27 October 2024

Green power play to keep Labor guessing, but Rattenbury should be in Cabinet

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
44
Man speaking into microphone

Greens Leader Shane Rattenbury wants a new deal, but he needs to be where the power is. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Last week saw a little strategic positioning by ACT Greens Leader Shane Rattenbury, flagging a change in the power-sharing dynamic between his party and Labor.

Laura Nuttall’s comeback win in Brindabella was a fillip for the Green after looking on Saturday night that they could be down to just two in the new Legislative Assembly.

But now with four, Mr Rattenbury is given a stronger hand to play with.

There is no doubt the Greens felt a little dudded in the last term regarding the way ministries were carved up and allocated, although Mr Rattenbury can’t complain about holding down the Attorney-General’s job.

Chief Minister Andrew Bar hit back that you can’t always be the minister for good news, but the Greens did seem to have their fair share of bad news to deal with.

READ ALSO Don’t blame Labor for election losses, Barr tells Greens

This time around, the question for them is, is it better to be inside the tent or not? Can they exert influence and have more leverage by not being part of the cabinet?

Superficially, the Greens lost two seats and should have less influence, but with Labor not improving on 10 and the Liberals stuck on nine, they will have a big say on how the numbers fall.

This is especially so if they sit outside of cabinet and find common ground with the Liberals and independents on individual issues.

It is something the Greens have done before, sitting on the crossbench where they can be less confined by Cabinet solidarity.

Mr Rattenbury immediately listed the Green agenda in the wake of Ms Nuttall’s victory – significant improvements on public housing, healthy environments, climate change and making Canberra a more affordable place to live.

In their minds, they are the trailblazers who can make seemingly unrealistic things happen but still be more pragmatic than their federal counterparts.

But it would be good if they quickly left the febrile atmosphere of the campaign behind and focused on more prosaic concerns.

That might calm those who won’t be thrilled at the thought of the Green tail wagging the Labor dog.

Whether it is in the best interest of the Territory for the now very experienced Mr Rattenbury to stay out of cabinet is debatable.

Mr Barr is down a minister with Mick Gentleman gone. Some have called him ineffectual, but Mr Gentleman did have experience across multiple portfolios.

Not having Mr Rattenbury to call on would shrink the talent pool and impose a heavier burden on the Labor team.

When it comes to the crunch, Mr Rattenbury should be where he can make the most contribution to the Territory as well as wield influence where it matters in cabinet.

The Assembly numbers will still give independents Thomas Emerson and Fiona Carrick opportunities to achieve good outcomes if they work issue by issue with the Greens – who look like they won’t operate as a bloc with Labor – and the Liberals, who have some soul-searching to do.

READ ALSO Coalition not thanking Jacinta Price for raising abortion debate

Despite the status quo numbers-wise being maintained in Brindabella, the big anti-Labor swing there has been noted, with Mr Barr indicating that the government will be paying much closer attention to the community’s needs in the south.

Two new Labor members who won’t want to be one-term wonders will be making sure the Chief Minister doesn’t forget.

It is imperative that the Liberals sort out its leadership and ideological issues quickly so it can be an effective opposition.

Here is something to think about. Only two candidates topped 9000 primary votes in the election – Mr Barr and the Liberals’ Mark Parton. Perhaps it’s time for the Mouth from the South to put his hand up.

Join the conversation

44
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Maybe under a cabinet would be a better option?

Janine Haskins3:15 pm 05 Nov 24

My frustration regarding politicians who talk the talk, but fail to walk the walk is compelling. Can we please get some ‘walkers’ on board to address multiple social justice issues.

The only job I’d give Rattenbury is checking the level of salt and pepper shakers in the Parliamentary cafe. Even then, it should be under supervision

Incidental Tourist10:45 am 31 Oct 24

I suppose they will keep improving affordability by increasing local taxes. We know the narrative – average tax take to average salary per average dwelling and stuff like that.

Why give such support to Rattenbury? He has been around too long, was responsible for the increase in taxes, rates and charges to fund his uneconomic light rail, supported Barr when he refused to have an Inquiry into the Orroral Valley fire, has done nothing to harden up magistrates who continue to accept numerous breaches of bail and hand out soft sentences, etc. He is a disaster.

