15 March 2023

'Child-less' versus 'child-free': why are women warring over these terms?

| Zoya Patel
Join the conversation

Women who choose not to have kids are missing out on the single most worthwhile, fulfilling experience they can have in life. Or not. Image: File.

I’m at that age now where every second day someone is asking me when my long-term partner and I are going to have kids (that, and when we’re getting married – the answer to which is ‘never’).

We’re in our thirties, we’ve been together for a very long time, we own a house, have good jobs, it’s like the old rhyme goes: first comes love, then comes monogamy, then comes a baby something-something etc.

Luckily for me, I actually do want to have a kid or two, which makes the invasive questions somewhat easier to bear. For my female friends who are suffering the same scrutiny, and either don’t want kids or have fertility challenges, it’s less welcome.

Recently, a cohort of women who don’t want children, ever, have started taking the conversation in a different direction by talking about their lives as being ‘child-free’ as opposed to the judgement-loaded more common term of ‘childless’.

READ ALSO Whoever controls the media, controls the mind … maybe

It might seem like a minor semantic difference, but the connotation is huge. Where ‘childless’ implies something is inherently missing from the lives of women (and it always seems to be women who suffer these questions; my partner, for example, had literally no idea our friends and family have been grilling me), ‘child-free’ suggests the opposite, that women without children are simply that – and there is nothing ‘less’ about their lives as a result.

Of course, if read slightly differently, ‘child-free’ could also suggest that women without children are ‘free’ from the burden of motherhood. I’m choosing to see it as an attempt to empower women who, for whatever reason, whether by choice or circumstance, don’t have kids and not a negative term creating more opportunity for judgement of mothers.

The reality is, women who don’t have children are treated differently in society, and it only increases as we age.

There is a lingering question of ‘why?’

Why don’t you have kids? What do you fill your life with? What gives you meaning? And underlying that is the suggestion that there is something perhaps a little selfish about you, that you’ve prioritised yourself over children. Or worse, that there’s something faulty in you that has prevented you from achieving these expected milestones.

READ ALSO Exploring power, ambition and misogyny in the theatrical production Julia

If you think I’m exaggerating, just take a peek online at the conversations between mothers and child-free women and see the judgment, anger and frustration flowing from both sides. I’ve watched mothers on social media claiming that women who choose not to have kids are missing out on the single most worthwhile, fulfilling experience they can have in life. I’ve watched child-free women argue that the freedom and self-determination they enjoy is something mothers can never again access once they have kids.

Neither of these things are objectively true. The truth for most women lies somewhere in the middle.

Personally, I’m worried that if I do have kids, some of my friends who definitely don’t want children will drift out of my life. And equally, as I watch close friends have kids, I worry that our friendships will wane as we have less and less in common during the early years when parenthood is particularly all-consuming.

So is the ‘child-free’ conversation going to help progress the conversation towards greater understanding and acceptance? Or are we just changing the shape of the wedge that exists between mothers and women without kids?

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

Let that SINK in

wodenresident2:38 pm 16 Mar 23

As a society we do not value ‘mothers’ or ‘family’ anymore. Instead for women ‘career’ and ‘independance’ are valued and promoted. More women are suceeding at university while more men drop out.

The birthrate has plummeted to below replacement levels. But it’s all good, because we can just import people on mass from elsewhere. Yay diversity.

The profile of the most unhappy person in America is a 42 year old childless female professional.

But it’s all good! Because we can simply rename a word (from child-less to child-free) and the problem magically goes away.

Max Scheckenbac1:21 pm 16 Mar 23

Hi Zoya
Arguing re using different worlds to describe not having children is the least of your issues.
Child bearing is a young woman’s game, the older you get the harder it becomes. 35 not the new 20, 40 is not 25.
If you have children and your friends choose not to stay in contact with you they never were your friends.
Perhaps when ur family gives u a hard time just blame ur man.
Remember the only thing you leave behind is your children.
All the best.

Why would you assume that the only thing she would leave behind in her children? She might leave books, art, music and a whole range of influences on all of those people she’s interacted with over the years. We all leave behind a range of memories for people, whether or not we have children.

Not having kids because you might loose friends seems completely childish. Shouldn’t you do what you want, and have friends that accept you for you.

If you had a group of friends that all wanted kids but you were too fearful of losing the friends no one ever gets what they want.

Every person alive today owes it to a lineage of parents that worked hard to raise a line of people. Worked hard to protect kids through wars famine, natural disaster, invasions you name it. A bunch of petty reasons for not having kids is a little odd

devils_advocate8:37 am 16 Mar 23

Option 3) these types of inconsequential semantic discussions largely occur on social media and in reality civilised folk tend to mind their own business when it comes to the family decisions of others.

Yes! Absolutely! You never ask people about their intentions to have or not have children, or why they did or didn’t have children, unless they raise the topic, simply because it might be an upsetting issue for them. Why do you need to know?

Boring, stale and self-centred. Meanwhile, in other news that may surprise the author, there’s a war in Ukraine.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.