7 February 2025

Isolationist working from home bad for public service and national capital, says Byron

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
219
Canberra Airport and Capital Property Group CEO Stephen Byron

Canberra Airport and Capital Property Group CEO Stephen Byron says the national capital’s workers need to return to the office. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

Canberra Airport and Capital Property Group boss Stephen Byron has launched a blistering attack on working from home policies for draining the life out of offices and the CBD.

Mr Byron, whose company operates the Brindabella Office Park at the Airport and is building new offices in the CBD, also blasted Canberra city for its lack of parking and the road system for its gauntlet of traffic lights and 40km/h speed limits, saying workers needed to be able to get to the workplace easily.

He made the comment at an ACT Property Council breakfast launching the latest Office Report. The question of working from home and how to get people back to their offices, particularly in the CBD where retail vacancies are the highest, dominated a panel discussion.

Mr Byron said working from home was a legacy of COVID and amounted to isolationism.

“It’s not being part of the team, it’s not being part of the culture, it’s not providing an environment for learning, for the young, for leadership, for mentoring,” he said.

READ ALSO Tough decisions: Steel flags pain as health puts budget into freefall

Mr Byron said remote public service appointments undermined the very notion of a national capital.

“Canberra particularly has a lot at risk with this work from home, because if you can have a job in Health and do it from Noosa or Brisbane or indeed Darwin, then why have a national capital,” he said.

“We’re tribal as people, we work better in teams, we work better collaboratively, we understand what we’re trying to achieve.

“The truth is, if you want to really work from home, every single person’s job is at risk of being outsourced overseas.”

Mr Byron said where was the incentive for teachers to stay in the classroom if there was a job with Education working at home.

“We are distorting our workplace and our professions with this work from home policy,” he said.

He said there was a lack of leadership on the issue from governments and managers, and the mandating of working from home in some departments had to stop.

“Managers need to manage people and show leadership and mentoring, and they need to say, I can look after my team as a team, not as an individual, and I’m probably going to employ people who live in the same city.”

He said the CBD needed to function better and have more people living there if it was to attract workers back and achieve that desired vibrancy.

Barton, where many departments and agencies were moving to, had been transformed in the past 20 years and left the CBD behind.

Mr Byron said it wasn’t just about the buildings but the spaces between them and the CBD needed to do better on precinct development and landscaping, as well as making it work from a transport point of view.

“It will be nice to see all the roads open and light rail operational, and I think getting those roads open is so fundamental because we are choking the city at the moment,” he said.

CBRE’s head of ESG (environmental, social, and governance) Su-Fern Tan said the industry needed to redefine the office and offer the right amenities, such as free fitness facilities and end of trip facilities, to lure people away from home.

Foundation for Social Health CEO Melanie Wilde said the evidence showed that working from home was bad for mental health, and that loneliness was rife in Canberra.

“It doesn’t mean everyone has to be ordered back Monday to Friday 9 to 5 but … we need to think about flexibility in terms of the team conversation and the interaction, not just individual preferences so that you have people in and out randomly.”

Ms Wilde said workplaces needed to create communities but Australia was way behind other countries that had been making these investments for a decade.

“We’re not going to solve the problem by just moving people from the desk in their homes to a desk in the building,” she said.

READ ALSO Property Council wants ACAT appeals scrapped for all housing projects, not just public housing

Ms Wilde said it was important for public policy makers to work in teams and not be isolated from the community.

“They’re dealing with really complex public policy questions that are intersectional, that are multi-disciplinary, that require innovation and creativity, and you only produce that type of thinking when you get people together, and also when you have your public policy makers actually interacting with the community,” she said.

Property Council of Australia ACT & Capital Region Executive Director Ashlee Berry said it was critical for the property industry to continue to work collaboratively with the ACT Government and local businesses to foster economic activity and innovation in the CBD.

“The supply side of the equation is well addressed, with high-quality developments in the pipeline. Now we need to focus on making sure Canberra remains a place where people want to work, live and do business,” she said.

“This means investing in the CBD’s vibrancy — supporting events, cultural activities and infrastructure that attract workers and enhances the overall appeal of the city centre.”

