19 June 2013

New CTP providers for Canberra!

| johnboy
Join the conversation
40
Barr

Katy Gallagher and Andrew Barr have the long awaited news that three new players are entering the Compulsory Third Party insurance market in the ACT:

Three insurers: AAMI, GIO and Apia (the Australian Pensioners Insurance Agency) have been granted licences to offer CTP insurance to ACT motorists. The licences will become effective on 1 July 2013. There is currently only one provider of CTP in the ACT.

“Today’s announcement is great news for Canberra motorists,” Treasurer Andrew Barr said. “Competition in our CTP market will bring the obvious benefit of choice.

“Competition also offers greater opportunities for innovative insurance products, more investment and employment in the ACT, and new thinking about how people injured in a motor vehicle accident might be rehabilitated and returned to health.

“We have had a single insurer in the ACT for more than three decades, and it is great for Canberrans to finally have greater product choice.


UPDATE: The Canberra Liberals’ Brendan Smyth has expressed his pleasure and says this means he was right.


Further update: The Law Society is also very happy:

The Society welcomes the news that there will be three more CTP insurers in the ACT market.

The government is to be congratulated on the success of their 2008 reforms in making CTP insurance in the ACT profitable for insurers while maintaining a reasonable level of benefits for innocent victims of motor vehicle accidents.

A senior ACT Treasury official recently informed a legal seminar that the estimated average cost of claims following the 2008 reforms fell from a forecast $157,371 in 2012 to an actual cost of $36,689.

These raw figures indicate a much larger profit than was expected when premiums were set.

We expect that this has been a factor in attracting the new insurers to the ACT market.

The extra competition may well result in lower premiums and the funding of a no-fault catastrophic care scheme.

Join the conversation

40
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Even though the changes take effect from 1 July, options for other insurers wont appear on renewals until 15 July at the earliest.

Unfortunately you can’t postpone payment if you are one of the unlucky few who’s registration falls due any time between now and then, and no refund will be offered.

Seems the only option is to renew for 3 months and hope one of the other CTP providers will save you more than the extra $30 you’ll pay for a 3 month renewal.

funbutalsoserious5:43 pm 21 Jun 13

I received my renewal just today for the 10th Jul, no mention of any other company than the dreaded NRMA.

So be careful before paying for shorter regos (like 3 months at an extra cost) as this may take some time before it is implemented.

wildturkeycanoe said :

Just did a quote online with Suncorp [GIO] and I could have saved $150 per year

Cool can I borrow your time machine? I’m assuming you have a time machine to find out if the CTP regulator will approve the premiums that Suncorp will submit after July 1?

wildturkeycanoe said :

This should have been done a long time ago but Govco has been greedy as usual.

Chop71 said :

Don’t blame the NRMA board member, blame the lazy/corrupt politicians who allowed this to go on for so long.

How is the the government’s fault? Insurers have been free to enter or leave the ACT CTP market over the last 30 years. Maybe NRMA will take the opportunity to pull the pin and pull out of the ACT market?

Gungahlin Al said :

I reckon NRMA has made turkeys of us here in the ACT while they’ve had the monopoly, and long-standing local NRMA board member Alan Evans has done precisely nothing about it. Yet he pocketed in excess of $118,000 last year.
Next NRMA election he should get the boot. Unfortunately, they’ve set themselves up with 4-year terms, so I believe the next election isn’t until late 2015…

Don’t blame the NRMA board member, blame the lazy/corrupt politicians who allowed this to go on for so long. I’d say Alan was doing a wonderful job (collecting the profits).

Wish Coles would get in on this. Their home and car insurance is considerably cheaper than any of the others. I know that’s probably because they are trying to establish themselves and then drive out the competition, but they are very good value atm.

Remember that the new players can initially charge less because they dont have the long tail of previous claims (some under more generous schemes). They are coming in ‘fresh’ with all the benefits of recent amendments. So its wrong to say you would have saved $150 every year for 10 years, you are saving $150 this year (perhaps) and other people such as P platers will no doubt be paying more than they would otherwise pay.

What will probably happen is:

1. initially the Suncorp insurers will charge less to get market share and because they have no existing liabilities.
2. over time their prices will increase as they have to pay out claims and because they have picked up a lot of customers who will just roll over their insurance
3. NRMA will reduce its prices a little bit to compete
4. we will end up with a price reduction of maybe $50 per year on average, but some people will pay less and some will be paying more.

Gungahlin Al9:41 am 21 Jun 13

I reckon NRMA has made turkeys of us here in the ACT while they’ve had the monopoly, and long-standing local NRMA board member Alan Evans has done precisely nothing about it. Yet he pocketed in excess of $118,000 last year.
Next NRMA election he should get the boot. Unfortunately, they’ve set themselves up with 4-year terms, so I believe the next election isn’t until late 2015…

wildturkeycanoe6:04 am 21 Jun 13

Just did a quote online with Suncorp [GIO] and I could have saved $150 per year every year for the last 10 years had this been in place already. According to their calculators, I have been paying the same CTP as that of a P plater. Put in my years of driving experience and wala, $150 in my pocket. This should have been done a long time ago but Govco has been greedy as usual. I don’t think we will see the same rates as NSW, but bring on change if that will make things better for us.

