15 January 2024

Aussie parents are getting older - and that's probably a good thing

| Zoe Cartwright
Join the conversation
13
A woman with brown hair holds a baby in a pink bow. The baby is crying and the woman is trying to calm her down.

The decrepit, 33-year-old author practises her mothering skills on her niece. She might get the hang of it in a few more years. Photo: Zoe Cartwright.

My colleague Ian Bushnell expressed his concerns that women are ignoring their biological clocks in his recent column about the increase in Australia’s average maternal age from 28.4 years in 2011 to 29.7 in 2021.

But spare a thought for us women who dare to have their first child after they turn 30 or even – gasp – 40.

Most of us spent the decade between 14 and 24 being told that if we get pregnant, our lives are over, ruined forever.

Just a couple of years later, the comments about declining fertility, potential birth defects, and how tiring it must be to be an older mum began.

The message most women get is there are about three good years for having children, and if your life doesn’t put you in the financial or relational position to have kids when you’re aged 25 to 28, you’re stuffed.

READ ALSO Taste the joys and bitter disappointments of a wanna-be veggie gardener

This is assuming you want the little blighters at all – with all the affection in the world, regardless of how old you are when you have them, kids are a uniquely exhausting endeavour. If they don’t appeal to you, rock on.

I’ve got mates who have had kids in their early 20s, late 20s, 30s and 40s, and honestly, I haven’t seen mums’ ages make much difference to their kids’ lives at all.

But who cares what I think – what does the data say?

What about, I’m sure, you’re screaming, the biological clock my colleague is so concerned about?

Well, it turns out it’s more like an hourglass than the countdown ticker on a bomb.

Fertility does begin to decline in your 30s – but the idea your fertility falls off a cliff at a certain age is a bit of a myth.

One study published in 2004 that looked at 770 European women found that, with sex at least twice a week, 78 per cent of women aged 35 to 40 conceived within a year, compared with 84 per cent of women aged 20 to 34.

READ ALSO Cats vs dogs debate gets fur flying but a cute kitty is the purr-fect pet, paws down

While risks to child health do increase with maternal age, again, with good medical care, the overall level of risk remains pretty low.

For example, a 25-year-old mum has a 1 in 1250 chance her baby will be born with Down Syndrome. The risk is three times higher at age 35 – at 1 in 400.

But apart from whether you can, should you have kids when you’re over 30, 35, or 40?

Like so many things in life, it depends – on your health, your income, your relationship stability.

But plenty of stats point to the benefits of having an older mum.

Research from the Max Planck Institute found that children born to older mothers did better in cognitive ability tests than those born to younger mothers.

A Danish study found that older maternal age was associated with fewer behavioural, social and emotional difficulties in children at ages seven and 11.

A 2019 study found many of the risks associated with older mums in the past were really risks for kids coming at the tail-end of large families; because today’s older mums are likely to be better-educated and more emotionally and financially stable, their kids actually benefit.

What about the mums themselves?

Some research indicates women who give birth in their 30s are more likely to enjoy a long life than those who finish having kids in their 20s. They’re also more likely to have a better verbal memory as they age.

Researchers from the London School of Economics and the University of Western Ontario examined data from about 8000 parents to measure happiness in first-time parents in the years before and after they had their first child.

Those 35 and up when they had their first child were stoked about it for the next 15 years, well into the terrible teens.

The happiness levels of parents aged 23 to 34 dropped back to their pre-child baseline within a couple of years, and those who had kids at 22 and under were less happy, full stop.

So what does all this mean?

It means individual women are probably best placed to decide if and when they want to have kids.

That having kids at any age comes with its own unique set of challenges.

That if anyone worries about the average age of mums creeping up, they’re probably better off campaigning for free tertiary education or affordable housing rather than guilting women into having kids before they’re emotionally or financially ready for them.

After all, they’re the ones left holding the baby.

Join the conversation

13
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Way the contribute to the stigma that already surrounds young parents and continue the us vs them narrative. It is very easy to cherry pick research that suits our opinion enforces our confirmation bias.

How about we support all other women and parents, instead of constantly trying to prove who is superior to the other?

davidmaywald1:37 pm 12 Jan 24

Having children is very physically demanding (as well as psychologically demanding). There is a lot of extra work to feed, clean, and clothe them. There is sleep deprivation, which can go on for many years. Long demanding days with few, if any, breaks. Once they become mobile, their speed and endurance increases quickly. There are many days when you’re pooped in the afternoon or evening, but the little ones keep going on and on… Male or female bodies in their 20s are much more capable of keeping up with kids, and bouncing back from the punishing schedule, compared to male and female bodies in their 40s… Knowing what I do now, I would choose to have kids much earlier… Also keep in mind the age of the grandparents, when they are in their 70s or 80s they are much less able to be actively involved than grandparents in their 50s and 60s (this alone can be a game changer, providing respite and balance for parents).

Nka “Nidakas” Asd9:02 am 09 Jan 24

Very subjective indeed. Supporting evidence largely cherry-picked to support the preferred narrative. The negative impact of low fertility, which is partly related to having kids late now prevalent in western and westernised societies, will be laid bare in about 50+ years from now. And if you think immigration is the solution, well, we shall see.

Thanks for saying this Zoe. I’m grateful to have been raised by “older” parents who had the financial security and wisdom to give me a good start in life. But in the end, the best age is the age that *you* are ready.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.