The best place in the Territorey for the architect of Rattenbury Rail is outside of the Territory.

Can’t stand Rattenbury.

Tubbsy Ringer5:31 pm 28 Oct 24

Many complaining about the election result resort to a snide tone about Labor and Greens, while glossing over the fact that the Liberals and other smaller conservative parties didn’t accumulate near enough votes to form government.

Accusing the incumbents of being wasteful with money isn’t a useful argument when you look at the recent fiscal record of the federal Liberal governments, or Dutton’s blatantly false claims about nuclear power. Like it or not, the federal stink attaches itself locally.

Canberra voters are well educated, and probably more likely to see through the Liberal costing smoke and mirrors.

I respectfully suggest the Canberra Libs and their supporters look for clear, well-costed policies that actually appeal to voters rather than running a negative campaign yet again. They may not like the tram, they may not like whatever else but the fact is far more voters were not dissatisfied enough with the status quo.

Until the conservatives switch on to this and offer a positive, inspiring alternative they will remain forever in opposition in Canberra.

Amanda Kiley6:12 pm 28 Oct 24

Labor will win again and again. Not because they are good but purely and only because we are a public service city.

No Amanda, Labor will win again and again not because we’re a public service city but because the Canberra Liberals refuse to be a moderate conservative party, leaving voters in the middle with nowhere else to go.

Why do you think they put Lee out front, they wanted the appearance of a moderate conservative party, and the electorate saw through that ruse.

Maybe it’s time for the Canberra Liberals to change.

Amanda Kiley8:50 am 29 Oct 24

I’m a long time Liberal voters and I do agree that they fall short in areas, but the fact remains we are a public service town and public servants and their families vote Labor. Nothing short of a miracle will see Liberal in power for the foreseeable future.

Amanda Kiley8:54 am 29 Oct 24

I respectfully disagree, yes Liberals have their deficiencies but not (by a long shot) more than Labor. So they keep getting voted in despite their track record of overspending, spending on the ridiculous, appalling planning department, terrible roads and the exts which take forever etc etc etc. How do you explain this other than their voter base?

Amanda Kiley, most employment is in the private sector, and it may be amazing news to you but not all public servants vote left, so far as I have been able to observe. While proportion of public servants has continued to dwindle over the years, Labor support continues nonetheless.

Add up the left v. right votes in the last election. The margin is small, so why throw in the towel? Some movement is required to match the electorate. They are the ones who vote.

Amanda, you’re out-of-date about Canberra being a Public Service city. Google it. This excerpt is from Riotact this year, for example:
“In his 2024 State of the Territory address, Chief Minister Andrew Barr suggested Canberra could no longer be considered purely a public service town. He said the proportion of APS employees in the ACT workforce had dropped significantly (31 per cent to 24 per cent) in the 10 years between 2011 and 2021.”

I’m sorry but stuff like “public servants and their families vote Labor” is absolute nonsense, and nothing but professional opposition talk.

The fact is, the Liberals did not present a credible alternative to Labor, as they have now repeated as a strategy in multiple elections. Just different ‘pet projects’ for excessive expenditure on, that was about it. And the projects put forward were primarily populist claptrap, poorly thought through, without decent analysis having been undertaken.

There was ample material to build a credible alternative government agenda on matters the electorate would respond to. I don’t think there are many that are happy with the dreadful direction of the ACT’s fiscal position. But where was the ‘we will do this differently’ agenda from the opposition. Not even a commitment to some form of expenditure review for goodness sake – a simple step that might have persuaded some they were serious about doing things differently.

The real issues the Canberra Liberals have is a relatively highly educated electorate. The smoke and mirror, cake for all tactics that work in other jurisdictions do not work here – people are more than happy to vote in alternative ways (for instance – the election of Pocock in the seante) if they are presented with a coherent and logical alternative. But the Canberra Liberals yet again gave those they needed to change the minds of very little to go on.