The Canberra office market maintained its position as one of the tightest capital city markets, with a vacancy rate of 9.2 per cent, down from 9.5 per cent over the six months to January 2025.

Join the conversation

219
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

This guy has all the intellectual capacity of Abraham Simpson without the virtue of brevity… honestly, there are so many flaws in his breakfast argument, he might as well talk about the good old days when “… the team wore onions in their belts, which was the style of the time. Let’s bring those halcyon days back (and continue to line my pockets with commercial rent!”)

..and yet, you fail to mention even one flaw in his argument. Was your entire comment just an opportunity to showcase your vocabulary?

People First3:32 pm 08 Feb 25

It’s disappointing that some big businesses are apparently failing to produce leaders with vision, humility and intellect.
Failing to undertake effective environmental scanning to ameliorate future risk shouldn’t be the fault of employees. What Australia needs in both business and politics is for leaders to take responsibility and be accountable for their oversights, rather than blame those in society who are barely existing due to stagnant wage growth and a cost of living crisis.
Maybe Mr Byron should be advocating for public sector pay increases that match the % of profit increases that big businesses have been achieving. At least that way people could afford to live in areas close to their work or afford to pay for fuel to get them there.

Barkat Mustafa2:47 pm 08 Feb 25

He would say that would not he? No one is renting is properties and these properties are becoming worthless.

In the end it’s all about the dollars for these property owners.

Who’s surprised that someone who’s only concerned about his investment and future income from businesses is attacking working from home. He’s completely biased and scared cause he knows that working from home is far superior to archaic office spaces. It’s smarter to accept that time moves on and he and everyone who supports him should accept they need to change their investment strategy rather than dwell in the past and fresh others down to their level

The world is changing and land-hoarding in Australia, at least on commercial property, is turning out to be a bad business investment. Nobody owes these people a living.

devils_advocate7:09 pm 07 Feb 25

Lmao

And marginal office buildings in poorly located areas with rubbish infrastructure (e.g. Brindabella Park) will be the first to go under – and rightly so

Also for all those banging on about productivity – if you didn’t have a way of defining and measuring productivity before WFH – and you just used time spent in the office as a proxy for productivity – then that’s just exposed your poor performance as a manager.

The government should stop paying these rent seekers and conduct it’s work from commonwealth owned buildings and land. Would be far better value for the tax payer and perhaps then we wouldn’t have to listen to this kind of vested interest garbage.

Isn’t this the same brain trust that says travel for work is unnecessary as you can get the work done through cheap contractors who have no clues of what needs to be done? Also these CEO’s are also the ones who say tracelling for meetings is a waste of resources as we have such great tools like Zoom and Teams. If we have such great tools, then what is the need to go toa workplace? Just because you built a fancy building which lies unoccupied, isn’t it. This is height of double standards, that when it suits you, people should come to work and when it doesn’t people should not travel.

Tom Worthington5:11 pm 07 Feb 25

Technology now allows being part of the team and part of the culture, wherever you are. I spent a decade studying how provide an online an environment for learning, for leadership and mentoring. These skills proved very useful when COVID struck and now form the basis of how most people work and learn.

The national capital can reinvent itself as the smart capital. A symbol for the nation and a technological education hub. You can work for a government agency from anywhere, but if you aspire to do it well, you will want to do it from Canberra.

Working better in hybrid teams is a skill you can learn and one students learn at Canberra’s universities. The reality is if we don’t learn to work online our jobs are at risk. Canberra doesn’t have a monopoly on these skills. If bosses insist staff come to the office, they won’t, they will get a new job with a better boss, perhaps in another city.

If we force workers to return to the office it creates an unnatural working environment. The best place for our students is not in a classroom, it is out in the real world. Our leaders need to show confidence in their staff that they do not need to have eyes on the all the time, they need to show leadership and mentor staff in how to take responsibility for their own productivity.

The CBD, like the university campuses, need to become more than just a place where people go because someone forces them to. They need to be a place where you can catch up with your colleagues occasionally, as well as have some fun.

Let’s face it, working from home is bad for developers (used to be called speculators which is appropriate) and CBD commercial property owners, but better for many employees and for productivity in many cases.