The Antichrist9:22 pm 20 Jun 13

magiccar9 said :

Erg0 said :

Didn’t know that, thanks for the link. It would explain why my new rego label, received yesterday, looked like it was printed with the last of the toner…

On the topic of this – would it hurt them to at least put something on the ‘stickers’ that resembled an adhesive surface. Two years running now mine has been little more than a coloured piece of paper with no damn stick on it.

From 1 July you won’t be needing the sticker anyway.

Erg0 said :

Didn’t know that, thanks for the link. It would explain why my new rego label, received yesterday, looked like it was printed with the last of the toner…

On the topic of this – would it hurt them to at least put something on the ‘stickers’ that resembled an adhesive surface. Two years running now mine has been little more than a coloured piece of paper with no damn stick on it.

Thevoiceofchoice12:52 pm 20 Jun 13

$20 difference between all anyway.

The Queensland CTP choice (all for exactly the same price as eachother) is more about what you’re getting in addition to basic CTP, being the personal medical costs of the hit driver.
Medical cover for the at-fault-driver, typically (with RACQ offering some minor discount on membership and roadside assist).

Very Busy said :

Reprobate said :

Aaargh my rego is due 1 July but I will be interstate that week so I need to do it beforehand… bugger!

Are you taking your car with you when you go interstate? If not, and it isn’t being used by anyone else, there is no point in having it registered while it isn’t being used.

Or even if you have your car with you interstate, why don’t you wait until one minute past midnight on the first of July, then pay over the internet? Since from that day on rego stickers will no longer be issued, you will immediately be legally able to drive it.

HiddenDragon12:10 pm 20 Jun 13

Roundhead89 said :

Don’t be fooled by claims that the price of CTP will go down now that there are new players. In NSW after competitors to the NRMA were brought in, the price of green slips went down for a few months then shot up again. And don’t be fooled by the smoke and mirrors claims of three new competitors. In reality there is one new competitor. GIO, AAMI and APIA are all owned by Queensland-based Suncorp, formerly known as the State Government Insurance Office (SGIO).

I’ll be happy(ish) if they don’t go up quite as quickly as in the past – but as you point out, insurance companies are masters at the art of the catch-up and the clawback, after giving a brief breather to their customers.

Reprobate said :

I did find a reminder though that from 1 July rego labels won’t be required in the ACT: http://www.rego.act.gov.au/Whatsnew/regolabelabolish.htm

Didn’t know that, thanks for the link. It would explain why my new rego label, received yesterday, looked like it was printed with the last of the toner…

Don’t be fooled by claims that the price of CTP will go down now that there are new players. In NSW after competitors to the NRMA were brought in, the price of green slips went down for a few months then shot up again. And don’t be fooled by the smoke and mirrors claims of three new competitors. In reality there is one new competitor. GIO, AAMI and APIA are all owned by Queensland-based Suncorp, formerly known as the State Government Insurance Office (SGIO).

Watson said :

Reprobate said :

Aaargh my rego is due 1 July but I will be interstate that week so I need to do it beforehand… bugger! Mind you, not sure APIA would be able to offer insurance to a 45YO whipper-snapper anyways…

No need to do it in advance? You can do it online on the day.

Will be driving on that day so the thought of spending a pleasant lunchtime stop trying to find wifi or a stable 3G connection to get onto the regoACT website on my mobile doesn’t appeal. Especially if a “saving” from the competition doesn’t eventuate.

Anyway, won’t the basic rego charge be going up as of 1 July anyway? It’s almost impossible to find the schedule of current fees on the website, let alone those for 2013-14. I did find a reminder though that from 1 July rego labels won’t be required in the ACT: http://www.rego.act.gov.au/Whatsnew/regolabelabolish.htm

cranky said :

The way to reduce premiums is to remove the lawyers picnic that is the current scheme. Obscene dollars go into ambulance chasing legal pockets as cases are argued in court. Other jurisdictions have little dificulty in applying a formula to injury/compensation payouts, resulting in vastly lower premiums required to pay for the schemes..

Have you ever been injured in one of those other jurisdications and tried to figure out your rights?

And, actually, other than NZ, which jurisdictions do you say have these formulas and have vastly lower premiums? NSW is about $100 per year cheaper (really peanuts given the costs of owning a car) and provide vastly reduced cover for any injured person. Great, you save $100, the injured person suffers $1000s

Reprobate said :

Aaargh my rego is due 1 July but I will be interstate that week so I need to do it beforehand… bugger! Mind you, not sure APIA would be able to offer insurance to a 45YO whipper-snapper anyways…

No need to do it in advance? You can do it online on the day.

Skidbladnir said :

I find it rude that the Law Society are even providing comment, let alone praising this outcome.

Yup, it’s kinda like the automotive industry praising the outcome of a study that determines light rail or high speed rail is economically infeasible.

