29 July 2024

ACT Greens leader seeks feedback on banning prime time radio and TV gambling ads to protect children

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
33
Man speaking into microphone

Shane Rattenbury says exposure to gambling advertising can set children on a path to developing harmful habits. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Minister for Gaming Shane Rattenbury is seeking community feedback on two proposals to ban gambling ads from radio and TV at certain times – restrictions aimed at protecting children.

The ACT Greens leader says young people were more exposed to gambling advertising than ever before and were inundated with gambling messages in their everyday lives.

“Exposure to gambling advertising can lead young people to view it as a positive activity, putting them on a path to developing harmful habits in the future,” he said.

Canberrans are being invited to submit their opinion online to two possible options:

Option 1: Restricting gambling advertising on radio in the ACT between 6 am and 8:30 am and on TV between 4 pm and 7:30 pm, Monday to Friday (inclusive), except on dedicated sports channels.

Option 2: A more restrictive proposal to ban gambling advertising in the ACT on radio between 6 am and 8:30 am, Monday to Friday (inclusive), on TV between 4 pm and 8:30 pm (or later), Monday to Friday (inclusive), and on TV between 6 am and 8:30 pm, Saturday and Sunday, except on dedicated sports channels.

READ ALSO Property vendors donate 0.1 per cent of sale price to fund $1 million worth of ACT social housing projects

Associate Professor Aino Suomi, director of the ANU’s Centre for Gambling Research, said the consultation process is a step in the right direction but doesn’t go nearly far enough.

“I’m not thrilled by the two options. We should ban gambling advertising at any time children could be watching TV,” she said.

“The evidence is there. Gambling advertising works, full stop. It’s also dangerous for adults to be exposed.

“We are in a similar space where smoking was many years ago … we are tinkering at the edges, smoking ads were eventually banned outright and I don’t think anyone wants to bring them back.”

Television advertising is regulated by the federal government in Australia. However, it is possible for a state or territory to restrict advertising content within its jurisdiction – the South Australian Government has banned gambling ads in its state between 4:30 pm and 7:30 pm on weeknights.

Associate Professor Suomi also noted that most children aren’t really listening to the radio and watching Free-to-Air TV anymore.

“Once kids hit 10,11 or 12, they’re interacting online. That’s where you need to ban ads – there are so many on apps.”

David Pollard, a candidate for Independents for Canberra at the upcoming ACT election, expressed a similar view.

“The proposed options might even have been effective in the mid-2010s. The way we consume media has drastically changed in the five years since the study on how children are exposed to gambling ads on TV. While any evidence-based approach to harm minimisation is worth exploring, the effectiveness and timing of this initiative are questionable.

“Cherry-picking certain times and media platforms seems to be taking a very safe path – there are more politically courageous ways to go.”

READ ALSO Stamp duty to go for first-home, off-the-plan buyers and pensioners in next term, says Labor

The ACT Government said it is also open to hearing about other potential restrictions, including those targeting subscription television and online platforms.

Mr Rattenbury had already asked his Justice and Community Safety Directorate to explore gambling TV and radio bans in 2022.

“Governments always move slowly on this issue,” Professor Suomi said.

Feedback on the ACT Government options can be provided on the Your Say website. A ‘Listening report’ detailing feedback outcomes will be published later this year.

Join the conversation

33
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Tom McLuckie8:01 am 04 Aug 24

If the Greens really wanted to protect the community from harn they should revisit their claims more policing is “persecution” of those “poor” criminals. How can anyone take these people seriously! Self inflated and self righteous they love political soundbites but are incapable of actual deliverables in every singles policy area.

Gambling and alcohol ads have no place on TV when kids are watching.
Good to see the Greens can still focus on the occasional sensible item that affects us all.

Maybe the government’s Gaming Minister, the Greens Shane Rattenbury should be seeking advice from Labor’s Dr Marisa Paterson. Dr Paterson it seems to me has been doing the hard yards in tackling gambling reforms in the ACT, reducing opportunities for clubs and gaming agencies to normalise gambling through their deceitful and unconscionable behaviour. By using loopholes in our laws, these clubs and agencies have actively and without shame continued to prey on the most vulnerable in our community, including the elderly and children. Our clubs and pubs, as well as international gaming agencies have benefited immensely from government largesse throughout the years, having it too good for too long and extracting billions of dollars from our communities through their unconscionable behaviour, contributing nothing in return.

Minister Rattenbury has been dilly-dallying around exploring gambling and advertising reform for over four years now` but little has been achieved. This proposal from the Greens, unsurprisingly announced just under three months out from an election, is just another gutless cop out by a party who after doing very little in government is a party in damage control, attempting to look like they are doing something.

It was only last year that the government instigated an inquiry into online gambling and the impacts it had on those experiencing gambling harm. The Greens and the Liberals did nothing. Dr Paterson as part of the inquiry launched the Bets Off, Game on Campaign calling on reform in a submission signed by all members of the Labor caucus. Doorknocking and contacting every resident in the Molonglo Valley as part of her campaign, she garnered overwhelming public support not to allow poker machines in clubs in the valley. This resulted in The Gaming Machine Amendment Act, a reform rejected by the opposition.

Gambling reform is ongoing and I look forward to more changes in this space including Labor cutting ties with the Greens after the next election!

