14 January 2024

Government appoints Timothy Parker as inaugural CEO of High Speed Rail Authority

| Andrew McLaughlin
Join the conversation
10
High-speed trains

Frecce high-speed trains stand ready at Rome’s Termini Stazione. Photo: Andrew McLaughlin.

Federal Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Catherine King has announced the appointment of Mr Timothy Parker as the inaugural CEO of the High Speed Rail Authority (HSRA).

Mr Parker’s appointment comes seven months after a five-member HSRA Board commenced work in June 2023 with the goal of facilitating a high-speed rail network on Australia’s east coast, starting with the Sydney to Newcastle section of the network. The board is comprised of Ms Jill Rossouw, Ms Gillian Brown, Ms Dyan Crowther, Mr Ian Hunt and Mr Neil Scales.

Australia has long held ambitions to build a high-speed rail network along the eastern seaboard linking Brisbane, Newcastle, Sydney, the Southern Highlands, Canberra, Wagga Wagga/Albury-Wodonga, and Melbourne, but multiple feasibility studies have demonstrated that the economics of what would be a multi-billion dollar project are yet to stack up.

But with rising aviation fuel costs, growing passenger traffic, and an increased focus on environmental issues, the government undertook before the last election to revisit the concept.

Ms King said Mr Parker had considerable leadership and project experience in delivering complex infrastructure projects to drive the development of high-speed rail in Australia.

READ ALSO Transport Minister visits troubled UK High Speed rail project

She said he had more than 30 years of experience in developing, procuring and delivering significant infrastructure projects including as the Head of Project for Sydney Metro since 2018, as well as having complex infrastructure experience working in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom.

“Proper planning is critical to the success of any significant infrastructure project and getting it right from the start will be of enormous benefit to this project in the future,” Ms King said.

“I look forward to working with Mr Parker in the CEO role and continuing to work with the HSRA Board to deliver HSRA’s key priority of planning and corridor works for the Sydney to Newcastle section of the high-speed rail network.

“High-speed rail will revolutionise interstate travel on the east coast, providing a fast alternative for people to move between cities and regional centres, promoting sustainable settlement patterns and creating broad economic benefits for regional centres,” Ms King said last June.

“This is a transformational project that has the ability to touch the lives of all Australians, particularly in our regions. The network could allow passengers to travel between major cities and regional centres at speeds exceeding 250 km/h.”

The first priority of the HSRA is to deliver a $500 million study into what planning and corridor works would be required for the Sydney to Newcastle section of the network.

Join the conversation

10
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
HiddenDragon7:50 pm 16 Jan 24

In the first instance, this is a political stunt aimed particularly at non-metropolitan seats and at city dwellers dreaming of escaping to somewhere less congested and over-priced.

Beyond that, it is just another manifestation of the idiot mentality infecting our governing elites, and their media/commentariat/think-tank propagandists, which assumes that a rapidly growing population is essential to sustaining demand in the economy and that the real wealth to fund that demand will magically be generated by a growing population.

The real world works differently and this infrastructure fantasy would only make sense (even allowing for the usual blather about “value capture”) if it was linked to a coherent plan for truly sustainable (in all senses of that word) national economic development. We have seen nothing like the latter from this government, and on present indications will not – it will likely just be more of the “renewable energy superpower” mirage along with policies which will see ever-growing public bureaucracies and increasing numbers employed in the publicly funded/subsidised care sectors (none of which will generate the hundreds of billions which this project would cost).

If you’ve ever traveled on High speed rail in Korea or Japan you’ll see how great it is but when you compare those countries with Australia you’ll realise why it will never work here. This bloke has been given a money for nothing job because the financials wont stack up.

For me, the key phrase in the above article is:
“… multiple feasibility studies have demonstrated that the economics of what would be a multi-billion dollar project are yet to stack up.”

It seems like establishing the HSRA Board and employing a CEO is jumping the gun.

Surely, before undertaking “… a $500 million study into what planning and corridor works would be required for the Sydney to Newcastle section of the network” there’s a need to prove that the economics of what would be a multi-billion dollar project NOW stack up?

Stephen Saunders7:48 am 16 Jan 24

in corrupt Australia, the trucking and airline lobbies will simply never allow widespread HSR.

If we’re lucky, they might just allow a half decent Sydney-Newcastle line. Analogous to the City-Gungahlin light rail.

Capital Retro9:50 am 16 Jan 24

The trucking and airline industries have to make profits to exist.

Usually, HSR projects are either taxpayer funded nation building vanity projects or virtual signaling. I don’t think any of them have ever made money so the taxpayer will pick up the tab at the end of the day.

How much money have successive governments in Australia thrown at HSR already?

Given that HSR is for moving people and trucking is for moving goods, I fail to see why the trucking lobby would actually care about HSR. As for the airline lobby, maybe the move to HSR would encourage better service and reduced prices.

@Stephen Saunders
“in corrupt Australia …”
As soon as I read that I just stopped – realising anything that followed would not be worth reading.

The trucking and airline industries have to make profits to exist.* Unless you are Qantas, or the numerous other airlines around the world that have invariably been bailed out over the years by governments when it goes pear shaped (there are plenty).

And not sure what a ‘virtual signaling’ project is (though virtual signalling is effectively a thing on many railway lines) – but it is easy to see the usual dribbling that was meant to be conveyed. A large amount of HSR projects across the world are most definitely not anywhere near that category. But most are in countries where HSR can stack up in the broad sense – I think we all know it is unlikely here to ever do so here.

Capital Retro3:40 pm 16 Jan 24

As you realize, it was meant to be “virtue” signaling. For a start, most HSRs are electric and that’s all going to be renewable isn’t it.

fridgemagnet12:50 pm 14 Jan 24

Maybe they should appoint the person who deftly ignored the negative findings of the economic analysis of light rail for the ACT. That would be the way to give high speed rail the green light.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.