Tubbsy Ringer9:40 am 29 Oct 24

Appreciate your thoughts Amanda. We’re not a public service family but the Liberals were the lowest mainstream party on out ballot papers. We felt there wasn’t much vision for the future and our kids in the Liberal election commitments. I hear the words over spending a lot when the incumbents are criticised, but infrastructure will never be cheaper than now due to inflation; future generations will look back on the tram as an excellent investment for example, despite the initial high cost. The liberal plan to privatise and sell off assets has been fiscally shortsighted at the federal level, and seeing the Kowen housing plan I can only imagine that will be the Libs’ approach to balancing the budget here.

What was the alternative that your beloved Liberals put forward Amanda? A whole suite of vanity projects that the Territory can’t afford, and not a lot else…..

Sure the labor Government is shite in many ways – but do you honestly think the opposition presented anything even approaching a credible alternative?

If you do, then you are part of the problem.

I have to disagree Amanda, with two seats going to independents and the strong independent vote some people were looking for a change, they just didn’t want to risk the Canberra Liberals or independents who might ally with them.

It was a missed opportunity, instead of trying to con the electorate into believing they’re a small “L”, socially moderate conservative party maybe the ACT Liberals should actually become that. I fear with Hanson they’re going the other way.

swaggieswaggie4:12 pm 28 Oct 24

“Mick Gentleman gone. Some have called him ineffectual” Really? EVERYONE in Tuggers called him ineffectual. We’re glad he’s gone .

The Greens vote in Qld is a better indication of how Aussies in general
feel about them. The Canberra bubble actually responded as well but not as effectively as Qld. Shane R should sit outside Cabinet – but then there’s that tempting salary, isn’t there Shane. Stay independent and show us you’re genuine

Leon Arundell2:30 pm 28 Oct 24

Will the Greens address the ACT’s excessive annual carbon footprint, which is four times the world average?
Or will they continue with the government greenwash that “the ACT is a global leader in reducing emissions”?
That’s like saying that a Ferrari driver who slows to 100 km/h for school zones “is a global leader in road safety.”
The reality is that government’s so-called “net zero emissions” policy addresses only 6% of our carbon footprint.
https://envcomm.act.gov.au/latest-from-us/acts-scope-3-greenhouse-gas-emissions/

Capital Retro3:08 pm 28 Oct 24

The green hypocrisy from our government is incredible.
Every time I go past one of the solar powered “drink bottle refund save-the planet shipping- containers” in suburban shopping centre car parks I laugh when the sun isn’t shining and they switch over to their self-contained fossil-fuel powered generators.
By the way, I haven’t seen any new electric buses lately. Are they still parked in the depots?

Really? I see them quite often. Whilst a small sample, I boarded 11 buses in the last 14 days and 3 were electric. That is roughly 4 times the percentage that could be expected from the percentage of electric buses currently making up the active fleet.

Capital Retro2:25 pm 30 Oct 24

I envy bus enthusiasts.

It is going to be big few weeks for Canberrans as they watch the latest shenanigans going on in the Canberra Liberals’ party room after the party’s election loss. I am going giddy just thinking about it!

That old war horse looking all snarly and revengeful, jackboot Jeremy Hanson, who should have gone years ago but has put his hand up for another comeback as leader, has stuck his head up after previously being dumped by his party and sitting it out sulking away on the backbench. Mr Hanson is not wanted by his party but does have the support from a few hangers on including Ed Cocks and the sluggish James Milligan who were just re-elected, as well as a few other newbies.

Will Mark Parton, all giddy from his part in bringing the Liberal vote up to respectable levels, put his hand up to for the leadership role and will Elizabeth Lee step down to make way?

No matter what happens, I think Ms Lee is the smartest brain in the party with neither Mr Parton nor Leanne Castley being able to bring the party up to an electable level, nor having the intellects to be leaders or achieve such a task!

I haven’t seen a campaign run as poorly as Lee’s since Bill Shorten’s disastrous loss to Scott Morrison. She may be smart but it wasn’t a smart campaign. “23 years is long enough” is not selling the electorate a vision of their future, it’s a whinge that betrays the entitlement of the ACT Liberals.