GrumpyGrandpa5:35 pm 31 Jul 24

Jack D.
Unless there is a landslide towards the ALP, which I doubt, the ALP will realign with the Greens, to secure government.
They could have run as a minority government, before but chose not align with the Greens in the current assembly.
Unless Mr Barr give a categoric commitment to the contrary, voters can assume the ALP would enter into an alliance again.

Yes,
Ms Paterson has done well in ensuring no community club will set up in the Molonglo Valley and instead residents will travel to other areas to gamble on Poker machines in clubs elsewhere.

Truly a win for the Molonglo Valley. LOL.

Gregg Heldon7:56 am 01 Aug 24

So Jack,
Happy to gloss over the fact that all the various Labor clubs across Canberra have poker machines, keno facilities and the like?

I have never glossed over the fact the Labor clubs have gambling facilities Gregg Heldon. I am pleased though that it is the Labor party that is taking steps to reform. Any reforms have been vociferously opposed by the Canberra Liberals who get their fair share of gambling revenue from clubs.

It is the reason I never visit clubs!

I am happy to support a ban on advertising, especially for young people and kids. But gambling is a legitimate pastime and what I don’t understand is why I have to go to Queanbeyan to play poker (a game of skill) or to the Casino to play for serious money but I can put the mortgage through the pokies at my local club. Our gambling laws federal and state are not fit for purpose.

Gregg Heldon10:26 am 31 Jul 24

The hypocrisy is breathtaking. Wants to ban all gambling advertising but is in coalition with a Government that has licenced clubs that offer poker machines as part of their amenities. If he had any morality, he’d either end the alliance after the next election (or now) or tell people why he won’t. He likes the power of being deputy chief minister.

Incidental Tourist10:03 pm 30 Jul 24

Why gambling advertisements should be banned and hard drugs should be allowed? Greens get busy with everything but paying any attention to local environmental issues around ACT. They are a total mess.

You can’t advertise “hard drugs”.

I think Rattenbury should ban everything. Except heroin and other such drugs. And I will never ever give up my clean burning wood fire. Hopefully people vote these people out in the next election.

Just get on with your real job and keep your noses out of all the fluffy stuff, your just incompetent

HiddenDragon7:48 pm 30 Jul 24

Businesses trying to hook kids on gambling are low life grubs, but this is an issue for the federal parliament, not a small sub-national jurisdiction with questionable authority and capacity to do what is proposed – pass on the concerns and any useful ideas to the feds and stop wasting borrowed dollars on feel good posturing.

Option 3. Get rid of Rattenbury at the next election. You want to ban this but are happy to allow drug decriminalisation. I so hope the public can see that you need to be evicted.

No government in the ACT has ever advocated for or passed legislation decriminalising drug use. Laws were passed in 2023 in which the maximum penalties for possessing small amounts of some illegal drugs for personal use were reduced.
Small amounts of drugs found on a person may attract either diversion to a health education and information session or the option of paying a fine.

Michael M, exactly what parallel are you attempting to draw?

The proposal is to ban advertising, as we do with cigarettes. Gambling would remain legal, like cigarettes. Neither is criminalised.

Decriminalisation of small quantities of drugs is not legalisation of drugs. As illegal products, they cannot be advertised either.

All of the above are health measures. Faux morality does not come in to it.

Are you unable to follow this, or are you mindlessly grabbing anything that floats past to support your prior prejudice against the messenger?

GrumpyGrandpa6:01 pm 30 Jul 24

Historically, big sport has been sponsored by the vices; smoking, alcohol and now gambling. We have got rid of smoking and alcohol sponsorship and it’s time to remove gambling too.

Notwithstanding the little disclaimers that accompany gambling ads, the marketing promotes the vice as fun, something that all your mates do and in my opinion it’s pervasive and unhealthy.

I’d be happy to see gambling advertisements removed entirely from advertising.

The thing that I find really bizarre is that Mr Rattenbury, on behalf of the ACT Government, is proposing to restrict gambling, yet supportive of less restrictions on personal drug use. I just don’t understand this.

Keep it simple and just ban all gambling advertising

I’d be happy to see gambling advertising go the way of cigarette advertising – but Rattenbury is delusional if he thinks that can be a state led thing. The Commonwealth needs to get off its butt and do something, if it wants to. Anything at a State/Territory level is just silly and a waste of time, unless every state is involved and forces the Commonwealth’s hand.

Mr Rattenbury, voters seek feedback from you about the promise you made on economic responsibility.

After the 2008 election Shane Rattenbury told the ABC “You know the community can rest assured that the Greens are here, we put down our commitment to Canberra last week, very clearly before the election to assure voters we are committed to a balanced budget over the economic cycle, we are committed to stable minority government and we are also committed to building a city for the future, a city that’s innovative in its employment base.”

It’s now 2024, the budget is well and truly blown, a new stadium, convention centre, theatre precinct, entertainment pavilion, and replacement pool are still dreamy plans for the future, and Greens expect re-election until at least 2028.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2008-10-20/stanhope-signals-greens-reservations/547188

AI is being used to generate sexually explicit material of school kids yet the clowns think gambling ads are the problem?

What is wrong with rattenbury and his gang of “ban everything” clowns?

Their job is to look after city services, maintain public amenities, and provide new amenities and services the electorate wants and needs. Their job is not to rule over the citizenry and push their own personal agendas. The greens behave like dictators, and people need to wake up to it.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.