We’ve known for decades that open plan offices kill productivity as there are constant distractions and interruptions preventing any type of complex thinking or strategic planning, both of which have diminished at work but which flourished at home, with greater creativity and autonomy. Really, who needs the micromanager boss hanging over their shoulder?

Regular well-planned and organised meetings can keep teams together very effectively and keep them on track with advance agendas instead of off the cuff chats that have no action plans to follow up.

Actual offices for those people who need to work confidentially or uninterrupted enable them to be productive at work. In open plan they can’t concentrate, can’t talk freely, can’t do their jobs.

And then there’s the wasted time in traffic commuting. Why would anyone use up all of their energy, money and time driving to work when they can achieve more from home. Work life balance says cut the wasted time and energy, meeting in the office only when necessary and when well-planned to be productive.

Human beings traditionally worked out of home until the Industrial Revolution. The remote IT revolution returns us to the way it should be -= if we are going to live in a house we should be able to enjoy it during the week, not just on weekends; we can incidentally care for others, whether children or elders. And whatever the car adverts tell us about open roads, they cost us a fortune, are too hot in summer, take ages to park, and remove us from the city we live in. I understand that some bosses may feel entitled to have power over people, but it’s the work that needs doing, not the place that needs going.

He has his hand out for money. Classic rent seeker.

It’s bad for property developers. But good for road congestion and urban air pollution. Developers can turn the office buildings into apartments.

What a surprise? Man with office space to sell thinks people need to work in offices.

Well said Stephen Byron. Never before has a national policy with such wide ranging social and economic consequences as working from home been rushed in without so much as proper discussion by parliament or a Productivity Commission inquiry. While private enterprise is now pushing back on WFH, woe betide any department head who risks a career limiting brawl by ordering their staff back to the office. It’s not just the work knowledge and mentoring that young people will miss out on but also the social skills that are learnt in a team environment. And we’ll end up with a nation of those who are able to comfortably work from home and those who can’t – nurses, doctors, teachers, firemen, retail and hospitality workers. Presumably the latter group will need to be paid more to compensate for the time and cost of commuting to work.

How surprising – a biased view from the property owners and Property Council! WFH has definite advantages for many people and this is good for employee satisfaction. There is also usually some benefit from some coming together in the office, so 100% WFH is worth questioning – but to tell all employees to get back the CBD is simply a one-sided view. Surely each workplace needs to be entrusted to make the best decisions around this.

Peter Crowley1:09 pm 07 Feb 25

Self-serving nonsense.

The headline should have been “Old man proves he is out of touch with the modern world”.

Love this headline!

I WFH and during the day connect with customers and colleagues all over Australia. How is going into an office going to help with that?

“workplaces need to create communities” – nonsense. Communities need third places to congregate after work. Even if you go to an office, work is work. Communities are for people and we’ve seen the demise of community halls, parks etc – replaced with businesses that expect you to buy something to loiter.

A property group CEO telling us to get back into commercial properties, no thanks.

Mandy Rice-Davies applies.

Poor Stephen and the Property Council. Your cash cows are staying in their own paddock. Boo hoo. When I retired I saved thousands in petrol costs and over inflated parking not having to drive into the CBD. Now living more comfortably on a much smaller income. Yes I know not everyone is in the same boat. You just have to get these leeches out of your wallet. Between the Property Council and the Local Council living off the rates and charges generated by the office buildings they will continue to push for what is good for them and bugger you. Fun ACT Budget ahead.

Oh dear, something isn’t to the liking of a monopolistic billionaire. I’m shattered.

Personally, I’m better off working from the office – except on very rare occasions. Not everybody is. And we already do more than enough destruction of public interest for the benefit of property developers.

pink little birdie10:55 am 07 Feb 25

Free parking and outdoor playgrounds are great city vibrancy. Parking in the city as a customer on week days costs a minimum of $3 to go the shops if you drive.
I don’t mind going into the office and would on multiple days but paying for parking is really off putting

The vast majority of APS WFH is 2 days a week. That is virtually no impact on city life and allows for more spending when people are in the city and is balanced with local spending. Anyone who disapproves of this is an idiot.

I am lucky enough to be in a job that supports working remotely. I work hybrid because I like the balance. I am more productive at home when I need to concentrate. It’s also less costly and less stressful. Open plan offices are too noisy and distracting if concentration is required for extended periods.