HiddenDragon11:12 pm 19 Jun 13

Competition is working so well in other areas – such as petrol prices – so why wouldn’t it work wonders here? Anyway, good to see something done on this long overdue subject.

Oh, and FYI Law Society, ACT Treasury is now abolished (and that’s a WHOLE other story).

If APIA refuses to insure a youngster like me, I’ll take them to the Human Rights Commission.

Like others, have just paid mine. And cleverly, the ACT RTA is so prepared, it asked me to enter the reference number in the box for the provider I “have chosen above”. And there it sits in all its glory – the one NRMA box alongside plenty of white space patiently awaiting more.

I thought this was new, but no, the form has been the same for at least the past two years (just cleaned out older records so can’t check beyond 2011). It’s clearly been a priority.

Reprobate said :

Aaargh my rego is due 1 July but I will be interstate that week so I need to do it beforehand… bugger! Mind you, not sure APIA would be able to offer insurance to a 45YO whipper-snapper anyways…

Are you taking your car with you when you go interstate? If not, and it isn’t being used by anyone else, there is no point in having it registered while it isn’t being used. There are no issues if you just pay for the rego when you need to use the car again on your return.

I find it rude that the Law Society are even providing comment, let alone praising this outcome.

Their members are simultaneously the cause of the problem and major future beneficiary, at the expense of my back pocket.

( Good lawyers learn to manipulate the legal system, great lawyers manipulate lawmakers)

curlylocks said :

So does this mean it will be cheaper to register your car???? Or are their different “types” of CTP depending on who you go with???????

I am assuming it will not be any cheaper at all. ho hum

Well let’s consider this, I ran two fictional scenarios through NRMA (the present incumbent in the ACT), one a best case scenario, the other a more challenging one, both with a very vanilla vehicle…

NSW – NRMA CTP Greenslip

Scenario 1: Youngest driver 40yrs old, 2007 Toyota Camry Altise, Comprehensive Insurance with 65% NCB = $435/yr

Scenario 2: Youngest driver 21, 2007 Camry Altise, No insurance, record of at-fault accidents in past two years = $579/yr

Proof is in the numbers, this move will potentially make CTP cheaper. In a competitive market, the two providers will be in competition and they will be able to customise their covers more compared to the current, one size fits all approach. The GIO rep at the presser today even indicated they will have three grades of cover depending on the quality of the driving record of the registered users.

This is simply window dressing. As has been pointed out, all these insurers are owned by the one company, so the chance of competition to attract business is minimal.

The way to reduce premiums is to remove the lawyers picnic that is the current scheme. Obscene dollars go into ambulance chasing legal pockets as cases are argued in court. Other jurisdictions have little dificulty in applying a formula to injury/compensation payouts, resulting in vastly lower premiums required to pay for the schemes.

Make no mistake, with the aid of Smyth, the local third party lawyers are making a fortune at the motorists expense. We should be asking why Barr has not pursued changing the system to reduce the legal meddling that currently exists.The fact that the Law Society are very happy about this development is indicative of the increased profits forseen.

The cosiness between local assembly members and the legal fraternity is such that the ACT motorist is only a bit player in the TPI scheme.

So, Suncorp signed up. That’s two true competitors…

So does this mean it will be cheaper to register your car???? Or are their different “types” of CTP depending on who you go with??????? I am assuming it will not be any cheaper at all. ho hum

For a compulsory insurance with tightly defined cover price is the only way to compete. we”ll see come the day the extra boxes turn up on the rego website.

gungsuperstar5:19 pm 19 Jun 13

Well that’s annoying. My rego is due on 27 June, I was going to pay it tomorrow.

I guess it would fanciful to assume that premiums will immediately drop on 1 July… but I’ll only be exercising the 3 month option I think to see what happens.

Captain RAAF4:42 pm 19 Jun 13

So now there will be four boxes to tick

1. NRMA
2. RNAM
3. MRAN
4. ANMR

It won’t get any cheaper, its all going to the same place.

From the CT article – http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/more-choice-for-third-party-insurance-in-act-20130619-2oik7.html

“Competition in our CTP market will bring the obvious benefit of choice.”
Really, thats it! No, the obvious benefit should be price and I dont see any of that. The benefit of ‘choice’ is squat.

Benefit of choice in this case is kinda like asking; do you want to lose your wallet with all you money in it, or do you want your wallet stollen with all your money in it?

Competition my bottom, all three of those companies are Suncorp companies so they might slightly undercut NRMA but will not compete with each other. I highly doubt they will even compete with NRMA very much and will just go with the same prices that already exist.

Yep, perfect timing. I just renewed mine on Friday last week.

Great news none the less.

Aaargh my rego is due 1 July but I will be interstate that week so I need to do it beforehand… bugger! Mind you, not sure APIA would be able to offer insurance to a 45YO whipper-snapper anyways…

The absence of pricing info makes me suspect that there will be no pricing benefit what so ever.

what a shame the new arrangement for CTP is not in effect now. I have to change the rego of a QLD vehicle to the ACT tomorrow.

Finally!!! …and right when I’ve just paid rego.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.