonald oh great line of argument there. With the ad hominem comes the admisson of failure.
I have lost track of the amount of times a muppet brained cyclist nearly cleaned me up on paths because of their gross stupidity on not ringing a bell to let people know they are coming. They seem to think it is hilarious.
Phil Mcdonald Maybe the "supervising adult" wasn't supervising properly? It is a SHARED PATH after all, so bloody share it then and share the responsibility too!
Margaret Freemantle No, can you?
I can tell you which mode of transport is responsible for over 1,000 fatalities and over 10,000 serious injuries each year, and it isn't cycling. I'm in no doubt about that.
Phil Mcdonald "Phil Mcdonald Peter Signorini never once have i nearly been knocked over by a car driving on the footpath or a bicycle path.. Pete you are living proof that you dont need a long neck to be a goose!!"
And you are living proof of a failure to draw distinction between personal experience and authoritative statistics. Over a thousand people don't "nearly" die because of cars, they DIE! Dead, Never to walk this earth again.
You, "nearly lost a two year old to a peanut cyclist."
Phil Mcdonald Really? I have. And I know of 3 cycling fatalities on bike PATHS... not lanes. through being hit by cars
Phil Mcdonald maybe you should check the road toll data then. Several hundred people are killed annually in Australia, and hundreds more injured. By motor vehicles. While walking. Often enough these deaths occur while they are walking on-the-footpath even!
And the ad-hominem continues. Further admission of you failure to present any case. Failed line of argument.