Wow. Man that makes a shedload of money off having people in the office says everyone should be forced into the office.

Blow me down shocked….

Self interested alarmist BS

It’s a pretty fair point. You only have to look at Melbourne which has become an insular ghost town through its crazy covid response and subsequent wfh policies. Small business, retail, construction and employment have been decimated. If it wasn’t for the public service, Canberra could become the same.

Get people back to work, stop making cars the bad guy (especially since Northbourne Avenue runs through the middle of town) and actually encourage people to use light rail since we’ve spent billions on it.

i guess the encouragement to use light rail is the forced removal of parking spaces and making it difficult for drivers. This in turn supports a WFH policy for people who live nowhere near the light rail line and have poor access to public transport.
This is the coming battle….most of us will have superannuation invested into commercial property, so if that value drops then so will your super. These value drops are only realised on the sale of a property, unlike a share price drop that can be reflected in your super virtually overnight. So there is a lot to think about, along with the knock-on effects of supporting local businesses and small business owners (coffee and food mainly). Lots of the moved to the suburbs, are are mobile now with these vans.
Personally i am more productive at home, i work longer hours and have less distractions, I can produce more. Office day is the easiest and least productive day of the week, with the travel and trying to find a parking space coming from over the border with no public transport.
However, until they sort out the parking I cannot see how they CAN make people return to the office, there is just nowhere to park anymore since the Government started selling the land off and people will try and resist a $125 a week private parking bill just to come to work and park in a shopping centre.
We had a disaster a few months ago with an office day and midday seminar. The presenter couldn’t find anywhere to park so was erratically late and unprepared, 20% of the attendees were rushing in late after driving in circles and finding nowhere to park, some just never showed up. The decision was taken to have no further face-to-face meetings in the city centre. So i agree with Byron here….the business case for the tram demands a certain number of customers, but they probably went a bit hard on trying to force it onto people. This is not Shanghai or even Sydney, there was no real business requirement for it and what is being produced is unnatural.
The ACT is going to be one of the best places in the world for tiny EV city cars. Nobody travels far, we have big solar coverage, people crisscross over a very small state and multiple suburbs and five town centres. We are lucky enough to have oodles of land for technology experimentation. Roads, parking, renting cars by the day or the hour, and charging….that’s what you levy for, that’s what you build. If you want people in the city centre, you need to build EV car parks because the target audience is a lot bigger than those that live along a tram line.

Is there any real evidence to support Melbourne is any more of an ‘insular ghost town’ compared to the differences seen post-COVID in many major cities? Every CBD is facing similar challenges – its just a different challenge that people have something easy to ‘blame it on’, instead of doing what business forever in a day has been doing, and should be doing – which is adapting to change and finding a way through it. They shouldn’t need forced customers to survive.

The fact is – people need to stop trying to get the world back to what it was pre-pandemic. The pandemic has proven many things – including that staff being forced into the office every day is not necessary from a technical perspective. A lot of the other claimed benefits are definitely up for debate. A recognition of the changed working world, and finding ways to balance the needs of all, instead of tired old bleatings by property moguls such as Byron will be far more acceptable to the majority.

Bob J, I agree with some of what you say. However, I think that the answer is not to build more parking spaces in the city (not even EV charging spots), but to keep building the light rail and improve buses for the parts of Canberra not yet served by rail. This is really the only way that you are going to reduce traffic bottlenecks. Adding parking will just add to traffic and add to sprawl, including job sprawl, and more vehicles miles travelled. EVs are certainly better for the environment than ICE cars, but they still cause significant particulate pollution from tyre wear (I say this as an EV owner myself). Car centric planning encourages building on greenfield sites which reduces habitat and causes its own emissions. And public transport is cheap – it costs me about $26/week for my daily commute – a fraction of the cost of driving. We need to give more people access to quality public transport.

Bob you’re quite right about the parking issues, the government’s dislike of cars (especially petrol ones, the majority) means parking costs have become a joke. The way things are going the only people in Civic will be students (not much spending money), ACT public servants and medium to large businesses. It’s no recipe for the future prosperity of Civic.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.