10 October 2023

APS morale may be low, but buck up and be part of the solution

| Deb Nesbitt
Join the conversation
11
Michael pezzullo

Michael Pezzullo has been forced to step aside from his role while under investigation. Photo: IPAA ACT.

Who can blame public servants for dragging their feet to work amid repeated revelations of poor ”stewardship” by their highly paid so-called leaders?

The weekly slapdown of the public service by one authority or another, and, I fear, journalists like me going on about it, is unfairly feeding the general population’s disdain for it.

And it’s all contributing to plummeting morale.

On top of the usual bagging all public servants cop, they’re wearing the damage caused by Robodebt, the PwC scandal that opened the outsourcing can of worms, and now the Home Affairs affair.

The vast majority of public servants had nothing to do with the unforgiveable horror of Robodebt and, like anyone paying attention, many were aghast seeing it rolled out. They also became well aware of the limits of their power to do anything about it.

Good people I know fled the public service without a package years ago because they couldn’t bear being complicit in promoting policies they found unconscionable.

In Home Affairs’ case, it was also because they refused to wear head honcho Michael Pezzullo’s ”optional” horrid black uniforms.

(What on earth were those military-style stripes and gold epaulets on the uniforms Home Affairs bosses wore as they fronted Senate estimates? They looked like something out of Pirates of Penzance. What a waste of money.)

There was no real choice about wearing the uniforms. Brave public servants who said ”no way” were bullied out as non-team players. They were mostly in immigration, which was subjected to swinging staff cuts, leaving many thousands of people in visa limbo.

READ ALSO Audit finds ADF responses to natural disasters reduced combat effectiveness

If Border Force was meant to discourage bad people from wanting to enter Australia, it’s been a huge failure, says Christine Nixon’s review, unveiled this week.

The lines of people awaiting and appealing visa decisions have grown exponentially since Home Affairs was created in 2017, providing the wicked with an easily exploited and valuable black market workforce. All under Mr Pezzullo’s watch.

Mr Pezzullo’s extraordinary WhatsApp exchanges with a Liberal political operative linked to the Coalition government, which were exposed last week, tell us a lot about his perception of the Australian Public Service Code of Conduct.

A secretary’s job is to deliver government policies and abide by the code, which requires apolitical advice. They’re paid handsomely to work out how to do that without compromising APS values or defying government policy. No-one would disagree it’s a tough gig requiring a strong spine and thick skin.

With public service morale so low, there’s a risk the Australian Public Service Commission’s handling of its inquiry into Mr Pezzullo’s conduct will deliver another blow.

I can promise this: if the commission shows any weakness in applying available sanctions for breaches of the code of conduct, there will be uproar.

A slap on the wrist or payout beyond Mr Pezzullo’s entitlements would send a dangerous signal that the code and the commission are impotent.

READ ALSO CPSU expands pay push to include Dept of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

There’s no room for double standards. Getting it wrong could undermine everything the Government is trying to do to repair the APS, and worsen morale.

As Public Service Minister Katy Gallagher told RiotAct columnist Ross Solly recently, public service morale has been affected by multiple things.

“It’s been a whole range of decisions, including the fact that it wasn’t able really to do the job it was being asked to do through lack of staffing and lack of respect under the former government,” Gallagher said.

It’s also about the culture nurtured by poor leaders. A fish rots from the head, and the stench can take a long time to remove. It’ll take time to turn that ship around and it’s best done by modelling and rewarding the behaviours and the culture you want to instil.

The APS has many good people who have hung in there throughout its trashing over the past decade. Let’s hope it can attract more by installing worthy, well-trained leaders with impeccable standards.

Gallagher and Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil spoke last week about their respect for public servants. O’Neil said she “loved working with public servants”. Good.

I’d say to public servants who are struggling: buck up, take pride in your job and be part of the solution.

Join the conversation

11
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Great article but less of the journalistic hyperbole would have made it better. Like the concept or not, the Australian Border Force (ABF) is a hierarchically structured quasi-military uniformed service with ranks. That’s what the stripes, braid, pips etc denote. The uniformed staff of the ABF are just as worthy as the ones wearing (non gender specific) suits! And by the way, the colour of the uniform is a dark blue, not black. Your allusion to the black uniformed fascists of history missed its mark.

Stephen Saunders1:37 pm 10 Oct 23

Author has completely bought, the facile Clare O’Neil narrative. Don’t look over here, at Labor’s open-borders all-time record 850K student visas and 450K net migration. Look over there, at “bad old Pezzullo” and “bad old Dutton”. It’s all their fault.

doomeddisciple3:38 pm 10 Oct 23

If you worked at Home Affairs in the past 10 years you would know that the author hasn’t even come close to the impact of Pezzullo or the culture of that place but just an excuse to trot out some 2GB bullsh!t.

Stephen Saunders5:24 pm 10 Oct 23

Don’t doubt how bad Pezzullo is, he’s the worst, but if so, why did Labor keep him on for 16 months? Because he could deliver the huge Albanese numbers, way beyond anything Morrison did. These are a matter of public record – not “2GB propaganda”.

In my 40 years experience in the APS it was clear to me that talk of “good leadership” was just that, talk. People-centric, affiliative, authoritative leadership was rarely rewarded with promotion. It’s the ‘deliver at any cost’ types that rose to the top. Both Coalition and Labor were/are guilty of that.

A huge reason for Pezzullo still being there is because instead of the Albo Government politicizing the PS by installing their own partisan dept heads like every Lib government has done since Howard is to bring the system back to having a truly independent PS. Unfortunately Pezzullo should have been the very first to be shown the door and sacked.

justsomeaussie12:57 pm 10 Oct 23

How come the discussion is never on the public servants who outsourced all this work? The big 4 didn’t take the money they were freely given it by pubic servants.

Every single contract is signed off by a public servant and yet no one is accountable for the billions that walked out the door.

That’s why everyone is leaving the public service. No accountability.

William Teach9:53 pm 10 Oct 23

The decision to outsource everything came from ministers through the secretaries and SES: most ordinary public servants hate large-scale outsourcing because it makes everything slow, inflexible, expensive, and inconvenient.

Peter Graves10:46 am 10 Oct 23

It’s time to recall the 24 years-old functions and objectives of the APS and ALL its staff, as established in Section 3 of the Public Service Act 1999:
“The main objects of this Act are: (a) to establish an apolitical public service that is efficient and effective in serving the Government, the Parliament and the Australian public; “

It’s that “effective” part that was forgotten for 27 years, after the unfortunate demise of the “Managing for Results” era after 1996. Part of that era was program evaluation, which Secretaries of the time undertook but then generally cast the subsequent Reports aside.

The Australian Centre for Evaluation now being established in Treasury can bring back that demonstration of APS effectiveness. It could also potentially lift the morale of APS staff by showing to them that all their work does produce results in the Australian public.

It does require the APS SES to take evaluation seriously, though – especially in sharing the outcomes and impacts of APS programs with the staff involved in their delivery.

The US Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act 2018 goes further than the Australian advisory requirements. It mandates that “Each agency shall designate a senior employee as Evaluation Officer to coordinate evidence-building activities and an official with statistical expertise to advise on statistical policy, techniques, and procedures.”

Thus the significant difference between “implemented” (the current APS intentions) and “embedded” (the US law).

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.