As for the Liberal leadership, if the answer to their problems with voters in the centre is to put up Hanson, a bloke who has already been rejected by the electorate and will only drag the party further right then I can only laugh….to quote the meme “It’s a bold strategy Cotton let’s see if it pays off em”….

I did not mention the party’s poor election campaign, that is another story. I would also argue that it was a disaster rivaling Bill Shorten’s who actually ran a good campaign with a result nobody expected!

I simply stated my belief that Elizabeth Lee is the only person in the party who has the intellect, and importantly, is more moderate and socially progressive to take the party forward!

Capital Retro5:21 pm 28 Oct 24

If “23 years is long enough” is not selling the electorate a vision of their future, what was Labor’s “it’s time” promising?

If “23 years is long enough” is the Canberra Liberals only vision to win government, no wonder they have been in opposition for 23 years CR!

At least Labor had policy ideas, a catchy song and high-profile supporters to go with their vision!

Jack, fair enough. Although I would argue that Shorten not being prepared for the inevitable negative gearing scare campaign and Bowen saying “If you don’t like it don’t vote for us” was a disaster, not to mention losing to an empty vessel like Scott Morrison.

The difference is @Capital Retro is “23 years is long enough” is a whinge and a demand, and “It’s time” is as YOU noted is a promise…

The Canberra Liberals paired their whinge with a deliberately light-on-details platform, Labor paired their promise with a raft of policy proposals.

Capital Retro9:37 pm 28 Oct 24

In reality, “ideas, a catchy song and high-profile supporters to go with their vision!” aren’t worth a rat’s ****.

Capital Retro7:18 am 29 Oct 24

Seano is #1 on the pile-on roster today.

“Seano is #1 on the pile-on roster today.”

I have no idea what you’re rabbiting on about now.

The Canberra Liberals lost, they’ll lose again next time if they don’t change and judging by their out-of-touch-with-reality online supporters that’s not going to happen.

Not to mention the possibility of the Liberals going back to Jeremy Hanson which would be doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result, ie the definition of insanity.

Capital Retro9:18 am 29 Oct 24

Seano, we both agree the Liberals will lose again. It doesn’t matter what they do, they can’t beat the Labor/Green octopus.

Two independent seats and a strong independent vote. Of course, the Liberals can win, I could run a better campaign than Lee did, the fact is moderate, sensible on social policy and climate conservatives can win in this district and this country.

But I agree they can’t win with people like Hanson on board, if he gets the leadership then the Liberals once again won’t have listened to the electorate and they’re already toast.

@Retro By “Labor/Green octopus” you mean an electorate not interested in a party full of cooked ideologues.

Why are Ian and today’s Canberra Times editorial advocating for Shane to throw his lot in with Labor? The argument from both seems to be to settle things down in the interests of the status quo. Has our Andy been cooing in their ears?

davidmaywald2:50 pm 28 Oct 24

Very perceptive of you Jayce… Yes, the coincidental timing and similarity of these opinion pieces is highly suspicious (why does it appear that CT and Riotact are both doing Labor’s bidding?). Given that Barr is a master manipulator of the media, such urging from Labor wouldn’t surprise at all. Shane Rattenbury may also be urging the media to run these lines, so that he can personally remain in cabinet… It would suit Labor to be able to shape government with the four Greens inside their tent (this would give Barr and Labor effective control of the government, with only 34% of votes and only 10 out of the 25 seats). Green voters and MLAs have been completed dudded during their coalitions and “power sharing” agreements with Labor, they have been used and gaslit and abused. Rattenbury should be held to account for this by his own party members… The Canberra community would be far better served with a crossbench of four Greens and two independents, to hold Labor accountable for their exaggerated promises and underwhelming delivery.

@davidmaywald
While a 6-member cross bench sounds powerful, at the end of the day, Barr only needs 3 votes to pursue his legislative agenda. Sadly, it means even if they are in the cross bench, assuming the Libs won’t agree on the 1 in 10 pieces of legislation that draw publicity, Barr will always find it easier to court the Greens vote.

The probable reality is, for the next 4 years, the independents best hope of having an impact, is through their parliamentary committee work.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.